Treatment of bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy: patients' treatment preferences.

PURPOSE: To determine the proportion of patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy (RT) for bone pain who would like to participate in the decision-making process, and to determine their choice of palliative RT regimen (2000 cGy in five fractions vs. 800 cGy in one fraction) for painful bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients were approached and all patients agreeing to participate provided written informed consent. Patients' decisional preferences were studied using a five-statement preference instrument. A decision board was used to help patients decide their preferred palliative RT regimen. Factors influencing patients' choices were studied using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study (55 women and 46 men). The preferences for decision-making were as follows: 30 active, 47 collaborative, and 24 passive. Most (55 [76%] of 72) patients favored one fraction of palliative RT (95% confidence interval, 65-86%). Patients were more likely to select the 800 cGy in one fraction because of the convenience of the treatment plan (odds ratio, 1.024; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1044) but were less likely to choose it because of the chance of bone fracture (odds ratio, 0.973; 95% confidence interval, 0.947-1.000) compared with 2000 cGy in five fractions. CONCLUSION: Most participating patients preferred to decide either by themselves or with the radiation oncologists which treatment option they preferred. An 800-cGy-in-one-fraction regimen was favored, independent of the treated site. The convenience of the treatment plan and the likelihood of bone fracture were the most important factors influencing patients' choice.

Multidisciplinary radiation oncology palliative care rounds as a continuing educational activity implementing the rapid response radiotherapy program at the toronto sunnybrook regional cancer centre.

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the development of the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program and evaluates the continuing medical education (CME) series, in the form of multidisciplinary monthly Radiation Oncology Palliative Care Rounds at the Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre. METHODS: Palliative care rounds were initiated by the multidisciplinary committee in September, 1998. From January, 2000, to June, 2002, attendees used a standard 5- point Likert rating scale to conduct formal evaluations. RESULTS: A total of 203 evaluation forms examining 20 rounds have been collected. Findings indicated that 86.8, 96.0, 87.1, and 90.8% of participants thought the material of the presentation was relevant to their practice, interesting, and instructional. Overall 90.1% of the respondents highly rated the grand rounds (rating of 4 or 5). CONCLUSION: The grand rounds are an effective CME activity at our hospital.

What do patients living with advanced cancer and their carers want to know? - a needs assessment.

Our primary objective was to determine the content and format that is most suitable for educational events targeting patients and carers who are living with advanced cancer. Secondary objectives included examining the differences in information needs between patients and their carers, and providing an estimate of the rate of participation in educational events targeting such patients and carers. Out-patients receiving palliative radiotherapy at Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center and their carers were invited to complete the Advanced Cancer Information Needs Survey. One hundred forty-four respondents participated in the survey. The participants identified the management of pain, fatigue, and home palliative care resources as the areas in which information was most needed. Carers displayed greater interest, and the range of topics in which they continue to seek additional information is wider. Thirty-one percent of respondents said they would participate in an educational event. A 'one-on-one' interview approach and short written materials were the preferred sources of information. Our study examined potential content areas and preferred format for proposed educational events targeting patients and carers living with advanced cancer. We also highlighted the reasons for, and potential limitations of this approach. The investment of future effort in evaluating the impact of 1 on 1 interviews and 'short written materials' on the informational needs of patients and carers living with advanced cancer is warranted.