Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 19973, 2019 12 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31882592

RESUMEN

The transmission of pathogens across the interface between wildlife and livestock presents a challenge to the development of effective surveillance and control measures. Wild birds, especially waterbirds such as the Anseriformes and Charadriiformes are considered to be the natural hosts of Avian Influenza (AI), and are presumed to pose one of the most likely vectors for incursion of AI into European poultry flocks. We have developed a generic quantitative risk map, derived from the classical epidemiological risk equation, to describe the relative, spatial risk of disease incursion into poultry flocks via wild birds. We then assessed the risk for AI incursion into British flocks. The risk map suggests that the majority of AI incursion risk is highly clustered within certain areas of Britain, including in the east, the south west and the coastal north-west of England. The clustering of high risk areas concentrates total risk in a relatively small land area; the top 33% of cells contribute over 80% of total incursion risk. This suggests that targeted risk-based sampling in a relatively small geographical area could be a much more effective and cost-efficient approach than representative sampling. The generic nature of the risk map method, allows rapid updating and application to other diseases transmissible between wild birds and poultry.


Asunto(s)
Animales Salvajes , Aves/virología , Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Aviar/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/transmisión , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/virología , Algoritmos , Animales , Brotes de Enfermedades , Geografía Médica , Gripe Aviar/transmisión , Gripe Aviar/virología , Modelos Teóricos , Densidad de Población , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis Espacial , Reino Unido/epidemiología
2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 14666, 2019 10 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31604960

RESUMEN

The objective was to measure the association between badger culling and bovine tuberculosis (TB) incidents in cattle herds in three areas of England between 2013-2017 (Gloucestershire and Somerset) and 2015-2017 (Dorset). Farming industry-selected licensed culling areas were matched to comparison areas. A TB incident was detection of new Mycobacterium bovis infection (post-mortem confirmed) in at least one animal in a herd. Intervention and comparison area incidence rates were compared in central zones where culling was conducted and surrounding buffer zones, through multivariable Poisson regression analyses. Central zone incidence rates in Gloucestershire (Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.34 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.39, p < 0.001) and Somerset (IRR 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.69, p < 0.001) were lower and no different in Dorset (IRR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.27, p = 0.168) than comparison central zone rates. The buffer zone incidence rate was lower for Gloucestershire (IRR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.70, p < 0.001), no different for Somerset (IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.16, p = 0.767) and lower for Dorset (IRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.54, p < 0.001) than comparison buffer zone rates. Industry-led culling was associated with reductions in cattle TB incidence rates after four years but there were variations in effects between areas.


Asunto(s)
Reservorios de Enfermedades/microbiología , Mustelidae/microbiología , Mycobacterium bovis/patogenicidad , Tuberculosis Bovina/epidemiología , Sacrificio de Animales/métodos , Animales , Bovinos , Reservorios de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Inglaterra , Humanos , Tuberculosis Bovina/microbiología , Tuberculosis Bovina/patología
3.
Ecol Evol ; 7(18): 7213-7230, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28944012

RESUMEN

Culling badgers to control the transmission of bovine tuberculosis (TB) between this wildlife reservoir and cattle has been widely debated. Industry-led culling began in Somerset and Gloucestershire between August and November 2013 to reduce local badger populations. Industry-led culling is not designed to be a randomized and controlled trial of the impact of culling on cattle incidence. Nevertheless, it is important to monitor the effects of the culling and, taking the study limitations into account, perform a cautious evaluation of the impacts. A standardized method for selecting areas matched to culling areas in factors found to affect cattle TB risk has been developed to evaluate the impact of badger culling on cattle TB incidence. The association between cattle TB incidence and badger culling in the first 2 years has been assessed. Descriptive analyses without controlling for confounding showed no association between culling and TB incidence for Somerset, or for either of the buffer areas for the first 2 years since culling began. A weak association was observed in Gloucestershire for Year 1 only. Multivariable analysis adjusting for confounding factors showed that reductions in TB incidence were associated with culling in the first 2 years in both the Somerset and Gloucestershire intervention areas when compared to areas with no culling (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87, p < .001 and IRR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34-0.51, p < .001, respectively). An increase in incidence was associated with culling in the 2-km buffer surrounding the Somerset intervention area (IRR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09-1.75, p = .008), but not in Gloucestershire (IRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.07, p = .243). As only 2 intervention areas with 2 years of data are available for analysis, and the biological cause-effect relationship behind the statistical associations is difficult to determine, it would be unwise to use these findings to develop generalizable inferences about the effectiveness of the policy at present.

4.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp ; 66(2): 96-106, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24672116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of depression in the United States, 10 few studies have identified which adverse effects (AEs) patients are willing or unwilling to tolerate when receiving antidepressants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify reasons for discontinuation10 and noncompliance with antidepressant medications, the impact of AEs on compliance and quality of life (assessed using impact of AEs on activities of daily living), and patients' suggestions for improving their medication, using a patient survey. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 years with mild to severe depression were 10 randomly selected by their physicians to be sent an invitation to complete the 42-question survey. Three hundred physicians nationwide assessed the severity of depression and symptoms of anxiety in each respondent, using their judgment. Patients were asked specific questions to assess reasons for discontinuation/noncompliance. Patients were also asked to rate AEs based on how difficult they were to "live with," and what 2 aspects of their antidepressant medication they would change if they could. RESULTS: In a separate, concurrent study, physicians classified 175 (50%) abdResults:0 mildly to moderately depressed and 84 (24%) as severely depressed. Ninety-one respondents (26%) were classified as having symptoms of anxiety. Two hundred seven patients (60%) indicated they had discontinued treatment with an antidepressant agent at some point in their lives, the most common reason for which was lack of efficacy (92 patients [44%]). Of the 344 patients currently being treated with an antidepressant, 75 (22%) reported noncompliance. The most common reasons for noncompliance were "have trouble remembering to take it" (19/44 patients [43%]), "gained a lot of weight" (11/41 [27%]), "unable to have an orgasm" (8/40 [20%]), and "lost interest in sex" (8/41 [20%]). The 4 AEs patients expressed as "extremely difficult to live with" were "weight gain" (104 patients [31%]), "unable to have erection" (83 [25%]), "difficulty reaching orgasm" (80 [24%]), and "tired during the day/no energy" (69 patients [21%]). The 3 most frequently cited improvements patients (n = 327) would make to their medications were better efficacy (176 patients [54%]) and eliminating AEs related to sexual desire and weight gain (112 [34%] and 105 [32%] patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this survey of patients with mild to severe10 depression suggest that compliance, and hence efficacy, can be promoted by (1) understanding what patients expect and desire from the antidepressants they are prescribed and (2) prescribing antidepressants associated with low rates of weight gain, sexual dysfunction, or tiredness.

19.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 19(1): 25-30, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17453658

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study investigated tiagabine monotherapy in subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) who had been switched from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as a result of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. METHODS: Adults with DSM-IV GAD, an adequate therapeutic response (> or =50% decrease in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety [HAM-A] total score) to SSRI or SNRI and sexual dysfunction were switched to open-label tiagabine 4-12 mg/day for 14 weeks. Assessments included the HAM-A, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) and the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX); assessments were made at baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, and 14. RESULTS: Twenty six subjects were included in the analysis. Tiagabine showed no worsening in baseline symptoms of GAD, with non-significant changes from baseline in mean HAM-A total scores and HADS Anxiety and Depression subscale scores. There was a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in ASEX total scores from baseline following tiagabine, indicating an alleviation of sexual dysfunction. Tiagabine was reasonably tolerated; the most commonly reported adverse events were dizziness/light headedness (n = 6; 23%), nausea (n = 6; 23%) and fatigue (n = 2; 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Tiagabine may be useful in subjects who respond to previous antidepressant therapy but develop sexual dysfunction as an adverse event.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas del GABA/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Nipecóticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Agonistas del GABA/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácidos Nipecóticos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/prevención & control , Tiagabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA