Varnish with S-PRG filler reduces dentin permeability after erosive/abrasive challenge.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different varnishes on dentin permeability to erosive/abrasive challenges. METHODS: 60 superficial dentin discs were randomly allocated to six groups (n=10): Duraphat, PRG Barrier Coat, Clinpro XT, Profluorid, Fluor Protector S and untreated (control). Permeability tests were carried out: after acid conditioning, after treatment, and after abrasive/erosive challenges. The abrasive-erosive challenges were performed for 5 days (citric acid and in remineralizing saliva), as well as abrasion with toothpaste slurry (Colgate Total 12). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained of the dentin surfaces (5,000x) after the treatments, and after the erosive/abrasive challenges. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests showed that all the varnishes promoted a decrease in dentin permeability directly after application, with Clinpro XT showing the highest percentage (69.52%) of dentin sealing (P= 0.0188). After the erosive/abrasive challenge, only PRG Barrier Coat varnish showed dentin sealing ability with reduced dentin permeability (42.16%) (P= 0.0014). However, none of the applied varnishes promoted a statistically significant difference in the percentage of dentin sealing, compared with the control group (P> 0.05). Clinpro XT showed a higher percentage of dentin sealing, while only PRG Barrier Coat showed reduced dentin permeability after the erosive/abrasive challenge. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Varnish containing S-PRG filler has the efficacy needed to be used as a coating material to reduce dentin permeability in situations of erosive/abrasive challenges.

Long-term bond strength of ormocer-based resin composites using a universal adhesive used in different adhesive strategies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate over time the bond strength to dentin of different resin composites (RBCs) associated with the universal adhesive system applied with self-etching or total-etching strategies. METHODS: 60 human third molars were obtained, randomly divided into experimental groups (n= 10) according to RBCs: methacrylate-based nanofilled (Z350 XT); low-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill (Admira Fusion X-base Universal); or high-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill composite (Admira Fusion X-tra). The adhesion procedure was performed using a universal adhesive (Futurabond U) applied in self-etching or total-etching mode. Occlusal preparations (Class I) were made, measuring 4 mm in mesiodistal length, 4 mm in depth, and 3 mm in buccolingual height. The cavities were restored considering the RBCs and adhesive strategies, and the light curing was performed using a LED unit (BluePhase) as recommended by the manufacturers. For this, the nanofilled RBCs were inserted by the oblique incremental technique while the bulk-fill RBCs were inserted in single increments. The samples were stored in water for 24 hours in an oven; to be sectioned, the sticks were randomly separated, stored in distilled water for 24 hours (immediate) or 12 months (long-term), and taken to the universal machine for a microtensile test (MPa). The fractured sticks were examined to classify the type of fracture. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α= 0.05). RESULTS: The MPa values of methacrylate-based nanofilled or high-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC were not affected by the strategy used to apply the universal adhesive system (P> 0.05). However, for the low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher values were obtained when the total-etching strategy was used compared to the self-etching mode (P< 0.05). After 12 months, when using the total-etching strategy low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher MPa values were obtained compared to the other materials (P< 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Regardless of the adhesive strategy used, the high-viscosity RBCs, whether based on methacrylate or Ormocer, showed similar adhesive behavior. Low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC showed greater long-term bond strength associated with the universal adhesive applied in the total-etching strategy.

Influence of calcium lactate and fluoride solution mouthrinses on tooth sensitivity and effectiveness of color change during in-office bleaching: A randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To conduct a clinical evaluation of calcium lactate and sodium fluoride mouthrinses in reducing sensitivity and efficacy of color change during in-office bleaching. METHODS: 75 participants were selected and divided into three groups (n= 25), according to the type of desensitizing treatment tested: calcium lactate mouthrinse prior to sodium fluoride mouthrinse before each bleaching session; daily mouthrinse with sodium fluoride; control (absence of mouthrinse). Each mouthrinse was used for 1 minute. Bleaching was performed following the same protocol in all groups, with 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost), in three 40-minute sessions, with a 48-hour interval between sessions. Clinical parameters such as sensitivity, gingival irritation and mouthrinse acceptability were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and clinical examination at two timepoints: baseline (before any treatment) and 48 hours after the end of treatment. The color was evaluated with a spectrophotometer (VITA Classical scale guide, 3D Master guide and CIEL*a*b*). The data were analyzed by generalized linear models and by one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: There was significant color change in all groups according to the VITA Classical scale guide (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference among the groups for ΔL*, Δa*, Δb* and ΔE over time (P> 0.05). The control group presented a significant increase in sensitivity (P= 0.008). The other groups showed no significant difference between initial and final timepoints (P> 0.05). No symptoms of gingival irritation were observed in any of the groups evaluated. All desensitizing treatments presented high acceptability. Bleaching treatment was effective, regardless of association with desensitizing treatments. No treatment prevented bleaching sensitivity, but the absence of a combined desensitizing treatment led to increased sensitivity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Although bleaching sensitivity during in-office bleaching treatment cannot be avoided, daily fluoridated mouthrinse or calcium lactate used prior to fluoridated mouthrinse prevented its increase.