A family with Fabry disease diagnosed by a single angiokeratoma.

This case presents a 39-year-old gentleman with a single angiokeratoma on the abdomen. Because of a family history of early onset cardiac disease, testing for Fabry disease was performed and a mis-sense mutation (A143T) in the Fabry gene confirmed the diagnosis. The unusual aspect of this case is that the patient otherwise had normal health. His only detectable abnormality was a high serum creatinine at 116 mmol/L. Two further affected males and four carrier females were detected on family screening. We tested a further five patients with a single angiokeratoma for Fabry disease. In the five tested though, no suggestive personal or family history was given for any of the patients and no further cases were detected. This case highlights the need for vigilance within dermatology clinics to consider Fabry disease even if a solitary angiokeratoma is the only presenting feature. Some patients do display a milder phenotype and thus a detailed family history should always be taken. As in this case, a solitary angiokeratoma and a suspicious family history may be the only clue. Because enzyme replacement therapy is now available, the potential benefits for the patient and their family are high.

Efficacy of topical PUVA soaks for palmoplantar dermatoses: an audit.

BACKGROUND: With a lack of evidence base for individual topical PUVA protocols, treatment is presently based on the consensus of current practice. This audit was designed to investigate the effectiveness of topical PUVA for palmoplantar dermatoses. METHODS: Phototherapy notes were reviewed on all patients who received hand and/or foot PUVA 2002-2007 in the Northern Health and Social Care Trust (NHSCT), Northern Ireland. RESULTS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The mean number of treatments, maximum single UVA dose, and cumulative dose, were 18.4, 4.2 J/cm2, and 48.3 J/cm2, respectively. A positive response to treatment occurred in 51.3% of patients, which fell short of the 70% standard set. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, number of treatments (P=0.04) and maximum single UVA dose (P=0.03) were the only variables associated with positive treatment outcome. The response was not influenced significantly by skin type, concurrent topical treatments, or cumulative UVA dose. Limitations to the study: Small patient numbers may have prevented the statistical significance of individual variables. CONCLUSIONS: UV dose increments should be clearly defined to avoid excess caution at the expense of an adequate patient response, and a minimum of 20 treatments administered to all patients, if tolerated.