RESUMEN
Intracranial multimodal monitoring (iMMM) is increasingly used for neurocritical care. However, concerns arise regarding iMMM invasiveness considering limited evidence in its clinical significance and safety profile. We conducted a synthesis of evidence regarding complications associated with iMMM to delineate its safety profile. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021225951) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guidelines to retrieve evidence from studies reporting iMMM use in humans that mention related complications. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots. The primary outcomes were iMMM complications. The secondary outcomes were putative risk factors. Of the 366 screened articles, 60 met the initial criteria and were further assessed by full-text reading. We included 22 studies involving 1206 patients and 1434 iMMM placements. Most investigators used a bolt system (85.9%) and a three-lumen device (68.8%), mainly inserting iMMM into the most injured hemisphere (77.9%). A total of 54 postoperative intracranial hemorrhages (pooled rate of 4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-10%; I2 86%, p < 0.01 [random-effects model]) was reported, along with 46 misplacements (pooled rate of 6%; 95% CI 1-12%; I2 78%, p < 0.01) and 16 central nervous system infections (pooled rate of 0.43%; 95% CI 0-2%; I2 64%, p < 0.01). We found 6 system breakings, 18 intracranial bone fragments, and 5 cases of pneumocephalus. Currently, iMMM systems present a similar safety profile as intracranial devices commonly used in neurocritical care. Long-term outcomes of prospective studies will complete the benefit-risk assessment of iMMM in neurocritical care. Consensus-based reporting guidelines on iMMM use are needed to bolster future collaborative efforts.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intracranial multimodality monitoring (iMMM) is increasingly used in acute brain-injured patients; however, safety and reliability remain major concerns to its routine implementation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including all patients undergoing iMMM at a single European center between July 2016 and January 2020. Brain tissue oxygenation probe (PbtO2), alone or in combination with a microdialysis catheter and/or an 8-contact depth EEG electrode, was inserted using a triple-lumen bolt system and targeting normal-appearing at-risk brain area on the injured side, whenever possible. Surgical complications, adverse events, and technical malfunctions, directly associated with iMMM, were collected. A blinded imaging review was performed by an independent radiologist. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients with 123 iMMM insertions were included for a median monitoring time of 9 [3-14] days. Of those, 93 (76%) patients had only PbtO2 probe insertion and 30 (24%) had also microdialysis and/or iEEG monitoring. SAH was the most frequent indication for iMMM (n = 60, 53%). At least one complication was observed in 67/123 (54%) iMMM placement, corresponding to 58/113 (51%) patients. Misplacement was observed in 16/123 (13%), resulting in a total of 6/16 (38%) malfunctioning PbtO2 catheters. Intracranial hemorrhage was observed in 14 iMMM placements (11%), of which one required surgical drainage. Five placements were complicated by pneumocephalus and 4 with bone fragments; none of these requires additional surgery. No CNS infection related to iMMM was observed. Seven (6%) probes were accidentally dislodged and 2 probes (2%) were accidentally broken. Ten PbtO2 probes (8%) presented a technical malfunction after a median of 9 [ranges: 2-24] days after initiation of monitoring and 4 of them were replaced. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a high occurrence of complications related to iMMM was observed, although most of them did not require specific interventions and did not result in malfunctioning monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Oxígeno , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Synthetic MR provides qualitative and quantitative multi-parametric data about tissue properties in a single acquisition. Its use in stroke imaging is not yet established. We compared synthetic and conventional image quality and studied synthetic relaxometry of acute and chronic ischemic lesions to investigate its interest for stroke imaging. We prospectively acquired synthetic and conventional brain MR of 43 consecutive adult patients with suspected stroke. We studied a total of 136 lesions, of which 46 DWI-positive with restricted ADC (DWI + /rADC), 90 white matter T2/FLAIR hyperintensities (WMH) showing no diffusion restriction, and 430 normal brain regions (NBR). We assessed image quality for lesion definition according to a 3-level score by two readers of different experiences. We compared relaxometry of lesions and regions of interest. Synthetic images were superior to their paired conventional images for lesion definition except for sFLAIR (sT1 or sPSIR vs. cT1 and sT2 vs. cT2 for DWI + /rADC and WMH definition; p values < .001) with substantial to almost perfect inter-rater reliability (κ ranging from 0.711 to 0.932, p values < .001). We found significant differences in relaxometry between lesions and NBR and between acute and chronic lesions (T1, T2, and PD of DWI + /rADC or WMH vs. mirror NBR; p values < .001; T1 and PD of DWI + /rADC vs. WMH; p values of 0.034 and 0.008). Synthetic MR may contribute to stroke imaging by fast generating accessible weighted images for visual inspection derived from rapidly acquired relaxometry data. Moreover, this synthetic relaxometry could differentiate acute and chronic ischemic lesions.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/patologíaRESUMEN
Brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2)-guided therapy can improve the neurological outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. With several Phase-III ongoing studies, most of the existing evidence is based on before-after cohort studies and a phase-II randomized trial. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of PbtO2-guided therapy in a single-center cohort. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive severe TBI patients admitted to our center who received either intracranial pressure (ICP) guided therapy (from January 2012 to February 2016) or ICP/PbtO2-guided therapy (February 2017 to December 2019). A genetic matching was performed based on covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and severity scores on admission. Intracranial hypertension (IH) was defined as ICP > 20 mmHg for at least 5 min. Brain hypoxia (BH) was defined as PbtO2 < 20 mmHg for at least 10 min. IH and BH were targeted by specific interventions. Mann−Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess differences between groups. A total of 35 patients were matched in both groups: significant differences in the occurrence of IH (ICP 85.7% vs. ICP/PbtO2 45.7%, p < 0.01), ICU length of stay [6 (3−13) vs. 16 (9−25) days, p < 0.01] and Glasgow Coma Scale at ICU discharge [10 (5−14) vs. 13 (11−15), p = 0.036] were found. No significant differences in ICU mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scales at 3 months were observed. This study suggests that the role of ICP/PbtO2-guided therapy should await further confirmation in well-conducted large phase III studies.
RESUMEN
Brain hypoxia can occur after non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), even when levels of intracranial pressure (ICP) remain normal. Brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) can be measured as a part of a neurological multimodal neuromonitoring. Low PbtO2 has been associated with poor neurologic recovery. There is scarce data on the impact of PbtO2 guided-therapy on patients' outcome. This single-center cohort study (June 2014-March 2020) included all patients admitted to the ICU after SAH who required multimodal monitoring. Patients with imminent brain death were excluded. Our primary goal was to assess the impact of PbtO2-guided therapy on neurological outcome. Secondary outcome included the association of brain hypoxia with outcome. Of the 163 patients that underwent ICP monitoring, 62 were monitored with PbtO2 and 54 (87%) had at least one episode of brain hypoxia. In patients that required treatment based on neuromonitoring strategies, PbtO2-guided therapy (OR 0.33 [CI 95% 0.12-0.89]) compared to ICP-guided therapy had a protective effect on neurological outcome at 6 months. In this cohort of SAH patients, PbtO2-guided therapy might be associated with improved long-term neurological outcome, only when compared to ICP-guided therapy.