RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between immunotherapy-containing and standard chemotherapy regimens with treatment delays and postoperative complications in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. The effect of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 139 women treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-522 regimen) from August 2021 to September 2022 with 287 consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone prior to July 2021 and underwent surgery. Baseline characteristics, time to treatments, and surgical complications were compared using two-sample non-parametric tests. Linear regression evaluated association of irAEs with time to surgery and radiation. Logistic regression identified factors associated with surgical complications. RESULTS: Age, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and mastectomy rates were similar among cohorts. No clinically relevant difference in time from end of neoadjuvant treatment to surgery was observed [KEYNOTE-522: median 32 (IQR 27, 43) days; non-KEYNOTE-522: median 31 (IQR 26, 37) days; P = 0.048]. Time to radiation did not differ (P = 0.7). A total of 26 patients (9%; non-KEYNOTE-522) versus 11 (8%; KEYNOTE-522) experienced postoperative complications (P = 0.6). In the KEYNOTE-522 cohort, 59 (43%) of 137 patients experienced 82 irAEs; 40 (68%) required treatment. Older age (P = 0.018) and ASA class 4 (P = 0.007) were associated with delays to surgery after adjusting for clinical factors. Experiencing ≥ 1 irAE was associated with delay to radiation (P = 0.029). IrAEs were not associated with surgical complications (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: We observed no clinically meaningful difference between times to surgery/adjuvant radiation or postoperative complications and type of preoperative chemotherapy. IrAEs were associated with delay to adjuvant radiation but not with postoperative complications or delay to surgery.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Mastectomía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Inmunoterapia , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radioterapia AdyuvanteRESUMEN
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 15%-20% of breast cancers diagnosed worldwide, which amounts to almost 200 000 cases each year. Although historically TNBC is considered difficult to treat with a poor prognosis, there is emerging evidence showing excellent response rates in a subset of TNBC patients. Attempts to de-escalate chemotherapy in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-neu amplified breast cancer subtypes have been successful. At present, robust strategies to personalize therapy in early-stage TNBC do not exist, and despite excellent response rates in a subset of patients, all patients are exposed to the same several cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Personalizing therapy in TNBC represents a challenge due to the scarcity of treatment options outside of cytotoxic chemotherapy and limited predictive and prognostic biomarkers to tailor treatment. Recent developments in understanding TNBC biology have sparked interest in exploring treatment optimization and personalization with the goal of achieving excellent response rates and long-term clinical outcomes, while simultaneously reducing physical, psychological, and financial toxicities for select patients. Here, we provide an update on the current evidence to support future studies examining de-escalating chemotherapy in patients with low-risk TNBC and adjuvant intensification strategies to improve outcomes for patients who are at high risk for systemic failure despite current standard-of-care treatments.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genéticaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Qatar is a small country on the Eastern coast of the Arabian Peninsula. Its population is a unique mixture of native citizens and immigrants. We aimed to describe the features of epilepsy in Qatar as such information is virtually lacking from the current literature. METHODS: We summarized information retrospectively collected from 468 patients with epilepsy seen through the national health system adult neurology clinic. RESULTS: Epilepsy was classified as focal in 65.5% of the cases and generalized in 23%. Common causes of epilepsy were as follows: stroke (9%), hippocampal sclerosis (7%), infections (6%), and trauma (6%). Sixty-six percent of patients were receiving a single antiepileptic drug, with levetiracetam being the most frequently prescribed drug (41% of subjects). When the patients were divided by geographical background, remote infections caused the epilepsy in 15% of Asian patients (with neurocysticercosis accounting for 10%) but only in 1% of Qatari and 3% of Middle East/North African subjects (with no reported neurocysticercosis) (p<0.001). Cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative etiologies were the most prominent in Qataris, accounting for 14% (p=0.005) and 4% (p=0.03) of cases, respectively. The choice of antiepileptic drugs varied also according to the regional background, but the seizure freedom rate did not, averaging at 54% on the last clinic visit. SIGNIFICANCE: To our knowledge, this is the first detailed information about epilepsy in Qatar. The geographical origin of patients adds to the heterogeneity of this disorder. Neurocysticercosis should be in the etiological differential diagnosis of epilepsy in patients coming from Southeast Asian countries, despite the fact that it is not endemic to Qatar. The choice of antiepileptic drugs is influenced by the availability of individual agents in the patients' native countries but had no bearing on the final seizure outcome.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/etiología , Neurocisticercosis/complicaciones , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piracetam/uso terapéutico , Qatar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and single-bone CNS-risk lesions have been reported to be at increased risk of diabetes insipidus (DI), central nervous system neurodegeneration (CNS-ND), and recurrence of disease. However, it is unknown whether the addition of chemotherapy or radiotherapy changes outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Ten pediatric institutions across North America and Europe contributed data of their patients with LCH and single-bone CNS-risk lesions. Clinical information on age, sex, specific craniofacial site involvement, and intracranial extension at diagnosis, therapy, and disease course was collected for all eligible patients. RESULTS: The final analysis included 93 eligible children who were either treated with systemic therapy (chemotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy, or radiotherapy) or local therapy (biopsy, curettage, and/or intralesional steroids). Fifty-nine patients had systemic and 34 had local therapy. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 80 ± 5% and 98 ± 2% in the systemic therapy group versus 85 ± 6% and 95 ± 5% in the local therapy group. There was no statistically significant difference between either group with regard to EFS (P = 0.26) and OS (P = 0.78). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference among the two treatment groups after adjusting for site and intracranial soft tissue extension, nor any trend favoring systemic therapy (HR = 2.26, 95% CI = 0.77-6.70; P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Systemic therapy may not reduce the risk of recurrence or late sequelae in children with LCH and single-bone CNS-risk lesions as compared to local treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Óseas/terapia , Histiocitosis de Células de Langerhans/mortalidad , Histiocitosis de Células de Langerhans/terapia , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
AIM: To explore the impact of previous treatment on the efficacy of investigational new drugs in registration trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Thirteen US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for 1st line MBC between 1/2000-12/2023 were identified and their supporting publications were searched in the ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Where available, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95â¯% confidence intervals (CI) for overall-survival (OS) were pooled into meta-analysis and the difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment naïve and previously treated patients was analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (HR=0.72 versus 0.80,p for difference=0.25). In indications for triple-negative BC, treatment-naïve patients had higher magnitude of OS benefit compared to previously treated patients (HR=0.53 versus 0.81,p=0.03). In indications for luminal disease, the magnitude of benefit was comparable between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In trials supporting 1st line therapy for TNBC the magnitude of benefit is significantly higher in treatment naïve compared to previously treated patients. Our findings may represent a previously unrecognized bias, potentially over-estimating the benefit of triple-negative BC new drugs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
Paclitaxel is one of the first-line treatments for breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. However, its use is limited by the high frequency of hypersensitivity reactions. In this retrospective chart review at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we assess clinical factors associated with immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel and characterize delayed hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer. 12,274 patients were treated with paclitaxel. 6,165 had breast cancer and 1,233 were seen by a dermatologist. 734 patients (11.9%) developed an immediate hypersensitivity reaction. Age (p < 0.001), race (p < 0.001), and prior history of allergy (p = 0.05) were associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions. 147 patients (4.0%) had a rash of interest. The most common phenotypes were maculopapular (52%) and urticaria (36%). Race (p < 0.001) and history of allergy (p < 0.001) were associated with development of a cutaneous reaction. Patients with an immediate hypersensitivity reaction were more likely to have developed a delayed cutaneous reaction (OR = 1.80). Risk factors for development of immediate hypersensitivity reactions in this study were younger age, race, and history of allergy. Patients who developed an immediate hypersensitivity reaction were more likely to develop a delayed hypersensitivity reaction. Risk factors for development of the rash included Asian race and history of allergy. Identification of risk factors is critical to guide care coordination. Awareness of these clinical factors which are associated with development of a rash could guide providers in choosing treatment with paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel. If the cutaneous reactions are bothersome to the patient, the transition of treatment from paclitaxel to nab-paclitaxel may be warranted, or a consideration of re-challenge or desensitization may be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Hipersensibilidad Tardía , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inducido químicamente , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inducido químicamente , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/inmunología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
The KEYNOTE-522 (KN522) regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) utilized q3week dosing for doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC); however, dose-dense AC (ddAC) has demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) compared to q3week AC in anthracycline and taxane-based regimens. We performed a retrospective analysis assessing the use of ddAC in KN522 and the impact of sequencing ddAC before or after carboplatin/paclitaxel (CbT) plus pembrolizumab on multiple outcomes. 128 patients with TNBC were included. Overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 56%. Sequencing of ddAC vs CbT first showed no difference in pCR rate (ddAC 55% vs. CbT 58%, p = 0.77). However, ddAC first compared to CbT first correlated with a significant increase in the incidence of overall treatment delays (ddAC 70% vs. CbT 51%, p = 0.03), with cytopenias most frequent (ddAC 59% vs. CbT 31%, p = 0.001). ddAC in a modified KN522 regimen is safe, tolerable, and effective. Efficacy is comparable regardless of chemotherapy sequencing, but ddAC first is significantly associated with higher rates of treatment delays and cytopenias.
RESUMEN
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the subtype with poorest prognosis. Despite the subtype's heterogeneity, there is still a paucity in effective targeted therapeutics that offer both good efficacy and tolerability, and chemotherapy remains the backbone of modern TNBC therapy. In the past few years, immunotherapy as well as novel therapeutic modalities like antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown clinical benefit and have been FDA approved in various clinical stages of unselected TNBC. However, there has not been similar advancement in molecularly targeted therapies, especially when compared to advancements seen in hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HER2-positive breast cancer. PARP inhibitors have been approved for BRCA-mutated TNBC, but responses are short-lived, and resistance remains a barrier for current treatment. PI3K pathway inhibitors approved in HR+ breast cancer has not worked for TNBC and continue to have significant dose-limiting adverse effects. EGFR inhibition has been thoroughly explored in TNBC, but all trials so far have shown minimal efficacy. Nevertheless, despite these setbacks, current research in targeted therapy for TNBC holds great promise in overcoming the barriers of the past and developing novel therapeutic approaches for the future. In this review, we describe molecular targets both identified and validated in the treatment of TNBC, discuss the historical efforts towards development of targeted agents and current areas of improvement, and address promising advances that have the potential to improve outcomes in this heterogenous and aggressive breast cancer subtype. Immunotherapy, ADCs, and AR targeting will be discussed in separate reviews of this edition.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/metabolismo , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesize that integrating high sTILs and additional clinicopathologic features associated with pCR could enhance our ability to predict the group of patients on whom treatment de-escalation strategies could be tested. In this prospective early-stage TNBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy study, pretreatment biopsies from 408 patients were evaluated for their clinical and demographic features, as well as biomarkers including sTILs, Ki-67, PD-L1 and androgen receptor. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to generate a computed response score to predict pCR. The pCR rate for the entire cohort was 41%. Recursive partitioning analysis identified ≥20% as the optimal cutoff for sTILs to denote 35% (143/408) of patients as having high sTILs, with a pCR rate of 59%, and 65% (265/408) of patients as having low sTILs, with a pCR rate of 31%. High Ki-67 (cutoff > 35%) was identified as the only predictor of pCR in addition to sTILs in the training set. This finding was verified in the testing set, where the highest computed response score encompassing both high sTILa and high Ki-67 predicted a pCR rate of 65%. Integrating Ki67 and sTIL may refine the selection of early stage TNBC patients for neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating de-escalation strategies.
RESUMEN
Targeting the HER2 oncogene represents one of the greatest advances in the treatment of breast cancer. HER2 is one member of the ERBB-receptor family, which includes EGFR (HER1), HER3 and HER4. In the presence or absence of underling genomic aberrations such as mutations or amplification events, intricate interactions between these proteins on the cell membrane lead to downstream signaling that encourages cancer growth and proliferation. In this Review, we contextualize efforts to pharmacologically target the ErbB receptor family beyond HER2, with a focus on EGFR and HER3. Preclinical and clinical efforts are synthesized. We discuss successes and failures of this approach to date, summarize lessons learned, and propose a way forward that invokes new therapeutic modalities such as antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), combination strategies, and patient selection through rational biomarkers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-3/genética , Receptor ErbB-3/metabolismo , Transducción de SeñalRESUMEN
Identifying triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients expected to have poor outcomes provides an opportunity to enhance clinical management. We applied an Evolutionary Action Score to functionally characterize TP53 mutations (EAp53) in 96 TNBC patients and observed that EAp53 stratification may identify TP53 mutations associated with worse outcomes. These findings merit further exploration in larger TNBC cohorts and in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Increased levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have recently been considered a favorable independent prognostic and predictive biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) ultrasound lexicon descriptors and sTILs in TNBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage I-III TNBC were evaluated within a single-institution neoadjuvant clinical trial. Two fellowship-trained breast radiologists used the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon to assess pretreatment tumor shape, margin, echo pattern, orientation, posterior features, and vascularity. sTILs were defined as low <20 or high ≥20 on the pretreatment biopsy. Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the association between lexicon descriptors and sTIL levels. RESULTS: The 284 patients (mean age 52 years, range 24-79 years) were comprised of 68% (193/284) with low-sTIL tumors and 32% (91/284) with high-sTIL tumors. TNBC tumors with high sTILs were more likely to have the following features: (1) oval/round shape than irregular shape (p = 0.003), (2) circumscribed or microlobulated margins than spiculated, indistinct, or angular margins (p = 0.0005); (3) complex cystic and solid pattern than heterogeneous pattern (p = 0.006); and (4) posterior enhancement than shadowing (p = 0.002). There was no significant association between sTILs and descriptors for orientation and vascularity (p = 0.06 and p = 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: BI-RADS ultrasound descriptors of the pretreatment appearance of a TNBC tumor can be useful in discriminating between tumors with low and high sTIL levels. Therefore, there is a potential use of ultrasound tumor characteristics to complement sTILs when used as stratification factors in treatment algorithms for TNBC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer that is commonly triple-negative and poorly responsive to neoadjuvant therapy in retrospective studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To better define clinical outcomes and correlates of response, we analyzed the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy, survival outcomes, and genomic and transcriptomic profiles of the pretreatment tumors in a prospective clinical trial (NCT02276443). A total of 211 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including 39 with MpBC, received doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-based neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Although not meeting the threshold for statistical significance, patients with MpBCs were less likely to experience a pCR (23% vs. 40%; P = 0.07), had shorter event-free survival (29.4 vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.15), metastasis-free survival (30.3 vs. 32.4 months, P = 0.22); and overall survival (32.6 vs. 34.3 months, P = 0.21). This heterogeneity is mirrored in the molecular profiling. Mutations in PI3KCA (23% vs. 9%, P = 0.07) and its pathway (41% vs. 18%, P = 0.02) were frequently observed and enriched in MpBCs. The gene expression profiles of each histologically defined subtype were distinguishable and characterized by distinctive gene signatures. Among nonmetaplastic (non-Mp) TNBCs, 10% possessed a metaplastic-like gene expression signature and had pCR rates and survival outcomes similar to MpBC. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations will determine if metaplastic-like tumors should be treated more similarly to MpBC in the clinic. The 23% pCR rate in this study suggests that patients with MpBC should be considered for NAT. To improve this rate, a pathway analysis predicted enrichment of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and RTK/MAPK pathways in MpBC, which may serve as new targetable vulnerabilities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Metaplasia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patologíaRESUMEN
High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with an improved pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that high baseline sTILs would have a favorable prognostic impact in TNBC patients without a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In this prospective NACT study, pretreatment biopsies from 318 patients with early-stage TNBC were evaluated for sTILs. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to search for the sTIL cutoff best associated with a pCR. With ≥20% sTILs identified as the optimal cutoff, 33% patients had high sTILs (pCR rate 64%) and 67% had low sTILs (pCR rate 29%). Patients were stratified according to the sTIL cutoff (low vs. high) and response to NACT (pCR vs. residual disease (RD)). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), with hazard ratios calculated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the 3-year restricted mean survival time (RMST) as primary measures. Within the high-sTIL group, EFS was better in patients with a pCR compared with those with RD (HR 0.05; 95% CI 0.01-0.39; p = 0.004). The difference in the 3-year RMST for EFS between the two groups was 5.6 months (95% CI 2.3-8.8; p = 0.001). However, among patients with RD, EFS was not significantly different between those with high sTILs and those with low sTILs (p = 0.7). RNA-seq analysis predicted more CD8+ T cells in the high-sTIL group with favorable EFS compared with the high-sTIL group with unfavorable EFS. This study did not demonstrate that high baseline sTILs confer a benefit in EFS in the absence of a pCR.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The number of online resources for patients with MDS is exponentially increasing; this is in large part due to the advent of social media which has introduced multiple avenues for information exchange and communication. Whether this information is targeted towards the patient population or not, the wealth of information online represents a new era of patient engagement in their health care. This review aims to highlight the different online resources being used in the field of MDS. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with MDS have access to the opinions of thought leaders in the field, advances in research and clinical trials, and the latest updates at national conferences and leading journals through social media. Social media is a powerful educational resource for patients with MDS when used conscientiously.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia/métodos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/instrumentación , Recursos en Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
In the era of modern communication, the physician and patient relationship has evolved to include an entirely new dimension-social media. This new dimension offers several opportunities for patient education, research and its dissemination, and professional development for health care providers; it can also serve as a platform for addressing important public health issues. However, these advantages come with challenges such as threats to patient and professional privacy. In this article, we dissect the benefits and drawbacks of this social evolution on the practicing hematologist-oncologist. We also perform a review of the current literature on the integration of social media in the practice of hematology/oncology; examine available guidelines for information exchange between health care professionals, industry, pharmaceutical companies, advocacy groups, and patients; and offer ways to create its seamless integration into clinical hematology-oncology practice.