Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Withdrawal Is Associated with Higher Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.

Our main aim was to describe the effect on the severity of ACEI (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) and ARB (angiotensin II receptor blocker) during COVID-19 hospitalization. A retrospective, observational, multicenter study evaluating hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with ACEI/ARB. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the composite outcome of prognosis (IMV (invasive mechanical ventilation), NIMV (non-invasive mechanical ventilation), ICU admission (intensive care unit), and/or all-cause mortality). We evaluated both outcomes in patients whose treatment with ACEI/ARB was continued or withdrawn. Between February and June 2020, 11,205 patients were included, mean age 67 years (SD = 16.3) and 43.1% female; 2162 patients received ACEI/ARB treatment. ACEI/ARB treatment showed lower all-cause mortality (p < 0.0001). Hypertensive patients in the ACEI/ARB group had better results in IMV, ICU admission, and the composite outcome of prognosis (p < 0.0001 for all). No differences were found in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients previously treated with ACEI/ARB continuing treatment during hospitalization had a lower incidence of the composite outcome of prognosis than those whose treatment was withdrawn (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.63-0.76). ARB was associated with better survival than ACEI (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.62-0.96). ACEI/ARB treatment during COVID-19 hospitalization was associated with protection on mortality. The benefits were greater in hypertensive, those who continued treatment, and those taking ARB.

Evolution of the Use of Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients in Spain between March and November 2020: SEMI-COVID National Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Since the results of the RECOVERY trial, WHO recommendations about the use of corticosteroids (CTs) in COVID-19 have changed. The aim of the study is to analyse the evolutive use of CTs in Spain during the pandemic to assess the potential influence of new recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, and observational study was conducted on adults hospitalised due to COVID-19 in Spain who were included in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry from March to November 2020. RESULTS: CTs were used in 6053 (36.21%) of the included patients. The patients were older (mean (SD)) (69.6 (14.6) vs. 66.0 (16.8) years; p < 0.001), with hypertension (57.0% vs. 47.7%; p < 0.001), obesity (26.4% vs. 19.3%; p < 0.0001), and multimorbidity prevalence (20.6% vs. 16.1%; p < 0.001). These patients had higher values (mean (95% CI)) of C-reactive protein (CRP) (86 (32.7-160) vs. 49.3 (16-109) mg/dL; p < 0.001), ferritin (791 (393-1534) vs. 470 (236-996) µg/dL; p < 0.001), D dimer (750 (430-1400) vs. 617 (345-1180) µg/dL; p < 0.001), and lower Sp02/Fi02 (266 (91.1) vs. 301 (101); p < 0.001). Since June 2020, there was an increment in the use of CTs (March vs. September; p < 0.001). Overall, 20% did not receive steroids, and 40% received less than 200 mg accumulated prednisone equivalent dose (APED). Severe patients are treated with higher doses. The mortality benefit was observed in patients with oxygen saturation

Lipoprotein (a) levels and outcomes in stable outpatients with symptomatic artery disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although genetic and epidemiological studies support that people with high lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are at an increased risk for arterial disease, its prognostic value in patients with established artery disease has not been consistently evaluated. METHODS: FRENA is a prospective registry of consecutive outpatients with coronary, cerebrovascular or peripheral artery disease. We assessed the risk for subsequent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or limb amputation according to Lp(a) levels at baseline. RESULTS: As of December 2016, 1503 stable outpatients were recruited. Of these, 814 (54%) had levels <30 mg/dL, 319 (21%) had 30-50 mg/dL and 370 (25%) had ≥50 mg/dL. Over a mean follow-up of 36 months, 294 patients developed subsequent events (myocardial infarction 122, ischemic stroke 114, limb amputation 58) and 85 died. On multivariable analysis, patients with Lp(a) levels of 30-50 mg/dL were at a higher risk for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.67; 95%CI: 2.77-7.85), ischemic stroke (HR: 8.27; 95%CI: 4.14-16.5) or limb amputation (HR: 3.18; 95%CI: 1.36-7.44) than those with normal levels. Moreover, patients with levels ≥50 mg/dL were at increased risk for myocardial infarction (HR: 19.5; 95%CI: 10.5-36.1), ischemic stroke (HR: 54.5; 95%CI: 25.4-116.7) or limb amputation (HR: 22.7; 95%CI: 9.38-54.9). CONCLUSIONS: Stable outpatients with symptomatic artery disease and Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL were at a 5-fold higher risk for subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke or limb amputation. Those with levels >50 mg/dL were at an over 10-fold higher risk.