Editorial Commentary: Radiographic Measurements of Knee Joint Space Are Inadequate for Demonstrating Chondral Restoration.

Orthopaedic advancements into the 21st century will increasingly focus on chondral restoration to either halt or reverse degenerative processes. Researchers and clinicians will need tools beyond patient-reported outcomes to measure the effectiveness of these treatment efforts. The use of joint space width (JSW) as a surrogate for chondral restoration is inadequate. At a minimum, such observations must standardize load transmission across the joint to be useful. Simple, readily available, standardized, and clinically useful measures of knee chondral restoration would facilitate and accelerate advances in the field. For now, it may be that improvement in JSW after chondral restoration could be attributable to changes in mechanical alignment of the knee and not the chondral restoration. JSW is an inadequate surrogate for chondral restoration, and anyone doing a stress radiograph of a unicompartmental degenerative knee recognizes this point.

Pectoralis Major Tendon Insertion Anatomy and Description of a Novel Anatomic Reference.

Pectoralis major rupture is an uncommon injury often treated surgically, requiring anatomic knowledge of the tendon insertion. This study defines the pectoralis major tendon insertion footprint and a novel anatomic relationship. Twelve cadaver shoulders were evaluated andmeasured using a standard surgical ruler to demonstrate the normal anatomic footprint. Measurements were taken from the anterior medial margin of the articular surface of the humeral head to the superior margin of the pectoralis major insertion and its relation to the latissimus dorsi tendon insertion. The average length and width of the pectoralis major insertion were 73.3 ± 10.0 mm and 3.3 ± 0.54 mm, respectively, consistent with previous publications. On average, the superior margin of the pectoralis tendon was within 1 mm of the latissimus dorsi insertion and 41.2 ± 9.27 mm from the articular margin. These points form a new anatomic reference of the latissimus dorsi, providing an intraoperative reference point when performing pectoralis major muscle tendon repair. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(1):39-41, 2018).

Refuting the lipstick sign.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic examination of the tendon has been described as the "gold standard" for diagnosis of tendinitis of the long head of the biceps (LHB). An arthroscopic finding of an inflamed and hyperemic LHB within the bicipital groove has been described as the "lipstick sign." Studies evaluating direct visualization in diagnosis of LHB tendinitis are lacking. METHODS: During a 1-year period, 363 arthroscopic shoulder procedures were performed, with 16 and 39 patients prospectively selected as positive cases and negative controls, respectively. All positive controls had groove tenderness, positive Speed maneuver, and diagnostic ultrasound-guided bicipital injection. Negative controls had none of these findings. Six surgeons reviewed randomized deidentified arthroscopic pictures of enrolled patients The surgeons were asked whether the images demonstrated LHB tendinitis and if the lipstick sign was present. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity and specificity were 49% and 66%, respectively, for detecting LHB tendinitis and 64% and 31%, respectively, for erythema. The nonweighted κ score for interobserver reliability ranged from 0.042 to 0.419 (mean, 0.215 ± 0.116) for tendinitis and from 0.486 to 0.835 (mean, 0.680 ± 0.102) for erythema. The nonweighted κ score for intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.264 to 0.854 (mean, 0.615) for tendinitis and from 0.641 to 0.951 (mean, 0.783) for erythema. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the lipstick sign performed only moderately well in a rigorously designed level III study to evaluate its sensitivity and specificity. There is only fair agreement among participating surgeons in diagnosing LHB tendinitis arthroscopically. Consequently, LHB tendinitis requiring tenodesis remains a clinical diagnosis that should be made before arthroscopic examination.

Biomechanical analysis of intramedullary vs. superior plate fixation of transverse midshaft clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Middle-third clavicle fractures represent 2% to 4% of all skeletal trauma in the United States. Treatment options include intramedullary (IM) as well as plate and screw (PS) constructs. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical stability of a specific IM system compared with nonlocking PS fixation under low-threshold physiologic load. METHODS: Twenty fourth-generation Sawbones (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA) with a simulated middle-third fracture pattern were repaired with either an IM device (n = 10) or superiorly positioned nonlocking PS construct (n = 10). Loads were modeled to simulate physiologic load. Combined axial compression and torsion forces were sequentially increased until failure. Data were analyzed on the basis of loss of rotational stability using 3 criteria: early (10°), clinical (30°), and terminal (120°). RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between constructs in early loss of rotational stability (P > .05). The PS group was significantly more rotationally stable than the IM group on the basis of clinical and terminal criteria (P < .05 for both). All test constructs failed in rotational stability. CONCLUSIONS: When tested under physiologic load, fixation failure occurred from loss of rotational stability. No statistical difference was seen between groups under early physiologic loads. However, during load to failure, the PS group was statistically more rotationally stable than the IM group. Given the clavicle's function as a bony strut for the upper extremity and the biomechanical results demonstrated, rotational stability should be carefully considered during surgical planning and postoperative advancement of activity in patients undergoing operative fixation of middle-third clavicle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics.

The prevalence of meniscal tears in young athletes undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of meniscal injury, specifically medial meniscal injury, in US Army soldiers undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction from 2002 to 2011 at our institution. A complete chart review was performed to identify the prevalence of meniscal pathology identified at the time of revision ACL surgery. Patient demographic data and meniscal injury patterns were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were identified, with a mean age of 28 years. The mean time to revision reconstruction was 67 months. Most patients (64.1%) reported a distinct reinjury. Reinjury was reported as the cause for revision ACL reconstruction in 43 patients. In this subgroup the mean time from reinjury to revision surgery was 13.9 months. Meniscal pathology was identified in 50 patients (74.6%). Medial meniscal tears were noted in 38 patients (56.7%), a rate significantly greater than that previously described (P = .008). Lateral meniscal tears were noted in 26 patients (38.8%), which was similar to previously published data (P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of meniscal injury at the time of revision ACL reconstruction in active-duty US Army soldiers is nearly identical to that of previously published data looking at a civilian population (74.6% v 74%) in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. However, the incidence of medial meniscal injury was greater in the active-duty population than in the civilian population (56.7% v 40%). The observed increase in the prevalence of medial meniscal pathology is likely multifactorial, relating to the unique demands on young military athletes in both combat and training environments, rate of reinjury, and various delays to treatment after reinjury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria.

Factors associated with successful selection in U.S. Army orthopaedic surgical programs are unreported. The current analysis includes survey data from all Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors (PDs) to determine these factors. PDs at all Army orthopaedic surgery residency programs were provided 17 factors historically considered critical to successful selection and asked to rank order the factors as well as assign a level of importance to each. Results were collated and overall mean rankings are provided. PDs unanimously expressed that performance during the on-site orthopaedic surgery rotation at the individual program director's institution was most important. Respondents overwhelmingly reported that Steps 1 and 2 licensing exam scores were next most important, respectively. Survey data demonstrated that little importance was placed on letters of recommendation and personal statements. PDs made no discriminations based on allopathic or osteopathic degrees. The most important factors for Army orthopaedic surgery residency selection were clerkship performance at the individual PD's institution and licensing examination score performance. Army PDs consider both USMLE and COMLEX results, because Army programs have a higher percentage of successful osteopathic applicants.

Iatrogenic nerve injuries in shoulder surgery.

The range of open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures continues to evolve and expand. Despite advances in instrumentation and technology, complications still exist and neurologic injury remains an inherent part of these procedures. Iatrogenic nerve injuries are among the more commonly cited complications associated with shoulder surgery. Various surgical procedures about the shoulder are known to place the brachial plexus and peripheral motor nerves at risk. Peripheral nerve monitoring has been helpful in identifying specific surgical steps and key anatomic regions that are susceptible to iatrogenic nerve injury.

A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of subacromial injection of triamcinolone compared to injection of ketorolac in the treatment of external shoulder impingement syndrome. METHODS: Thirty-two patients diagnosed with external shoulder impingement syndrome were included in this double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Each patient was randomized into the steroid group or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) group. The steroid syringe contained 40 mg triamcinolone; and the NSAID syringe contained 60 mg ketorolac. Each patient was evaluated in terms of arc of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) for evaluating pain, and the UCLA (The University of California at Los Angeles) shoulder rating scale. RESULTS: At 1 month follow-up, both treatment arms resulted in increased range of motion and decreased pain. The steroid group decreased in active abduction while the NSAID group increased (steroid: 134°, NSAID: 151°, P = .03). The mean improvement in the UCLA shoulder rating scale at 4 weeks was 7.15 for the NSAID group and 2.13 for the steroid group (P = .03). Subgroup analysis of the UCLA scale demonstrated an increase in both forward flexion strength (P = .04) and patient satisfaction (P = .03) in the NSAID group. No significant difference could be seen in all other outcome measures. CONCLUSION: In this study, an injection of ketorolac resulted in greater improvements in the UCLA shoulder rating scale than an injection of triamcinolone at 4 weeks follow-up. While both triamcinolone and ketorolac are effective in the treatment of isolated subacromial impingement, ketorolac appears to have equivalent if not superior efficacy; all the while decreasing patient exposure to the potential side-effects of corticosteroids.

Comparison of complication rates of intramedullary pin fixation versus plating of midshaft clavicle fractures in an active duty military population.

Military service members have increased requirements of shoulder weight bearing to perform duties. Operative intervention has increased for treatment of displaced middle one-third clavicle fractures. Complications of operatively treated clavicle fixation have not been extensively studied. A retrospective, longitudinal cohort chart evaluation was conducted of all active duty members undergoing fixation of middle one-third clavicle fractures, for complications between intramedullary pin fixation and plate constructs. This review found 62 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Thirty-three patients underwent intramedullary pin fixation with Hagie pins and 31 patients underwent precontoured superior clavicle plate fixation of their middle one-third clavicle fractures. Complications included wound infection, skin and/or soft tissue irritation, and need for unplanned hardware removal. The overall complication rate was 31% in the plate fixation group versus 9% in the intramedullary pin group (p = .024). All patients achieved fracture union with return to duty; however, increased overall complications were seen in the plate fixation group.

Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an uncommon but potentially serious complication. The incidence of infection is approximately 0.44%. Staphylococcus and streptococcus strains are the most common infectious pathogens. Infection is typically via direct inoculation. Articular cartilage damage is primarily the result of the unregulated host inflammatory response. The timing of presentation is typically <2 months following surgery. Presenting symptoms commonly mirror normal postoperative findings, making diagnosis difficult. Although laboratory inflammatory markers are often elevated, knee arthrocentesis is the gold standard for diagnosis. Treatment involves serial arthroscopic or open irrigation and debridement procedures and antibiotic management. Graft retention is often possible, although fixation implants may require removal or exchange. Successful results have been reported following infection eradication in both graft retention and early revision ACL reconstruction scenarios.

Autograft-Only and Allograft-Augmented Hamstring Autograft Have Similar Failure Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Purpose: To compare failure rates and clinical outcomes after hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with and without allograft augmentation by a single surgeon otherwise using the same surgical technique. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis with prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes of primary hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction with and without allograft augmentation performed in a military population by a single surgeon. The primary outcome measure was graft failure, defined as graft rupture confirmed by use of magnetic resonance imaging scans and/or revision ACL reconstruction. The secondary outcome measure was the postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Results: This study included 112 patients with a mean follow-up period of 65.3 months. In patients with a graft diameter of 8 mm or greater, there was no difference in failure rates (9.4% for autograft only vs 6.3% for hybrid, P = .59). There was a higher failure rate in patients in the autograft-only group with a graft diameter of less than 8 mm (29.4%) when compared with the hybrid graft group (6.3%, P = .008). There were no hybrid grafts less than 8 mm in diameter. There were no differences in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score between groups as long as the graft diameter was 8 mm or greater. Conclusions: In patients undergoing hamstring ACL reconstruction, there was no significant difference in graft failure rates or outcome scores between autograft only and autograft with allograft augmentation as long as grafts were 8 mm or greater. High failure rates were seen when the graft diameter was less than 8 mm. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

A High Rate of Return to Running Is Seen After Both Arthroscopic and Open Shoulder Surgery.

Purpose: To determine the percentage of patients who report the ability to run 1 mile at various time points after arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for all active-duty military patients aged 18 to 45 years who underwent shoulder surgery at a single institution over a 2-year period. The rehabilitation protocol discouraged running before 3 months, but all patients were able to return to unrestricted running at 3 months postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they lacked 1-year follow-up data. Parameters collected included demographic information and validated patient-reported outcome measures at the preoperative and short-term postoperative visits, as well as patients' ability to run at least 1 mile postoperatively. Results: A total of 126 patients were identified who underwent shoulder surgery with return-to-running data. Compared with baseline, significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes were shown at 1 and 2 years postoperatively (P = .001). The percentage of patients reporting the ability to run 1 mile postoperatively was 59% at 3 months, 74% at 4.5 months, 79% at 6 months, 83% at 12 months, and 91% at 24 months. There was no significant difference in patients undergoing shoulder surgery for instability versus non-instability diagnoses or in patients undergoing open versus arthroscopic anterior stabilization. All 11 patients unable to return to running at final follow-up had chronic lower-extremity diagnoses limiting their running ability. Conclusions: Young military athletes undergoing arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery have a high rate of early return to running. Approximately 60% of patients report the ability to run 1 mile at 3 months postoperatively, and three-quarters of patients do so at 4.5 months. Age, sex, military occupation, underlying diagnosis or type of surgery did not influence the rate of return to running after shoulder surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The influence of posterior acromial morphology on outcomes and return to pushups in young patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair.

Background: Prior evidence has identified specific posterior acromial morphology as significantly associated with unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of posterior acromial morphology on the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair (APCLR) for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. Additionally, we sought to determine the influence of posterior acromial morphology on the rate and time to return to pushups following APCLR. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. The study included consecutive patients undergoing APCLR. Data collected included demographics, radiographic measurements including posterior acromial height (PAH) and posterior acromial tilt on preoperative scapular-Y radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures at the preoperative and postoperative visits. In addition, starting at 6 months postoperative, patients were asked if they could perform pushups defined as at least 10 repetitions. At the final follow-up, we collected the number of pushups patients were able to perform. Results: Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent APCLR with a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 12-41). Significant improvement from preoperative to 2 years postoperative was demonstrated in Subjective Shoulder Value (50-85), VAS (6-2.5), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (48 to 83), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) (1437-777), P = .001. The recurrent instability rate was 3/32 (9%). Patients with PAH > 23 (N = 17) had a recurrent instability rate of 18% (3/17) versus PAH ≤ 23 (N = 15) 0% (0/15), worse WOSI scores (P = .41), and a lower number of pushups (P = .48). The percentage of patients reporting the ability to perform pushups was (6 months/1 year/2 years) (50%/78%/95%). The mean number of pushups reported at the final follow-up was 33 (range, 1-60). Discussion: Following APCLR, approximately 50% of patients resume pushups at 6 months postoperatively, and 80% return at 1 year. Patients reported performing a mean of 33 pushups following APCLR at the final follow-up. Patients with a PAH greater than 23 on preoperative scapular-Y radiographs had a higher rate of recurrent posterior instability, worse WOSI scores, and lower return to pushups; however, the results did not meet statistical significance. Therefore, future larger studies are needed to determine if posterior acromial morphology is independently associated with worse outcomes and increased recurrent instability rates following APCLR.

Preoperative wait time for orthopedic surgeries at a military medical center.

We performed a retrospective review of elective orthopedic surgeries performed at our institution in 2008. Surgical wait time was defined as the interval between when surgery was offered and when it was performed. Data were available for 1,120 patients and included date and type of procedure, patient age, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) category, and military rank. Mean wait time for all procedures was 69.1 days. Significant differences were found with regard to patient age, ASA class, rank, and type of procedure. Older patients with higher ASA had significantly longer wait times. Enlisted soldiers had the shortest wait times and retirees the longest. Total joint procedures had the longest wait time (mean 140 days) and the highest anesthesia class. Elective trauma procedures had the shortest wait time (mean 27.2 days). Sports procedures accounted for 46.3% of all cases reviewed. In our cohort, older patients with higher ASA class and those undergoing a total joint procedure can expect longer preoperative wait times. No preferential care given to officers, as enlisted soldiers had the shortest wait times. At our military medical center, which closely models a managed care system, patients can expect to wait more than 2 months for elective orthopedic surgeries.

Preparedness of orthopaedic surgeons for modern battlefield surgery.

Over 220 U.S. Army orthopaedic surgeons have deployed during the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). This study documents the orthopaedic procedures performed during the GWOT and identifies training that prepared surgeons for deployment. It reveals deficiencies in surgeons' preparedness and intends to improve predeployment training. All surgeons deployed during the GWOT from 2001 to 2007 were surveyed. Questions fit 4 general categories: deployment demographics, medical and surgical experiences, predeployment preparation, and self-perceived preparedness during deployment. Response rate was 70%. Surgeons averaged 138 adult operative cases and 26 pediatric cases per deployment. All surgeons performed irrigation and debridement, 94% external fixation, 93% amputations, 89% arthrotomies, 86% open reduction and internal fixation, and 76% soft-tissue coverage procedures. Residency and fellowship contributed most to surgeon preparedness for deployment. Surgeons generally reported high levels of preparedness, but nearly 1 in 6 reported low levels of medical, surgical and physical preparedness. More reported low levels of mental preparedness. Soft-tissue coverage was the most frequently reported surgical deficiency. This study documents the number and types of orthopaedic procedures performed during the GWOT and identifies the self-perceived preparedness deficiencies of surgeons in a combat environment. Improvements in predeployment training are needed to better prepare surgeons for managing battlefield causalities.

Rate and time to return to shooting following arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery.

Background: There is limited information on return to shooting following shoulder surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate and timing for resuming shooting a rifle following shoulder surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. The study included patients undergoing arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization for unidirectional shoulder instability, and arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears, SLAP lesions, biceps tendinopathy, and acromioclavicular pathology. Data collected included the laterality of surgery, shooting dominance, and patient-reported outcome measures at the preoperative and postoperative visits. Starting at the 4.5-month clinic visit, patients were asked if they could shoot a military rifle. Results: One hundred patients were identified with arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery with a mean age of 30 years (range, 18-45) and a mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-32). The cohort consisted of patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair (n = 23), arthroscopic posterior labral repair (n = 18), open Latarjet (n = 16), mini-open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OBT) (n = 25), OBT with open distal clavicle resection (DCR) (n = 10), open DCR (n = 4), and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with concomitant OBT (n = 4). Significant improvement in SSV, VAS, ASES, and WOSI was shown at 1-year postoperative, SSV 85, VAS 2, ASES 85, WOSI 239, P = .001. The percentage of patients reporting the ability to shoot a military rifle postoperatively were 47%, 63%, 85%, and 94% at 4.5 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. At 4.5 months postoperatively, patients who underwent surgery ipsilateral to their shooting dominance (n = 59) had a rate of return to shooting (33%) versus shoulder surgery on the contralateral side of shooting dominance (n = 41) (60%), P = .04. However, there was no significant difference in the groups at 6 months and 1 year. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the rate of return to shooting at 6 months in patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair versus the remainder of the cohort (posterior instability (33%) vs. (69%), P = .016), and a significant difference between posterior shoulder stabilization and anterior shoulder stabilization (70%), P = .03. Conclusion: Patients undergoing arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery have a high rate of return to shooting. Approximately 60% of patients resume shooting at 6 months postoperatively and 85% return at 1 year. Patients undergoing shoulder surgery on the contralateral side of their shooting dominance return to shooting significantly faster than those with shoulder surgery ipsilateral to their shooting dominance. Additionally, those undergoing arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization return to shooting at a slower rate than anterior stabilization surgery.

A new reduction technique for completely displaced forearm and wrist fractures in children: a biomechanical assessment and 4-year clinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric distal radius fractures are treated with closed methods, however, in recent years an increasing number of fractures are treated with operative management. Multiple reduction techniques are described in the orthopaedic literature but no recent advances have been made in the closed management of these injuries. We describe the efficacy of new, single-provider manual reduction technique that improves reduction efficacy and we separately show its biomechanical superiority to other common techniques. METHODS: Review the results of a new reduction technique, known as the Lower Extremity-aided Fracture Reduction (LEAFR) maneuver, used on a specific cohort of consecutively treated patients at a single institution over a 4-year period with bayoneted distal radius fractures. Intention-to-treat methodology and descriptive statistics are utilized to analyze accuracy of reduction, need for operative intervention, residual deformity, and complications. In addition, perform a biomechanical comparison between the LEAFR maneuver, the 2 person traction counter-traction method and finger traps. RESULTS: The technique allowed 24 consecutively treated, bayoneted distal radius fractures to be reduced from average translational and shortening deformities of 11.4 and 6.5 mm to 2.1 and 0.4 mm, respectively (P<0.0001). Two (8%) of the 24 patients had failure to eliminate bayonet displacement, whereas only 3 patients (12.5%) ultimately required operative intervention. No cases of growth arrest were noted. A biomechanical assessment of the maneuver showed the ability to generate an average of 597.8 Newtons (N) of axial traction which is statistically significant in comparison to other accepted methods of reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The LEAFR is a clinically effective and biomechanically sound technique for reduction of bayoneted distal radius fractures in children. It is a simple, reproducible technique not reliant on equipment or additional skilled providers. In addition, it results in decreased rates of operative management and represents advancement in the treatment of pediatric distal radius fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (Retrospective Case Series), Level I (Biomechanical Comparison Study).

Allograft osteochondral transplantation in the knee in the active duty population.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of allograft osteochondral transplantation in the knee in the active duty population, focusing on the patient's ability to remain on active duty following the procedure. A retrospective review was performed on all active duty patients undergoing allograft osteochondral transplantation surgery of the knee at our institution from 2003 to 2011. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics and treatment details. Eighteen patients underwent osteochondral transplantation surgery from 2003 to 2011. One of the patients is still in the acute recovery phase of their procedure (<1 year since surgery), and one patient was already in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process at the time of surgery. Of the remaining sixteen patients, nine have either entered or completed the MEB since surgery. Six of the seven patients who have stayed on active duty remain on activity-restricting profiles. The average time from surgery to MEB for these patients was 23.2 months. In the setting of the unique demands of active duty soldiers, osteochondral allograft transplantation does not appear to be conducive to retention on active duty.

Unique distal clavicular fracture in an active-duty military population.

We present a series of distal clavicle fractures in which the coracoclavicular ligaments remain intact to the proximal segment, but the distal aspect of the clavicle is displaced superiorly. The fractures sustained in this series are not described in any of the multiple classification systems currently in use for clavicular fractures. We present a series of 2 active-duty patients who sustained nearly identical distal clavicle fractures during Army combatives training. A 23-year-old male was treated successfully with nonoperative therapy and returned to deployment within 2 months. A 23-year-old female failed nonoperative treatment and was successfully treated with an operative open distal clavicle resection. This rare fracture attributed to a specific mechanism of injury has a potential to be commonly encountered in active-duty patients taking part in mandatory combatives programs.

High Incidence of Anterior Shoulder Pain in Young Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of anterior shoulder pain in young athletes undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability and in patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain treated without biceps tenodesis at the time of arthroscopic posterior labral repair who underwent a revision biceps tenodesis procedure at short-term follow up. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a single institution over a 24-month period. The study included young patients who underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The electronic medical record, magnetic resonance arthrograms, and arthroscopic images were reviewed to exclude patients with posterior labral tears with anterior labral tear or SLAP (superior labrum anterior-to-posterior) tear extension on advanced imaging and arthroscopic examination. Data collected included the presence of preoperative tenderness to palpation of the biceps tendon in the groove, the results of a preoperative Speed test, postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value, the presence of postoperative anterior shoulder pain, and the need for a secondary biceps tenodesis. RESULTS: We identified 65 patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair for posterior shoulder instability. From this cohort, 26 patients with symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair. The incidence of preoperative anterior shoulder pain with Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness and a positive Speed test was identified in 20 of 26 patients (76.9%). Of 26 patients, 5 (19%) had concomitant biceps tenodesis. The median postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (interquartile range, 60-90) at median follow-up of 2.1 years. Of the 20 patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain, 8 of 20 (40%) reported persistent anterior pain. One patient (4.7%) underwent a secondary biceps tenodesis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of anterior shoulder pain and Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness in patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic posterior labral repair for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. At short-term follow-up, few patients required a secondary biceps tenodesis procedure; however, 30% of patients had persistent anterior shoulder pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective diagnostic case series.