Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 53(3): 297-303, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23699678

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the types of drug and dietary supplement inquiries submitted to the National Center for Drug Free Sport through the Resource Exchange Center (REC). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: United States, from July 2009 through June 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Athletes and athletic personnel associated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). INTERVENTION: Tabulation and classification of drugs and dietary supplement inquiries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Characteristics and trends of drug and dietary supplement inquiries. RESULTS: Inquiries for prescription medications for albuterol inhalers, methylphenidate, amphetamines, and prednisone were the most common using a drug lookup function. The most common inquiries for over-the-counter medications included pseudoephedrine, loratadine, cetirizine, and caffeine. Among dietary supplements, inquiries for amino acids/metabolites, vitamins and minerals, and herbal products occurred most frequently. One dietary supplement, N.O.-Xplode (Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc.), accounted for the majority of individual dietary supplement inquiries. Banned substances accounted for 30% of all inquiries submitted to the REC and 18% of medications searched in a drug lookup database. CONCLUSION: Almost 25,000 inquiries were submitted to the REC. Pharmacists can use this information to advise, counsel, and refer NCAA athletes regarding the use of banned and permitted substances. Education programs regarding stimulants, dietary supplements, and the risk of using substances such as animal byproducts are needed, and pharmacists can participate in these programs.


Asunto(s)
Atletas , Suplementos Dietéticos , Doping en los Deportes , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Información sobre Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Rol Profesional , Estudiantes , Estados Unidos , Universidades
2.
J Community Health ; 37(1): 113-8, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21644021

RESUMEN

The availability of tobacco and alcohol products in community pharmacies contradicts the pharmacists' Code of Ethics and presents challenges for a profession that is overwhelmingly not in favor of the sale of these products in its practice settings. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of pharmacies that sell tobacco products and/or alcoholic beverages and to characterize promotion of these products. The proportion of pharmacies that sell non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products as aids to smoking cessation also was estimated. Among 250 randomly-selected community pharmacies in Los Angeles, 32.8% sold cigarettes, and 26.0% sold alcohol products. Cigarettes were more likely to be available in traditional chain pharmacies and grocery stores than in independently-owned pharmacies (100% versus 10.8%; P < 0.001), and traditional chain drug stores and grocery stores were more likely to sell alcoholic beverages than were independently-owned pharmacies (87.5% vs. 5.4%; P < 0.001). Thirty-four (41.5%) of the 82 pharmacies that sold cigarettes and 47 (72.3%) of the 65 pharmacies that sold alcohol also displayed promotional materials for these products. NRT products were merchandised by 58% of pharmacies. Results of this study suggest that when given a choice, pharmacists choose not to sell tobacco or alcohol products.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas Alcohólicas/provisión & distribución , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Nicotiana , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar , Publicidad , Bebidas Alcohólicas/economía , Humanos , Los Angeles
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 43(11): 1898-902, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19809008

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a woman who used duloxetine during pregnancy and breast-feeding. CASE SUMMARY: A 29-year-old woman was treated with duloxetine for depression during the second half of an uncomplicated gestation. She gave birth at term to a healthy female infant. A cord blood sample was obtained at birth. The mother continued the antidepressant while exclusively breast-feeding her infant. One month later, we collected blood and milk samples from the mother and a single blood sample from the infant. All samples were analyzed for the presence and concentrations of duloxetine. DISCUSSION: Duloxetine crosses the placenta at term and is excreted into breast milk. No evidence of developmental or other type of toxicity was observed in the infant at birth or during the first 32 days after birth. The published literature detailing human pregnancy experience with this antidepressant is limited to 11 cases in which women became pregnant while taking duloxetine. In 10 cases, the drug was discontinued when pregnancy was diagnosed and no outcome data were reported. In the eleventh case, an infant exposed to duloxetine 90 mg/day developed neonatal behavioral syndrome. One study examined the excretion of duloxetine into breast milk, but the mothers discontinued nursing for the study. In the present case, no adverse effects from exposure to the drug in milk were noted in the exclusively breast-fed infant. The possibility of functional/neurobehavioral deficits appearing later in life cannot be excluded because long-term follow-up has not been conducted in infants exposed to duloxetine in utero or during nursing. CONCLUSIONS: No developmental toxicity or other signs of toxicity were observed in an infant exposed to duloxetine during the second half of gestation and during breast-feeding in the first 32 days after birth. However, the possibility of functional/neurobehavioral deficits appearing later in life cannot be excluded.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia/sangre , Intercambio Materno-Fetal/fisiología , Leche Humana/metabolismo , Tiofenos/sangre , Adulto , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Lactancia/efectos de los fármacos , Intercambio Materno-Fetal/efectos de los fármacos , Leche Humana/química , Leche Humana/efectos de los fármacos , Embarazo , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 42(6): 898-901, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18460586

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of use of high-dose carisoprodol during pregnancy and breast-feeding. CASE SUMMARY: A 28-year-old woman with severe back muscle spasm took carisoprodol 2800 mg/day before and throughout an uncomplicated pregnancy and while exclusively breast-feeding her infant during the first month after birth. Serum drug concentrations of carisoprodol and the active metabolite meprobamate were measured in the mother and infant. Concentrations of these agents also were measured in breast milk. Developmental toxicity was not observed in the near-term infant, whose birth weight was at the 10th percentile for gestational age. Only slight sedation was noted in the infant during breast-feeding, and no signs or symptoms of withdrawal were noted when nursing was stopped. DISCUSSION: Carisoprodol and meprobamate are excreted into breast milk. Although the published human pregnancy data are limited to 15 cases, carisoprodol does not appear to cause developmental toxicity (growth restriction, structural anomalies, functional/neurobehavioral deficits, or death), even when the mother is taking high doses. No signs or symptoms of withdrawal were noted in our infant or in a previously published case when breast-feeding was stopped. Long-term follow-up has not been conducted in exposed infants, and the possibility of functional/neurobehavioral l deficits appearing later in life cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Except for mild sedation, no other toxicity was observed in a near-term infant exposed to carisoprodol throughout gestation and during breast-feeding in the first month after birth.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Carisoprodol/uso terapéutico , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Transporte Biológico , Lactancia Materna , Carisoprodol/efectos adversos , Carisoprodol/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Intercambio Materno-Fetal , Meprobamato/farmacocinética , Leche Humana/metabolismo , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/efectos adversos , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/farmacocinética , Embarazo , Espasmo/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Ann Pharmacother ; 42(1): 46-52, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18056832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that teaspoons are commonly used to administer liquid medications to children. The capacity of household teaspoons ranges from 1.5 mL to 9 mL, potentially leading to errors in dosing. There are few studies evaluating alternative measuring devices. OBJECTIVE: To assess adult consumers' previous experience with measuring devices for oral liquids, compare the accuracy of an oral syringe with that of a dosing cup, and determine consumer perceptions of accuracy and ease of use of an oral syringe and a dosing cup. METHODS: Individuals at least 18 years of age were shown a picture of 5 commonly used measurement devices and asked their perceptions of and experience with the devices. They were then asked to measure a 5 mL (1 teaspoon) dose of Tylenol (acetaminophen) suspension, using the EZY Dose oral syringe and the dosing cup provided by the manufacturer. An acceptable dose was defined as 5.0 +/- 0.5 mL. Following the measurement, participants completed a 5 item survey that assessed their perceptions of the accuracy and ease of use of the syringe and dosing cup. RESULTS: A total of 96 subjects completed the study. Participants more commonly reported use of droppers (68%), dosing cups (67%), and teaspoons (62%) versus cylindrical spoons (49%) or oral syringes (49%) for measuring oral liquids. Sixty-four (66.7%) subjects measured an acceptable dose using the syringe versus 14 subjects (14.6%) using the cup (p < 0.001). The mean volumes +/- SD measured with the syringe and cup were 4.5 +/- 0.7 mL and 6.3 +/- 0.7 mL, respectively (p < 0.001). After using both devices, the majority of subjects believed that the syringe (80%) and cup (71%) would measure an accurate dose. Most (87%) participants perceived that the cup was easy to use; 63% believed that the syringe was easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: Droppers and dosing cups were the most commonly used devices in the home for measuring liquid medications. Subjects were more likely to measure an acceptable dose with an oral syringe when compared with a dosing cup. However, a large proportion of study participants were unable to measure an accurate dose with either device. Community pharmacists should educate caregivers on the selection and proper use of measuring devices to improve the accuracy of medication administration in the home.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Errores de Medicación , Soluciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidadores , Niño , Recolección de Datos , Equipos y Suministros , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Percepción , Farmacéuticos , Rol Profesional , Autoadministración , Jeringas
6.
ASAIO J ; 63(1): 24-31, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27660902

RESUMEN

Thromboembolic (TE) events and hemorrhagic complications continue to remain as frequent adverse events and causes of death after mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) implantation. To counterbalance this postimplant multifactorial hypercoagulable state, antithrombotic therapy given postimplant must be individually tailored to keep patient adequately anticoagulated yet normocoagulable. Prior studies describing different anticoagulation protocols do not define normocoagulability for patients on MCSDs. We evaluated the role of thromboelastography platelet mapping (TEG PM) in defining "normocoagulability" for MCS patients on anticoagulant (warfarin) and antiplatelet agents. Ninety-eight MCSD patients who underwent TEG PM assay at our institution from 2012 to 2014 were included for retrospective analysis. Eleven (11.2%) subjects developed at least one TE event during the study period. Of the 13 TE events, 8 occurred in patients with total artificial heart (TAH). TEG parameters closest to the event or when patient was clinically adequately anticoagulated and corresponding international normalized ratio (INR) were measured. Thromboelastography coagulation index (CI) appears to be the single most statistically significant parameter that can be used to designate a patient as normocoagulable. Based on our results, patients with HeartMate II (HM II) and Heart Ware (HW) devices should be maintained at a CI value of less than or equal to 1.5 whereas patients with TAH devices should be maintained at a CI less than or equal to 1.2. The CI should be correlated with the degree of Vitamin K-dependent coagulation factor inhibition that is achieved using device-specific goal INR ranges. A recent modification, TEG PM assesses the effects of antiplatelet drug. Maximal amplitude arachidonic acid (MA-AA) < 50 and maximal amplitude adenosine diphosphate (MA-ADP) < 50 are desired for normocoagulable state.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Tromboelastografía , Tromboembolia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Plaquetas/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Diabetes Care ; 28(8): 1851-5, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16043722

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if glyburide and glipizide are excreted into breast milk and if breast-feeding from women taking these drugs causes infant hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied eight women who had received a single oral dose of 5 or 10 mg glyburide. Drug concentrations were measured in maternal blood and milk for 8 h after the dose. In a separate study, five women were given a daily dosage (5 mg/day) of glyburide or glipizide, starting on the first postpartum day. Maternal blood and milk drug concentrations and infant blood glucose were measured 5-16 days after delivery. RESULTS: In the single-dose glyburide study, the mean maximum theoretical infant dose (MTID) as a percent of the weight-adjusted maternal dose (WAMD) was <1.5 and <0.7% for the 5- and 10-mg doses, respectively. For the five women taking daily dosages, the mean MTID as a percent of the WAMD was <28% for glyburide and <27% for glipizide. The high estimates were due to the insensitivity of the assay. Neither glyburide nor glipizide were detected in breast milk in either study and blood glucose was normal in the three infants (one glyburide and two glipizide) who were wholly breast-fed when the drug concentrations were at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: Neither glyburide nor glipizide were detected in breast milk, and hypoglycemia was not observed in the three nursing infants. Both agents, at the doses tested, appear to be compatible with breast-feeding.


Asunto(s)
Glipizida/farmacocinética , Gliburida/farmacocinética , Hipoglucemiantes/metabolismo , Leche Humana/química , Adulto , Femenino , Glipizida/sangre , Gliburida/sangre , Humanos , Lactante , Alimentos Infantiles/análisis
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 105(6): 1437-41, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15932841

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether metformin is excreted into breast milk and whether this exposure adversely affects the blood glucose of nursing infants. METHODS: Seven women were started on metformin 500 mg twice daily on the first day after cesarean delivery. Breastfeeding was started at the same time. Two women were excluded. Two other women stopped breastfeeding for personal reasons unrelated to the drug therapy, but did provide serum and milk samples, because they regularly pumped their breasts to maintain lactation. Peak and trough serum and milk samples were drawn between postoperative days 4 and 17. In 3 infants, blood was drawn for glucose determination at the same time as the maternal samples. RESULTS: The trough milk concentration in 1 subject was below the assay detection limit. Excluding this subject, the mean peak and trough serum metformin concentrations were 1.06 mug/mL (range 0.68-1.90 mug/mL) and 0.42 mug/mL (range 0.26-0.51 mug/mL), respectively, whereas the mean peak and trough metformin concentrations in breast milk were 0.42 mug/mL (range 0.38-0.46 mug/mL) and 0.39 mug/mL (range 0.31-0.52 mug/mL), respectively. The mean milk:serum ratio was 0.63 (range 0.36-1.00) and the mean estimated infant dose as a percentage of the mother's weight-adjusted dose was 0.65% (range 0.43-1.08%). In 3 infants, the blood glucose concentrations 4 hours after a feeding were within the normal limit, ranging from 47-77 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: Metformin is excreted into breast milk, but the amounts seem to be clinically insignificant. No adverse effects on the blood glucose of the 3 nursing infants were measured.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Lactancia Materna , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Metformina/farmacocinética , Leche Humana/química , Adulto , Cesárea , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/sangre , Lactante , Recién Nacido/sangre , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Metformina/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 59(12): 1183-8, 2002 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12073859

RESUMEN

The accuracy rates of board-registered pharmacy technicians and pharmacists in checking unit dose medication cassettes in the inpatient setting at two separate institutions were examined. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, both in Los Angeles county, petitioned the California State Board of Pharmacy to approve a waiver of the California Code of Regulations to conduct an experimental program to compare the accuracy of unit dose medication cassettes checked by pharmacists with that of cassettes checked by trained, certified pharmacy technicians. The study consisted of three parts: assessing pharmacist baseline checking accuracy (Phase I), developing a technician-training program and certifying technicians who completed the didactic and practical training (Phase II), and evaluating the accuracy of certified technicians checking unit dose medication cassettes as a daily function (Phase III). Twenty-nine pharmacists and 41 technicians (3 of whom were pharmacy interns) participated in the study. Of the technicians, all 41 successfully completed the didactic and practical training, 39 successfully completed the audits and became certified checkers, and 2 (including 1 of the interns) did not complete the certification audits because they were reassigned to another work area or had resigned. In Phase II, the observed accuracy rate and its lower confidence limit exceeded the predetermined minimum requirement of 99.8% for a certified checker. The mean accuracy rates for technicians were identical at the two institutions (p = 1.0). The difference in mean accuracy rates between pharmacists (99.52%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 99.44-99.58%) and technicians, (99.89%; 95% CI 99.87-99.90%) was significant (p < 0.0001). Inpatient technicians who had been trained and certified in a closely supervised program that incorporated quality assurance mechanisms could safely and accurately check unit dose medication cassettes filled by other technicians.


Asunto(s)
Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Sistemas de Medicación/normas , Farmacéuticos/normas , Técnicos de Farmacia/normas , Embalaje de Medicamentos , Sistemas de Medicación/organización & administración
10.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am ; 25(4): 897-913, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25442165

RESUMEN

To help clinicians understand the risks associated with performance-enhancing drugs, this overview covers prohibited lists of substances and methods, therapeutic use exemptions, the legitimate indications and adverse effects, including for megadose and polypharmacy doping of stimulants, anabolic steroids, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and growth hormone and ways in which physicians or patients risk committing anti-doping rule violations inadvertently.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Doping en los Deportes , Sustancias para Mejorar el Rendimiento/farmacología , Medición de Riesgo , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA