RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the use of distraction arthroplasty for ankle osteoarthritis, with respect to patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, range of motion and radiographic outcomes. METHODS: A computer-based search was performed in PubMed, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus and ISI Web of Science. Two reviewers independently performed title/abstract and full-text screening. Quality assessment was performed using The Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) and Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. RESULTS: Whilst all studies evaluating PROMs reported significant (P < 0.05) improvement, these were either below or only slightly above the minimally clinically important difference. The rate of conversion to arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty was high, with failure rates of up to 52% reported. CONCLUSION: Due to the inconsistent improvements in PROMs, which are likely overestimated due to substantial bias, and the high failure rate, this review suggests that distraction arthroplasty is not currently an effective treatment option for ankle arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies.