[The treatment of chronic wounds in the head and neck area after radiotherapy with medical honey]. / Die Behandlung chronischer Wunden im Kopf-Hals-Bereich nach Radiatio mit medizinischem Honig.

BACKGROUND: Wound healing problems and chronic wounds can be a therapeutic challenge are a frequent problem after radiotherapy. They can appear spontaneously or after further surgery. The permanently altered tissue is associated with recurrent bacterial infections with weeping wounds, which cannot be treated sufficiently by conventional conservative wound care. The topical application of medical honey seems to have a positive effect in such cases. The aim of this prospectively study is to check this effectiveness in the treatment of wound healing problems and chronic wounds in the head and neck area of irradiated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period of July 2012 until August 2013 nine patients were treated with medical honey. All pa-tients had previously radiotherapy in the head and neck area. 5 patients had protracted wound healing problems after salvage surgery. The remaining 4 cases had spontaneously dehiscenced wounds at the beginning of the study. The wound healing was confirmed by measurement of the wound edges and depth and by adequate photo documentation. RESULTS: In all cases, the conventional wound care was unsuccessfully. In 8 of 9 cases, the wounds could be brought to cure by the application of medical honey over 3-8 weeks. Side effects or allergic reactions to the medical honey were not seen in any -cases. CONCLUSION: Based on our clinical experience we believe that the topical application of medical honey in non-healing or recurrent wounds in the head and neck area after radiotherapy is a reason-able and successful alternative therapy.

Dose-escalated radiotherapy with PET/CT based treatment planning in combination with induction and concurrent chemotherapy in locally advanced (uT3/T4) squamous cell cancer of the esophagus: mature results of a phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective phase I/II trial assessed feasibility and efficacy of dose-escalated definitive chemoradiation after induction chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Primary study endpoint was loco-regional progression-free survival at 1 year. METHODS: Eligible patients received 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy with irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil weekly and cisplatin every 2 weeks (weeks 1-6, 8-13) followed by concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and irinotecan (weeks 14, 15, 17, 18, 20). Radiotherapy dose escalation was performed in three steps (60 Gy, 66 Gy, 72 Gy) using conventional fractionation, planning target volumes were delineated with the aid of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans. During follow-up, endoscopic examinations were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Between 09/2006 and 02/2010, 17 patients were enrolled (male/female:13/4, median age: 59 [range 48-66] years, stage uT3N0/T3N1/T4N1: 4/12/1). One patient progressed during induction chemotherapy and underwent surgery. Of 16 patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy, 9 (56%) achieved complete response after completion of chemoradiation. One-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 77% [95%CI: 59-100], 53% [34-83], 41% [23-73], and 29% [14-61], respectively. Loco-regional progression-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 59% [40-88], 35% [19-67], and 29% [14-61], corresponding cumulative incidences of loco-regional progressions were 18% [4-39%], 35% [14-58%], and 41% [17-64%]. No treatment related deaths occurred. Grade 3 toxicities during induction therapy were: neutropenia (41%), diarrhoea (41%), during combined treatment: neutropenia (62%) and thrombocytopenia (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-escalated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin/irinotecan after cisplatin/irinotecan/5FU induction chemotherapy was tolerable. The hypothesized phase II one-year loco-regional progression free survival rate of 74% was not achieved. Long-term survival compares well with other studies on definitive radiotherapy using irinotecan and cisplatin but is not better than recent trials using conventionally fractionated radiotherapy ad 50 Gy with concurrent paclitaxel or 5FU and platinum compound. Trial registration The present trial was registered as a phase I/II trial at the EudraCT database: Nr. 2005-006097-10 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2005-006097-10/DE ) and authorized to proceed on 2006-09-25.

Accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy within trimodality therapy concepts for stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer: Markedly higher rate of pathologic complete remissions than with conventional fractionation.

BACKGROUND: Radiation dose escalation within definitive radiochemotherapy (RTx/CTx) was not successful for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using conventional fractionation (CF). Accelerated-hyperfractionation (AHF) counteracts tumour cell repopulation. In this observational study, the effects of neoadjuvant RTx/CTx using AHF or CF were studied by histopathology and using the survival end-point. METHODS: Data from all consecutive lung cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant RTx/CTx and thoracotomy between 08/2000 and 06/2012 were analysed. Patients received induction chemotherapy (cisplatin-doublets) followed by concurrent RTx/CTx using AHF (45 Gy/1.5 Gy bid) or CF-RTx (46 Gy/2 Gy qd). For estimating the AHF versus CF treatment effects, multivariate analysis (MA), propensity score weighting (PS), and instrumental variable analysis (IV) were used. FINDINGS: 239 patients were treated, median age 58 (34-78)years, stage II/IIIA/B: 19/88/132, squamous cell/adenocarcinomas/other: 98/107/34; AHF/CF-RTx 112/127 patients. No significant differences between both groups, in tumour related factors (age, gender, Charlson comorbiditiy score, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), haemoglobin, stage, histopathology and grading), existed. Crude rates of pathologic complete responses (pCR) in AHF and CF groups were 37% and 24% respectively. The dose fractionation effect on pCR was significant (p ⩽ 0.006, PS and IV analyses). There was a significant dependence of pCR on biologically effective dose. pCR also depended on treatment time (MA, p = 0.04; PS, p = 0.0004). Median treatment time was 22 d or 31 d using AHF or CF (p<0.0001), respectively. Adenocarcinomas had lower pCR rates in comparison to other histologies. Five-year survival of patients with pCR was 65%, independent of the fractionation. INTERPRETATION: This large monoinstitutional analysis demonstrates an increased effect of AHF on pCR of lung cancer which modifies overall survival.