Biological response to titanium implants coated with nanocrystals calcium phosphate or type 1 collagen in a dog model.

OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the osteogenic potential of electrosprayed organic and non-organic surface coatings in a gap-implant model over 4 and 12 weeks of implantation into the dog mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen Beagle dogs received experimental titanium implants in the mandible 3 months after removal of left premolars (P2, P3 and P4). Three types of implants were installed in each animal: non-coated implant, nano-CaP coated implant and implant with type 1 collagen coating. Both micro-CT and histomorphometry were used to evaluate peri-implant bone response after implantation periods of 4 and 12 weeks. The bone area percentage was assessed histomorphometrically in three different zones (inner: 0-300 µm; middle: 300-600 µm; and outer: 600-1000 µm) around the implant surface. Bone-bridging of the gap was also calculated for each sample. RESULTS: Four weeks after implantation, nano-CaP and collagen-coated implants showed significantly higher bone volume (BV) in the inner zone compared with non-coated implants (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). After 12 weeks, histomorphometric analysis showed comparable amounts of BV between all experimental groups. Also, no significant difference was found in the BV, as measured using micro-CT, between the implant groups. Absolute bone ingrowth measurements were highest for collagen-coated implants, but these differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: The obtained data failed to provide a consistent favourable effect on bone formation of the collagen coating over 3 months of implantation. It is concluded that the source of the collagen as well as the limited osseous environment overshadowed a possible effect of the applied implant surface modifications. Similarly, the tested nano-apatite surface coating did not improve peri-implant bone ingrowth into a gap-implant model.

Osseointegration of oral implants after delayed placement in rabbits: a microcomputed tomography and histomorphometric study.

PURPOSE: This study compared osseointegration of implants placed 14 days after implant site preparation with that of immediately placed implants in rabbit femurs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were placed bilaterally in the femoral condyles of 12 rabbits. On one side, the implants were placed 14 days after osteotomy, and the other side received implants immediately after osteotomy. Healing was assessed by microcomputed tomography and histomorphometry. RESULTS: The delayed implants (placed 14 days after osteotomy) showed better osseointegration than the immediately placed implants. Bone-to-implant contact and bone volume, as assessed by histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography, were significantly higher for the implants placed after 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: From this study, it can be concluded that early osteotomy bed preparation and placement of implants after a 2-week delay predisposes to better bone-implant interface healing.