Differential Diagnosis between Takotsubo Syndrome and Acute Coronary Syndrome-A Prospective Analysis of Novel Cardiovascular Biomarkers for a More Selective Triage.

INTRODUCTION: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is clinically indistinguishable from an ACS. Despite the implementation of clinical scoring systems and novel biomarkers, coronary angiography currently remains necessary for differential diagnosis. METHODS: 93 patients with chest pain and the suspicion of TTS were enrolled in two study centers. Fetuin-A, IGFBP-2, Galectin-3, and TNF α were determined in serum samples, collected within 24 h after the onset of symptoms. Serum levels of biomarkers were analyzed for the differential diagnostic value between TTS and ACS. RESULTS: Compared to TTS, patients with ACS had significantly lower serum levels of Fetuin-A and IGFBP-2. The cut-off value of Fetuin-A for the identification of TTS compared to ACS was 55.74 µg/mL (sensitivity: 100.0%, specificity: 82.6%, PPV: 63.2%, NPV: 100.0%). An optimal cut-off value for IGFBP-2 for the differential diagnosis between TTS and ACS was determined as 171.77 ng/mL (sensitivity: 76.0%, specificity: 82.6%, PPV: 76.4%, NPV 72.7%). CONCLUSION: Fetuin-A and IGFBP-2 might facilitate the triage between TTS and ACS and could be therefore of great benefit for the guidance of treatment.

Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Non-Invasive Ways of Risk Stratification, Especially in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and concomitant pulmonary hypertension show a significantly reduced survival prognosis. Right heart catheterization as a preoperative diagnostic tool to determine pulmonary hypertension has been largely abandoned in recent years in favor of echocardiographic criteria. Clinically, determination of echocardiographically estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure falls far short of invasive right heart catheterization data in terms of accuracy. The aim of the present systematic review was to highlight noninvasive possibilities for the detection of pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, with a special focus on cardiovascular biomarkers. A total of 525 publications regarding echocardiography, cardiovascular imaging and biomarkers related to severe aortic valve stenosis and pulmonary hypertension were analyzed in a systematic database analysis using PubMed Central®. Finally, 39 publications were included in the following review. It was shown that the current scientific data situation, especially regarding cardiovascular biomarkers as non-invasive diagnostic tools for the determination of pulmonary hypertension in severe aortic valve stenosis patients, is poor. Thus, there is a great scientific potential to combine different biomarkers (biomarker scores) in a non-invasive way to determine the presence or absence of PH.

Differences of Hemogram Parameters and Their Ratios among Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome, Acute Coronary Syndrome and Healthy Individuals.

Introduction: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are clinically indistinguishable from each other. Although therapeutically redundant, coronary angiography remains indispensable for differential diagnosis. Methods: In our study, we compared hemogram parameters and their ratios in 103 patients presenting with undiagnosed chest pain. Blood was drawn at baseline in 40 patients with TTC, 63 patients with ACS, and 68 healthy controls ((Ctrl) no coronary artery disease or signs of heart failure). Results: Peripheral lymphocyte counts were significantly depressed in TTC and ACS patients when compared to the Ctrl. Consequently, all three investigated hemogram ratios were significantly elevated in patients with ACS or TTC (NLR: TTC: median 3.20 vs. ACS: median 3.82 vs. Ctrl: median 2.10, p < 0.0001; BLR: median 0.02 vs. ACS: median 0.00 vs. Ctrl: median 0.00, p < 0.0001; MLR: median 0.37 vs. ACS: median 0.44 vs. Ctrl: median 0.28, p < 0.0001). Of note, BLR was only significantly elevated in patients with TTC, and not in patients with ACS (ACS vs. Ctrl p = 0.183). Conclusion: Basophil count and BLR are significantly increased in TTC patients when compared to ACS and may, therefore, be helpful in the distinction of TTC from ACS. Whereas NLR might be useful to differentiate ACS from controls. Elevated basophil counts and BLR in TTC patients are interesting findings and may confirm speculations about the partly unexplained pathophysiology.

Pretreatment with Betablockers, a Potential Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Takotsubo Syndrome.

Introduction: Treatment with betablockers is controversial in Takotsubo syndrome (TTS); however, many physicians intuitively initiate or continue betablocker therapy in these patients. The effect of preadmission betablocker use on adverse cardiovascular events has not been studied in the literature. Methods: To investigate this issue, we evaluated clinical complications, defined by the endpoint of occurrence of hemodynamically relevant arrythmia, cardiac decompensation, and all-cause adverse cardiac events, during hospitalization, in 56 patients hospitalized for TTS between April 2017 and July 2021. We compared the risk of adverse cardiovascular events between patients with preadmission betablocker therapy and those without preadmission betablocker therapy. Pretreatment betablocker therapy was defined as daily betablocker intake for more than a week including day of admission. Results: TTS patients taking preadmission betablockers had a significantly increased risk of all-cause complications relative to patients without betablockers in preadmission medication ((52.0% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.010; OR 4.5 (95% Cl 1.38-14.80)). Furthermore, TTS patients already taking betablockers on admission showed a statistically significant increased risk of cardiac decompensation when compared to patients without pretreatment with betablockers (p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics in patients who were taking beta blockers as an adjunct therapy prior to admission for TTS relative to those who were not. There is however an increase in comorbidities, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, in past medical history in patients taking a preadmission betablocker. The difference is related to therapeutic applications for beta blockers and was not significant based on endpoints of our study. Conclusions: Preadmission betablocker treatment was associated with a 4.5 times higher risk of adverse cardiac events. This increased risk of all-cause complications and of cardiac decompensation within the acute phase of TTS is presumably due to the negative inotropic effects of betablockers and upregulation of ß-adrenergic receptors in patients with chronic betablocker therapy.

Soluble ST2 as a Potential Biomarker for Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients Undergoing TAVR?

BACKGROUND: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and has been shown to limit patient survival. Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) is a cardiovascular biomarker that has proven to be an important prognostic marker for survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study was to assess the importance of the sST2 biomarker for risk stratification in patients with severe AS in presence or absence of PH. METHODS: In 260 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR procedure, sST2 serum level concentrations were analyzed. Right heart catheter measurements were performed in 152 patients, with no PH detection in 43 patients and with PH detection in 109 patients. Correlation analyses according to Spearman, AUROC analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated. RESULTS: Patients with severe AS and PH showed significantly higher serum sST2 concentrations (p = 0.006). The sST2 cut-off value for non-PH patients regarding 1-year survival yielded 5521.15 pg/mL, whereas the cut-off value of PH patients was at a considerably higher level of 10,268.78 pg/mL. A cut-off value of 6990.12 pg/mL was related with a significant probability of PH presence. Survival curves showed that patients with severe AS and PH not only had higher 1-year mortality, but also that increased levels of sST2 plasma concentration were associated with earlier death. CONCLUSION: sST2 definitely has the potential to provide information about the presence of PH in patients with severe AS, in a noninvasive way.

The Value of Fetuin-A as a Predictor to Identify Takotsubo Patients at Risk of Cardiovascular Events.

INTRODUCTION: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) remains a life-threatening disease with the risk of decompensated heart failure and arrhythmias. Valid markers for the prediction of outcome are unavailable. The novel biomarkers fetuin-A, matrix metalloproteinases-2 (MMP-2), myeloperoxidase (MPO), Syndecan-1 and CD40-L show promising results for risk stratification of cardiovascular patients. Nevertheless, clinical implementation has not been investigated in TTC patients. METHODS: To investigate this issue, we evaluated clinical complications in 51 patients hospitalized for TTC and measured the serum levels of fetuin-A, MPO, MMP-2, Syndecan-1 and CD40-L within 24 h after admission. RESULTS: Serum levels of Fetuin-A correlated inversely with the risk of cardiac decompensation and all cause complications within the acute phase of TTC. Fetuin-A levels over 190.1 µg/mL (AUC: 0.738, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity: 52.6%) indicate an acute phase of TTC without cardiac decompensation. Despite lower fetuin-A levels in patients with all cause complications, the combined endpoint remained slightly unmet (p = 0.058, AUC: 0.655). Patients with fetuin-A levels over 213.3 µg/mL are at risk of experiencing hemodynamic relevant rhythm disorders (AUC: 0.794; sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 79.1%). Other biomarkers failed to reveal a prognostic impact. Pro-BNP and hs troponin levels at admission did not predict adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSION: Fetuin-A is a promising marker in our study and could be of benefit for the prediction of short-term adverse cardiac events in TTC patients. Therefore, fetuin-A might be of value to evaluate an individual's risk for complications within the acute phase of TTC and to individually choose the time of intensive care and hospitalization.

Analysis of Selected Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and the Most Frequent Cardiomyopathies.

Introduction: Among the causes of de novo diagnosed cardiomyopathy, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) plays a minor role, with an occurrence of 50,000-100,000 cases per annum in the United States. In clinical practice, a differentiation of a TTC toward an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) or a dilatative cardiomyopathy (DCMP) appears to be challenging, especially in a subacute setting or in atypical types of TTC. Methods: To investigate this issue, we analyzed serum levels of sST2, GDF-15, suPAR, HFABP, and clinical parameters including echocardiography in 51 patients with TTC, 52 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and 65 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP). Results: sST-2 seemed to be the most promising biomarker for prediction of a TTC in differential diagnosis to an ICMP (AUC: 0.879, p = < 0.001, Cut off values: 12,140.5 pg/ml) or to a DCMP (AUC: 0.881, p = < 0.001, cut off value: 14521.9 pg/ml). GDF-15 evidenced a slightly lower AUC for prediction of a TTC in differential diagnosis to an ICMP (AUC: 0.626, p = 0.028) and to a DCMP (AUC: 0.653, p = 0.007). A differential diagnostic value was found for H-FABP in the prediction of a DCMP compared to TTC patients (AUC: 0.686, p = < 0.001). In propensity score matching for left ventricular ejection fraction, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors, differences in the plasma levels of sST2 and H-FABP in the matched cohort of TTC vs. DCMP remained statistically significant. In the matched cohort of TTC vs. ICMP, differences in sST2 also remained statistically significant Conclusion: As medical therapy, long term prognosis, interval of follow-ups, rehabilitation program and recommendations differ completely between TTC and ICMP/DCMP, biomarkers for differential diagnosis, or rather for confirmation of diagnosis, are warranted in cases of cardiomyopathies with unsure origin. sST-2, GDF-15 and H-FABP might facilitate the classification.

Management of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators during Pregnancy-A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: With the advent of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) technology in recent decades, patients with inherited or congenital cardiomyopathy have a greater chance of survival into adulthood. Women with ICDs in this group are now more likely to reach reproductive age. However, pregnancy represents a challenge for clinicians, as no guidelines for the treatment of pregnant women with an ICD are currently available. METHODS: To analyze this issue, we performed a systematic screening of the literature using the keywords: pregnancy with ICD, lead fracture in pregnancy, lead thrombi in pregnancy, ventricular tachycardia in pregnancy, inappropriate shocks in pregnancy, ICD discharge in pregnancy and ICD shock in pregnancy. Of 1101 publications found, 27 publications were eligible for further analysis (four retrospective trials and 23 case reports). RESULTS: According to physiological changes in pregnancy, resulting in an increase in heart rate and cardiac output, a vulnerability for malignant arrhythmias and device-related complications in ICD carriers might be suspected. While the literature is limited on this issue, maternal complications including arrhythmia burden with following ICD therapies, thromboembolic events and lead complications as well as inappropriate shock therapy have been reported. According to the limited available studies, associated risk seems not to be more frequent than in the general population and depends on the underlying cardiac pathology. Furthermore, worsening of heart failure and related cardiovascular disease have been reported with associated risk of preterm delivery. These observations are exaggerated by restricted applications of diagnostics and treatment due to the risk of fetal harm in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Due to limited data on management of ICDs during pregnancy, further scientific investigations are required. Consequently, careful risk assessment with individual risk evaluation and close follow ups with interdisciplinary treatment are recommended in pregnant ICD carriers.