Improving Delayed Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Otitis Media.

OBJECTIVES: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most-common indication for antibiotics in children. Delayed antibiotic prescribing for AOM can significantly reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics for select children. We sought to improve delayed prescribing for AOM across 8 outpatient pediatric practices in Colorado. METHODS: Through a collaborative initiative with American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we implemented an economical 6-month antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included education, audit and feedback, online resources, and content expertise. Practices used The Model for Improvement and plan-do-study-act cycles to improve delayed antibiotic prescribing. Generalized estimating equations were used to generate relative risk ratios (RRRs) for outcomes at the intervention end and 3- and 6-months postintervention. Practice surveys were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 69 clinicians at 8 practice sites implemented 27 plan-do-study-act cycles. Practices varied by size (range: 6-37 providers), payer type, and geographic setting. The rate of delayed antibiotic prescribing increased from 2% at baseline to 21% at intervention end (RRR: 8.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.68-17.17). Five practices submitted postintervention data. The rate of delayed prescribing at 3 months and 6 months postintervention remained significantly higher than baseline (3 months postintervention, RRR: 8.46; 95% CI: 4.18-17.11; 6 months postintervention, RRR: 6.69; 95% CI: 3.53-12.65) and did not differ from intervention end (3 months postintervention, RRR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.62-2.05; 6-months postintervention, RRR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.53-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline rate of delayed prescribing was low. A low-cost intervention resulted in a significant and sustained increase in delayed antibiotic prescribing across a diversity of settings.

Managing Excessive Weight Gain in Children <2 Years of Age: Interviews with Primary Care Providers.

Background: Excessive weight gain in the first 2 years of childhood is a risk factor for future obesity. However, the current absence of clear, standardized identification and treatment guidelines may hinder primary care providers' (PCPs) ability to manage early excessive weight gain in children <2. The objective of this study was to explore PCPs' perspectives on evaluating and communicating about early excessive weight gain and to identify PCP-opined barriers to the care of children exhibiting such trends. Methods: A trained interviewer conducted 20 semistructured interviews with PCPs on identifying and communicating with families about early excessive weight gain in children <2 years old. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the transcripts. Results: Interviews uncovered three major themes: (1) the approach to identifying excessive weight gain in children <2 showed high variability across participants despite relative consistency in weight assessment methodology, (2) while possessing communication strategies, providers recognized multiple barriers impeding the execution of weight-related conversations with caregivers, and (3) providers perceived the need for additional support to improve their ability to respond to excessive weight gain in children <2 years old. Conclusions: Variability exists in PCP-reported methods used and barriers faced when identifying, communicating, and responding to excessive weight gain in very early childhood. Introducing guidelines and resources to help standardize the assessment and communication of excessive weight gain in children <2 could augment PCPs' strategies for managing accelerated weight-gain trajectories to mitigate rates of childhood obesity.

Use of the Delphi Technique to Obtain Community Input on Leading Contributors to Early Childhood Obesity in Latino Communities.

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, Latino children are disproportionately affected by childhood obesity and related comorbidities. Stakeholder engagement has the potential to heighten the efficacy of interventions, thereby reducing the disparate prevalence of obesity among Latino children. The objective of this study was to identify stakeholders' opinions on factors influencing early childhood obesity in Latino children aged 0 to 5 years. METHOD: This study used the Delphi technique to gather and prioritize stakeholders' opinions about the factors and barriers considered most influential in early (age 0-5 years) childhood obesity intervention or prevention within the Latino community. Three sequential phases were used. Participants included Latina women as well as staff from community organizations serving Denver metropolitan's Latino population. RESULTS: Study results revealed that stakeholders value the role of the child's primary care provider in the identification of overweight children and desire more educational support to reduce intake of nonnutritious foods. Participants further determined that obesity-related knowledge gaps and affordability of healthy foods and activities were the largest barriers to helping Latino children maintain healthy weights. CONCLUSION: Use of this stakeholder-informed data could assist in the development of future culturally tailored interventions aimed at reducing the rates of early childhood obesity in the Latino population.