RESUMEN
The unintended pregnancy framework, a central tenet of sexual and reproductive health care delivery and research, has been depicted as an adverse outcome that should be prevented. There is growing criticism of the inadequacies of this framework, although little modification in public health guidelines, measurement, or clinical practice has been seen. This article critically reviews the literature on unintended pregnancy to encourage reflection on how this framework has negatively influenced practice and to inspire the advancement of more patient-centered care approaches. We begin by outlining the historical origins of the unintended pregnancy framework and review how this framework mischaracterizes patients' lived experiences, fails to account for structural inequities, contributes to stigma, and is built upon weakly supported claims of a negative impact on health outcomes. We close with a discussion of the relationship between health care provision and unintended pregnancy care and the implications and recommendations for realigning clinical practice, research, and policy goals.
Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción , Embarazo no Planeado , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Conducta Sexual , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe attitudes about abortion among registered nurses (RNs) licensed in California and to determine if demographic characteristics were associated with these attitudes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, one-time survey. SETTING: Online between 2015 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS: Nurses with active RN licenses in California (N = 2,500). METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent to a random sample of 2,500 RNs with active California licenses between 2015 and 2017 to assess their personal and professional demographic characteristics and their attitudes toward abortion. Using scores on the Abortion Attitudes Scale, we dichotomized participants into proabortion and antiabortion categories. We used chi-square tests to determine differences based on demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Data from 504 RNs licensed in California are included in this analysis. Most respondents identified as female (n = 462, 92%), older than 50 years of age (n = 379, 75%), married (n = 364, 72%), White (n = 354, 70%), and Christian (n = 322, 64%). They were more likely to have negative attitudes toward abortion care if they identified as Christian (p < .001) and more positive attitudes if they identified as White (p < .001) independent of identifying as Christian. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents had a complex range of attitudes about abortion. In some cases, these attitudes aligned and/or conflicted with stated religious orientation. This study highlights the demographic characteristics that are associated with the attitudes and beliefs about abortion among RNs licensed in California.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Aborto Inducido/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Adulto , California , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the provision of procedural sedation during abortion by expert nurses and to describe the factors that are associated with time to discharge for women who receive this sedation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were generated to describe a retrospective cohort of women presenting for abortion under procedural sedation. Analysis of variance was used to determine significant characteristics that influenced time to discharge. SETTING: A single clinical site that employs seven expert nurses. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 194 medical records were available for this analysis. RESULTS: All women were discharged home with accompaniment, and no incidents of respiratory distress or other adverse complications occurred. Most women (n = 136) received at least 150 µg fentanyl and 3 mg midazolam, and 71% of women in the first trimester and 83% of women in the second trimester entered the recovery area with no pain. Variables significantly associated with time spent in the recovery area were gestational age at time of abortion (t = -2.68, p = .008), pain at entry to recovery area (t = -0.254, p = .008), and pain at 15 minutes (t = 0.25, p = .038). CONCLUSION: Expert nurses can administer procedural sedation for pain control associated with abortion and are capable of monitoring women and helping them return to baseline status after the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Legal , Sedación Consciente , Fentanilo , Midazolam , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos , Aborto Legal/efectos adversos , Aborto Legal/métodos , Aborto Legal/enfermería , Adulto , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Sedación Consciente/enfermería , Femenino , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/terapia , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care is often overlooked in advanced practice nursing educational programs, but advanced practice registered nurses are expected to provide care in this sensitive area. Competencies for SRH care were developed by the World Health Organization, and individual countries including the United States have adapted them to their unique health systems and populations. In this article, we discuss extant and future pathways for advanced practice registered nurses to develop competence in SRH care.