Food insecurity definitions and body mass index. Response

Gulliford, Martin; Mahabir, Deepak; Rocke, Brian

In his commentary, Dr Edward A. Frongillo criticizes our use of a well-described household food security scale in Trinidad. There will always be some uncertainty concerning the application of a given measure as there is no perfect instrument to evaluate food security or dietary patterns in any population. The household food security measure was used in the US national Current Population Survey (which provided the comparison data used in Dr Frongillo's commentary) but the application of the instrument to all groups in the multilingual, culturally diverse US population 'has not been examined sufficiently' (ref. 3, p. 8). Questionnaire evaluation must be considered when differences in literacy, language, dialect, or culture, as well as socioeconomic status, may influence responses and this consideration might suggest that an instrument should be tailored to local requirements. It is advisable, however, to be judicious in modifying such measures so as not to compromise the validity or comparability of an instrument. Departures from a previously tested template should only be undertaken to guarantee enhanced performance of a measure. Dr Frongillo's comments appear to underestimate both the weight of evidence required to justify an alteration to an established measure and the limitations of local 'validation' studies. Before concluding that a measure gives unsatisfactory results in a given local population, or a particular group within a population, it is essential to ensure that the findings cannot be ascribed to error or bias. There is a relatively high risk that local questionnaire evaluation studies, implemented within the short time scales suggested, will lead to erroneous conclusions if sample sizes are too small or if subjects are insufficiently representative.

Virtual Health Library

Caribbean

Export format:

Food insecurity definitions and body mass index. Response

Subject(s)