ProTarget: a Danish Nationwide Clinical Trial on Targeted Cancer Treatment based on genomic profiling - a national, phase 2, prospective, multi-drug, non-randomized, open-label basket trial.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of trials indicate that treatment outcomes in cancer patients with metastatic disease are improved when targeted treatments are matched with druggable genomic alterations in individual patients (pts). An estimated 30-80% of advanced solid tumors harbor actionable genomic alterations. However, the efficacy of personalized cancer treatment is still scarcely investigated in larger, controlled trials due to the low frequency and heterogenous distribution of druggable alterations among different histologic tumor types. Therefore, the overall effect of targeted cancer treatment on clinical outcomes still needs investigation. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: ProTarget is a national, non-randomized, multi-drug, open-label, pan-cancer phase 2 trial aiming to investigate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of currently 13 commercially available, EMA-approved targeted therapies outside the labeled indication for treatment of advanced malignant diseases, harboring specific actionable genomic alterations. The trial involves the Danish National Molecular Tumor Board for confirmation of drug-variant matches. Key inclusion criteria include a) measurable disease (RECIST v.1.1), b) ECOG performance status 0-2, and c) an actionable genomic alteration matching one of the study drugs. Key exclusion criteria include a) cancer type within the EMA-approved label of the selected drug, and b) genomic alterations known to confer drug resistance. Initial drug dose, schedule and dose modifications are according to the EMA-approved label. The primary endpoint is objective response or stable disease at 16 weeks. Pts are assigned to cohorts defined by the selected drug, genomic alteration, and tumor histology type. Cohorts are monitored according to a Simon's two-stage-based design. Response is assessed every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks. The trial is designed similar to the Dutch DRUP and the ASCO TAPUR trials and is a partner in the Nordic Precision Cancer Medicine Trial Network. In ProTarget, serial fresh tumor and liquid biopsies are mandatory and collected for extensive translational research including whole genome sequencing, array analysis, and RNA sequencing. DISCUSSION: The ProTarget trial will identify new predictive biomarkers for targeted treatments and provide new data and essential insights in molecular pathways involved in e.g., resistance mechanisms and thereby potentially evolve and expand the personalized cancer treatment strategy. PROTOCOL VERSION: 16, 09-MAY-2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04341181. Secondary Identifying No: ML41742. EudraCT No: 2019-004771-40.

Induction of PIK3CA alterations during neoadjuvant letrozole may improve outcome in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer constitutes almost 85% of all breast cancer patients and are a genetically highly heterogenic group. Data on the association of somatic alterations to outcome and prognosis are however sparse. In this neoadjuvant endocrine phase II trial including postmenopausal breast cancer patients with ER+, HER2 normal breast cancer, we investigated the rate of pathogenic mutations before and after treatment as well as the association with treatment response and survival. METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment tumour samples from 109 patients treated with neoadjuvant letrozole were collected and analysed with Next Generation Sequencing utilizing a panel of 12 genes (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, ESR1, KIT, KRAS, NRAS, PDGFRA, PIK3CA, and RAF1). Residual disease was assessed by a modified Miller Payne scale and the Residual Cancer Burden index. Survival data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Among the 109 patients, 52 had at least one pathogenic mutation in the pretreatment sample and 60 in the posttreatment sample. The most frequently mutated gene was PIK3CA, followed by EGFR and KRAS. Twelve different pathogenic PIK3CA mutations were identified, primarily in exon 20 and exon 9. An altered PIK3CA mutation profile from the pre- to the posttreatment specimen was significantly associated to improved pathological outcome. Overall and Disease-Free Survival benefits in PIK3CA mutated patients was observed. CONCLUSION: Considerable heterogeneity was identified both among patients and between pre- and posttreatment samples. PIK3CA has the potential to be a predictive biomarker. To further assess the implications of a treatment related altered PIK3CA mutation profile, more data are needed.

Genomic alterations in the stepwise progression from normal mucosa to metastasizing oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the genomic changes that occur in the development from dysplasia, cancer and to regional metastases in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Material and methods: We included OSCC patients with lymph node metastases at diagnosis, treated with primary surgery at Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen in the period 2007-2014. The resected tumor specimens were evaluated by a pathologist, who marked areas of morphologically normal tissue and dysplasia surrounding the cancer, two areas from the cancer tissue, and one area within the lymph node metastases. From these areas a punch biopsy was taken, and DNA from each sample was extracted and sequenced using Illumina's TSO500 HT cancer panel. Results: From 51 OSCC patients, 255 samples were included, comprising a wide variety of genomic alterations. Substantial intratumor heterogeneity was found. The most commonly mutated gene was TP53, mutated in 65% of all samples. Only two patients had no TP53 mutation in any samples. We found that morphologically normal appearing mucosa as well as surrounding dysplasia also contained malignant mutations, supporting the theory of field cancerization. There was a significant lower average tumor mutational burden (TMB) in the lymph node metastases compared to the primary tumors, supporting the theory of clonal selection. Conclusion: Substantial inter- and intratumor genomic heterogeneity was found. Mutation of TP53 was the most common and was present in all but two patients. Our data strongly supports the theory of clonal selection and the theory of field cancerization.

Detection of circulating tumor-derived material in peripheral blood of pediatric sarcoma patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Detection of circulating tumor-derived material (cTM) in the peripheral blood (PB) of cancer patients has been shown to be useful in early diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and disease monitoring. However, it has not yet been thoroughly evaluated for pediatric sarcoma patients. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies reporting the detection of circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, and circulating RNA in PB of pediatric sarcoma patients. Data on performance in identifying cTM and its applicability in diagnosis, and evaluation of tumor characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment response was extracted from publications. RESULTS: A total of 79 studies were assigned for the present systematic review, including detection of circulating tumor cells (116 patients), circulating tumor DNA (716 patients), and circulating RNA (2887 patients). Circulating tumor cells were detected in 76% of patients. Circulating DNA was detected in 63% by targeted NGS, 66% by shallow WGS, and 79% by digital droplet PCR. Circulating RNA was detected in 37% of patients. CONCLUSION: Of the cTM from Ewing's sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma ctDNA proved to be the best target for clinical application including diagnosis, tumor characterization, prognosis, and monitoring of disease progression and treatment response. For osteosarcoma the most promising targets are copy number alterations or patient specific micro RNAs, however, further investigations are needed to obtain consensus on clinical utility.

Redefining germline predisposition in children with molecularly characterized ependymoma: a population-based 20-year cohort.

Ependymoma is the second most common malignant brain tumor in children. The etiology is largely unknown and germline DNA sequencing studies focusing on childhood ependymoma are limited. We therefore performed germline whole-genome sequencing on a population-based cohort of children diagnosed with ependymoma in Denmark over the past 20 years (n = 43). Single nucleotide and structural germline variants in 457 cancer related genes and 2986 highly evolutionarily constrained genes were assessed in 37 children with normal tissue available for sequencing. Molecular ependymoma classification was performed using DNA methylation profiling for 39 children with available tumor tissue. Pathogenic germline variants in known cancer predisposition genes were detected in 11% (4/37; NF2, LZTR1, NF1 & TP53). However, DNA methylation profiling resulted in revision of the histopathological ependymoma diagnosis to non-ependymoma tumor types in 8% (3/39). This included the two children with pathogenic germline variants in TP53 and NF1 whose tumors were reclassified to a diffuse midline glioma and a rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor, respectively. Consequently, 50% (2/4) of children with pathogenic germline variants in fact had other tumor types. A meta-analysis combining our findings with pediatric pan-cancer germline sequencing studies showed an overall frequency of pathogenic germline variants of 3.4% (7/207) in children with ependymoma. In summary, less than 4% of childhood ependymoma is explained by genetic predisposition, virtually restricted to pathogenic variants in NF2 and NF1. For children with other cancer predisposition syndromes, diagnostic reconsideration is recommended for ependymomas without molecular classification. Additionally, LZTR1 is suggested as a novel putative ependymoma predisposition gene.

Actionable Molecular Alterations Are Revealed in Majority of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Genomic Tumor Profiling at Progression after First Line Treatment.

Background: Genomic profiling in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung cancer (NSCLC) can reveal Actionable Molecular Alterations (AMAs). Our study aims to investigate clinical relevance of re-biopsy after first line treatment, by reporting on acquired and persistent AMAs and potential targeted treatments in a real-time cohort of NSCLC patients. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line treatment were prospectively included in an observational study (NCT03512847). Genomic profiling was performed by TruSight Oncology 500 HT gene panel on tumor tissue collected at diagnosis and at time of progression. Results: The 92 patients re-biopsied at progression had received immunotherapy (n = 44), chemotherapy (n = 44), or combination treatment (n = 4). In 87 of these patients (95%), successful genomic profiling was performed at both the diagnostic biopsy and the re-biopsy. In 74 patients (85%), ≥1 AMA were found. The AMAs were acquired in 28%. The most frequent AMAs were observed in TP53 (45%), KRAS (24%), PIK3CA (6%), and FGFR1 (6%). Only five patients (5%) received targeted treatment mainly due to deterioration in performance status. Conclusions: Re-biopsy at progression revealed acquired AMAs in approximately one third of patients, and 85% had at least one AMA with the potential of receiving targeted treatment, thus strengthening the clinical relevance of re-biopsy.

Cell-free DNA in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma - a clinical prospective feasibility study.

Background: Glioblastoma (GB) is an incurable brain cancer with limited treatment options. The aim was to test the feasibility of using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to support evaluation of treatment response, pseudo-progression and whether progression could be found before clinical and/or radiologic progression. Results: CfDNA fluctuated during treatment with the highest levels before diagnostic surgery and at progression. An increase was seen in 3 out of 4 patients at the time of progression while no increase was seen in 3 out of 4 patients without progression. CfDNA levels could aid in 3 out of 3 questionable cases of pseudo-progression. Methods: Eight newly diagnosed GB patients were included. Blood samples were collected prior to diagnosis, before start and during oncologic treatment until progression. Seven patients received concurrent radiotherapy/Temozolomide with adjuvant Temozolomide with one of the patients included in a clinical trial with either immunotherapy or placebo as add-on. One patient received radiation alone. CfDNA concentration was determined for each blood sample. Conclusions: It was feasible to measure cfDNA concentration. Despite the limited cohort size, there was a good tendency between cfDNA and treatment course and -response, respectively with the highest levels at progression.

Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO)-Clinical Utility of Using Molecular Profiling to Select Patients to Phase I Trials.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical benefit of tumor molecular profiling to select treatment in the phase I setting. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid cancers and exhausted treatment options referred to a phase I unit were included in a prospective, single-center, single-arm open-label study (NCT02290522). Tumor biopsies were obtained for comprehensive genomic analysis including whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing. When possible, patients were treated with regimen matched to the genomic profile. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: From May 2013 to January 2017, a total of 591 patients were enrolled, with 500 patients undergoing biopsy. Genomic profiles were obtained in 460 patients and a potential actionable target was identified in 352 (70%) of 500 biopsied patients. A total of 101 patients (20%) received matched treatment based on either gene mutations or RNA expression levels of targets available in early clinical trials or off-label treatment. Objective response according to RECIST1.1 was observed in 15 of 101 patients (0% complete response, 15% partial response), with a median PFS of 12 weeks (95% confidence interval, 9.9-14.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the feasibility of genomic profiling to select patients in the phase I setting and suggests that genomic matching can be beneficial for a minor subset of patients with no other treatment options. Randomized studies may validate this assumption.See related commentary by Ratain, p. 1136.

Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of treatment response in BRAF V600E mutated non-melanoma solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We evaluated longitudinal tracking of BRAF V600E in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a marker of treatment response to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) combination therapies in non-melanoma solid tumors included in the Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO) program. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated tumors were treated with combination therapies including BRAFi. Quantification of mutant cfDNA from plasma was determined and correlated to clinical outcomes. Exome sequencing was performed to identify possible resistance mutations. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had BRAF-mutated tumors out of 455 patients included in CoPPO and 17 started BRAFi combination (EGFRi/MEKi) therapy. Tumor responses were achieved in 8 out of 16 evaluable patients and the median overall- and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) was 15 and 4.8 months, respectively. Longitudinal measurements of BRAF V600E-mutant cfDNA indicated disease progression prior to radiological evaluation and a reduction in the mutant fraction of more than 50% after 4 and 12 weeks of therapy was associated with a significantly longer PFS (p=0.003 and p=0.029) and OS (p=0.029 and p=0.017). Furthermore, the baseline mutant fraction and total level of cfDNA positively correlated with tumor burden (p=0.026 and p=0.024). Finally, analysis of cfDNA at progression revealed novel mutations potentially affecting the MAPK pathway. CONCLUSION: BRAFi combination therapies showed a response rate of 50% in BRAF V600E-mutated non-melanoma tumors. The fraction of BRAF-mutant cfDNA represent a sensitive indicator for clinical outcomes with plasma collected at week 4 and 12 as crucial time points for monitoring response and disease progression.