RESUMEN
During treatment, children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) gain fat mass and lose skeletal muscle mass. The great majority live in low- and middle-income countries with few studies of their body composition and none addressing the hypothesis that the disease itself contributes to nutritional morbidity. At diagnosis, children with ALL were compared to their siblings on socioeconomic status (SES). Nutritional status was assessed by mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)-for-age Z scores and body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Median SES scores for the patients (47.5) and their siblings (47.0) were very similar (P = 0.5). MUAC Z scores for patients aged >5 years were lower than for siblings (P < 0.001). On DXA siblings had a higher mean appendicular lean mass index Z score, a surrogate of skeletal muscle mass, than patients (P = 0.019). A logistic model to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of being severely/moderately under-nourished (classified by MUAC Z score) by SES revealed that, compared with siblings (n = 49), children with ALL (n = 60) had a higher probability of being under-nourished (OR 5.25, 95% CI 1.44-25.95, P = 0.02). The results support the hypothesis that children at diagnosis of ALL in Guatemala are more nutritionally depleted than their apparently healthy siblings.
Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón , Composición Corporal , Estado Nutricional , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Hermanos , Humanos , Guatemala , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Preescolar , Músculo EsqueléticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effective communication is founded on bidirectional participation from families and healthcare providers. In adult medicine, bidirectional communication promotes treatment adherence and builds the family-provider relationship. However, the relationship between communication styles in pediatrics remains poorly understood, particularly in culturally diverse settings. This study aims to investigate parent-provider communication dynamics and parental involvement during diagnostic cancer communication in Guatemala. PROCEDURE: This qualitative study included 20 families of children with cancer and 10 providers at Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica in Guatemala. Psychoeducation and diagnostic conversations between parents, psychologists, and oncologists were recorded and thematically analyzed using a priori and novel codes exploring communication behaviors, parental engagement, and interpersonal dynamics. RESULTS: Participating parents had children with various diagnoses. Only 15% of fathers and 5% of mothers reported education beyond primary school. Providers spoke 68% of words during psychoeducation and 85% of words during diagnosis conversations. Providers used supportive communication behaviors providing explanations, demonstrating verbal attentiveness, and soliciting questions and non-supportive behaviors including paternalistic talk. Parental participation was considered active when they asked questions, expressed hopes or concerns, or asserted their opinions, and non-active when participation was limited to brief responses to closed-ended questions. Supportive provider communication often encouraged active participation; non-supportive communication did not. Furthermore, active parental participation prompted supportive communication from providers, while non-active participation did not. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the bidirectional nature of effective communication, establishing that provider communication styles both influence and are influenced by parental participation, and emphasizing the importance of supportive provider communication for patient-centered care.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Neoplasias , Padres , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Guatemala , Adulto , Padres/psicología , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Oncología Médica , Personal de Salud/psicologíaRESUMEN
The TeLeo Program offers a free-access 2-year online learning program to support fellowship programs in pediatric oncology, enhance networking opportunities, and facilitate the exchange of context-specific, educational content within the pediatric oncology community in training in Latin America. In its first edition beginning in 2021, 185 fellows from 40 centers in 12 Latin American countries were enrolled. Additional courses for other healthcare professionals related to oncology in the region were produced to further support the program. A digital platform was created to allow users to easily access learning activities after registration, with 7075 professionals currently registered.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia , Oncología Médica , Pediatría , Humanos , América Latina , Oncología Médica/educación , Pediatría/educación , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Telemedicina , Becas , NiñoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In the absence of a standardized tool to assess the quality of pediatric hematology/oncology training programs, the Education Program Assessment Tool (EPAT) was conceptualized as a user-friendly and adaptable tool to evaluate and identify areas of opportunity, pinpoint needed modifications, and monitor progress for training programs around the world. METHODS: The development of EPAT consisted of three main phases: operationalization, consensus, and piloting. After each phase, the tool was iteratively modified based on feedback to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity. RESULTS: The operationalization process led to the development of 10 domains with associated assessment questions. The two-step consensus phase included an internal consensus phase to validate the domains and a subsequent external consensus phase to refine the domains and overall function of the tool. EPAT domains for programmatic evaluation are hospital infrastructure, patient care, education infrastructure, program basics, clinical exposure, theory, research, evaluation, educational culture, and graduate impact. EPAT was piloted in five training programs in five countries, representing diverse medical training and patient care contexts for proper validation of the tool. Face validity was confirmed by a correlation between the perceived and calculated scores for each domain (r = 0.78, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: EPAT was developed following a systematic approach, ultimately leading to a relevant tool to evaluate the different core elements of pediatric hematology/oncology training programs across the world. With EPAT, programs will have a tool to quantitatively evaluate their training, allowing for benchmarking with centers at the local, regional, and international level.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality cancer care depends on interdisciplinary communication. This study explored the communication practices of interdisciplinary clinicians, the types of healthcare services for which they engage in interdisciplinary collaboration, and the association between interdisciplinary care and perceived quality of care, as well as job satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a survey of interdisciplinary clinicians from cancer centers in Guatemala, Honduras, Panama, El Salvador, and Haiti. The survey included 68 items including previously validated tools and novel questions. RESULTS: Total 174 interdisciplinary clinicians completed the survey: nurses (n = 60), medical subspecialists (n = 35), oncologists (n = 22), psychosocial providers (n = 20), surgeons (n = 12), pathologists (n = 9), radiologists (n = 9), and radiation oncologists (n = 5). Oncologists reported daily communication with nurses (95%) and other oncologists (91%). While 90% of nurses reported daily communication with other nurses, only 66% reported daily communication with oncologists, and more than 50% of nurses reported never talking to pathologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, or surgeons. Most clinicians described interdisciplinary establishment of cancer treatment goals and prognosis (84%), patient preferences (81%), and determination of first treatment modality (80%). Clinicians who described more interdisciplinary collaboration had higher job satisfaction (p = .04) and perceived a higher level of overall quality of care (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians in these limited resource settings describe strong interdisciplinary collaboration contributing to higher job satisfaction and perceived quality of care. However, nurses in these settings reported more limited interdisciplinary communication and care. Additional studies are necessary to further define clinical roles on interdisciplinary care teams and their associations with patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Oncología Médica , Neoplasias , Niño , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Región del Caribe , América CentralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary teamwork supports high-quality cancer care and effective utilization of limited resources. This study purposed to examine the value, structure, process, and effectiveness of interdisciplinary care (IDC) among pediatric oncology providers in low-income and middle-income countries in Central America and the Caribbean. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was disseminated to pediatric oncology providers at 5 centers participating in the Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Association of Central America. The survey included previously validated items and novel questions assessing the value (importance), structure (multidisciplinary meeting attendance), process (team climate), and effectiveness (job satisfaction, quality of care and communication) of IDC. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 174 providers, including 22 oncologists, 9 pathologists, 9 radiologists, 5 radiation oncologists, 12 surgeons, 35 subspecialists, 60 nurses, 20 psychosocial providers, and 2 other staff. Participants agreed that IDC benefits team members (95%) and patients (96%). IDC structure and processes varied across the region. Multidisciplinary meeting attendance differed by center (P = .005) and discipline (P < .0001). Participants who frequently attended multidisciplinary meetings reported a more positive team climate (P = .0003). Team climate was positively associated with job satisfaction (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, team climate was predictive of an improved perception of communication between professionals (P < .0001), with families (P < .0001), and with patients (P = .0005), as well as with quality of the care environment (P = .006) and overall care quality (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all surveyed participants valued IDC, and the structure and processes supporting IDC varied by center. Associations between a collaborative professional climate, job satisfaction, and the perception of quality care encourage continued investigation and prioritization of IDC in these settings.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Oncólogos , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/terapia , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children. Characterized by high levels of Native American ancestry, Hispanics are disproportionally affected by this cancer with high incidence and inferior survival. However, the genetic basis for this disparity remains poorly understood because of a paucity of genome-wide investigation of ALL in Hispanics. Performing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 940 Hispanic children with ALL and 681 ancestry-matched non-ALL controls, we identified a novel susceptibility locus in the ERG gene (rs2836365; P = 3.76 × 10-8; odds ratio [OR] = 1.56), with independent validation (P = .01; OR = 1.43). Imputation analyses pointed to a single causal variant driving the association signal at this locus overlapping with putative regulatory DNA elements. The effect size of the ERG risk variant rose with increasing Native American genetic ancestry. The ERG risk genotype was underrepresented in ALL with the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion (P < .0005) but enriched in the TCF3-PBX1 subtype (P < .05). Interestingly, ALL cases with germline ERG risk alleles were significantly less likely to have somatic ERG deletion (P < .05). Our results provide novel insights into genetic predisposition to ALL and its contribution to racial disparity in this cancer.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Hispánicos o Latinos/genética , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/genética , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/clasificación , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/patología , Pronóstico , Regulador Transcripcional ERG/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized pediatric oncology patients are at high risk of clinical decline and mortality, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) assist with the early identification of deterioration. To the authors' knowledge, no studies to date have evaluated the cost-benefit of PEWS in LMICs. METHODS: A PEWS was implemented at the National Pediatric Oncology Unit (Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica [UNOP]), a pediatric oncology hospital in Guatemala, resulting in a reduction in unplanned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) transfers. Variable costs of maintaining the PICU and hospital floor were calculated for the year prior to and after the implementation of PEWS using administrative data. PEWS implementation costs were tabulated. The number of PICU inpatient days averted due to reduced unplanned PICU transfers after implementation was calculated, adjusting for changes in hospital inpatient days. Savings per inpatient day from unplanned PICU transfers were calculated. All costs were adjusted for inflation. RESULTS: There were 457 fewer PICU inpatient days due to unplanned transfers noted the year after implementation of PEWS, adjusting for changes in hospital volume. The variable costs of an unplanned PICU transfer versus a bed on the hospital floor was $806 per day. The total cost of implementing PEWS at UNOP was $13,644 ($7 per admission). Through reductions in variable PICU costs, UNOP saved a net $173 per admission ($354,514 annual net savings) after implementation of PEWS. The cost savings were sustained in a series of more conservative 1-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of PEWS at UNOP resulted in an incremental savings due to a reduction in the number of unplanned PICU transfers. The results of the current study demonstrate that hospital investment in PEWS can improve the quality of pediatric cancer care, optimize PICU use, and reduce costs.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud , Hospitales Pediátricos , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica/economía , Oncología Médica/métodos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Pediatric oncology patients hospitalized in resource-limited settings are at high risk for clinical deterioration resulting in mortality. Intermediate care units (IMCUs) provide a cost-effective alternative to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Inappropriate IMCU triage, however, can lead to poor outcomes and suboptimal resource utilization. In this study, we sought to characterize patients with clinical deterioration requiring unplanned transfer to the IMCU in a resource-limited pediatric oncology hospital. Patients requiring subsequent early PICU transfer had longer PICU length of stay. PEWS results prior to IMCU transfer were higher in patients requiring early PICU transfer, suggesting PEWS can aid in triage between IMCU and PICU care.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Neoplasias , Transferencia de Pacientes , Triaje/métodos , Algoritmos , Niño , Preescolar , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Guatemala , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized pediatric oncology patients are at high risk of clinical decline and mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings. Pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) aid in the early identification of clinical deterioration; however, there are limited data regarding their feasibility or impact in low-resource settings. This study describes the successful implementation of PEWS at the Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP), a pediatric oncology hospital in Guatemala, resulting in improved inpatient outcomes. METHODS: A modified PEWS was implemented at UNOP with systems to track errors, transfers to a higher level of care, and high scores. A retrospective cohort study was used to evaluate clinical deterioration events in the year before and after PEWS implementation. RESULTS: After PEWS implementation at UNOP, there was 100% compliance with PEWS documentation and an error rate of <10%. Implementation resulted in 5 high PEWS per week, with 30% of patients transferring to a higher level of care. Among patients requiring transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), 93% had an abnormal PEWS before transfer. The rate of clinical deterioration events decreased after PEWS implementation (9.3 vs 6.5 per 1000-hospitalpatient-days, p = .003). Despite an 18% increase in total hospital patient-days, PICU utilization for inpatient transfers decreased from 1376 to 1088 PICU patient-days per year (21% decrease; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the successful implementation of PEWS in a pediatric oncology hospital in Guatemala, resulting in decreased inpatient clinical deterioration events and PICU utilization. This work demonstrates that PEWS is a feasible and effective quality improvement measure to improve hospital care for children with cancer in hospitals with limited resources. Cancer 2017;123:2965-74. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Instituciones Oncológicas , Recursos en Salud , Hospitales Pediátricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Evaluación en Enfermería , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana , Femenino , Guatemala , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Neumonía/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/terapia , Signos VitalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric oncology patients are at high risk of clinical deterioration, particularly in hospitals with resource limitations. The performance of pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) to identify deterioration has not been assessed in these settings. This study evaluates the validity of PEWS to predict the need for unplanned transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) among pediatric oncology patients in a resource-limited hospital. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study comparing the highest documented and corrected PEWS score before unplanned PICU transfer in pediatric oncology patients (129 cases) with matched controls (those not requiring PICU care) was performed. RESULTS: Documented and corrected PEWS scores were found to be highly correlated with the need for PICU transfer (area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.940 and 0.930, respectively). PEWS scores increased 24 hours prior to unplanned transfer (P = .0006). In cases, organ dysfunction at the time of PICU admission correlated with maximum PEWS score (correlation coefficient, 0.26; P = .003), patients with PEWS results ≥4 had a higher Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) (P = .028), and PEWS results were higher in patients with septic shock (P = .01). The PICU mortality rate was 17.1%; nonsurvivors had higher mean PEWS scores before PICU transfer (P = .0009). A single-point increase in the PEWS score increased the odds of mechanical ventilation or vasopressors within the first 24 hours and during PICU admission (odds ratio 1.3-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: PEWS accurately predicted the need for unplanned PICU transfer in pediatric oncology patients in this resource-limited setting, with abnormal results beginning 24 hours before PICU admission and higher scores predicting the severity of illness at the time of PICU admission, need for PICU interventions, and mortality. These results demonstrate that PEWS aid in the identification of clinical deterioration in this high-risk population, regardless of a hospital's resource-level. Cancer 2017;123:4903-13. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud/economía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Guatemala , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Pediatría/economía , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment refusal and abandonment are major causes of treatment failure for children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), like Guatemala. This study identified risk factors for and described the intervention that decreased abandonment. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of Guatemalan children (0-18 years) with cancer treated at the Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP), 2001-2008, using the Pediatric Oncology Network Database. Treatment refusal was a failure to begin treatment and treatment abandonment was a lapse of 4 weeks or longer in treatment. The impact of medicina integral, a multidisciplinary psychosocial intervention team at UNOP was evaluated. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified the effect of demographic and clinical factors on abandonment. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the survival. RESULTS: Of 1,789 patients, 21% refused or abandoned treatment. Abandonment decreased from 27% in 2001 to 7% in 2008 following the implementation of medicina integral. Factors associated with increased risk of refusal and abandonment: greater distance to the centre (P < 0.001), younger age (P = 0.017) and earlier year of diagnosis (P < 0.001). Indigenous race/ethnicity (P = 0.002) was associated with increased risk of abandonment alone. Abandonment correlated with decreased overall survival: 0.57 ± 0.02 (survival ± standard error) for those who completed therapy versus 0.06 ± 0.02 for those who abandoned treatment (P < 0.001) at 8.3 years. CONCLUSION: This study identified distance, age, year of diagnosis and indigenous race/ethnicity as risk factors for abandonment. A multidisciplinary intervention reduced abandonment and can be replicated in other LMICs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Negativa al Tratamiento , Adolescente , Cuidados Posteriores , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Guatemala/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children of Hispanic ancestry have a higher incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) compared with other ethnic groups, but to the authors' knowledge, the genetic basis for these racial disparities remain incompletely understood. Genome-wide association studies of childhood ALL to date have focused on inherited genetic effects; however, maternal genetic effects (the role of the maternal genotype on phenotype development in the offspring) also may play a role in ALL susceptibility. METHODS: The authors conducted a family-based exome-wide association study of maternal genetic effects among Hispanics with childhood B-cell ALL using the Illumina Infinium HumanExome BeadChip. A discovery cohort of 312 Guatemalan and Hispanic American families and an independent replication cohort of 152 Hispanic American families were used. RESULTS: Three maternal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) approached the study threshold for significance after correction for multiple testing (P<1.0 × 10-6 ): MTL5 rs12365708 (testis expressed metallothionein-like protein [tesmin]) (relative risk [RR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.61-4.27 [P = 1.8 × 10-5 ]); ALKBH1 rs6494 (AlkB homolog 1, histone H2A dioxygenase) (RR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.84-7.74 [P = 3.7 × 10-5 ]); and NEUROG3 rs4536103 (neurogenin 3) (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.30-2.37 [P = 1.2 × 10-4 ]). Although effect sizes were similar, these SNPs were not nominally significant in the replication cohort in the current study. In a meta-analysis comprised of the discovery cohort and the replication cohort, these SNPs were still not found to be statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons (rs12365708: pooled RR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.48-3.50], P = 1.99 × 10-4 ; rs6494: pooled RR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.38-3.85], P = .001; and rs4536103: pooled RR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.29-2.16] P = 9.23 × 10-5 ). CONCLUSIONS: In what to the authors' knowledge is the first family-based based exome-wide association study to investigate maternal genotype effects associated with childhood ALL, the results did not implicate a strong role of maternal genotype on disease risk among Hispanics; however, 3 maternal SNPs were identified that may play a modest role in susceptibility. Cancer 2016;122:3697-704. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B/patología , Exoma/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Hispánicos o Latinos/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo/métodos , Genotipo , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Fenotipo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The delivery of effective treatment for pediatric solid tumors poses a particular challenge to centers in middle-income countries (MICs) that already are vigorously addressing pediatric cancer. The objective of this study was to improve the current understanding of barriers to effective treatment of pediatric solid tumors in MICs. METHODS: An ecologic model centered on pediatric sarcoma and expanded to country as the environment was used as a benchmark for studying the delivery of solid tumor care in MICs. Data on resources were gathered from 7 centers that were members of the Central American Association of Pediatric Hematologists and Oncologists (AHOPCA) using an infrastructure assessment tool. Pediatric sarcoma outcomes data were available, were retrieved from hospital-based cancer registries for 6 of the 7 centers, and were analyzed by country. Patients who were diagnosed from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2009 with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and other soft tissue sarcomas were included in the analysis. To explore correlations between resources and outcomes, a pilot performance index was created. RESULTS: The analyses identified specific deficits in human resources, communication, quality, and infrastructure. The treatment abandonment rate, the proportion of metastatic disease at diagnosis, the relapse rate, and the 4-year abandonment-sensitive overall survival (AOS) rate varied considerably by country, ranging from 1% to 38%, from 15% to 54%, from 24% to 52%, and from 21% to 51%, respectively. The treatment abandonment rate correlated inversely with health economic expenditure per capita (r = -0.86; P = .03) and life expectancy at birth (r = -0.93; P = .007). The 4-year AOS rate correlated inversely with the mortality rate among children aged <5 years (r = -0.80; P = 0.05) and correlated directly with the pilot performance index (r = 0.98; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to improve the effectiveness of treatment for pediatric solid tumors in MICs are warranted, particularly for pediatric sarcomas. Building capacity and infrastructure, improving supportive care and communication, and fostering comprehensive, multidisciplinary teams are identified as keystones in Central America. A measure that meaningfully describes performance in delivering pediatric cancer care is feasible and needed to advance comparative, prospective analysis of pediatric cancer care and to define resource clusters internationally.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Sarcoma/economía , Sarcoma/terapia , Adolescente , América Central , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Sistema de Registros , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Factores Socioeconómicos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Bridging the survival gap for children with cancer, between those (the great majority) in low and middle income countries (LMIC) and their economically advantaged counterparts, is a challenge that has been addressed by twinning institutions in high income countries with centers in LMIC. The long-established partnership between a Central American consortium--Asociación de Hemato-Oncología Pediátrica de Centro América (AHOPCA)--and institutions in Europe and North America provides a striking example of such a twinning program. The demonstrable success of this endeavor offers a model for improving the health outcomes of children with cancer worldwide. As this remarkable enterprise celebrates its 15th anniversary, it is appropriate to reflect on its origin, subsequent growth and development, and the lessons it provides for others embarking on or already engaged in similar journeys. Many challenges have been encountered and not all yet overcome. Commitment to the endeavor, collaboration in its achievements and determination to overcome obstacles collectively are the hallmarks that stamp AHOPCA as a particularly successful partnership in advancing pediatric oncology in the developing world.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Cooperación Internacional , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Pediatría/organización & administración , América Central , Niño , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMEN
Explanatory models (EMs) are used in medical anthropology to characterize individual understandings of illness. This study investigated how interdisciplinary clinical interactions elicited caregiver EMs at a pediatric cancer center in Guatemala. This qualitative study included caregivers of 20 children with newly diagnosed cancer at Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP) in Guatemala City, Guatemala. UNOP's diagnostic process includes social work intake, psychoeducation with a psychologist, and a diagnostic conversation with an oncologist and psychologist. Audio-recordings from the diagnostic process and a semi-structured interview were obtained, transcribed, and translated from Spanish. Transcripts were coded using a priori codes based on the five explanatory model (EM) components (occurrence, causation, pathophysiology, course of sickness, and treatment), as well as disease, and illness accounts. Thematic content analysis explored the EM framework as applied to diagnostic interactions between families and clinicians. All five components of the EM were addressed during the diagnostic process at UNOP. Clinicians, particularly psychologists, initiated conversation about the EM more than caregivers. When prompted, caregivers discussed all aspects of the EM but only rarely mentioned pathophysiology. Disease accounts were primarily described by clinicians, while caregivers used illness accounts to describe cancer causation. Clinicians validated existence of both disease and illness accounts. UNOP's interdisciplinary team elicited families' beliefs and facilitated in-depth discussion of all aspects of the EM, leading to a shared understanding of cancer and its treatment. Utilizing the EM framework in clinical practice may support culturally-competent pediatric cancer care.
RESUMEN
Children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about how adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer were affected. Sixty-seven physicians and nonphysician providers were interviewed about their experiences caring for AYAs with cancer in Latin America. Quotes related to the COVID-19 pandemic were identified and grouped into themes. Barriers from the COVID-19 pandemic included limited space, restrictions on travel, reduced funding, limited staff, limited services, and changes to treatment. However, improvements to care that arose from the COVID-19 pandemic included better access to distance learning and telemedicine.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adolescente , América Latina/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Neoplasias/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in adolescents and young adults (AYA) worldwide. Although successful treatment of cancer in AYA has increased in recent years in most of the world, this is not true for many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where over 80% of all AYA live. This study investigated the needs of AYA with cancer in parts of Latin America (LATAM) through the perspectives of non-physician health care providers and partners. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (in Spanish) were conducted with non-physician partners from Mexico, Peru, Central America, and the Caribbean over Zoom. Participants were recruited through previously identified local physicians and international non-physician professionals working in these countries. Transcripts were coded and key themes identified until thematic saturation was reached (Atlas.ti). FINDINGS: Thirty participants representing eight countries were interviewed, providing 1202 min of transcript data. Data were organized into barriers, facilitators, and strategies to improve the delivery of health care for AYA with cancer in LATAM at the patient- (e.g., financial barriers, continued schooling), parent- (e.g., limited medical literacy, advocacy), and hospital-level (e.g., structural barriers, increasing funding). INTERPRETATION: There are many similarities in the barriers and facilitators to AYA care between LATAM and high-income countries (HIC); however, some characteristics are more unique to LATAM, for example, strict age restrictions for pediatric care and abandonment of therapy. As LATAM countries continue to build cancer control programs, there is an opportunity to consider our identified barriers, facilitators, and strategies to address the unique needs of AYA with cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , América Latina , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Adulto , Personal de Salud/psicología , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe and assess the regional experience of a pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship program based in Guatemala. METHODS: The Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP) in Guatemala City, Guatemala, is the only hospital in Central America dedicated exclusively to childhood and adolescent cancer. To address the regional need for specialists, a fellowship program in pediatric hematology/oncology was launched in 2003. The UNOP fellowship program comprises 3 years of training. Although the program is based at UNOP, it also includes rotations locally and internationally to enhance clinical exposure. The curriculum is based on international standards to cover clinical expertise, research, professionalism, communication, and health advocacy. Trainees are selected according to country or facility-level need for pediatric hematologists/oncologists, with a plan for them to be hired immediately after completing their training. RESULTS: Forty physicians from 10 countries in Latin America have completed training. In addition, there are currently 13 fellows from five countries in training. Of the graduates, 39 (98%) are now practicing in pediatric hematology/oncology in Latin America. Moreover, many of them have leadership positions within their institutions and participate in research, advocacy, and policy making. Graduates from the UNOP program contribute to institutions by providing care for an increasing number of patients with pediatric cancer. The UNOP program is the first pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship program in the world to be accredited by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International, an international body accrediting clinical training programs. CONCLUSION: The UNOP program has trained specialists to increase the available care for children with cancer in Latin America. This regional approach to specialist training can maximize resources and serve as a model for other programs and regions.
Asunto(s)
Becas , Hematología , Oncología Médica , Pediatría , Humanos , Guatemala , Hematología/educación , Becas/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/educación , Pediatría/educación , Niño , Adolescente , Neoplasias , FemeninoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thiopurines such as mercaptopurine (MP) are widely used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Thiopurine-S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and Nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) inactivate thiopurines, and no-function variants are associated with drug-induced myelosuppression. Dose adjustment of MP is strongly recommended in patients with intermediate or complete loss of activity of TPMT and NUDT15. However, the extent of dosage reduction recommended for patients with intermediate activity in both enzymes is currently not clear. METHODS: MP dosages during maintenance were collected from 1768 patients with ALL in Singapore, Guatemala, India, and North America. Patients were genotyped for TPMT and NUDT15, and actionable variants defined by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium were used to classify patients as TPMT and NUDT15 normal metabolizers (TPMT/NUDT15 NM), TPMT or NUDT15 intermediate metabolizers (TPMT IM or NUDT15 IM), or TPMT and NUDT15 compound intermediate metabolizers (TPMT/NUDT15 IM/IM). In parallel, we evaluated MP toxicity, metabolism, and dose adjustment using a Tpmt/Nudt15 combined heterozygous mouse model (Tpmt+/-/Nudt15+/-). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (1.2%) were TPMT/NUDT15 IM/IM in the cohort, with the majority self-reported as Hispanics (68.2%, 15/22). TPMT/NUDT15 IM/IM patients tolerated a median daily MP dose of 25.7 mg/m2 (interquartile range = 19.0-31.1 mg/m2), significantly lower than TPMT IM and NUDT15 IM dosage (P < .001). Similarly, Tpmt+/-/Nudt15+/- mice displayed excessive hematopoietic toxicity and accumulated more metabolite (DNA-TG) than wild-type or single heterozygous mice, which was effectively mitigated by a genotype-guided dose titration of MP. CONCLUSION: We recommend more substantial dose reductions to individualize MP therapy and mitigate toxicity in TPMT/NUDT15 IM/IM patients.