RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The pain that occurs after septorhinoplasty is an important factor affecting the comfort of the patient. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of perioperative intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion on postoperative pain and quality of recovery in patients underwent septorhinoplasty surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients who underwent septorhinoplasty were randomly divided into two groups. Magnesium group received intravenous magnesium after induction of anesthesia (30 mg/kg), then infused until the end of the surgical procedure (9 mg/kg). The placebo group received the same volume of saline infusion. The VAS score was used for postoperative pain assessment, and the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score was used for the assessment of recovery status. RESULTS: The postoperative 30 min, 1st, 2nd, 4th (p < .001) and 24th hour (p < .05) VAS scores of the patients in the magnesium infusion group were significantly lower compared to the placebo group. Also; in terms of physical comfort (p < .001), emotional state (p < .05), psychological support, pain and total score values (p < .001), patients in magnesium group had significantly higher QoR-40 scores than those in placebo group. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative magnesium infusion, which is widely used in many surgeries to provide controlled hypotension, also contributes significantly to patient comfort with its positive effect on postoperative pain and recovery scores.
Asunto(s)
Sulfato de Magnesio , Magnesio , Humanos , Sulfato de Magnesio/farmacología , Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Infusiones Intravenosas , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by the Gram-negative coccobacillus Francisella tularensis. It is frequently overlooked in the differential diagnosis of neck masses because of its rarity. The purpose of this study is to report cases diagnosed with tularemia among patients presenting to our clinic with neck masses and to share our experience. METHODOLOGY: Patients presented to our hospital with cervical masses and diagnosed with tularemia were included in this retrospective study. Medical files of all patients were evaluated, and physical examination findings, titration values, date of diagnosis, location of the abscess or mass, place of residence, occupation, drinking water sources, sedimentation (SED), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell (WBC) values were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included in the study. Forty patients (52.6%) were living in rural villages and 36 (47.4%) in urban areas. Thirty-one (40.8%) were engaged in animal husbandry and 29 (38.2%) in agriculture. In terms of drinking water sources, 59 patients (73.6%) obtained water from the mains, while 10 (13.32%) used well water. The most frequently observed clinical findings were swelling in the neck, sore throat, lethargy, and fever. Neck swelling frequently occurred in levels II and III. CONCLUSIONS: Since tularemia is rare and there are no specific clinical findings, diagnosis may be problematic. Ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialists should be familiar with the clinical symptoms of tularemia in the head and neck region and should consider a preliminary diagnosis of tularemia in the differential diagnosis of persistent neck masses.