RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10693.].
RESUMEN
Reproducibility and predictive value on outcome are the main criteria to evaluate the utility of histological scores. Here we analyze the reproducibility of donor biopsy assessment by different on-call pathologists and the retrospective evaluation by a single renal pathologist blinded to clinical outcomes. We also evaluate the predictive value on graft outcome of both evaluations. A biopsy was performed in donors with any of the following: age≥55 years, hypertension, diabetes, creatinine>1.5 mg/dl, or stroke. Glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, intimal thickening, and arteriolar hyalinosis evaluated according to the Banff criteria were added to obtain a chronic score. Biopsies were classified as mild (≥3), intermediate (4-5), or advanced (6-7) damage, and unacceptable (≥8) for transplantation of 127 kidneys biopsied. Weighted κ value between both readings was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.54). Evaluation of biopsies by the renal pathologist was significantly and independently associated with estimated 12-month glomerular filtration rate and a significant composite outcome variable, including death-censored graft survival and time to reach an estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Thus, there was no association between readings of on-call pathologists and outcome. The lack of association between histological scores obtained by the on-call pathologists and graft outcome suggests that a specific training on renal pathology is recommended to optimize the use of kidneys retrieved from expanded criteria donors.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia , Selección de Donante , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/patología , Riñón/cirugía , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Riñón/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is the characteristic lesion of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, in some patients presents with no circulating HLA antibodies or C4d positivity. AIM: Patients with TG accomplishing criteria for chronic AMR were compared to patients with isolated TG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed late (>6 months) graft biopsies performed between 2007 and 2010 (n = 75). Biopsies with C4d-negative TG and no circulating donor-specific antibody were called isolated TG (n = 12), and chronic AMR was defined according to Banff consensus (n = 17). HLA antibodies were evaluated by Luminex technology. Immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify graft infiltrating cells. RESULTS: Patients with isolated TG were older (52 ± 14 vs. 35 ± 14; p = 0.0048), received grafts from older donors (54 ± 16 vs. 41 ± 18; p = 0.0554), and displayed a lower inflammation in the glomerular (g-score: 0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.0865; CD3 positive cells/glomeruli: 1.5 ± 2.9 vs. 4.4 ± 4.1; p = 0.0147), interstitial (i-score: 1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 1.0; p = 0.0685; CD45 positive cells/hpf: 18 ± 11 vs. 57 ± 68; p = 0.0132), and peritubular capillary (ptc-score 0.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 0.9; p = 0.0089; CD45 positive cells/hpf: 3.7 ± 3.1 vs. 10.1 ± 7.4; p = 0.0290) compartments. Fifteen grafts were lost and graft survival was significantly lower in patients with chronic AMR (p = 0.0122). CONCLUSION: Isolated TG is associated with less severe allograft inflammation and with a better outcome than chronic AMR.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/mortalidad , Complemento C4b/inmunología , Glomerulonefritis/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón , Fragmentos de Péptidos/inmunología , Adulto , Femenino , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Renal allograft half-life time (t½) is the most straightforward representation of long-term graft survival. Since some statistical models overestimate this parameter, we compare different approaches to evaluate t½. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a 1-year functioning graft transplanted in Spain during 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 were included. Exponential, Weibull, gamma, lognormal and log-logistic models censoring the last year of follow-up were evaluated. The goodness of fit of these models was evaluated according to the Cox-Snell residuals and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was employed to compare these models. RESULTS: We included 4842 patients. Real t½ in 1990 was 14.2 years. Median t½ (95% confidence interval) in 1990 and 2002 was 15.8 (14.2-17.5) versus 52.6 (35.6-69.5) according to the exponential model (P < 0.001). No differences between 1990 and 2002 were observed when t½ was estimated with the other models. In 1990 and 2002, t½ was 14.0 (13.1-15.0) versus 18.0 (13.7-22.4) according to Weibull, 15.5 (13.9-17.1) versus 19.1 (15.6-22.6) according to gamma, 14.4 (13.3-15.6) versus 18.3 (14.2-22.3) according to the log-logistic and 15.2 (13.8-16.6) versus 18.8 (15.3-22.3) according to the lognormal models. The AIC confirmed that the exponential model had the lowest goodness of fit, while the other models yielded a similar result. CONCLUSIONS: The exponential model overestimates t½, especially in cohorts of patients with a short follow-up, while any of the other studied models allow a better estimation even in cohorts with short follow-up.