Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 56(7): 223, 2024 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060802

RESUMEN

Trypanosomosis due to Trypanosoma evansi (surra) is one of the most important diseases with a significant impact on camel health and production. Trypanosoma-induced immunosuppression mechanisms, which are key factors of disease pathogenesis, have been characterized in several animal species. The present study investigated, therefore, the impact of trypanosomosis on the immunophenotype of blood leukocytes in camels. For this, the relative and absolute values of blood leukocyte populations, their expression pattern of cell surface molecules, and the numbers of the main lymphocyte subsets were compared between healthy camels and camels with clinical symptoms of chronic surra and serological evidence of exposure to Trypanosoma infection. Leukocytes were separated from the blood of healthy and diseased camels, labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Compared to healthy camels, the leukogram of diseased camels was characterized by a slightly increased leukocyte count with moderate neutrophilia and monocytosis indicating a chronic inflammatory pattern that may reflect tissue injury due to the long-lasting inflammation. In addition, the analysis of lymphocyte subsets revealed a lower number and percentage of B cells in diseased than healthy camels. In vitro incubation of camel mononuclear cells with fluorochrome-labeled T. evansi revealed a higher capacity of camel B cells than T cells to bind the parasite in vitro. Furthermore, cell viability analysis of camel PBMC incubated in vitro with T. evansi whole parasites but not the purified antigens resulted in Trypanosoma-induced apoptosis and necrosis of camel B cells. Here we demonstrate an association between trypanosomosis in camels and reduced numbers of blood B cells. In vitro analysis supports a high potential of T. evansi to bind to camel B cells and induce their elimination by apoptosis and necrosis.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B , Camelus , Citometría de Flujo , Trypanosoma , Tripanosomiasis , Animales , Camelus/parasitología , Trypanosoma/aislamiento & purificación , Tripanosomiasis/veterinaria , Tripanosomiasis/parasitología , Tripanosomiasis/sangre , Tripanosomiasis/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Citometría de Flujo/veterinaria , Masculino , Femenino , Muerte Celular , Apoptosis
2.
Front Vet Sci ; 10: 1227908, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155762

RESUMEN

Ticks are important ectoparasites that transmit various pathogens causing morbidity and mortality in humans and animals. Saudi Arabia faces several challenges that can contribute to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) bacteria. These challenges require collaborative efforts to successfully achieve significant control of AMR in the country. The present study aims to isolate bacteria from camels' tick Hyalomma dromedarii in Al-Jouf province to identify and determine these isolates' antimicrobial susceptibilities. Forty-nine ticks were collected from dromedary camels and morphologically classified as H. dromedarii. Ticks were then homogenized and plated individually, which resulted in the isolation of 55 bacteria. The results showed that the bacterial isolates belong to 20 different species. About 71% (n = 39) of the total isolates were identified as Gram-positive bacteria comprised of 11 different species, while 29% (n = 16) of the total isolates were Gram-negative bacteria comprised of 9 different species. The most prevalent isolate within the total samples was Staphylococcus lentus (22.45%, 11/49), followed by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (18.37%, 9/49) and Sphingomonas paucimobilis (16.33% 8/49). The antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Gram-positive bacteria showed that 100% (n = 31) were resistant to benzylpenicillin; 90.3% (n = 28) were resistant to oxacillin; 58.1% (n = 18) were resistant to clindamycin; 48.4% (n = 15) were resistant to vancomycin. In addition, 32.3% (n = 10) were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin; 25.8% (n = 8) were resistant to erythromycin; 16.1% (n = 5) were resistant to teicoplanin; 6.5% (n = 2) were resistant to tetracycline. All Gram-positive bacteria were 100% susceptible to linezolid, gentamicin, tobramycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, tigecycline, and nitrofurantoin. In antimicrobial susceptibility tests for the Gram-negative bacteria, 57.14% (n = 8) of the identified bacteria were resistant to ampicillin, whereas 50% (n = 7) were resistant to cefoxitin and ceftazidime. About 28.57% (n = 4) of the Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to ceftriaxone, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. In addition, 21.43% (n = 3) were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cephalothin; 14.29% (n = 2) were resistant to cefepime and nitrofurantoin; 7.14% (n = 1) were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline. However, all Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to other examined antimicrobials. This is the first study that investigates the role of the hard tick as a potential reservoir for AMR pathogens within our region.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA