RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching effects on healthcare systems and society with resultant impact on trauma systems worldwide. This study evaluates the impact the pandemic has had in the Washington, DC Metropolitan Region as compared with similar months in 2019. DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study of all adult trauma centers in the Washington, DC region was conducted using trauma registry data between January 1, 2019 and May 31, 2020. March 1, 2020 through May 31, 2020 was defined as COVID-19, and January 1, 2019 through February 28, 2020 was defined as pre-COVID-19. Variables examined include number of trauma contacts, trauma admissions, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, trauma center location (urban vs. suburban), and patient demographics. RESULTS: There was a 22.4% decrease in the overall incidence of trauma during COVID-19 compared with a 3.4% increase in trauma during pre-COVID-19. Blunt mechanism of injury decreased significantly during COVID-19 (77.4% vs. 84.9%, p<0.001). There was no change in the specific mechanisms of fall from standing, blunt assault, and motor vehicle crash. The proportion of trauma evaluations for penetrating trauma increased significantly during COVID-19 (22.6% vs. 15.1%, p<0.001). Firearm-related and stabbing injury mechanisms both increased significantly during COVID-19 (11.8% vs. 6.8%, p<0.001; 9.2%, 6.9%, p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The overall incidence of trauma has decreased since the arrival of COVID-19. However, there has been a significant rise in penetrating trauma. Preparation for future pandemic response should include planning for an increase in trauma center resource utilization from penetrating trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Failure to achieve fascial primary closure after damage control laparotomy (DCL) is associated with increased morbidity, higher healthcare expenditures, and a reduction in quality of life. The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) to facilitate closure remains controversial and poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether exposure to NMBA is associated a higher likelihood of primary fascial closure. METHODS: All adult trauma patients admitted between January 2002 and May 2008 who (1) went directly to the operating room, (2) were managed initially by DCL, and (3) survived to undergo a second laparotomy. Study group (NMBA+): those receiving NMBA in the first 24 hours after DCL. Comparison group (NMBA-): those not receiving NMBA in the first 24 hours after DCL. Primary fascial closure defined as fascia-to-fascia approximation by hospital day 7. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one patients met inclusion (92 in NMBA+ group, 99 in NMBA- group). Although the NMB+ patients were younger (31 years vs. 37 years, p = 0.009), there were no other differences in demographics, severity of injury, or lengths of stay between the groups. However, NMBA+ patients achieved primary closure faster (5.1 days vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.046) and were more likely to achieve closure by day 7 (93% vs. 83%, p = 0.023). After controlling for age, gender, race, mechanism, and severity of injury, logistic regression identified NMBA use as an independent predictor of achieving primary fascial closure by day 7 (OR, 3.24, CI: 1.15-9.16; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Early NMBA use is associated with faster and more frequent achievement of primary fascial closure in patients initially managed with DCL. Patients exposed to NMBA had a three times higher likelihood of achieving primary fascial closure by hospital day 7.
Asunto(s)
Fascia/lesiones , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Fasciotomía , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Heridas Penetrantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Revascularization after extremity vascular injury has long been considered an important skill among trauma surgeons. Increasingly, some trauma surgeons defer vascular repair in response to training or practice patterns. This study was designed to document results of extremity revascularization surgery to evaluate trauma surgeon outcomes and judicious referral of more complex injuries to vascular surgeons (VAS). The trauma registry of an urban level I trauma center was used to identify all patients from 2003 to 2013 who underwent an early (<24 hours) procedure for urgent management of acute injury to extremity vessels. Patients were managed by trauma (TRA) versus VAS based on the practice pattern of the on-call trauma surgeon. Injury and outcome variables were recorded. Of 115 patients, 84 patients were revascularized by trauma and 31 vascular surgeries. There was no difference in complication rates or frequency of any type of complication associated with repairs performed by VAS or TRA. There were similar rates between the two groups for patients with multiple injuries, such as venous, bone or tendon, and nerve injury to the affected extremity. One VAS patient and two TRA patients developed compartment syndrome. In appropriately selected patients, trauma surgeons achieve good outcomes after revascularization of injured extremities.
Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Selección de Paciente , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos VascularesRESUMEN
Immunization with an adenovirus-PSA (Ad5-PSA) vaccine alone strongly induces the expansion of CD8+ T cells with enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity against the antigen-bearing tumor cells in vitro as well as in vivo in a mouse model of prostate cancer. However, in an attempt to enhance the anti-tumor immunity induced by the vaccine, co-administration of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN) with Ad5-PSA vaccine dramatically reduces the immune responses measured by in vitro CTL activity and the number of IFN-gamma producing cells. Surprisingly, in vivo experiments showed that mice immunized with the combined approach of Ad5-PSA and CpG had enhanced protection against the subsequent tumor challenge as compared to mice immunized with vaccine alone. These data demonstrate an unexpected dichotomous relationship between in vitro CTL activity and in vivo tumor protection suggesting that an alternative mechanism of tumor destruction was invoked after co-administration of the CpG ODN with the vaccine.