Platelet function testing: Current practice among clinical centres in Northern Europe.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet function tests are used to screen and diagnose patients with possible inherited platelet function defects (IPFD). Some acquired platelet dysfunction may be caused by certain drugs or comorbidities, which need to be excluded before testing. AIMS: To identify current practice among centres performing platelet function tests in Northern Europe. METHODS: A total of 14 clinical centres from Sweden (six), Finland (two), Denmark (two), Norway (one), Estonia (two) and Iceland (one) completed the survey questionnaire, the population capture area of about 29.5 million. RESULTS: Six of the 14 (42.8%) centres providing platelet function assessment represent comprehensive treatment centres (EUHANET status). A Bleeding score (BS) or ISTH bleeding assessment tool (ISTH BAT score) is evaluated in 11/14 (78.6%) centres and family history in all. Five/14 centres (35.7%) use structured preanalytical patient instructions, and 10/14 (71.4%) recorded questionnaire on the preassessment of avoidance of any drugs or natural products affecting platelet functions. Preliminary investigations of screening tests of coagulation are performed in 10/14 (71.4%), while in 4/14 (28.6%), the diagnostic work-up of IPFD and von Willebrand disease (VWD) is performed simultaneously. The work-up of IPFD includes peripheral blood smear in 10/14 (71.4%), platelet aggregometry in all, flow cytometry in 10/14 (71.4%) and Platelet Function Analysis (PFA) in 3/11 (28.6%). Molecular genetic diagnosis is available in 7/14 (50%) centres. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable variability in the current practice illustrates the need for harmonization between the Northern European centres according to the international registers (i.e. EUHASS) and IPFD guidelines (ISTH, EHA).

Substantial prevalence of subclinical cardiovascular diseases in patients with hemophilia A evaluated by advanced electrocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemophilia A (PWHA) have reportedly lower mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. AIM: To evaluate signs of CVD in asymptomatic PWHA using advanced electrocardiography (A-ECG). METHODS: PWHA (n = 29, median [interquartile range] age 57 [47-70] years) and age-matched male controls (n = 29, 59 [48-68] years) were evaluated. Digital resting 12­lead ECGs were retrospectively analysed using both conventional and A-ECG techniques including derived vectorcardiography and waveform complexity. Previously validated multivariate A-ECG scores designed to detect: 1) cardiac disease in general, 2) left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), 3) coronary artery disease or coronary microvascular disease (CAD/CMVD), or 4) left ventricular hypertrophy defined as left ventricular electrical remodelling (LVH/LVER), were quantified and compared between PWHA and controls. RESULTS: Compared to controls, PWHA had a higher probability of having cardiac disease (median [interquartile range] 84.6 [32.5-99.5] vs. 0.6 [0.2-8.2]%), LVSD (4.1 [1.3-12.9] vs. 0.9 [0.5-3.2]%), CAD/CMVD (84.3 [35.6-96.6] vs. 6.7 [0.8-24.4]%), and LVH/LVER (17 [5/29] vs. 0 [0/29]%). Compared to patients with non-severe HA (n = 20), patients with severe HA (n = 9) showed a non-significant trend towards lower probability of cardiac disease, CAD/CMVD, LVSD and LVH/LVER. CONCLUSION: In PWHA, A-ECG exhibits changes more indicative of overt or subclinical CVD compared to controls, and there is a tendency for lower scores for CVD in patients with severe compared to non-severe HA. These results suggest that PWHA ≥ 40 years could be at higher risk for CVD than age-matched controls and that A-ECG could potentially be used for early detection.

Global Hemostatic Methods to Tailor Treatment With Bypassing Agents in Hemophilia A With Inhibitors- A Single-Center, Pilot Study.

For patients with hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors treated with bypassing agents there are no reliable methods to assess treatment effect. We investigated the utility of global hemostatic methods in assessing treatment with bypassing agents (rFVIIa or activated prothrombin complex [aPCC]). All patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors followed at the Coagulation Unit or the Pediatric Coagulation Unit at Karolinska University Hospital aged 6 years and above were eligible for this noninterventional study. Baseline plasma samples were spiked with bypassing agents in increasing concentrations (aPCC 50 U/kg, 100 U/kg, 150 U/kg, and rFVIIa 90 µg/kg and 270 µg/kg) in vitro. For patients treated with factor concentrates or bypassing agents follow-up samples were collected (in vivo tests). The samples were analyzed using overall hemostatic potential (OHP), and calibrated automated thrombogram, Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT). Nine patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors were included. Spiking with rFVIIa normalized the coagulation potential in 6/8 samples, in 3 only with high dose. Only one sample did not improve adequately after spiking with aPCC. The improvement in hemostasis was reliably shown by both CAT and OHP. The baseline potential was, however, more often measurable by OHP compared to CAT. Factor concentrate had been administered to 5 patients normalizing the hemostatic potential in vivo in 2 (without spiking). The hemostatic improvement induced by spiking with rFVIIa or aPCC is shown by OHP and CAT, but the results have to be evaluated in larger cohorts.

Evaluation of coagulation assays versus LC-MS/MS for determinations of dabigatran concentrations in plasma.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor for which routine laboratory monitoring is currently not recommended. However, there are situations in which measurements of the drug and its effect are desirable. We therefore compared and validated different coagulation methods for assessments of dabigatran in clinical samples in relation to measurements of plasma dabigatran, without the purpose of establishing effective and safe concentrations of dabigatran in plasma. METHODS: Samples were obtained from 70 atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran etexilate. Plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and were compared with coagulation methods Hemoclot thrombin inhibitors (HTI) and Ecarin clotting assay (ECA), as well as with prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). RESULTS: A wide range of dabigatran concentrations was determined by LC-MS/MS (<0.5-586 ng/mL). Correlations between LC-MS/MS results and estimated concentrations were excellent for both HTI and ECA overall (r(2) = 0.97 and 0.96 respectively, p < 0.0001), but the precision and variability of these assays were not fully satisfactory in the low range of dabigatran plasma concentrations, in which ECA performed better than HTI. aPTT performed poorly, and was normal (<40 s) even with dabigatran levels of 60 ng/mL. PT-INR was normal even at supratherapeutic dabigatran concentrations. CONCLUSION: LC-MS/MS is the gold standard for measurements of dabigatran in plasma. Alternatively, either HTI or ECA assays may be used, but neither of these assays is dependable when monitoring low levels or to infer total absence of dabigatran. The aPTT assay is relatively insensitive to dabigatran, and normal aPTT results may be observed even with therapeutic dabigatran concentrations.

Biological Variation in Rotational Thromboelastometry in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Rivaroxaban.

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic hemostasis test used primarily in the management of bleeding after trauma or in cardiac surgery. To allow safe and valid clinical interpretation of test results, objective specifications for analytical performance are needed, which are generally based on biological variation within (CVI) and between (CVG) individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate biological variation in ROTEM in patients receiving rivaroxaban. Sixty patients with atrial fibrillation on stable rivaroxaban therapy were included, from whom blood was collected on six occasions: three times at trough and three at peak rivaroxaban concentrations. ROTEM® Extem and LowTF were measured as well as rivaroxaban concentration, PT, APTT, and anti-Xa. Within- (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) biological estimates were calculated. Knowledge of these biological variation components will help to establish the appropriate objective analytical performance specifications for ROTEM analysis.

Practical viewpoints on the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT, type II) is an immune-mediated disorder due to antibodies formed against heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes, usually appearing at days 5 to 14 after initiation of heparin. It is important to recognize HIT because heparin prophylaxis or treatment paradoxically associates with new venous and/or arterial thrombosis. Early clinical suspicion and diagnosis together with proper pharmacotherapy and close laboratory monitoring are the cornerstones for successful management. This includes monitoring of Thrombocytopenia, its Timing to heparin administration, appearance of new Thrombosis or resistance to treatment, and differential diagnosis by exclusion of o Ther causes (the 4T's). Specific attention should be paid to the absence or presence of thrombosis and to tailoring thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulant therapy with a nonheparin alternative. Even in the absence of HIT-associated thrombosis, an active policy for prolonged thromboprophylaxis is demanded. Rapid and reliable assays should be developed for diagnosis and anticoagulation monitoring to secure safe management with nonheparins. Semiquantitative testing for on-call hours should be available and later confirmed as clinically needed. Alternative therapeutic options are available, but because their use is infrequent, experienced coagulation treatment centers should provide guidance in the treatment and in laboratory monitoring. Most of the evidence in HIT is grade IC, and thus the best evidence is provided by clinical experience. New anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors may offer future alternatives in the management of HIT, but the current treatment options provide the best experience and benefit. The joint clinical and laboratory guidelines provided in this article along with two practical case scenarios were prepared by a Nordic expert panel. They will be valuable for hematologists and colleagues who do not routinely encounter HIT.

The in vitro addition of idarucizumab to plasma samples from patients increases thrombin generation.

Dabigatran interferes with many coagulation tests. To overcome this obstacle the use of idarucizumab as an in vitro antidote to dabigatran has been proposed. The aim of this study was to test the effect of idarucizumab as an in vitro antidote to dabigatran in ex vivo plasma samples from routine clinical patients examined by a thrombin generation assay (TGA). From 44 patients with atrial fibrillation five blood samples were collected. Thrombin generation was measured in all samples before and after the addition of idarucizumab. When idarucizumab was added to baseline plasma (no dabigatran), it caused a significantly shorter Lag Time and Time to Peak Thrombin, and a higher Peak Thrombin and Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) of TGA. Similar results were obtained when idarucizumab was added to dabigatran-containing plasma, with TGA parameters comparable to baseline + idarucizumab plasma, but not to baseline plasma. In summary, our study showed that in vitro addition of idarucizumab to plasma samples from patients increases thrombin generation. The use of idarucizumab to neutralize dabigatran in patient plasma samples as well as the clinical relevance of in vitro increased thrombin generation induced by idarucizumab needs further investigation.

Overall hemostasis potential and aPTT-clot waveform analysis as powerful laboratory diagnostic tools for identification of hemophilia A patients with unexpected bleeding phenotype.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally used laboratory methods do not always accurately reflect bleeding severity in hemophilia A (HA) patients. The ability of three global assays for identifying patients with unexpected bleeding phenotype was investigated. METHODS: Overall hemostasis potential (OHP), aPTT-clot waveform analysis (aPTT-CWA), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), FVIII activities, and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 concentrations were measured in 62 HA patients (30 severe and 32 non-severe) and 27 male controls. Bleeding phenotype was determined using our proposed scoring system including age at first joint bleed, number of target joints, and number of joint/muscle bleeds per year. Bleeding score ≤ 4 defined patients with mild bleeding phenotype (N = 27); score ≥ 5 defined severe bleeding phenotype (N = 35). RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic analysis performed for distinguishing patients with severe and mild bleeding phenotype yielded following values of area under the curve: 0.910 (FVIII); 0.891 (aPTT-CWA parameter DELTA); 0.769 (OHP); and 0.634 (ETP). Unexpected bleeding phenotype was identified in 11/62 HA patients: 8/32 (25%) non-severe HA patients had severe, while 3/30 (10%) severe HA patients had mild bleeding phenotype, and global assays enabled the identification of all these patients. OHP and DELTA were revealed as the most reliable parameters for bleeding phenotype determination (10/11 and 9/11 unexpected results, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes OHP and aPTT-CWA as a powerful laboratory diagnostic tool in identifying HA patients with unexpected bleeding presentations, with the best results achieved by combining both assays. Global assays should not completely replace FVIII activity measurement but should be a part of the HA diagnostic algorithm.

Predictive Ability of a Clinical-Genetic Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism in Northern and Southern European Populations.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complex, multifactorial problem, the development of which depends on a combination of genetic and acqfiguired risk factors. In a Spanish population, the Thrombo inCode score (or TiC score), which combines clinical and genetic risk components, was recently proven better at determining the risk of VTE than the commonly used model involving the analysis of two genetic variants associated with thrombophilia: the Factor V Leiden (F5 rs6025) and the G20210A prothrombin (F2 rs1799963). The aim of the present case-control study was to validate the VTE risk predictive capacity of the TiC score in a Northern European population (from Sweden). The study included 173 subjects with VTE and 196 controls. All were analyzed for the genetic risk variants included in the TiC gene panel. Standard measures -receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio (OR)-were calculated. The TiC score returned an AUC value of 0.673, a sensitivity of 72.25%, a specificity of 60.62%, and an OR of 4.11. These AUC, sensitivity, and OR values are all greater than those associated with the currently used combination of genetic variants. A TiC version adjusted for the allelic frequencies of the Swedish population significantly improved its AUC value (0.783). In summary, the TiC score returned more reliable risk estimates for the studied Northern European population than did the analysis of the Factor V Leiden and the G20210A genetic variations in combination. Thus, the TiC score can be reliably used with European populations, despite differences in allelic frequencies.

Genetics and Hemostatic Potential in Persons with Mild to Moderate Hemophilia A with a Discrepancy between One-Stage and Chromogenic FVIII Assays.

BACKGROUND: Factor VIII (FVIII) activity (FVIII:C) can be measured by different methods including one-stage clotting assays (OSAs) and chromogenic assays (CSAs). Discrepancy between FVIII:C assays is known and associated with genetic variations causing mild and moderate hemophilia A (HA). We aimed to study the discrepancy phenomenon and to identify associated genetic alterations. Further, we investigated if hemostatic global assays could discriminate the group with discrepant FVIII:C from them. METHODS: The study contained plasma samples from 45 patients with HA (PwHA) from Hemophilia Centers in Stockholm, Sweden, and Belgrade, Serbia. We measured FVIII:C with OSA and CSA, sequenced the F8 gene, and performed two global hemostatic assays; endogenous thrombin potential and overall hemostatic potential. RESULTS: Nineteen of 45 PwHA had a more than twofold higher FVIII:C using OSA compared to CSA and were considered discrepant. Thirty-four causal mutations were detected, where of five had not previously been associated with assay discrepancy. These novel mutations were p.Tyr25Cys, p.Phe698Leu, p.Met699Leu, p.Ile1698Thr, and Ala2070Val. We found no difference between discrepant and nondiscrepant cases with either of the global assays. CONCLUSION: There was a discrepancy between FVIII:C assays in almost half of the PwHA, which for some could lead to missed HA diagnoses or misclassification of severity. Genotyping confirmed that mutations associated with FVIII:C discrepancy cluster in the A domains of F8, and five mutations not previously associated with FVIII:C discrepancy was identified. Global hemostatic assays did not contribute to distinguish assay discrepancy in PwHA.

Diagnostic Accuracy in Acute Venous Thromboembolism: Comparing D-Dimer, Thrombin Generation, Overall Hemostatic Potential, and Fibrin Monomers.

Introduction For acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), a biomarker with higher specificity than D-dimer would be of great clinical use. Thrombin generation and overall hemostatic potential (OHP) reflect the hemostatic balance by globally assessing multiple coagulation factors and inhibitors. These tests discriminate between healthy controls and patients with a prothrombotic tendency but have yet to be established as clinical biomarkers of VTE. Objective This study compares endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and OHP to D-dimer and fibrin monomers (FM) in outpatients with suspected VTE. Methods A cross-sectional diagnostic study where 954 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis were recruited consecutively from the medical emergency department at Karolinska University Hospital. D-dimer, FM, OHP, and ETP were analyzed in a subpopulation of 60 patients with VTE and 98 matched controls without VTE. VTE was verified either by ultrasonography or computed tomography and clinical data were collected from medical records. Results Compared with healthy controls, both VTE and non-VTE patients displayed prothrombotic profiles in OHP and ETP. D-dimer, FM, ETP area under the curve (AUC), and ETP T lag were significantly different between patients with VTE and non-VTE. The largest receiver-operating characteristic AUCs for discrimination between VTE and non-VTE, were found in D-dimer with 0.94, FM 0.77, and ETP AUC 0.65. No useful cutoff could be identified for the ETP or the OHP assay. Conclusion Compared with D-dimer, neither ETP nor OHP were clinically viable biomarkers of acute venous thrombosis. The data indicated that a large portion of the emergency patients with suspected VTE were in a prothrombotic state.

Effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran on global hemostasis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

: The study was aimed to evaluate the effects of two standard doses of rivaroxaban and dabigatran on global hemostatic assays in patients with atrial fibrillation. The study included 52 patients treated with rivaroxaban (15/20 mg), 50 on dabigatran (110/150 mg) and 20 healthy individuals. Platelet-poor plasma was used for determination of three global hemostatic assays, namely endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) and overall hemostasis potential (OHP). Rivaroxaban and dabigatran reduced ETP (P < 0.01) although OHP (P < 0.05) was diminished only by dabigatran. Strong correlations were noticed between ETP parameters and the plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban (ETP, r = -0.51; c-max, r = -0.85; t-lag, r = 0.83; t-max, r = 0.66) as well as with plasma concentration of dabigatran (ETP, r = -0.75; c-max, r = -0.74; t-lag, r = 0.73; t-max, r = 0.52). Analysis of dabigatran concentrations under 50 ng/ml showed that ETP parameter has area under the concentration-time curve-receiver operating characteristic value of 0.879 (95% confidence interval 0.776-0.980). Dabigatran treatment paradoxically increased area under the concentration-time curve and peak values although rivaroxaban decreased peak values (P < 0.01). However, significant correlation between CAT parameters and plasma concentration of both direct oral anticoagulants was not observed. We confirmed that the CAT assay is inappropriate for estimation of dabigatran effects and is not fully sensitive as regards rivaroxaban. The ETP assay can potentially be the appropriate method for estimation of global hemostatic capacity as regards both direct oral anticoagulants. The role of OHP needs to be confirmed in additional studies. ETP parameter of chromogenic assay has promising potential in exclusion of high plasma concentrations of dabigatran.

Phosphatidylserine positive microparticles improve hemostasis in in-vitro hemophilia A plasma models.

Circulating microparticles (MPs) are procoagulant due to the surface containing phosphatidylserine (PS), which facilitates coagulation. We investigated if MPs improve hemostasis in HA plasma models. MPs isolated from pooled normal human plasma were added to severe, moderate and mild HA plasma models (0%, 2.5%, 20% FVIII). The MPs' effect on hemostasis was evaluated by calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) and overall hemostasis potential (OHP) assays, while fibrin structure was imaged by standard confocal, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MPs partially restored thrombin generation and fibrin formation in all HA plasma models. The procoagulant effect of MPs requires PS exposure, to a less extent of contact pathway activation, but not tissue factor exposure or in vitro stimulation of MPs. MPs partially normalized the fibrin structure, and using super-resolution STED, MPs attached to fibrin were clearly resolved. In summary, our results demonstrate that PS positive MPs could improve hemostasis in HA plasma models.

Comparison of two immunochemical assays for measuring thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor concentration with a functional assay in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

TAFI was measured as relative activity concentration (Pefakit) and antigen concentration (Haemochrom and Asserachrom) both acutely and during convalescence in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome, and in a group of healthy controls. There was a rather weak but significant correlation between the activity and antigen concentrations. The results obtained by the Haemochrom method, assumed to measure the concentrations of all forms of TAFI, were lower than those by the Asserachrom method although the latter is assumed to only measure the pro-TAFI concentration. Both immunoassays gave lower results than the functional method (Pefakit). The patients in the convalescence phase showed a higher activity concentration than the healthy controls. The Asserachrom showed a higher concentration in the acute and convalescence phases of the patients compared to the controls, whereas the Haemochrom did not show any such difference. This could be related to different species of the TAFI molecule and thus different reactivity to the antibodies. Therefore the optimal choice of assay for determination of TAFI in different clinical studies is of importance. The Pefakit and Asserachrom seem to be appropriate candidates.

Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but serious immune-mediated complication of heparin treatment. HIT is characterized by an acute, transient prothrombotic state combined with thrombocytopenia and is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that bind to complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4. The diagnosis of HIT relies on clinical presentation and the demonstration of HIT antibodies. One approach to improve the efficacy of laboratory analysis is to use a diagnostic algorithm. AIM: To evaluate one diagnostic algorithm for HIT where the 4 T's clinical risk score is combined with immunochemical and/or functional assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The quality of the diagnostic algorithm was retrospectively evaluated in 101 patients with suspected HIT. Laboratory results obtained from the diagnostic algorithm were compared to Heparin-Induced Platelet Aggregation (HIPA) and clinico-pathological evaluation of patients' medical records. RESULTS: We found that the algorithm had a diagnostic efficacy of 94%, with specificity of 94% and sensitivity 94%. Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 16.0, and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 15.5. The efficacy of PaGIA (n=95) was 0.46, and IgG-specific HPF4-abELISA (n=54) was 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic algorithm for HIT is sufficiently accurate and leads to in overall faster results and decreased cost of analysis. The weakest link of the algorithm is the risk of miscalculated 4T's scores, which is inevitably exacerbated by the insufficient experience most clinicians have with HIT. This highlights the importance of clear instructions from the laboratory and coagulation clinic.

Correlation to FVIII:C in Two Thrombin Generation Tests: TGA-CAT and INNOVANCE ETP.

INTRODUCTION: Several thrombin-generation tests are available, but few have been directly compared. Our primary aim was to investigate the correlation of two thrombin generation tests, thrombin generation assay-calibrated automated thrombogram (TGA-CAT) and INNOVANCE ETP, to factor VIII levels (FVIII:C) in a group of patients with hemophilia A. The secondary aim was to investigate inter-laboratory variation for the TGA-CAT method. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 45 patients with mild, moderate and severe hemophilia A. The TGA-CAT method was performed at both centers while the INNOVANCE ETP was only performed at the Stockholm center. Correlation between parameters was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation test. For determination of the TGA-CAT inter-laboratory variability, Bland-Altman plots were used. RESULTS: The correlation for the INNOVANCE ETP and TGA-CAT methods with FVIII:C in persons with hemophilia (PWH) was r=0.701 and r=0.734 respectively.The correlation between the two methods was r=0.546.When dividing the study material into disease severity groups (mild, moderate and severe) based on FVIII levels, both methods fail to discriminate between them.The variability of the TGA-CAT results performed at the two centers was reduced after normalization; before normalization, 29% of values showed less than ±10% difference while after normalization the number increased to 41%. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods correlate in an equal manner to FVIII:C in PWH but show a poor correlation with each other. The level of agreement for the TGA-CAT method was poor though slightly improved after normalization of data. Further improvement of standardization of these methods is warranted.

Diluted thrombin time reliably measures low to intermediate plasma dabigatran concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran was first introduced as a fixed-dose drug without routine coagulation monitoring, but current recommendations suggest that diluted thrombin time can be used to estimate plasma drug level. The aim of this study was to assess a diluted thrombin time assay based on the same thrombin reagent already used for traditional thrombin time measurements that reliably measure low to intermediate plasma dabigatran levels. METHODS: We included 44 patients with atrial fibrillation who started treatment with dabigatran 150 mg (23 patients) or 110 mg (21 patients) twice a day. Blood samples were collected at baseline (no dabigatran) and 2-4 weeks after the beginning of dabigatran therapy at trough and at peak. Plasma dabigatran levels were measured with diluted thrombin time and compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry as the reference method. The performance of the diluted thrombin time was compared to Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor and Ecarin Chromogenic Assay. RESULTS: In ex vivo plasma samples, diluted thrombin time highly correlated with the liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (Pearson's R = 0.9799). In the low to intermediate range (dabigatran concentration ≤ 100 µg/L) diluted thrombin time correlated significantly more closely to the liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (R = 0.964) than Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor (R = 0.935, p = 0.05) or Ecarin Chromogenic Assay (R = 0.915, p < 0.01). It was also the only functional assay without any significant bias in the low to intermediate range. Both trough and peak diluted thrombin time values were similar to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the diluted thrombin time assay presented in this study reliably detects dabigatran and that it is superior to the Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor assay in the low to intermediate range.

Dabigatran Concentration: Variability and Potential Bleeding Prediction In "Real-Life" Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Routine laboratory monitoring is currently not recommended in patients receiving dabigatran despite its considerable variation in plasma concentration. However, in certain clinical situations, measurements of the dabigatran effect may be desirable. We aimed to assess the variability of dabigatran trough and peak concentration and explore the potential relationship between dabigatran concentration and adverse events. We included 44 patients with atrial fibrillation who started treatment with dabigatran 150 mg (D150) or 110 mg (D110) twice daily. They contributed 170 trough and peak blood samples that were collected 2-4 and 6-8 weeks after dabigatran initiation. Plasma dabigatran concentration was measured by LC-MS/MS and indirectly, by selected coagulation tests. D110 patients were older (74 ± 7 versus 68 ± 6 years), had lower creatinine clearance (68 ± 21 versus 92 ± 24 mL/min) and higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc score (3.1 ± 1.3 versus 2.3 ± 0.9) compared to D150 patients (all p < 0.05), but both had similar dabigatran concentrations in both trough and peak samples. Dabigatran concentrations varied less in trough than in peak samples (17.0 ± 13.6 versus 26.6 ± 19.2%, p = 0.02). During the 12-month follow-up, 4 patients on D150 and 6 on D110 suffered minor bleeding. There was no major bleeding or thromboembolic event. Patients with bleeding had significantly higher average trough dabigatran concentrations (93 ± 36 versus 72 ± 62 µg/L, p = 0.02) than patients without bleeding, while peak dabigatran values had no predictive value. Dabigatran dose selection according to the guidelines resulted in appropriate trough concentrations with acceptable repeatability. High trough concentrations may predispose patients to the risk of minor bleeding.