RESUMEN
Several biomedical applications contain multiple treatments from which we want to estimate the causal effect on a given outcome. Most existing Causal Inference methods, however, focus on single treatments. In this work, we propose a neural network that adopts a multi-task learning approach to estimate the effect of multiple treatments. We validated M3E2 in three synthetic benchmark datasets that mimic biomedical datasets. Our analysis showed that our method makes more accurate estimations than existing baselines.
Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , BenchmarkingRESUMEN
Predicting multiple heterogeneous biological and medical targets is a challenge for traditional deep learning models. In contrast to single-task learning, in which a separate model is trained for each target, multi-task learning (MTL) optimizes a single model to predict multiple related targets simultaneously. To address this challenge, we propose the Multi-gate Mixture-of-Experts with Exclusivity (MMoEEx). Our work aims to tackle the heterogeneous MTL setting, in which the same model optimizes multiple tasks with different characteristics. Such a scenario can overwhelm current MTL approaches due to the challenges in balancing shared and task-specific representations and the need to optimize tasks with competing optimization paths. Our method makes two key contributions: first, we introduce an approach to induce more diversity among experts, thus creating representations more suitable for highly imbalanced and heterogenous MTL learning; second, we adopt a two-step optimization (Finn et al., 2017 and Lee et al., 2020) approach to balancing the tasks at the gradient level. We validate our method on three MTL benchmark datasets, including UCI-Census-income dataset, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) and PubChem BioAssay (PCBA).
RESUMEN
Methods for causal inference from observational data are an alternative for scenarios where collecting counterfactual data or realizing a randomized experiment is not possible. Our proposed method ParKCA combines the results of several causal inference methods to learn new causes in applications with some known causes and many potential causes. We validate ParKCA in two Genome-wide association studies, one real-world and one simulated dataset. Our results show that ParKCA can infer more causes than existing methods.