Field evaluation of diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and specificity (DSp) of common tests for amoebic gill disease (AGD) and complex gill disease (CGD) in cultured Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Scotland using Bayesian latent class models.

Amoebic gill disease (AGD) and complex gill disease (CGD) are the most significant marine gill diseases in salmon aquaculture in Scotland. Little is published about diagnostic performance of tests to detect these diseases, making it difficult to interpret test results. We estimated diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and specificity (DSp) of common tests for AGD (gross AGD score, qPCR for Neoparamoeba perurans, histopathology) and CGD (gross proliferative gill disease (PGD) score, gross total gill score, histopathology). Because specifications in our sampling protocol implemented to encourage consistency across the farms might affect diagnostic performance of histopathology (historically the reference standard for gill diseases), we used Bayesian latent class models without reference standard. Cases and non-cases were based on less, medium, and severe stringent case definitions, representing different cut-off levels for the different tests. Gross gill scores for both diseases were excellent in designating non-diseased fish, DSps were generally around 1. To detect CGD, DSe of gross total gill score and gross PGD score were between respectively 0.81 (0.73 - 0.91 lower to upper 95% credible interval) and 0.53 (0.46 - 0.64) for medium stringent case definitions, and to detect AGD the DSe for the gross AGD score was between 0.53 (0.48-0.57) and 0.14 (0.07 - 0.22) for respectively the less and severe stringent case definition. Thus, gross gill scores were medium to good in designating truly diseased fish, implying some false negatives are expected. For CGD the DSe for gross total gill scores were the highest, for AGD it was the qPCR test at a DSe of 0.92 (0.86 - 0.99). For both diseases, DSe was lowest for histopathology, e.g. 0.23 (0.16 - 0.30) for AGD and 0.1 (0.07 - 0.14) for CGD under medium stringent case definitions, perhaps due to collecting the second gill arch on the right rather than the worst affected arch, whilst PCR sampling and gross gill scoring included multiple (PCR) or all (gross scoring) gill arches. The diagnostic goals of these tests differ; gross gill scoring provides a low-cost presumptive diagnosis, PCR a non-lethal confirmation of the presence of a specific pathogen and histopathology provides information on the underlying aetiology of gill damage as well as the extent, severity, and chronology of gill disease. An effective gill health surveillance strategy is likely to incorporate multiple diagnostic tools used in a complementary manner.

Impact of Salmonid alphavirus infection in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fry.

With increasing interest in the use of triploid salmon in commercial aquaculture, gaining an understanding of how economically important pathogens affect triploid stocks is important. To compare the susceptibility of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) to viral pathogens, fry were experimentally infected with Salmonid alphavirus sub-type 1 (SAV1), the aetiological agent of pancreas disease (PD) affecting Atlantic salmon aquaculture in Europe. Three groups of fry were exposed to the virus via different routes of infection: intraperitoneal injection (IP), bath immersion, or cohabitation (co-hab) and untreated fry were used as a control group. Mortalities commenced in the co-hab challenged diploid and triploid fish from 11 days post infection (dpi), and the experiment was terminated at 17 dpi. Both diploid and triploid IP challenged groups had similar levels of cumulative mortality at the end of the experimental period (41.1% and 38.9% respectively), and these were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than for the other challenge routes. A TaqMan-based quantitative PCR was used to assess SAV load in the heart, a main target organ of the virus, and also liver, which does not normally display any pathological changes during clinical infections, but exhibited severe degenerative lesions in the present study. The median viral RNA copy number was higher in diploid fish compared to triploid fish in both the heart and the liver of all three challenged groups. However, a significant statistical difference (p < 0.05) was only apparent in the liver of the co-hab groups. Diploid fry also displayed significantly higher levels of pancreatic and myocardial degeneration than triploids. This study showed that both diploid and triploid fry are susceptible to experimental SAV1 infection. The lower virus load seen in the triploids compared to the diploids may possibly be related to differences in cell metabolism between the two groups, however, further investigation is necessary to confirm this and also to assess the outcome of PD outbreaks in other developmental stages of the fish when maintained in commercial production systems.