Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 68(3): 318-327, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28396005

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The study sought to describe a single centre's technical approach to transradial intervention and report on clinical outcomes and safety. METHODS: A total of 749 transradial access (TRA) procedures were performed at a single hospital in 562 patients (174 women and 388 men). Procedures included 445 bland embolizations or chemoembolizations of the liver, 88 uterine artery embolizations, and 148 procedures for Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (Y90), which included mapping and administration. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (range 27-96 years). RESULTS: Four cases (0.5%) required crossover to transfemoral (tortuous anatomy, inability to secure a stable position for embolization, vessel spasm and base catheter not being of a sufficient length). A single asymptomatic, short-segment radial artery occlusion occurred (0.3%), 3 patients (0.4%) developed small hematomas postprocedurally, and 2 patients (0.7%) had transient neurological pain, which was resolved within a week without treatment. It was found that 98% of patients who had a previous femoral access procedure would choose radial access for subsequent procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial access is a safe, effective technique, with a learning curve; however, this procedure has the potential to significantly improve departmental workflow and cost savings for the department and patient experience.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Radial , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia , Cateterismo Periférico , Embolización Terapéutica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Future Oncol ; 11(9): 1421-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25602287

RESUMEN

The management of colorectal liver metastasis has undergone a significant change since the development of novel ablation and embolization. Drug-eluting microsphere platforms, designed to deliver targeted concentrations of systemic therapy directly into the tumor via its arterial vasculature, have garnered interest and gained in popularity in recent years. Based on in vitro and in vivo data, multiple factors contribute to locoregional exposure including carrier base, smaller particle size (larger surface area), chemotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic intensity. Based on the current published clinical data, therapy appears well tolerated but the questions remain as to the ideal technique, patient population and overall efficacy. The purpose of this article is to provide a perspective on the scientific basis, and clinical review of the current data supporting the use of this platform in the setting of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Portadores de Fármacos , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA