Combined laparoscopic and transperineal endoscopic total pelvic exenteration for local recurrence of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery is a combination of single-port surgery and transanal surgery and was initially developed as a treatment for rectal tumors. Recently, this approach has also been used for more advanced or extended pelvic surgery. METHODS: We present a surgical video of combined laparoscopic and transperineal endoscopic total pelvic exenteration performed in a male patient with recurrent rectal cancer and discuss the pros and cons of this approach. RESULTS: The operating time was 775 min and the operative blood loss was 485 ml. The pathology was recurrent adenocarcinoma invading the prostate and urethra with negative surgical margins. The postoperative course was uneventful except for a urinary tract infection that was treated with antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The transanal/perineal endoscopic approach may have some benefits for extended pelvic surgery for recurrent rectal cancer.

Is the prognostic impact of tumor location in patients with surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma affected by surgical approach?

AIM: The aim of the present study was to clarify differences in node metastasis mode and clinical outcomes based on tumor location in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants comprised 228 patients with ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy without preoperative supplement therapies. Lymph nodes were harvested from three fields: the neck, thorax, and abdomen. Patients were divided into three groups depending on tumor location [upper esophagus (UE), middle esophagus, or lower esophagus (LE)] and analyzed clinicopathologically. RESULTS: The LE group showed significantly more progressive ESCC in terms of tumor invasion (p = 0.025), node metastasis (p = 0.0071), and TNM stage (p = 0.0043). The LE group revealed a tendency to metastasize to extrathoracic (especially abdominal) nodes (p = 0.0008). Recurrent laryngeal node metastasis was increased in the UE group (p = 0.016). However, no prognostic differences were detected between groups according to tumor location. Likewise, subgroup analyses by surgical approach (open thoracotomy vs. thoracoscopy) and cancer stage (stage I/II, III, and IV) did not reveal any significant prognostic impact of tumor location. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic spread varied by tumor location, but no prognostic impact of tumor location could be detected in patients with ESCC in spite of surgical approach or cancer stage.