Comparison of early and late removal of the urinary catheter after rectal cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n: 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p: 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n: 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n: 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de la retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda urinaria tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que incluyó pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer rectal en un único centro. El momento de la retirada de la sonda urinaria se aleatorizó y se dividió en dos grupos: primeras 48 horas y después de 48 horas. Se compararon las tasas de retención urinaria y de nueva cateterización entre los pacientes con retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 60 años (31-88 años) y predominio del sexo masculino (n = 40, 60.9%). Se produjo retención urinaria tras la retirada de la sonda en 8 (12%). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a necesidad de nueva cateterización (14% frente a 10%, p = 0.63). Todos los pacientes que precisaron un nuevo cateterismo (n = 8) y fueron dados de alta con una sonda urinaria (n = 4) eran varones. CONCLUSIONES: La retirada precoz o tardía de la sonda no influye en la aparición de retención urinaria en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de recto.

Should we consider Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) as a new diagnostic marker for rectal cancer?

PURPOSE: The Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI), which depends on peripheral neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte count, was found to be an effective prognostic indicator for various malignancies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic value and the prognostic impact of SIRI on rectal cancer patients. METHOD: The medical records of patients underwent sphincter-sparing rectal cancer surgery at general surgery between 2017 and 2022 were examined retrospectively. Patient demographics, operation types, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapies, pathological results, and complications were recorded. A total number of 99 patients who operated with diagnoses other than cancer were conducted as a control group. SIRI was calculated from preoperative peripheral blood samples' neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte count. The optimal cut-off value for SIRI was found to be 1.38. The clinicopathological outcomes and Overall Survival (OS) were analyzed under two groups according to the SIRI values lower or higher than 1.38. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 104. The median age of the entire cohort was 62 (31-89). The median follow-up time was 33 (1-62) months. The median SIRI value in the study group was significantly higher compared with the control group. The study group was examined under two groups: SIRI 1.38 and SIRI > 1.38. The male gender was significantly more frequent in the high SIRI group. The remaining patient demographics and operation types were similar between the groups. The pathological outcomes were similar between the two groups. Overall Survival rate was better in the low SIRI group than those higher. The higher group had significantly higher complication rates than the lower SIRI group (p: 0.004). CONCLUSION: SIRI may be a valuable diagnostic marker in rectal cancer patients. Higher SIRI levels were also associated with poorer prognosis and increased complication rates. Still, further prospective studies with a larger number of patients are needed.