Adaptation of Metabolomics and Microbiomic Research Protocols During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, researchers in the P30 Center for the Study of Symptom Science, Metabolomics, and Multiple Chronic Conditions at Emory University's Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing faced major challenges in recruitment and data collection because of limited access to the clinic and community facilities and the risk of COVID-19 exposure associated with in-person study contact. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to (a) describe how a cadre of pilot/supplement principal investigators adapted their studies to allow for safe and trustworthy data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through date of publication) and (b) discuss steps that facilitated the technical aspects of remote data collection, especially involving biological specimens. RESULTS: Four pilot studies and two administrative supplements within the center-all at different stages of execution-adopted various alternative remote recruitment, enrollment, and data and specimen collection approaches to continue their research endeavors in a way that maximized the safety of both the research participants and the research teams. DISCUSSION: The article concludes with a discussion on the importance of a participant-centered approach when using remote methods, actions, or steps initiated to facilitate the technical aspects of remote data collection and reflections on the continued use of remote research strategies beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

A review of the efficacy of a low-cost cancer screening test using cancer sniffing canines.

One of the most powerful tools in fighting cancer is early detection, as it has been strongly linked to greater chances of cancer survival. However, traditional cancer screening tests can cost hundreds if not thousands of dollars and are therefore not an affordable option for many marginalized populations. From a public health perspective, it is vital to research the use of inexpensive cancer detection so that low-resourced patients have greater access to affordable cancer screening. Numerous studies dating from the early 2000s to recent years have shown extensive evidence that the exceptional olfactory system of canines allows them to detect certain odors through exhaled breath condensate that are known to be biomarkers of a variety of cancers. In addition to providing a cheaper alternative to conventional cancer screening tests, the use of cancer sniffing dogs has other benefits, including great reliability and accuracy. There are a few major types of cancer for which the 'cancer dog test' proved to be remarkably effective, particularly colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancers. The test is non-invasive unlike most previous detection methods, meaning that it is also a safer option for individuals seeking cancer screening. Although the use of cancer sniffing dogs does have certain limitations and scope for error, it would provide a more affordable and accessible option for cancer screening, making it especially beneficial to low-resourced populations.