Setting for single position surgery: survey from expert spinal surgeons.

PURPOSE: To describe a comprehensive setting of the different alternatives for performing a single position fusion surgery based on the opinion of leading surgeons in the field. METHODS: Between April and May of 2021, a specifically designed two round survey was distributed by mail to a group of leaders in the field of Single Position Surgery (SPS). The questionnaire included a variety of domains which were focused on highlighting tips and recommendations regarding improving the efficiency of the performance of SPS. This includes operation room setting, positioning, use of technology, approach, retractors specific details, intraoperative neuromonitoring and tips for inserting percutaneous pedicle screws in the lateral position. It asked questions focused on Lateral Single Position Surgery (LSPS), Lateral ALIF (LA) and Prone Lateral Surgery (PLS). Strong agreement was defined as an agreement of more than 80% of surgeons for each specific question. The number of surgeries performed in SPS by each surgeon was used as an indirect element to aid in exhibiting the expertise of the surgeons being surveyed. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons completed both rounds of the questionnaire. Moderate or strong agreement was found for more than 50% of the items. A definition for Single Position Surgery and a step-by-step recommendation workflow was built to create a better understanding of surgeons who are starting the learning curve in this technique. CONCLUSION: A recommendation of the setting for performing single position fusion surgery procedure (LSPS, LA and PLS) was developed based on a survey of leaders in the field.

Safe and effective performance of pediatric spinal deformity surgery in patients unwilling to accept blood transfusion: a clinical study and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric deformity surgery traditionally involves major blood loss. Patients refusing blood transfusion add extra clinical and medicolegal challenges; specifically the Jehovah's witnesses population. The objective of this study is to review the safety and effectiveness of blood conservation techniques in patients undergoing pediatric spine deformity surgery who refuse blood transfusion. METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed 20 consecutive patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery and refused blood transfusion at a single institution between 2014 and 2018. We collected pertinent preoperative, intraoperative and most recent clinical and radiological data with latest follow-up (minimum two-year follow-up). RESULTS: Twenty patients (13 females) with a mean age of 14.1 years were identified. The type of scoliotic deformities were adolescent idiopathic (14), juvenile idiopathic (1), neuromuscular (3) and congenital (2). The major coronal Cobb angle was corrected from 55.4° to 11.2° (80% correction, p <  0.001) at the latest follow-up. A mean of 11.4 levels were fused and 5.6 levels of Pontes osteotomies were performed. One patient underwent L1 hemivertebra resection and three patients had fusion to pelvis. Estimated blood loss, percent estimated blood volume loss, and cell saver returned averaged 307.9 mL, 8.5%, and 80 mL, respectively. Average operative time was 214 min. The average drop in hemoglobin after surgery was 2.9 g/dL. The length of hospital stay averaged 5.1 days. There were no intraoperative complications. Three postoperative complications were identified, none related to their refusal of transfusion. One patient had in-hospital respiratory complication, one patient developed a late infection, and one patient developed asymptomatic radiographic distal junctional kyphosis. CONCLUSIONS: Blood conservation techniques allow for safe and effective spine deformity surgery in pediatric patients refusing blood transfusion without major anesthetic or medical complications, when performed by an experienced multidisciplinary team. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Improving Health-related Quality of Life for Patients With Nonambulatory Cerebral Palsy: Who Stands to Gain From Scoliosis Surgery?

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear what factors influence health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in neuromuscular scoliosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate which factors are associated with an improvement in an HRQOL after spinal fusion surgery for nonambulatory patients with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: A total of 157 patients with nonambulatory CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System IV and V) with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after PSF were identified from a prospective multicenter registry. Radiographs and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Quality of life was evaluated using the validated Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) questionnaire. Patients who had an increase of 10 points or greater from baseline CPCHILD scores were considered to have meaningful improvement at 2 years postoperatively. 10 points was chosen as a threshold for meaningful improvement based on differences between Gross Motor Function Classification System IV and V patients reported during the development of the CPCHILD. Perioperative demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables were analyzed to determine predicators for meaningful improvement by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 36.3% (57/157) of the patients reported meaningful improvement in CPCHILD scores at 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative radiographic parameters, postoperative radiographic parameters, and deformity correction did not differ significantly between groups. Patients who experienced meaningful improvement from surgery had significantly lower preoperative total CHPILD scores (43.8 vs. 55.2, P<0.001). On backwards conditional binary logistic regression, only the preoperative comfort, emotions, and behavior domain of the CPCHILD was predictive of meaningful improvement after surgery (P≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Analysis of 157 CP patients revealed a meaningful improvement in an HRQOL in 36.3% of the patients. These patients tended to have lower preoperative HRQOL, suggesting more "room for improvement" from surgery. A lower score within the comfort, emotions, and behavior domain of the CPCHILD was predictive of meaningful improvement after surgery. Radiographic parameters of deformity or curve correction were not associated with meaningful improvement after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

Progressive decline in pulmonary function 5 years post-operatively in patients who underwent anterior instrumentation for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in pulmonary function tests (PFT) at 5 years post-operatively in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to determine whether these changes are progressive or static after 2 years. METHODS: AIS surgical patients with pre-operative and 5 year post-operative forced expiratory volume (FEV) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were included. The percentage of patients with pulmonary impairment at 5 years was calculated. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate changes between pre-operative PFT and 5 years post-operative PFT and to determine whether the changes differed between curve types and approach. A sub-analysis of patients with 2 year data was performed to determine whether PFT changes were static or progressive. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-two patients had undergone pre-operative and 5 year post-operative PFTs. At 5 years, 42% were normal, 41% had mild impairment, and 17% had moderate-severe impairment. Overall, there was a decline in % predicted FVC (p < 0.05); FEV remained stable. There was no difference based on major curve type (p > 0.05). Anterior instrumentation cases declined significantly between pre-operative PFT and 5 years post-operative PFT (FEV: - 10% open, - 6% thoracoscopic; FVC: - 13% open, - 8% thoracoscopic) (p ≤ 0.02). The posterior cases remained stable (2% FEV, p = 0.7; - 0.6% FVC, p = 0.06). A subgroup of 90 patients with 2 year post-operative PFTs demonstrated that changes were progressive between 2 and 5 years post-operatively. The average change in FVC from 2 to 5 years was significantly different between the anterior open (- 9%) and posterior-only (0.7%) groups (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: In patients who underwent anterior instrumentation, PFTs declined from the pre-operative to the 5 years post-operative time point. There was a progressive decline of 4-10% beyond 2 years post-operatively. Patients who underwent posterior instrumentation remained stable. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

L3 translation predicts when L3 is not distal enough for an "ideal" result in Lenke 5 curves.

PURPOSE: Determining whether to fuse a Lenke 5 curve to L3 or to L4 is often a difficult decision. The purpose of this study was to determine preoperative variables predictive of an "ideal" or "less than ideal" outcome for Lenke 5 curves instrumented to L3. METHODS: A multicentre registry of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients was queried for surgically treated Lenke 5 curves with a lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L3 and minimum 2 years of follow-up. Five seasoned surgeons qualitatively rated the 2-year postoperative images as "ideal" or "less than ideal" with respect to correction and alignment. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic variables were compared between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine variables most predictive of a "less than ideal" outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria. Twenty-three were considered "less than ideal" by ≥ 3 surgeons; 81 were unanimously "ideal". Preoperatively, the "less than ideal" group had significantly stiffer curves, greater apical translation, and greater LIV angulation and translation. Multivariate regression found that preoperative L3 translation (p = 0.009) was the single most important predictor of a "less than ideal" outcome: < 3.5 cm consistently resulted in an "ideal" outcome, while > 3.5 cm risked a "less than ideal" result. CONCLUSION: While multiple variables are important in achieving an "ideal" outcome in Lenke 5 curves, this study found preoperative L3 translation was the most important predictor of success with an L3 translation < 3.5 cm being a potential threshold for selecting L3 as the LIV. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Selective thoracic fusion of a left decompensated main thoracic curve: proceed with caution?

PURPOSE: Previous research has shown that with certain idiopathic scoliosis curve types, performing a selective thoracic fusion (STF) is associated with an increased risk of coronal decompensation post-operatively. The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of curve correction and fusion level on post-operative balance in STF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with pre-operative coronal decompensation. METHODS: A multicenter database was queried for subjects with right Lenke 1-4C curves, pre-operative left coronal imbalance, and 2-year follow-up who underwent STF (caudal fusion level of L1 or proximal). Rates of decompensation were compared between groups with different levels of fusion. Thoracic and lumbar curve correction as well as Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcome scores were compared between groups that were post-operatively balanced or persistently decompensated. RESULTS: 121 patients were identified with average thoracic and lumbar curves of 53° and 41°. Mean pre- and post-operative decompensations were 2.4 ± 1.0 and 1.8 ± 1.1 cm, respectively. Eighteen patients were fused short, 62 to, and 41 were fused past the stable vertebra. Ten patients were fused short, 32 to, and 78 were fused past the neutral vertebra. Incidence of post-operative decompensation was 41%. No differences in post-operative decompensation relative to the stable or neutral vertebra were noted (p = 0.66, p = 0.74). Post-operatively, those patients who were balanced had similar thoracic curve correction (58%) to those decompensated (54%, p = 0.11); however, patients balanced post-operatively had greater SLCC (45 vs 40%, p = 0.04). No differences in SRS-22 outcome scores were noted between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was a high rate of post-operative decompensation in patients with pre-operative coronal decompensation undergoing STF. Fusion to or past the stable or neutral vertebra did not affect the risk of persistent decompensation. Attempts to improve SLCC could reduce post-operative decompensation.

Performing a Definitive Fusion in Juvenile CP Patients is a Good Surgical Option.

BACKGROUND: In juveniles with progressive curves, there is debate regarding the use of growth friendly implants versus definitive fusion. This study presents outcomes of juvenile cerebral palsy (CP) scoliosis patients who underwent definitive fusion before age 11. METHODS: A review of a prospective, multicenter registry identified patients 10 years and younger who had a definitive posterior fusion for their CP scoliosis. Preoperative and postoperative demographic and radiographic changes were evaluated with descriptive statistics. Repeated measures analysis of variance were utilized to compare outcome scores. RESULTS: Fourteen children with a mean age of 9.7 years (8.3 to 10.8 y) and a minimum of 2 years follow-up (range 2 to 3 y) were identified. The mean preoperative curve magnitude and pelvic obliquity was 84±25 degrees (range 63 to 144 degrees) and 25±14 degrees, respectively. All patients were skeletally immature with open triradiate cartilage. Three patients had unit rods with wires while the rest incorporated pedicle screws. Immediately postoperation, the average major curve was 25±17 degrees (P≤0.001, 71% correction rate). At most recent follow-up, the average major curve increased to 30±18 degrees (P≤0.001) for a 65% correction rate. Pelvic obliquity improved to 4±4 degrees (84% correction, P≤0.001) immediately postoperation and to 6±5 degrees (P=0.002) at latest follow-up for a 76% correction rate. None of the patients required revision surgery for progression. From pre to most recent follow-up, the CPchild Health outcome scores improved from 47 to 58 (P=0.019). One patient had a deep infection, and 1 patient had a broken rod that did not require any further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive scoliosis in juvenile CP patients requires the surgeon to balance the need for further growth with the risks of progression or repeated surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that definitive fusion once the curves approach 90 degrees results in significant radiographic and quality of life improvements, but further follow-up is needed to determine whether those results remain after skeletal maturity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Recurrence of rib prominence following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screws and direct vertebral body derotation.

PURPOSE: Pedicle screw constructs combined with direct vertebral body derotation (DVBD) provide a powerful corrective force of the rib prominence associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We wished to evaluate the incidence and correlative factors associated with recurrence of rib prominence (RRP) developing postoperatively despite adequate initial correction. METHODS: 103 patients with AIS underwent pedicle screw fixation with DVBD without thoracoplasty and had postoperative scoliometer readings at 6, 12, and 24 months. Patients with RRP, defined as a postoperative scoliometer increase ≥5°, were compared to those without recurrence. RESULTS: The mean rib prominence measured 14.0 ± 4.3° preoperatively, with a correction of 50.3 ± 26.7 % at 6 months, 49.0 ± 39.0 % at 1 year, and 49.1 ± 26.7 % at 2 years. RRP was identified in 15.5 % of the patients with a correction of 57.5 ± 25.5 % at 6 months, 47.2 ± 42.5 % at 1 year, and 40.4 ± 21.6 % at 2 years. At 2 years, the RRP group demonstrated a significantly larger major coronal Cobb (p < 0.05) and a trend towards less curve correction (p = 0.09). Patients with open triradiates had a significantly higher rate of RRP compared to those with closed (p = 0.01). Worsening apical vertebral rotation at 2 years post-operation occurred in 43.8 % (7/16) of the patients with RRP. CONCLUSION: RRP after posterior fusion for AIS with all pedicle screw constructs and DVBD occurred in 15.5 % of patients in our study. Patients with open triradiate cartilage had a significantly higher rate of RRP, although most with RRP were skeletally mature. There was a trend towards loss of coronal correction and increased apical vertebral rotation at 2 years in patients with RRP. The potential for RRP after adequate initial correction should be discussed with patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique Guide: Surgical Tips and Tricks.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a popular technique as it allows for the placement of a large interbody implant through a retroperitoneal, transpsoas working corridor. Historically, the interbody is placed with the patient in lateral decubitus and then repositioned to prone for the posterior instrumentation. While this has been an effective and successful technique, removing the interoperative flip would improve the efficiency of these cases. This has led to modified LLIF approaches including single-position prone LLIF (pLLIF). This modification has shown to be an efficient and powerful technique; however, learning to navigate the LLIF approach in the prone position has its own challenges. The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed description of our pLLIF technique while simultaneously introducing surgical tips to overcome the challenges of the approach and optimize the implantation of the interbody device.

Endoscopic Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: A Narrative Review of Full-Endoscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative lumbar spine disease is the leading cause of disability and work absenteeism worldwide. Lumbar microdiscectomy became the standard treatment for herniated discs and stenotic disease. With the evolution of different techniques, endoscopic spinal surgery emerged to minimize the surgical footprint while providing at least non-inferior results. Currently, two different types of endoscopic spine procedures are dominating the surgical scenario: "Full-Endoscopic" (FE) and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic" (UBE) Spine Surgery. The aim of this study is to describe and analyze their indications, their technical characteristicswithitsadvantagesanddisadvantagesofbothtechniquesandtheirfuture trends. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the most relevant articles published up to August 2023 through a Pub Med search. The search terms " FE Spine Surgery" and " UBE Spine Surgery" were used. The articles selected, were independently reviewed by 3 authors and 55 full text articles were reviewed. RESULTS: The FE and UBE Spine Surgery techniques were described. The FE technique is performed with a monoportal access under constant saline irrigation. The FE comprises the transforaminal and the interlaminar approaches, and the indication depends from the pathology to treat, and still remains controversial. UBE can approach also the spine from a posterior, postero lateral,and para spinal route. It uses two different ports addressed to a target with continuous irrigation. The process of establishing these two portals is called triangulation. CONCLUSIONS: FE and UBE spine surgery have demonstrated outcomes comparable to open surgery, minimizing complications and surgical footprint.

Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis After Personalized Interbody Fusion: The Importance of Preoperative Planning and Alignment in Degenerative Spine Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data have highlighted the significance of planning and aligning total and segmental lumbar lordosis with pelvic morphology when performing short-segment fusion with the goal of reducing the risk of adjacent segment disease while also decreasing spine-related disability. This study evaluates the impact of personalized interbody implants in restoring pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch compared with a similar study using stock interbody implants. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective analysis assessed radiographic pre- and postoperative spinopelvic alignment (PI-LL) in patients who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar fusions with personalized interbody implants for degenerative (nondeformity) indications. The aim was to assess the incidence of malalignment (PI-LL ≥ 10°) both before and after fusion surgery and to determine the rate of alignment preservation and/or correction in this population. RESULTS: There were 135 patients included in this study. Of 83 patients who were aligned preoperatively, alignment was preserved in 76 (91.6%) and worsened in 7 (8.4%). Among the 52 preoperatively malaligned patients, alignment was restored in 23 (44.2%), and 29 (55.8%) were not fully corrected. Among patients who were preoperatively aligned, there was no statistically significant difference in either the "preserved" or "worsened" groups between stock devices and personalized interbody devices. In contrast, among patients who were preoperatively malaligned, there was a statistically significant increase in the "restored" group (P = 0.046) and a statistically significant decrease in the "worsened" groups in patients with personalized interbodies compared with historical stock device data (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a historical cohort with stock implants, personalized interbody implants in short-segment fusions have shown a statistically significant improvement in restoring patients to normative PI-LL. Using 3-dimensional preoperative planning combined with personalized implants provides an important tool for planning and achieving improvement in spinopelvic parameters.

Analyzing the L4-5 Segmental Alignment Change of Two Minimally Invasive Prone-Based Interbody Fusions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: Restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) is a principal objective during spinal fusion procedures, traditionally focusing on achieving an LL within 10° of the pelvic incidence (PI). Recent studies have demonstrated a relatively constant L4-S1 alignment of 35-40° at L4-S1 and at least 15° at L4-5, regardless of PI. Based on these results, this study was created to examine the success rate of achieving a minimum of 15° at L4-5 through two differing prone-based techniques: Prone Lateral (pLLIF) and Trans Foraminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF). METHODS: One hundred patients with a primary single-level L4-5 interbody fusion (50 pLLIF and 50 TLIF) were retrospectively analyzed. Pre and post-operative radiographs were measured to examine the segmental change at each level in the lumbar spine and calculate the success rate for achieving a minimum L4-5 segmental lordosis of 15° at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The overall success rate of achieving an L4-5 segmental alignment >15° at the final follow-up was 70%. Prone LLIF was significantly more likely than TLIF to achieve this goal, achieving L4-5 > 15° 84% of the time vs TLIFs 56% (P = 0.002). Prone LLIF demonstrated an average L4-5 increase of 5.6 ± 5.9° which was larger than the mean increase for TLIF 0.4 ± 3.8° (P < 0.001). In both techniques, there was an inverse correlation between pre-operative L4-5 angle and L4-5 angle change. CONCLUSION: Prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion demonstrates a high success rate for achieving a post-operative L4-5 angle >15° and achieves this at a higher rate than TLIF.

Changes in Alignment at Untreated Vertebral Levels Following Short-Segment Fusion Using Personalized Interbody Cages: Leveraging Personalized Medicine to Reduce the Risk of Reoperation.

BACKGROUND: An abnormal postoperative lordosis distribution index (LDI), which quantifies the ratio between the lordosis at L4 to S1 and the lordosis at L1 to S1, contributes to the development of adjacent segment disease and increased revision rates in patients undergoing short-segment lumbar intervertebral fusions. Incorporating preoperative spinopelvic parameters and LDI into the surgical plan for short-segment fusion is important for guiding alignment restoration and preserving normal preoperative alignment in unfused segments. This study examined changes in LDI, segmental lordosis, and lordosis of the unfused levels in patients treated with personalized interbody cage (PIC) implants. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated radiographic measurements from 111 consecutively treated patients diagnosed with degenerative spinal conditions and treated with a short-segment fusion of L4 to L5, L5 to S1, or L4 to S1 using PIC implant(s) within 6 months of the fusion procedure. Comparisons of intervertebral lordosis for treated and untreated levels as well as LDI pre- and postoperatively were performed. RESULTS: In patients with a preoperative hypolordotic distribution (LDI < 50%), statistically significant increases were found in LDI postoperatively, approaching the normal LDI range (LDI 50%-80%). Likewise, patients with hyperlordotic distribution preoperatively (LDI > 80%) experienced a decrease in LDI postoperatively, trending toward the normal range, although the changes were not statistically significant. Intervertebral lordosis for the L5 to S1 level increased significantly following the placement of a PIC in the normal and hypolordotic LDI groups. Changes in intervertebral lordosis for L5 to S1 were not significant for patients with preoperative hyperlordotic LDI. Reciprocal changes in intervertebral lordosis at L1 to L4 were not observed in any groups. CONCLUSIONS: PIC implants may provide a benefit for patients, particularly those with hypolordotic distributions preoperatively. They have the potential to further improve patient outcomes by helping surgeons to achieve patient-specific lordosis goals, which may help to reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease and revisions in patients undergoing short-segment lumbar intervertebral fusions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Personalized implants can help surgeons achieve patient-specific alignment goals, potentially prevent adjacent segment disease, and reduce long-term reinterventions.

Radiographic Alignment in Deformity Patients Treated With Personalized Interbody Devices: Early Experience From the COMPASS Registry.

BACKGROUND: Literature supports the need for improved techniques to achieve spinopelvic alignment and reduce complication rates in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Personalized interbody devices were developed to address this need and are under evaluation in the multicenter Clinical Outcome Measures in Personalized aprevo (circle R superscript) Spine Surgery (COMPASS (TM suprascript) registry. This report presents interim COMPASS pre- and postoperative sagittal alignment results and complication rates for a subcohort of COMPASS patients diagnosed and surgically treated for spinal deformity. METHODS: COMPASS is a postmarket observational registry of patients enrolled either before or after index surgery and then followed prospectively for 24 months. Sagittal alignment was assessed with SRS-Schwab modifiers for pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and T1 pelvic angle. Summed SRS-Schwab modifiers were utilized to assign overall deformity status as mild, moderate, or severe. Complications were extracted from patient medical records. RESULTS: The study included 67 patients from 9 centers. Preoperative severe deformity was observed in 66% of patients. Index surgeries included implantation of a median of 2 personalized interbody devices by anterior, lateral, or transforaminal approaches and with a median of 8 posteriorly instrumented levels. Overall postoperative sagittal alignment improved with a significant decrease in the mean sum of SRS-Schwab modifiers that correlated strongly to improvements in pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Among 44 patients with preoperative severe overall deformity, 16 improved to moderate and 9 to mild deformity. Complications occurred for 13 patients (19.4%), including 1 mechanical complication requiring revision 9 months after surgery and none related to personalized interbody devices. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ASD patients whose treatment included personalized interbody devices can obtain favorable postoperative alignment status comparable to published results and with no complications related to the personalized interbody devices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study contributes to growing evidence that personalized interbody devices contribute to improved sagittal alignment in ASD patients by directly adjusting the orientation of adjacent vertebra.

Predictability in Achieving Target Intervertebral Lordosis Using Personalized Interbody Implants.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar lordosis distribution has become a pivotal factor in re-establishing the foundational alignment of the lumbar spine. This can directly influence overall sagittal alignment, leading to improved long-term outcomes for patients. Despite the wide availability of hyperlordotic stock cages intended to achieve optimal postoperative alignment, there is a lack of correlation between the lordotic shape of a cage and the resultant intervertebral alignment. Recently, personalized spine surgery has witnessed significant advancements, including 3D-printed personalized interbody implants, which are customized to the surgeon's treatment and alignment goals. This study evaluates the reliability of 3D-printed patient-specific interbody implants to achieve the planned postoperative intervertebral alignment. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 217 patients with spinal deformity or degenerative conditions. Patients were included if they received 3D-printed personalized interbody implants. The desired intervertebral lordosis (IVL) angle was prescribed into the device design for each personalized interbody (IVL goal). Standing postoperative radiographs were measured, and the IVL offset was calculated as IVL achieved minus IVL goal. RESULTS: In this patient population, 365 personalized interbodies were implanted, including 145 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs), 99 lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIFs), and 121 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Among the 365 treated levels, IVL offset was 1.1° ± 4.4° (mean ± SD). IVL was achieved within 5° of the plan in 299 levels (81.9%). IVL offset depended on the approach of the lumbar interbody fusion and was achieved within 5° for 85.9% of LLIF, 82.6% of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions and 78.6% of ALIFs. Ten levels (2.7%) missed the planned IVL by >10°. ALIF and LLIF levels in which the plan was missed by more than 5° tended to be overcorrected. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of 3D-printed personalized interbody implants to achieve planned sagittal intervertebral alignment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Personalized interbody implants can consistently achieve IVL goals and potentially impact foundational lumbar alignment.

More experienced surgeons less likely to fuse: a focus group review of 315 hypothetical EOS cases.

INTRODUCTION: Previous work has identified significant variability in decision making and multiple areas of clinical equipoise in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). In an attempt to better understand possible determinants of this variability, we examined the relationship between socioclinical attributes of 11 participating surgeons and decision making regarding the treatment of EOS. METHODS: Eleven experienced EOS surgeons were surveyed. The first part of the survey consisted of questions regarding surgeon and practice demographics. Next, surgeons were queried regarding their preferred management of 315 hypothetical EOS cases. Cases varied considerably in etiology [idiopathic, and low-tone and high-tone neuromuscular (HTNM)], age, and curve severity and progression. Treatment options were analyzed both individually and grouped as conservative (observation, bracing, or casting) versus surgical (spine-based or rib-based distraction, growth guidance, growth modulation, or definitive fusion). An "outlier" variable was created to determine the extent of a surgeon's deviation from the group in management decisions. A univariate and multivariate regression analysis to identify statistical associations between physician characteristics and their management decisions in the presented hypothetical cases was performed. RESULTS: The cohort's mean years in practice was 20.7±7.36 years. Fifty-six percent of the cohort held Chest Wall and Spine Deformity Study Group (CWSDSG) membership and 56% were members of the Growing Spine Study Group. Multivariate regression demonstrated more years of practice predicted a lower preference for fusion (P<0.05). This effect was greater among HTNM cases (P<0.05). Overall, there was equal interest among groups regarding the choice between rib-based and spine-based distraction methods; however, for the subset of patients with HTNM scoliosis, membership in the CWSDSG (P<0.05) and the percentage of practice spent treating spinal deformity (P<0.05) predicted more rib-based distraction use. CONCLUSIONS: EOS surgeons with more experience were less likely to opt for definitive fusion. Use of rib-based distraction methods was common across surgeons in both study groups and within various cohorts of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (survey of experts).

Single-Position Transpsoas Corpectomy and Posterior Instrumentation in the Thoracolumbar Spine for Different Clinical Scenarios.

BACKGROUND: The concept of single-position spine surgery has been gaining momentum because it has proven to reduce operative time, blood loss, and hospital length of stay with similar or better outcomes than traditional dual-position surgery. The latest development in single-position spine surgery techniques combines either open or posterior pedicle screw fixation with transpsoas corpectomy while in the lateral or prone positioning. OBJECTIVE: To provide, through a multicenter study, the results of our first patients treated by single-position corpectomy. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent corpectomy and instrumentation in the lateral or prone position without repositioning between the anterior and posterior techniques. Data regarding demographics, diagnosis, neurological status, surgical details, complications, and radiographic parameters were collected. The minimum follow-up for inclusion was 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were finally included in our study (24 male patients and 10 female patients), with a mean age of 51.2 (SD ± 17.5) years. Three-quarter of cases (n = 27) presented with thoracolumbar fracture as main diagnosis, followed by spinal metastases and primary spinal infection. Lateral positioning was used in 27 cases, and prone positioning was used in 7 cases. The overall rate of complications was 14.7%. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter series of patients who underwent single-position corpectomy and fusion. This technique has shown to be safe and effective to treat a variety of spinal conditions with a relatively low rate of complications. More series are required to validate this technique as a possible standard approach when thoracolumbar corpectomies are indicated.

Time to surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: How long does it take? A multicenter study.

Study design: Retrospective review of multicentric data. Objectives: To estimate the time from initial visit to surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and the main reasons for the time to surgery in a multicenter study. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 509 patients with AIS from 16 hospitals across six Latin American countries. From each hospital's deformity registry, the following patient data were extracted: demographics, main curve Cobb angle, Lenke Classification at the initial visit and time of surgery, time from indication-for-surgery to surgery, curve progression, Risser skeletal-maturity score and causes for surgical cancelation or delay. Surgeons were asked if they needed to change the original surgical plan due to curve progression. Data also were collected on each hospital's waiting list numbers and mean delay to AIS surgery. Results: 66.8% of the patients waited over six months and 33.9% over a year. Waiting time was not impacted by the patient's age when surgery first became indicated (p = 0.22) but waiting time did differ between countries (p < 0.001) and hospitals (p < 0.001). Longer time to surgery was significantly associated with increasing magnitude of the Cobb angle through the second year of waiting (p < 0.001). Reported causes for delay were hospital-related (48.4%), economic (47.3%), and logistic (4.2%). Oddly, waiting time for surgery did not correlate with the hospital's reported waiting-list lengths (p = 0.57). Conclusion: Prolonged waits for AIS surgery are common in Latin America, with rare exceptions. At most centers, patients wait over six months, most commonly for economic and hospital-related reasons. Whether this directly impacts surgical outcomes in Latin America still must be studied.

Perioperative Complications and Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes in Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative complications and mid-term outcomes for severe pediatric spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have evaluated the impact of complications on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in severe pediatric spinal deformity. METHODS: Patients from a prospective, multicenter database with severe pediatric spinal deformity (minimum of 100 degree curve in any plane or planned vertebral column resection (VCR)) with a minimum of 2-years follow-up were evaluated (n=231). SRS-22r scores were collected preoperatively and at 2-years postoperatively. Complications were categorized as intraoperative, early postoperative (within 90-days of surgery), major, or minor. Perioperative complication rate was evaluated between patients with and without VCR. Additionally, SRS-22r scores were compared between patients with and without complications. RESULTS: Perioperative complications occurred in 135 (58%) patients, and major complications occurred in 53 (23%) patients. Patients that underwent VCR had a higher incidence of early postoperative complications than patients without VCR (28.9% vs. 16.2%, P =0.02). Complications resolved in 126/135 (93.3%) patients with a mean time to resolution of 91.63 days. Unresolved major complications included motor deficit (n=4), spinal cord deficit (n=1), nerve root deficit (n=1), compartment syndrome (n=1), and motor weakness due to recurrent intradural tumor (n=1). Patients with complications, major complications, or multiple complications had equivalent postoperative SRS-22r scores. Patients with motor deficits had lower postoperative satisfaction subscore (4.32 vs. 4.51, P =0.03), but patients with resolved motor deficits had equivalent postoperative scores in all domains. Patients with unresolved complications had lower postoperative satisfaction subscore (3.94 vs. 4.47, P =0.03) and less postoperative improvement in self-image subscore (0.64 vs. 1.42, P =0.03) as compared to patients with resolved complications. CONCLUSION: Most perioperative complications for severe pediatric spinal deformity resolve within 2-years postoperatively and do not result in adverse HRQoL outcomes. However, patients with unresolved complications have decreased HRQoL outcomes.

When to Consider Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is There a Role for a Comeback With New Implants?

OBJECTIVE: To perform a comprehensive review of the literature about the role of stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). METHODS: A MEDLINE review was conducted including studies about stand-alone LLIF for any condition. The opinions of the authors were also considered. Studies that included biomechanical, cadaveric, or clinical aspects of stand-alone cages were revised to obtain data about the pros, cons, and limitations of the technique. Comparative studies with 360° (lateral + posterior) fusions were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were identified. After reviewing the abstracts, 18 full articles of interest for the objective of this review were analyzed. Recommendations based on the literature were made. Although most of the recommendations in the literature were about augmentation with pedicle screws, there may be a role for stand-alone LLIF in some particular cases. Specific technical aspects should be considered to reduce the failure rate. CONCLUSION: Although there might be some specific indications for stand-alone LLIF, it should be considered an exception rather than the rule.