RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current method of treatment of spinal deformities would be almost impossible without pedicle screws (PS) placement. There are only a few studies evaluating the safety of PS placement and possible complications in children during growth. The present study was carried out to evaluate the safety and accuracy of PS placement in children with spinal deformities at any age using postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: 318 patients (34 males and 284 females) who underwent 6358 PS fixations for pediatric spinal deformities were enrolled in this multi-center study. The patients were divided into three age groups: less than 10 years old, 11-13 years old, and 14-18 years old. These patients underwent postoperative CT scans and were analyzed for pedicle screw malposition (anterior, superior, inferior, medial, and lateral breaches). RESULTS: The breach rate was 5.92% for all pedicles. There were 1.47% lateral and 3.12% medial breaches for all pedicles with tapping canals, and 2.66% lateral and 3.84% medial breaches for all pedicles without a tapping canal for the screw. Of the 6358 screws placed in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine, 98% of the screws were accurately placed (grade 0, 1, and juxta pedicular). A total of 56 screws (0.88%) breached more than 4 mm (grade 3), and 17 (0.26%) screws were replaced. No new and permanent neurological, vascular, or visceral complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The free-hand technique for pedicle screw placement in the acceptable and safety zone in pedicles and vertebral bodies was 98%. No complications associated with screw insertion in growth were noted. The free-hand technique for pedicle screw placement can be safely used in patients at any age. The screw accuracy does not depend on the child's age nor the size of the deformity curve. Segmental instrumentation with posterior fixation in children with spinal deformities can be performed with a very low complication rate. Navigation of the robot is only an auxiliary tool in the hands of the surgeons, and the result of the work ultimately depends on the surgeons.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: Patients treated with the two previous generations of ulnarization developed a bump related to the ulnar head becoming prominent on the radial side of the hand. To finally remedy this problem, a third generation of ulnarization was developed to keep the ulnar head contained. While still ulnar to the wrist center, the center of the wrist remains ulnar to the ulnar head, with the ulnar head articulating directly with the trapezoid and when present the trapezium. (2) Methods: Between 2019 and 2021, 22 radial club hands in 17 patients were surgically corrected with this modified version of ulnarization. (3) Results: In all 17 patients, the mean HFA (hand-forearm-angle) correction was 68.5° (range 12.2°-88.7°). The mean ulna growth was 1.3 cm per year (range 0.2-2 cm). There were no recurrent radial deviation deformities more than 15° of the HFA. (4) Conclusions: This new version of ulnarization may solve the problem of the ulna growing past the carpus creating a prominent ulnar bump. The results presented are preliminary but promising. Longer-term follow-up is needed to fully evaluate this procedure.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) is a rare bone disease that results in growth of benign cartilage-capped tumors and a number of skeletal deformities. Forearm deformities are present in up to 60% of patients with MHE, and radial head subluxation or dislocation occurs in 20% to 30%. Radial head subluxation/dislocation results in a shortened forearm and loss of motion. The purpose of this study was to identify radiographic variables that are most predictive of radial head subluxation/dislocation in an effort to determine the need for prophylactic treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of consecutive patients with MHE treated in our center between April 2007 and December 2019. Radiographic measurements included the presence or absence of distal ulnar osteochondromas, total ulnar bow, total radial bow, and percent ulnar length. Participants were separated into 3 groups based on the status of the radial head: located, subluxated, and dislocated. Radiographic measurements were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis H test with Dunn post-hoc analysis. A prediction model was run using a binomial logistic regression, and a prediction matrix was created. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included in the study. There were significant differences in the located group compared with the dislocated group in terms of pronation, supination, and extension. The percent ulnar length, total ulnar bow, and total radial bow differed significantly between the located and dislocated groups (p < 0.0001); however, in the binomial regression analysis, only the percent ulnar length and total ulnar bow could be used to distinguish between the located group and the subluxated/dislocated group. Both of these measurements were significant predictors of subluxation/dislocation. There was no radial head subluxation/dislocation in patients with an ulnar bow of <17°. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that total ulnar bow and percent ulnar length are good predictors of radial head subluxation/dislocation. These 2 parameters can be utilized to monitor forearm deformity and guide timing for prophylactic treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.