RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a self-administered measure designed to assess the level of inability to function socially as a consequence of a defined problem or disorder. METHODS: A total of 230 patients with emotional disorders completed the Danish translation of the WSAS, measures of anxiety and depression, the Level of Personality Functioning Brief Form, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form, and the World Health Organization Five-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5). We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis of the previously suggested factor structure of the instrument. We furthermore evaluated the construct validity of the WSAS by means of its relationship with depression, anxiety, personality functioning, and overall well-being. Finally, we evaluated the utility of the WSAS to identify those on long-term sick-leave by conducting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The instrument had a poor to average fit with the previously reported single-factor structure, but a better fit to a modified single-factor structure. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega showed good internal scale reliability (α = .79, ωtotal = .85). WSAS was positively correlated with measures of anxiety (r = .33), depression (r = .44), and personality functioning (r = .23 and r = .20), and negatively correlated with WHO-5 wellbeing (r = -.57). The optimal cut-off point in the ROC-analyses was 23, which yielded a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 55% in the prediction of sick-leave status. DISCUSSION: The Danish WSAS shows promising psychometric properties, but has limited external validity insofar as predicting long-term sick leave in psychiatric patients with emotional disorders.
Asunto(s)
Ausencia por Enfermedad , Ajuste Social , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Empleo , Dinamarca , Psicometría , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Theoretical conceptualizations of emotion and affect regulation have a considerable common ground. However, mentalization theory considers the ability to regulate affects as being contingent on the ability to mentalize. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between emotion regulation and mentalization, operationalized as reflective functioning, in a sample of patients with depression and/or anxiety. METHODS: The study used data from the TRAns-diagnostic Cognitive behavioural Therapy versus standard cognitive behavioural therapy (TRACT-RCT) trial. Patients with depression and/or anxiety (N = 291; 64.4% female; Mage = 32.2; SD = 11.0) completed the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (ERSQ) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-6). Correlation and regression analyses were performed to determine associations of the measures of ERSQ and RFQ-6 in relation to the outcome variables, global well-being (World Health Organization Well-being Index; WHO-5) and social functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale; WSAS). RESULTS: Overall, the patients had a reduced level of emotion regulation (MERSQ_Total = 1.77; SD = 0.59). However, only mildly impaired reflective functioning was found (MRFQ-6 = 3.57; SD = 1.26). ERSQ correlated significantly with RFQ-6 (r = -0.31), that is, more frequent use of emotion regulation strategies was associated with less hypomentalization. ERSQ was a stronger predictor of well-being and social function than RFQ-6. CONCLUSION: In patients with anxiety and/or depression, hypomentalization as measured by the RFQ-6 is not a major problem, but emotion regulation is. It seems that these two, theoretically related constructs, do not necessarily co-occur. Alternatively, the RFQ-6 scale might not capture the mentalization construct in a valid way. Emotion regulation strategies are highly related to symptomatology; therefore, they are likely to be an important target for psychotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Regulación Emocional , Mentalización , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) was designed to measure trait positive affect (PA) and trait negative affect (NA). METHODS: The Danish PANAS was administered to outpatients with depression and anxiety disorders. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega and factorial structure was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was evaluated by means of correlations with the negative affectivity and the detachment domain of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 6 (HARS-6) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6 (HDRS-6). RESULTS: PANAS Scores of 256 patients were analyzed. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega showed good internal consistency for both the PA score (alpha = .84 and omega = .89) and the NA score (alpha = .86 and omega = .90). CFA analysis confirmed a structure with two factors corresponding to the PA and NA factors. PA was negatively correlated with the detachment domain of PID-5 (r = -.47), HARS-6 (r = -.15) and HDRS-6 (r = -.37). NA was positively correlated with PID-5-SF negative affectivity domain (r = .43), HARS-6 (r = .51) and HDRS-6 (r = .52). DISCUSSION: The Danish PANAS has promising internal consistency and construct validity, which are comparable to other studies of the instrument.
Asunto(s)
Afecto , Trastornos del Humor , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Trastornos del Humor/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Dinamarca , PsicometríaRESUMEN
Personality traits underlying both anxiety disorders and depression are more malleable than previously presumed. This study examined associations between changes in personality traits (i.e. negative affectivity and detachment) and alleviation of anxiety and depression symptoms following cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). We hypothesized that decreases in negative affectivity would predict alleviation of depression and anxiety symptoms and decreases in detachment would predict decreases in depression and, to a lesser degree, anxiety symptoms. Data (N = 156) were collected in a randomized controlled trial comparing transdiagnostic and diagnosis-specific group CBT for patients with major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder or agoraphobia. We assessed personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and symptoms with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25-item scale (SCL). Prediction was based on regression analyses. We found that decreases in negative affectivity predicted lower levels of depression and anxiety symptoms while decreases in detachment only predicted lower levels of depression symptoms. The findings substantiate current efforts to explicate the dynamic interplay between personality traits and symptoms and support the existing focus on targeting negative affectivity and detachment in therapy for anxiety disorders and depression. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT02954731).
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Depresión , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , AnsiedadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) delivered in a group format could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy of group UP and diagnosis-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) for anxiety and depression in outpatient mental health services. METHODS: In this pragmatic, multi-center, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we assigned 291 patients with major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or agoraphobia to 14 weekly sessions in mixed-diagnosis UP or single-diagnosis dCBT groups. The primary test was non-inferiority, using a priori criteria, on the World Health Organisation 5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) at the end of the treatment. Secondary outcomes were functioning and symptoms. We assessed outcomes at baseline, end-of-treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. A modified per-protocol analysis was performed. RESULTS: At end-of-treatment, WHO-5 mean scores for patients in UP (n = 148) were non-inferior to those of patients in dCBT (n = 143; mean difference -2.94; 95% CI -8.10 to 2.21). Results were inconclusive for the WHO-5 at the 6-month follow-up. Results for secondary outcomes were non-inferior at end-of-treatment and the 6-month follow-up. Client satisfaction and rates of attrition, response, remission, and deterioration were similar across conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT demonstrated non-inferior acute-phase outcomes of group-delivered UP compared with dCBT for major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in outpatient mental health services. The long-term effects of UP on well-being need further investigation. If study findings are replicated, UP should be considered a viable alternative to dCBT for common anxiety disorders and depression in outpatient mental health services.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavior Therapy (TCBT) manuals delivered in individual format have been reported to be just as effective as traditional diagnosis specific CBT manuals. We have translated and modified the "The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders" (UP-CBT) for group delivery in Mental Health Service (MHS), and shown effects comparable to traditional CBT in a naturalistic study. As the use of one manual instead of several diagnosis-specific manuals could simplify logistics, reduce waiting time, and increase therapist expertise compared to diagnosis specific CBT, we aim to test the relative efficacy of group UP-CBT and diagnosis specific group CBT. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a partially blinded, pragmatic, non-inferiority, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of UP-CBT vs diagnosis specific CBT for Unipolar Depression, Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia/Panic Disorder. In total, 248 patients are recruited from three regional MHS centers across Denmark and included in two intervention arms. The primary outcome is patient-ratings of well-being (WHO Well-being Index, WHO-5), secondary outcomes include level of depressive and anxious symptoms, personality variables, emotion regulation, reflective functioning, and social adjustment. Assessments are conducted before and after therapy and at 6 months follow-up. Weekly patient-rated outcomes and group evaluations are collected for every session. Outcome assessors, blind to treatment allocation, will perform the observer-based symptom ratings, and fidelity assessors will monitor manual adherence. DISCUSSION: The current study will be the first RCT investigating the dissemination of the UP in a MHS setting, the UP delivered in groups, and with depressive patients included. Hence the results are expected to add substantially to the evidence base for rational group psychotherapy in MHS. The planned moderator and mediator analyses could spur new hypotheses about mechanisms of change in psychotherapy and the association between patient characteristics and treatment effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02954731 . Registered 25 October 2016.
Asunto(s)
Agorafobia/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno de Pánico/terapia , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been associated with cluster A personality disorder (PD) traits, mainly paranoid and schizoid traits. AIM: The aim of the study was to further investigate cluster A personality pathology in patients with SAD. METHODS: Self-reported PD traits were investigated in a clinical sample of 161 participants with SAD and in a clinical comparison group of 145 participants with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PAD). RESULTS: A diagnosis of SAD was associated with more paranoid and schizotypal PD traits, and an association between depression and personality pathology could indicate a state-effect of depression on PD traits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SAD had more cluster A personality pathology than patients with PAD, with the most solid indication for paranoid personality pathology.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Paranoide/psicología , Personalidad , Trastornos de la Personalidad/diagnóstico , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Trastorno de la Personalidad Esquizotípica/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with higher morbidity including suicidal ideation and behavior. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a known treatment for PTSD, MDD and comorbid PTSD and MDD. Since the patients with comorbid MDD and PTSD (PTSD-MDD) are sicker, we hypothesize a poorer response to treatment compared to patients with MDD only. Ninety-six MDD patients were included in the study: 76 with MDD only and 20 with PTSD-MDD. Demographic and clinical parameters at baseline were assessed. We examined clinical parameters before and after 3 months of open SSRI treatment in subjects with PTSD-MDD and compared this group to individuals with MDD only. At baseline, PTSD-MDD patients had higher Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Buss-Durkee Hostility Scale scores compared with MDD only subjects. There was a significant decrease in scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale, and Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation after 3 months of treatment with SSRIs in both groups. The magnitude of improvement in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation scores was greater in the PTSD-MDD group compared to the MDD only subjects. Symptoms of depression including suicidal ideation improved in MDD patients with or without comorbid PTSD after 3 months of treatment with SSRIs but improvement in suicidal ideation was greater in the PTSD-MDD group. Our finding has not supported the hypothesis that a response to treatment is poorer in the PTSD-MDD group which may indicate that sicker patients benefit more from the treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Ideación Suicida , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Suicide is a global public health problem and effective psychological interventions are needed. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of an app-assisted suicide prevention treatment on suicide risk and depression. One hundred twenty-nine participants were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of psychotherapy adhering to the framework of Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS), with (TAU+APP, N = 60) or without (TAU, N = 69) access to a mobile application (i.e., LifeApp'tite). Suicide risk and symptoms of depression were assessed pre- and posttherapy, and at 4-month follow-up. The TAU+APP group showed a smaller decrease on self-reported suicide risk at the end of treatment, corresponding to a medium between-group effect size (p = .008, d = 0.46). At the 4-month follow-up this was the case only at the trend level, where the effect size was also of a smaller magnitude (p = .057, d = 0.30). No differences between the treatment groups were observed on self-reported depressive symptoms, either immediately following treatment (p = .732, d = 0.05) or at follow-up (p = .467, d = 0.11). The unexpected negative effect concerning suicide risk points to crucial consideration of issues pertaining to timing, dosing, and content when adding new technology to existing treatments both in this and other populations.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Aplicaciones Móviles , Psicoterapia/instrumentación , Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Depresión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aplicaciones Móviles/tendencias , Psicoterapia/métodos , Psicoterapia/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Autodestructiva/diagnóstico , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Suicidio/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We determined the proportion of psychiatric treatments for disorders not due to substance use among a cohort of subjects (n = 3,114) seeking treatment for cannabis dependence. Data were retrieved from Danish treatment registers. Cases were compared with a representative sample, which was randomly selected from the general population according to age and gender (n = 15,570). Cannabis users were followed, and reentry into substance abuse treatment was used as an outcome deploying Cox regression analysis. The proportion of treatment for all psychiatric disorders was much higher among cases than among controls: schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR] = 7.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 6.1-10.2), bipolar disorders (OR = 4.9; 95% CI = 2.8-8.5), other affective disorders (OR = 7.6; 95% CI = 6.1-9.5), and personality disorders (OR = 17.3; 95% CI = 14.5-20.5). All in all, 40.7% of cases, compared with 5.2% of controls, had received psychiatric treatment (OR = 12.5; 95% CI = 11.3-13.8). A history of psychiatric treatment was associated with increased rates of reentry into substance abuse treatment, in general (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.20-1.53), specifically for cannabis (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.07-1.48) and opioid (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.23-1.99) dependence. This is the first study to show that the proportion of psychiatric treatment is much elevated among subjects seeking treatment for cannabis dependence, and that a history of psychiatric problems is associated with higher rates of reentry into substance abuse treatment.
Asunto(s)
Abuso de Marihuana/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/rehabilitación , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/rehabilitación , Comorbilidad , Dinamarca , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Abuso de Marihuana/rehabilitación , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Trastornos del Humor/psicología , Trastornos del Humor/rehabilitación , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/psicología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/rehabilitación , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros , Retratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/rehabilitación , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Estadística como AsuntoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Little is known about the association between cannabis abuse/dependence, comorbid alcohol and substance use, depression, suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. OBJECTIVES: To establish the lifetime occurrence of depression, suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior in a group of very heavy cannabis users seeking treatment and to investigate the significance of a range of social, family and contextual factors with special emphasis on alcohol. STUDY GROUP: 119 subjects recruited from 19 different substance treatment centers in Denmark. METHODS: Structured questionnaires and assessment for psychiatric disorders using Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Lifetime use and dependence of substances was established using parts of Addiction Severity Index (ASI), parts of Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tests (AUDIT). RESULTS: Lifetime depression (46%), suicidal ideation (42%), and suicidal behavior (23%) were highly frequent. These problems were more common among females and related to adverse childhood experiences and parental alcoholism, while it could not be demonstrated that comorbid alcohol or other drug use increased the risk. Parental alcoholism remained significantly related to depression (p < .009), suicidal ideation (p < .001), and suicidal behavior (p < .03) after adjustment for a range of possible confounders using logistic regression. Physical abuse during childhood was associated with suicidal ideation (p < .01) and reporting an 'all in all bad childhood' was associated with suicidal behavior (p < .03) adjusting for the same control variables. CONCLUSIONS: Depression, suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior are common phenomena among heavy cannabis users predicted from factors related to childhood and parental alcoholism.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/psicología , Depresión/complicaciones , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Psicología del Adolescente , Suicidio/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Dinamarca , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Traumatic stress disorders are prevalent in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. However, there is a lack of prospective longitudinal studies investigating the risk of severe mental illness for people diagnosed with traumatic stress disorders. We aimed to assess if patients with acute stress reaction (ASR) or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are at increased risk of schizophrenia spectrum disorders or bipolar disorder. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study covering the entire Danish population including information on inpatient and outpatient mental hospitals over 2 decades. Predictors were in- or outpatient diagnoses of ASR or PTSD. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CIs of schizophrenia, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and bipolar disorder. RESULTS: Persons with a traumatic stress disorder had a significantly increased risk of schizophrenia (IRR 3.80, CI 2.33-5.80), schizophrenia spectrum disorder (IRR 2.34, CI 1.46-3.53), and bipolar disorder (IRR 4.22, CI 2.25-7.13). Risks were highest in the first year after diagnosis of the traumatic stress disorder and remained significantly elevated after more than 5 years. Mental illness in a parent could not explain the association. CONCLUSION: Our findings support an association between diagnosed traumatic stress disorders and subsequent schizophrenia spectrum disorder or bipolar disorder. If replicated, this may increase clinical focus on patients with traumatic stress disorders.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/etiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/complicaciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Cognitive models of panic disorder (PD) with or without agoraphobia have stressed the role of catastrophic beliefs of bodily symptoms as a central mediating variable of the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Perceived ability to cope with or control panic attacks, panic self-efficacy, has also been proposed to play a key role in therapeutic change; however, this cognitive factor has received much less attention in research. The aim of the present review is to evaluate panic self-efficacy as a mediator of therapeutic outcome in CBT for PD using descriptive and meta-analytic procedures. We performed systematic literature searches, and included and evaluated 33 studies according to four criteria for establishing mediation. Twenty-eight studies, including nine randomized waitlist-controlled studies, showed strong support for CBT improving panic self-efficacy (criterion 1); ten showed an association between change in panic self-efficacy and change in outcome during therapy (criterion 2); three tested, and one established formal statistical mediation of panic self-efficacy (criterion 3); while four tested and three found change in panic self-efficacy occurring before the reduction of panic severity (criterion 4). Although none of the studies fulfilled all of the four criteria, results provide some support for panic self-efficacy as a mediator of outcome in CBT for PD, generally on par with catastrophic beliefs in the reviewed studies.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno de Pánico/terapia , Pánico , Autoeficacia , Adaptación Psicológica , Humanos , Trastorno de Pánico/psicologíaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Despite a remarkable co-occurrence of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and schizophrenia, little is known about the clinical and etiological relationship of these 2 disorders. Exploring the degree to which these disorders share etiological factors might provide useful implications for clinicians, researchers, and those with the disorders. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether patients with OCD experience an enhanced risk of developing schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders and to determine whether a family history of OCD constitutes a risk factor for schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using individual data from longitudinal nationwide Danish registers, we conducted a prospective cohort study with 45 million person-years of follow-up. All survival analyses were adjusted for sex, age, calendar year, parental age, and place of residence at the time of birth. A total of 3 million people born between January 1, 1955, and November 30, 2006, were followed up from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2012. During this period, 30 556 people developed schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The presence of a prior diagnosis of OCD and the risk of a first lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia and a schizophrenia spectrum disorder assigned by a psychiatrist in a hospital, outpatient clinic, or emergency department setting. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals are used as measures of relative risk. RESULTS: The presence of prior diagnosis of OCD was associated with an increased risk of developing schizophrenia (IRR = 6.90; 95% CI, 6.25-7.60) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (IRR = 5.77; 95% CI, 5.33-6.22) later in life. Similarly, offspring of parents diagnosed as having OCD had an increased risk of schizophrenia (IRR = 4.31; 95% CI, 2.72-6.43) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (IRR = 3.10; 95% CI, 2.17-4.27). The results remained significant after adjusting for family history of psychiatric disorders and the patient's psychiatric history. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A diagnosis of OCD was associated with higher rates of schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The observed increase in risk suggests that OCD, schizophrenia, and schizophrenia spectrum disorders probably lay on a common etiological pathway.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/complicaciones , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/etiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Salud de la Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a feasibility and efficacy trial of mindfulness therapy in somatization disorder and functional somatic syndromes such as fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome, defined as bodily distress syndrome (BDS). METHODS: We randomized 119 patients to either mindfulness therapy (mindfulness-based stress reduction and some cognitive behavioral therapy elements for BDS) or to enhanced treatment as usual (2-hour specialist medical care and brief cognitive behavioral therapy for BDS). The primary outcome measure was change in physical health (SF-36 Physical Component Summary) from baseline to 15-month follow-up. RESULTS: The study is negative as we could not demonstrate a different development over time for the two groups (F(3,2674)=1.51, P=.21). However, in the mindfulness therapy group, improvement was obtained toward the end of treatment and it remained present at the 15-month follow-up, whereas the enhanced treatment as usual group achieved no significant change until 15-month follow-up. The change scores averaged half a standard deviation which amounts to a clinically significant change, 29% changed more than 1 standard deviation. Significant between-group differences were observed at treatment cessation. CONCLUSION: Mindfulness therapy is a feasible and acceptable treatment. The study showed that mindfulness therapy was comparable to enhanced treatment as usual in improving quality of life and symptoms. Nevertheless, considering the more rapid improvement following mindfulness, mindfulness therapy may be a potentially useful intervention in BDS patients. Clinically important changes that seem to be comparable to a CBT treatment approach were obtained. Further research is needed to replicate or even expand these findings.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Meditación/métodos , Meditación/psicología , Psicoterapia Breve/métodos , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , Terapia por Relajación/psicología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/terapia , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Comorbilidad , Dinamarca , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Conducta de Enfermedad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Síndrome , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to estimate the economic consequences of somatization disorder and functional somatic syndromes such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, defined as bodily distress syndrome (BDS), when mindfulness therapy is compared with enhanced treatment as usual. METHODS: A total of 119 BDS patients were randomized to mindfulness therapy or enhanced treatment as usual and compared with 5950 matched controls. Register data were analyzed from 10years before their inclusion to 15-month follow-up. The main outcome measures were disability pension at the 15-month follow-up and a reduction in total health care costs. Unemployment and sickness benefit prior to inclusion were tested as possible risk factors. RESULTS: At 15-month follow-up, 25% from the mindfulness therapy group received disability pension compared with 45% from the specialized treatment group (p=.025). The total health care utilization was reduced over time in both groups from the year before inclusion (mean $5325, median $2971) to the year after inclusion (mean $3644, median $1593) (p=.0001). This overall decline was seen in spite of elevated costs due to assessment and mindfulness therapy or enhanced treatment as usual. The BDS patients accumulated significantly more weeks of unemployment and sickness benefit 5 and 10years before inclusion (p<.0001) than the population controls. CONCLUSIONS: Mindfulness therapy may prevent disability pension and it may have a potential to significantly reduce societal costs and increase the effectiveness of care. Accumulated weeks of unemployment and sickness benefit are possible risk factors for BDS.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Meditación/métodos , Meditación/psicología , Psicoterapia Breve/economía , Psicoterapia Breve/métodos , Terapia por Relajación/economía , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , Trastornos Somatomorfos/economía , Trastornos Somatomorfos/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dinamarca , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pensiones , Terapia por Relajación/psicología , Seguridad Social/economía , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Síndrome , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The aim of the study was to determine excess mortality associated with cannabis use disorders. Individuals entering treatment for cannabis use disorders were followed by use of Danish registers and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) estimated. Predictors of different causes of death were determined. A total of 6445 individuals were included and 142 deaths recorded during 26,584 person-years of follow-up. Mortality was predicted by age, comorbid use of opioids, and lifetime injection drug use. For different causes of death the SMRs were: accidents: 8.2 (95% CI 6.3-10.5), suicide: 5.3 (95% CI 3.3-7.9), homicide/violence: 3.8 (95% CI 1.5-7.9), and natural causes: 2.8 (95% CI 2.0-3.7). Following exclusion of those with secondary use of opioids, cocaine, amphetamine, or injection drug use, SMRs for all causes of death remained significantly elevated except for homicide/violence. The study underlines the need to address mortality risk associated with cannabis use disorders.
Asunto(s)
Abuso de Marihuana/mortalidad , Abuso de Marihuana/rehabilitación , Accidentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Niño , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Familia , Femenino , Predicción , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/mortalidad , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Factores Socioeconómicos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/mortalidad , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PD) is well-established; however, little is known about the underlying change processes of clinical improvement during therapy. According to cognitive theories, CBT for PD primarily works by changing catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily symptoms and panic attacks. However, panic self-efficacy, i.e. the perceived ability to cope with panic attacks, has also been suggested as an important change mechanism in CBT for PD. The aim of the study was to investigate if change in catastrophic misinterpretations and panic self-efficacy mediated change in the level of anxiety during the course of thirteen sessions of group CBT for PD. Forty-five participants completed weekly self-report measures of the possible cognitive mediators and the level of anxiety throughout therapy. The results indicated that within-person change in panic self-efficacy in one session, but not in catastrophic misinterpretations, predicted within-person level of anxiety symptoms the following week. However, in a reversed analysis, prior change in level of anxiety symptoms also predicted change in panic self-efficacy the following session. These results support panic self-efficacy as a mediator of change in CBT for PD, although a reciprocal causal relationship between panic self-efficacy and level of anxiety seems to be implied.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Catastrofización/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno de Pánico/terapia , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Anciano , Agorafobia/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multinivel , Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: To assess correlations and agreement between timeline follow-back (TLFB)-assisted self-report and blood samples for cannabis use. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial. SETTING: Copenhagen, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and three patients from the CapOpus trial with cannabis use disorder and psychosis, providing 239 self-reports of cannabis use and 88 valid blood samples. MEASUREMENTS: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC) and 11-nor-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THC-COOH) detected in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Self-report of cannabis-use last month by TLFB. Pearson's r, sensitivity and specificity calculated as measures of correlation or agreement. FINDINGS: Correlations were strong; r = 0.75 for number of days and r = 0.83 for number of standard joints in the preceding month when excluding outliers. Including outliers, coefficients were moderate to strong (r = 0.49). There were differences in subgroups, mainly inconsistent, depending on inclusion or exclusion of outliers. Sensitivity and specificity for TLFB detecting the presence or absence of cannabis use were 95.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 88.0-99.1%) and 72.2% (95% CI 46.5-90.3%), respectively. Using 19 days as cut-off on TLFB, they were 94.3% (95% CI 86.0-98.4%) and 94.4% (95% CI 72.2-99.9%), respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Timeline follow-back (TLFB)-assisted self-report of cannabis use correlates highly with plasma-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in patients with comorbid cannabis use disorder and psychosis. Sensitivity and specificity of timeline follow-back appear to be optimized with 19 days as the cut-off point. As such, timeline follow-back may be superior to analysis of blood when going beyond 19 days of recall.
Asunto(s)
Dronabinol/análogos & derivados , Abuso de Marihuana/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Biomarcadores/sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Dronabinol/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Curva ROC , Autoinforme , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodosRESUMEN
This is a register-based cohort study of 20,581 individuals in treatment for illicit substance use disorders in Denmark between 1996 and 2006. All in all, 1441 deaths were recorded during 111,445 person-years of follow-up. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) associated with different primary substance types were calculated and Cox-regression analyses were performed in order to establish hazard ratios (HR) associated with injection drug use and psychiatric comorbidity. SMRs for primary users of specific substances were: cannabis: 4.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.2-5.8), cocaine: 6.4 (CI: 3.9-10.0), amphetamine: 6.0 (CI: 4.2-8.3), heroin: 9.1 (CI: 8.5-9.8), and other opioids 7.7 (CI: 6.6-8.9). For MDMA ('ecstasy') the crude mortality rate was 1.7/1000 person-years (CI: 0.4-7.0) and the SMR was not significantly elevated. Injection drug use was associated with significantly increased hazard ratios in users of opioids and cocaine/amphetamine. Overall, psychiatric comorbidity was not associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.1 [CI: 0.9-1.2], p=.28), but an association was found specifically among cocaine/amphetamine users (HR: 3.6 [CI: 2.1-6.4], p<.001).