Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration (minutes), intraoperative bleeding (mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drilling frequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis. RESULTS: Four observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD = - 24.66, p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD = - 10.37, P < 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = - 2.15, P < 0.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = - 2.42, P = < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques.

Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Non-inferiority trial. OBJECTIVE: Limited cervical spinal (c-spine) immobilization in resource-limited settings of LMICs suggests alternatives are necessary for patients with traumatic injuries. We propose a novel method of c-spine immobilization using folded towels. SETTING: Washington University in St. Louis. METHODS: Using non-inferiority trial design, thirty healthy patients (median age = 22) were enrolled to test the efficacy of folded towels in comparison with rigid cervical collars, foam neck braces, and no immobilization. We measured cervical range of motion (CROM) in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions. A weighted composite score (CS) was generated to compare immobilization methods. A preserved fraction of 75% was determined for non-inferiority, corresponding to the difference between the median values for CROM between control (no immobilization) and c-collar states. RESULTS: C-collars reduce median CROM in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions by an average of -36.83° seated (-17.75° supine) vs. no immobilization. Folded towels and foam neck braces reduced CROM by -27° seated (-16.75° supine) and -14.25° seated (-9.5° supine), respectively. Compared to a 25% non-inferiority margin (permitting an average 9.21° of cervical movement across six cardinal directions), the CS determined folded towels are non-inferior (CSseated = 0.89, CSsupine = 0.47). Foam neck braces are inferior (CSseated = 2.35, CSsupine = 2.10). CS > 1 surpassed the non-inferiority margin and were deemed inferior. CONCLUSIONS: Folded towels are a non-inferior means of immobilizing c-spine in extension and rotation, but not flexion, vs. c-collars. We propose folded towels could be trialed in combination with backboards to deliver affordable and effective prehospital TSCI management in resource-limited settings.

Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre's experience.

AIM: To determine (1) frequency of resident research projects being in the same orthopaedic subspecialty that they ultimately choose for fellowship and practice; (2) percentage of research projects that were published. METHODS: Resident Thesis Day programs were independently assessed by two reviewers from 2010 to 2020. Reviewers classified projects based on orthopaedic subspecialty: Spine, Joints, Trauma, Hand, Foot and Ankle, Sports, Pediatrics, Oncology, and Shoulder Elbow. Presenting residents' fellowship subspecialty, current practice specialty, and geographic state of current practice were collected using internet searches. Correlation of residents who completed a thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship and current practice was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 81 resident physicians, 11 (13.6%) female, were included. In the entire cohort, 50.6% did a thesis day project in a different field than their current or projected subspecialty. Of those who completed, or are currently completing fellowship, 33 (52.4%) did their thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship. Of the current residents who have matched into fellowship, 46.7% did a thesis day project in the same subspecialty. A total of 51 (63.0%) projects were published. CONCLUSION: The majority of resident research projects were published, and about 50% of orthopaedic residents went on to complete a fellowship and practice in the same subspecialty as their research project. As residents often spend a considerable amount of time and effort on their projects, these findings may help tailor resident education and research curriculums to focus more on research principles than specific orthopedic content.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) and surgical-site infection in pediatric patients. BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Despite numerous studies in adults, benefit of AP in preventing SSIs in children is uncertain. METHODS: Patients aged 0 to 21 years who underwent surgical procedures at a pediatric acute care hospital from April 1, 2009, to December 31, 2010, were assessed. Antibiotic prophylaxis indication and administration according to an evidence-based guideline were recorded. Complete compliance was defined as AP given, when indicated, within 60 minutes before incision. Surgical-site infections were identified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria and documented in the medical records using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. Multiple logistic regressions adjusting for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, wound classification, admission status, surgical discipline, and surgical duration evaluated association of AP compliance and SSI. RESULTS: Of 5309 patients for whom antibiotics were indicated, 3901 (73.5%) with complete compliance had an infection rate of 3.0%, whereas 1408 (26.5%) who were not compliant had an infection rate of 4.3% (adjusted relative risk: 0.7; 95% confidence interval: 0.5-0.9; P = 0.02). Of 4156 patients for whom antibiotics were not indicated, the 895 (21.5%) who received antibiotics had an infection rate of 1.7% compared with 0.7% in the 3261 (78.5%) who did not receive antibiotics (adjusted relative risk: 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 0.8-3.1; P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric surgery, complete compliance with AP was associated with 30% decreased risk of SSI.

Increasing Compliance With an Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guideline to Prevent Pediatric Surgical Site Infection: Before and After Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an intervention for improving antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) guideline compliance to prevent surgical site infections in children. BACKGROUND: Although appropriate AP reduces surgical site infection, and guidelines improve quality of care, changing practice is difficult. To facilitate behavioral change, various barriers need to be addressed. METHODS: A multidisciplinary task force at a pediatric hospital developed an evidence-based AP guideline. Subsequently, the guideline was posted in operating rooms and the online formulary, only recommended antibiotics were available in operating rooms, incoming trainees received orientation, antibiotic verification was included in time-out, computerized alerts were set for inappropriate postoperative prophylaxis, and surgeons received e-mails when guideline was not followed. AP indication and administration were documented for surgical procedures in July 2008 (preintervention), September 2011 (postintervention), and April-May 2013 (follow-up). Compliance was defined as complete--appropriate antibiotic, dose, timing, redosing, and duration when prophylaxis was indicated; partial--appropriate drug and timing when prophylaxis was indicated; and appropriate use--complete compliance when prophylaxis was indicated, no antibiotics when not indicated. Compliance at preintervention and follow-up was compared using χ(2) tests. RESULTS: AP was indicated in 43.9% (187/426) and 62.0% (124/200) of surgical procedures at preintervention and follow-up, respectively. There were significant improvements in appropriate antibiotic use (51.6%-67.0%; P < 0.001), complete (26.2%-53.2%; P < 0.001) and partial compliance (73.3%-88.7%, P = 0.001), correct dosage (77.5%-90.7%; P = 0.003), timing (83.3%-95.8%; P = 0.001), redosing (62.5%-95.8%, P = 0.003), and duration (47.1%-65.3%; P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention improved compliance with a pediatric AP guideline.

Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Older patients undergo surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in great numbers, but as a result of substantial diagnostic and surgical heterogeneity, the impact of age on results after surgery is poorly defined. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared groups of patients younger and older than 70 years with relative clinical and surgical homogeneity to determine differences in (1) interval improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and (2) perioperative adverse events. METHODS: We performed a subgroup analysis of an ongoing prospective observational study. Patients were divided based primarily on age (younger than 70 years [n = 68] and 70 years or older [n = 41]) and secondarily on procedure (minimally invasive decompression alone or decompression and instrumented fusion). With the exception of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists status, the two age groups were similar (p > 0.3) in baseline demographics and ODI. Mean pre- and postoperative ODI were compared between groups at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Perioperative adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: At all time intervals, both younger and older patients demonstrated (p = 0.05 to < 0.001) improvements in ODI. At the 1-year mark, no differences in ODI were demonstrated between the younger and older patients for decompression only (21 versus 26 [p = 0.29]) or decompression and fusion (19 versus 18 [p = 0.97]). Interval improvement in ODI was not different between younger and older patients at any time point for decompression only (6 weeks: -18 versus -20 [p = 0.66]; 6 months: -21 versus -17 [p = 0.41]; 12 months: -21 versus -15 [p = 0.29]) or decompression and fusion (6 weeks: -11 versus -12 [p = 0.58]; 6 months: -21 versus -22 [p = 0.69]; 12 months: -23 versus -27 [p = 0.97]). There were no differences in perioperative adverse events between groups (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: When clinical and surgical heterogeneity is minimized, improvements in terms of disability as measured by the ODI and the frequency of adverse events after surgery in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis are comparable to those of younger patients. For patients with focal lumbar spinal stenosis, age alone should not dissuade us from considering surgical intervention if otherwise indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Management of Incidental Durotomies During Open Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental durotomy is a common intraoperative complication of lumbar spine surgery. Intra and postoperative protocols in the management of this common complication vary considerably, with no consensus in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review (1) lumbar dural repair techniques for open degenerative procedures; (2) review described postoperative protocols after lumbar dural repairs. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed for all articles published from inception until September 2022 using Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify articles assessing the management of durotomy in open surgery for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Two independent reviewers assessed the articles for inclusion criteria, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Outcomes included persistent leaks, return to the operating room, recurrent symptoms, medical complications, or patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 10,227 articles were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 9 studies were included (n=1270 patients) for final review. Repair techniques included; no primary repair, suture repair in running or interrupted manner with or without adjunctive sealants, sealants alone, or patch repair with muscle, fat, epidural blood patch, or synthetic graft. Postoperative protocols included the placement of a subfascial drain with varying durations of bed rest. Notable findings included no benefit of prolonged bedrest compared with early ambulation ( P =0.4), reduced cerebrospinal fluid leakage with fat graft compared with muscle grafts ( P <0.001), and decreased rates of revision surgery in studies that used subfascial drains (1.7%-2.2% vs 4.34%-6.66%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in intraoperative durotomy repair techniques and postoperative protocols exists. Primary repair with fat graft augmentation seems to have the highest success rate. Postoperatively, the use of a subfascial drain with early ambulation reduces the risk of pseudomenignocele formation, medical complications, and return to the operating room. Further research should focus on prospective studies with the goal to standardize repair techniques and postoperative protocols.

Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Database.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are established surgical options for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, and cervical degenerative disc disease. However, current literature does not demonstrate a clear superiority between ACDF and CDA. PURPOSE: To investigate procedural and patient-reported outcomes of ACDF and CDA among patients included in the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) database. DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected outcomes registry data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Individuals within the MSSIC database presenting with radiculopathy, myelopathy, or cervical spondylosis refractory to typical conservative care undergoing primary ACDF or CDA from January 4, 2016, to November 5, 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative measures (including surgery length, length of stay, return to OR, any complications), patient-reported functional outcomes at 2-year follow-up (including return to work, patient satisfaction, PROMIS, EQ-5D, mJOA). METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF were matched 4:1 with those undergoing CDA; propensity analysis performed on operative levels (1- and 2- level procedures), presenting condition, demographics, and comorbidities. Initial comparisons performed with univariate testing and multivariate analysis performed with Poisson generalized estimating equation models clustering on hospital. RESULTS: A total of 2,208 patients with ACDF and 552 patients with CDA were included. Baseline demographics were similar, with younger patients undergoing CDA (45.6 vs 48.6 years; p<.001). Myelopathy was more frequent in ACDF patients (30% vs 25%; p=.015). CDA was more frequently planned as an outpatient procedure. Length of stay was increased in ACDF (1.3 vs 1.0 days; p<.001). Functional outcomes were similar, with comparable proportions of patients meeting minimal clinically important difference thresholds in neck pain, arm pain, PROMIS, EQ-5D, and mJOA score. After multivariate regression, no significant differences were seen in surgical or functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar outcomes for those undergoing ACDF and CDA at 2 years. Previous meta-analyses of CDA clinical trial data adhere to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria required by clinical studies; this registry data provides "real world" clinical outcomes reflecting current practices for ACDF and CDA patient selection.

Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials.

PURPOSE: Displaced femoral neck fractures in healthy elderly patients have traditionally been managed with hemiarthroplasty (HA). Recent data suggest that total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be a better alternative. METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature was conducted. Randomized controlled trials comparing all forms of THA with HA were included. Three authors independently extracted articles and predefined data. Results were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Eight trials totalling 986 patients were retrieved. After THA 4 % underwent revision surgery versus 7 % after HA. The one-year mortality was equal in both groups: 13 % (THA) versus 15 % (HA). Dislocation rates were 9 % after THA versus 3 % after HA. Equal rates were found for major (25 % in THA versus 24 % in HA) and minor complications (13 % THA versus 14 % HA). The weighted mean of the Harris hip score was 81 points after THA versus 77 after HA. The subdomain pain of the HHS (weighted mean score after THA was 42 versus 39 points for HA), the rate of patients reporting mild to no pain (75 % after THA versus 56 % after HA) and the score of WOMAC (94 points for THA versus 78 for HA) all favored THA. Quality of life measured with the EQ-5D favored THA (0.69 versus 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the fit elderly may lead to higher patient-based outcomes but has higher dislocation rates compared with hemiarthroplasty. Further high-quality randomized clinical trails are needed to provide robust evidence and to definitively answer this clinical question.

Lateral mass screw placement in the atlas: description of a novel surgical technique, radiographic parameters, and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques of C1 lateral mass screw placement have been described. We sought to delineate the radiographic angle of safety medially and laterally and describe a novel surgical technique of C1 lateral mass screw placement. We sought to (I) determine the angle of safety medially and laterally of the C1 lateral mass; (II) assess the size available of the lateral mass in the AP and coronal planes; (III) describe novel technique of insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw utilizing navigation and a novel start point. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cervical computed tomography (CT) images of normal adults. Radiographic measurements were then obtained using these images including the angle (degrees) of safety medially and lateral of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally, as well as the length and width (mm) of the C1 lateral masses. A novel surgical technique was used by identifying the confluence of the medial aspect of the posterior arch and the lateral mass. This confluence is then marked out as the C1 screw start point. Under navigation guidance, lateral mass screws were placed with 0 degrees of medial-lateral angulation from posterior to anterior. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with a mean age of 52.6±25.6 years (33% female) were included. The mean medial and lateral angle of safety of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally was 23±3.8 degrees and 32±5 degrees, respectively. Average length and width of the lateral mass was 17.7 and 13.3 mm respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the radiographic window of safety medially and laterally for safe and reproducible placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Further, a novel technique using a medial start point and navigation guidance with 0 degrees of angulation in the coronal plane is described. Further research is required to assess outcomes of patients utilizing this method as well as biomechanical studies to assess this construct strength compared to others that are frequently used.

Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Dysphagia Severity Following Anterior Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The anterior approach to the cervical spine is commonly used to treat cervical pathology. It is, however, associated with high rates of dysphagia, which may be associated with substantial patient morbidity. Perioperative corticosteroid administration has been advocated to decrease dysphagia rates; its efficacy, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to determine the efficacy of perioperative corticosteroid administration in reducing postoperative dysphagia as well as any adverse effects, such as pseudarthrosis and infection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials], ClinicalTrials.gov) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated corticosteroids versus any comparator for prevention of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine procedures. Two independent reviewers used the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria to assess eligibility and risk of bias, perform data extraction, and rate the quality of evidence. The primary outcome was severity of postoperative dysphagia. We conducted meta-analyses of dysphagia (both overall and by delivery method), pseudarthrosis, and postoperative infection. RESULTS: After screening of 927 articles, a total of 7 studies were eligible for final inclusion. These included 431 patients, of whom 247 received corticosteroids and 184 received placebo or a control treatment. Moderate-quality evidence demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative dysphagia rates (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.63; p < 0.001), and this finding was robust to both permutation analyses and sensitivity analyses removing the studies with a high risk of bias. There was no significant difference between intravenous and local steroid administration (p = 0.16). There were no documented infections. There was no significantly increased risk of pseudarthrosis in those receiving steroids compared with placebo or a control treatment (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found moderate-quality evidence supporting the use of perioperative corticosteroid administration as an adjunct to anterior cervical spinal procedures. Patients treated with corticosteroids intravenously or locally had significantly decreased severity of dysphagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prehospital care for traumatic spinal cord injury by first responders in 8 sub-Saharan African countries and 6 other low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) constitutes a considerable portion of the global injury burden, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Prehospital care can address TSCI morbidity and mortality, but emergency medical services are lacking in LMICs. The current standard of prehospital care for TSCI in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs is unknown. METHODS: This review sought to describe the state of training and resources for prehospital TSCI management in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs. Articles published between 1 January 1995 and 1 March 2020 were identified using PMC, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria spanned first responder training programs delivering prehospital care for TSCI. Two reviewers assessed full texts meeting inclusion criteria for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and extracted relevant characteristics to assess trends in the state of prehospital TSCI care in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs. RESULTS: Of an initial 482 articles identified, 23 met inclusion criteria, of which ten were set in Africa, representing eight countries. C-spine immobilization precautions for suspected TSCI patients is the most prevalent prehospital TSCI intervention for and is in every LMIC first responder program reviewed, except one. Numerous first responder programs providing TSCI care operate without C-collar access (n = 13) and few teach full spinal immobilization (n = 5). Rapid transport is most frequently reported as the key mortality-reducing factor (n = 11). Despite more studies conducted in the Southeast Asia/Middle East (n = 13), prehospital TSCI studies in Africa are more geographically diverse, but responder courses are shorter, produce fewer professional responders, and have limited C-collar availability. DISCUSSION: Deficits in training and resources to manage TSCI highlights the need for large prospective trials evaluating alternative C-spine immobilization methods for TCSI that are more readily available across diverse LMIC environments and the importance of understanding resource variability to sustainably improve prehospital TSCI care.

Robotic navigation system utilization for percutaneous sacroiliac screw placement: surgical setup and technique.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology is a common cause of significant pain and disability, and operative treatment consisting of SIJ fusion can be performed in cases where non-operative measures fail to provide sustained relief. Through the years, SIJ fusion has evolved from an open invasive procedure, to more recently, being performed through minimally invasive techniques. Intraoperative navigation systems and robotic guidance are becoming popularized for SIJ fusion, as well as other routine and complex spinal cases. The utility of navigation and robotics is the enhanced ability of the surgeon to place instrumentation more accurately, with less dissection, blood less, and overall operative time. We present a technique guide for robotic instrumented SIJ fusion with intraoperative navigation that we have put into practice at our institution and found to be very beneficial to patients for the above reasons. We describe the setup and utilization of these technologies intraoperatively, and provide specific case examples to highlight our technique. The described methods have been found to be effective and reproducible, allowing for minimally invasive SIJ screw placement with high accuracy and safety. We emphasize that utilizing intraoperative navigation and robotics is not meant to substitute for surgeon knowledge of case steps or anatomy, but rather to enhance safety and efficacy. To our knowledge, robotic SIJ fusion has not been previously described in the literature.

Intravenous lidocaine in spine surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the role of intravenous lidocaine as a supplemental pain control modality in patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of supplemental intravenous lidocaine in spine surgery. We developed a comprehensive search strategy to adequately screen for randomized controlled trials involving intravenous lidocaine in spine surgery. Continuous outcomes included postoperative opiate consumption and postoperative pain scores. Dichotomous outcomes included nausea, vomiting, pneumonia, delirium, and wound infection. RESULTS: A total of 3 RCTs comprising 235 patients were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Cumulative morphine consumption at 48 h was not statistically significant between lidocaine and control groups. Postoperative pain was not statistically significant at any measured time points in the first and second day postoperatively. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications including nausea, vomiting, pneumonia, delirium, or surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that current literature does not support the use of intravenous lidocaine as an adjunctive measure of pain management after spine surgery. Given the relatively few numbers of studies in this field, further randomized controlled trials are needed to make a definitive conclusion on the effectiveness of lidocaine in spine surgery patients.

Disparities in outcomes after spine surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.

OBJECTIVE: Most studies on racial disparities in spine surgery lack data granularity to control for both comorbidities and self-assessment metrics. Analyses from large, multicenter surgical registries can provide an enhanced platform for understanding different factors that influence outcome. In this study, the authors aimed to determine the effects of race on outcomes after lumbar surgery, using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in 3 areas: the North American Spine Society patient satisfaction index, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low-back pain, and return to work. METHODS: The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative was queried for all elective lumbar operations. Patient race/ethnicity was categorized as Caucasian, African American, and "other." Measures of association between race and PROs were calculated with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) to report adjusted risk ratios. RESULTS: The African American cohort consisted of a greater proportion of women with the highest comorbidity burden. Among the 7980 and 4222 patients followed up at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, respectively, African American patients experienced the lowest rates of satisfaction, MCID on ODI, and return to work. Following a GEE, African American race decreased the probability of satisfaction at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Race did not affect return to work or achieving MCID on the ODI. The variable of greatest association with all 3 PROs at both follow-up times was postoperative depression. CONCLUSIONS: While a complex myriad of socioeconomic factors interplay between race and surgical success, the authors identified modifiable risk factors, specifically depression, that may improve PROs among African American patients after elective lumbar spine surgery.

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Feasibility, Patient/Provider Satisfaction, and Value of Virtual Spine Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, patient/provider satisfaction, and perceived value of telehealth spine consultation after rapid conversion from traditional in-office visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were obtained for patients undergoing telehealth visits with spine surgeons in the first 3 weeks after government restriction of elective surgical care at 4 sites (March 23, 2020, to April 17, 2020). Demographic factors, technique-specific elements of the telehealth experience, provider confidence in diagnostic and therapeutic assessment, patient/surgeon satisfaction, and perceived value were collected. RESULTS: A total of 128 unique visits were analyzed. New (74 [58%]), preoperative (26 [20%]), and postoperative (28 [22%]) patients were assessed. A total of 116 (91%) visits had successful connection on the first attempt. Surgeons felt very confident 101 times (79%) when assessing diagnosis and 107 times (84%) when assessing treatment plan. The mean and median patient satisfaction was 89% and 94%, respectively. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for video over audio-only visits (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was not significantly different with patient age, location of chief complaint (cervical or thoracolumbar), or visit type (new, preoperative, or postoperative). Providers reported that 76% of the time they would choose to perform the visit again in telehealth format. Sixty percent of patients valued the visit cost as the same or slightly less than an in-office consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and high patient/provider satisfaction of virtual spine surgical consultation, and appropriate reimbursement and balanced regulation for spine telehealth care is essential to continue this existing work.

3D-printed Patient-specific Spine Implants: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To review the current clinical use of 3-dimensional printed (3DP) patient-specific implants in the spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Additive manufacturing is a transformative manufacturing method now being applied to spinal implants. Recent innovations in technology have allowed the production of medical-grade implants with unprecedented structure and customization, and the complex anatomy of the spine is ideally suited for patient-specific devices. Improvement in implant design through the process of 3DP may lead to improved osseointegration, lower subsidence rates, and faster operative times. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and other sources that resulted in 1842 unique articles. All manuscripts describing the use of 3DP spinal implants in humans were included. Two independent reviewers (N.W. and N.E.S.) assessed eligibility for inclusion. The following outcomes were collected: pain score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, subsidence, fusion, Cobb angle, vertebral height, and complications. No conflicts of interest existed. No funding was received for this work. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 35 patients. Only case series and case reports were identified. Follow-up times ranged from 3 to 36 months. Implant types included vertebral body replacement cages, interbody cages, sacral reconstruction prostheses, iliolumbar rods, and a posterior cervical plate. All studies reported improvement in both clinical and radiographic outcomes. 11 of 35 cases showed subsidence >3 mm, but only 1 case required a revision procedure. No migration, loosening, or pseudarthrosis occurred in any patient on the basis of computed tomography or flexion-extension radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the systematic review indicate that 3DP technology is a viable means to fabricate patient-matched spinal implants. The effects on clinical and radiographic outcome measures are still in question, but these devices may produce favorable subsidence and pseudoarthrosis rates. Currently, the technology is ideally suited for complex tumor pathology and atypical bone defects. Future randomized controlled trials and cost analyses are still needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-systematic review.