How do I implement pathogen reduced Cryoprecipitated fibrinogen complex in a tertiary Hospital's blood Bank.

BACKGROUND: Kaiser-Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center (LAMC) is a 560 licensed bed facility that provides regional cardiovascular services, including 1200 open heart surgeries annually. In 2021, LAMC explored alternative therapies to offset the impact of pandemic-driven cryo AHF shortages, and implemented Pathogen Reduced Cryoprecipitated Fibrinogen Complex (also known as INTERCEPT Fibrinogen Complex or IFC). IFC is approved to treat and control bleeding associated with fibrinogen deficiency. Unlike cryo AHF, IFC has 5-day post-thaw shelf life with potential operational and clinical benefits. The implementation steps and the operational advantages to the LAMC Blood Bank are described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighteen months post-implementation, the institution reviewed their product implementation experience and compared IFC with cryo AHF with a retrospective review of transfusion service and cardiac post-op data. RESULTS: IFC significantly decreased product wastage rates and order-to-issue time. It did not significantly impact post-op product utilization or hospital length of stay (LOS) in cardiac surgery patients when compared with cryo AHF. DISCUSSION: Implementation of IFC provides improved product supply stability, shorter turnaround times, and reduced wastage.

Lessons learned from the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma at Kaiser Permanente.

Background: In April 2020, the Mayo Clinic helped establish the US Food and Drug Administration Expanded Access Protocol for COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) convalescent plasma (CCP). The effectiveness of CCP in the published literature is contradictory because some retrospective studies showed benefit in reducing mortality and severe illness, whereas prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrated no benefit of CCP. Objectives: To discuss (1) the implementation of CCP across Kaiser Permanente Southern California between April 2020 and April 2021, (2) retrospective multivariable analysis of 2,831 patients with COVID-19 who were transfused with CCP compared with 18,475 patients with COVID-19 who did not receive CCP, (3) how to reconcile contradictory published data regarding the efficacy of CCP, and (4) guidance regarding the future use of convalescent plasma in a large community hospital setting. Methods: Multivariable analysis was controlled for demographic characteristics, level of oxygen delivery, intensive care unit stay, selected laboratory findings, and other concurrent treatment-related variables. Tubing segments from 151 CCP units transfused between October 2020 and April 2021 were retrospectively tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain IgG. Multivariable analysis showed that CCP transfusion did not affect mortality rates at 30 days and 5 months (odds ratio, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.87-1.25, and hazard ratio, 1.05, 95% CI, 0.93-1.19). Conclusions: If convalescent plasma is offered as a therapeutic in a future viral pandemic, we recommend (1) transfusing only those patients who are negative for neutralizing antibodies, (2) transfusing very early during the disease course, (3) only using convalescent plasma with known levels of neutralizing antibodies, or (4) alternatively providing fractionated hyperimmune globulin.