Efficacy of erythromycin compared to clarithromycin and azithromycin in adults or adolescents with community-acquired pneumonia: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: It is debatable whether erythromycin has similar efficacy to other macrolides in treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of erythromycin with clarithromycin and azithromycin. METHODS: We performed this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults or adolescents with CAP which compared the efficacy of erythromycin monotherapy to either azithromycin or clarithromycin. We searched PubMed and EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and three clinical trial registries up to November 02, 2021. We evaluated heterogeneity and used random-effects models to perform risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included four RCTs (total of 472 patients), which compared the clinical efficacy of erythromycin versus clarithromycin. No studies comparing monotherapy of erythromycin versus azithromycin were found. Erythromycin use was associated with significantly lower rates of clinical success (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98; P-value = 0.033; I2 = 20.27%), clinical cure (RR,0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92; P-value = 0.014; I2 = 8.75%), and radiological success (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.996; P-value = 0.045; I2 = 20.12%) than clarithromycin. CONCLUSION: Erythromycin is less effective than clarithromycin as empiric treatment of CAP in adults and adolescents. Because of this and the higher rate of adverse reactions, erythromycin should not be used in the majority of CAP patients when azithromycin and clarithromycin are available.

Genistein ameliorated experimentally induced gastric ulcer in rats via inhibiting gastric tissues fibrosis by modulating Wnt/ß-catenin/TGF-ß/PKB pathway.

OBJECTIVES: Gastric ulcer (GU) is a prevalent chronic digestive disease affecting about 10% of the world's population leading to gastrointestinal perforation and bleeding. Genistein is a legume flavonoid with antioxidants, anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activities. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the ability of genistein to reduce experimentally induced GU in rats by affecting gastric tissue fibrosis Wnt/ß-catenin/TGF-ß/SMAD4 pathway. METHODS: Thirty rats were used. Ten rats served as control, and GU was induced in twenty rats using a single dose of indomethacin (80 mg/kg) orally. Following induction of GU, ten were treated with genistein 25 mg/kg orally. The gastric tissues were isolated to investigate markers of gastric fibrosis, Wnt, ß-catenin, transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß, SMAD4, and Protein kinase B (PKB). In addition, gastric sections were stained with PAS and anti-TGF-ß antibodies. RESULTS: Investigation GU micro-images revealed degeneration in both surface cells and glandular epithelial cells, which was improved by genistein. In addition, treatment with genistein significantly reduced the expression of Wnt, ß-catenin, TGF-ß, SMAD4, and PKB. CONCLUSION: Besides antioxidant activity, genistein improves experimentally induced GU in rats, at least in part, via reduction of gastric tissue fibrosis as indicated by reduction in expression of Wnt, ß-catenin, TGF-ß, SMAD4, and PKB.

Hierarchical Modeling of Patient and Physician Determinants of Blood Pressure Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients with and without Diabetes: Pooled Analysis of Six Observational Valsartan Studies with 15,282 Evaluable Patients.

We pooled data from 6 valsartan-related studies including 3,658 diabetic and 11,624 nondiabetic patients to evaluate blood pressure (BP) outcomes after approximately 90 days of second- or later-line valsartan treatment. Hierarchical linear and logistic regressions were applied to identify determinants of BP outcomes. Similar reductions in BP values and similar BP control rates were achieved in both groups after approximately 90 days of therapy. The modeling analyses identified several common and different patient- and physician-related determinants of BP outcomes for both groups, many of which are modifiable or clinically manageable. Through varying in terms of association and influence between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups, patient-related determinants included age, BP at diagnosis of hypertension, risk factors, valsartan regimen, concomitant antihypertensive treatment, and adherence; and physician-related determinants included gender, years in practice, and hypertension management. In summary, in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, the use of valsartan-centric treatment regimens in second- or later-line antihypertensive treatment is associated with significant reductions in BP level and improvement in BP control. The determinants identified in modeling provide guidance to clinicians in the common and differential management of hypertension in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.