HBV reactivation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-interleukin-6: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the possibility of HBV reactivation (HBVr) in patients with RA under anti-IL-6 treatment. METHODS: Using PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE, we performed a systematic literature search for articles related to HBVr in RA patients under anti-IL-6 treatment. The search was performed with no date limits and was last updated 28 January 2023. The results from all the databases were combined and duplicates were excluded, as were non-English articles, case reports, position articles, comments, and paediatric studies. RESULTS: Our initial search led to 427 articles; 28 were duplicates, 46 non-English, 169 reviews, 31 books/letters, 25 case reports, and 88 irrelevant to the meta-analysis aim; 21 were excluded due to inadequate information, leaving 19 articles, with a sum of 372 RA patients with chronic HBV (CHB) or resolved HBV infection, for further analysis. The overall risk for HBVr in RA patients with CHB was 6.7%, increasing to 37% when only RA patients with CHB and no antiviral prophylaxis were included. On the contrary, HBVr was close to 0% in RA patients with resolved HBV infection, irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis. All RA patients experiencing HBVr in these studies were successfully managed with antiviral treatment and/or drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Overall, anti-IL-6 treatment comes with a significant risk of HBVr in RA patients with CHB; risk is diminished when antiviral prophylaxis is used. In contrast, in RA patients with resolved HBV infection, the risk of HBVr seems to be extremely low. Large, well-designed studies (either controlled trials or multicentre/international observational studies) are warranted to further validate these results.

Incidence of autoantibodies related to systemic autoimmunity in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of autoantibodies (AAbs) in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients and to investigate whether AAbs influence the clinical outcome. METHODS: Serum samples were drawn within the first 48 hours upon admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) from 217 consecutive patients, from January 1st, 2021, to May 10th, 2021, and investigated for the presence of AAbs using conventional techniques. Serum samples (n=117) of age- and sex-matched healthy individuals collected before COVID-19 pandemic were used as controls. RESULTS: COVID-19 patients in the ICU had more commonly AAbs compared to age- and sex-matched controls (174/217, 80.2% vs. 73/117, 62.4%, p<0.001). Patients expressed more frequently ANAs (48.4% vs. 21.4%, p<0.001), anti-dsDNA (5.1% vs. 0%, p=0.01), anti-CCP (8.3% vs. 1.7%, p=0.014) and anti-CL IgM AAbs (21.7% vs. 9.4%, p=0.005) than controls, respectively. Simultaneous reactivity against at least three autoantigens, occurred in 144 out of 174 (82.8%) patients. The two groups did not differ in terms of clinicoepidemiologic characteristics or the mortality ratio within the ICU. Patients who died compared to convalescents were older, had higher ferritin, D-dimers levels, APACHE II score, lower oxygen saturation, higher prevalence of comorbidities and cognitive dysfunction. However, AAbs were not found to correlate with the clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe COVID-19 express AAbs more commonly compared to controls. No correlation was found between AAbs and disease outcome.

COVID-19: Clinical features and outcomes in unvaccinated 2-dose and 3-dose vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 patients with systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Clinical data on vaccinated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who have systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (SAARD) are limited. This observational study aimed to report the clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 among cases with SAARD that were unvaccinated or were 2- and 3-dose vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and were consecutively recorded by the treating physician. Unvaccinated and 2- and 3-dose vaccinated patients were compared in terms of COVID-19 symptomatology, hospitalizations, oxygen supplementation requirements, and death rates. From the beginning of the pandemic to February 15, 2022, 134 vaccine-naïve COVID-19 cases were recorded among our study cohort. From March 1, 2021 to February 15, 2022, 89 2-dose vaccinated and 105 3-dose vaccinated patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 ≥14 days after the second dose were included. The hospitalization rate was higher in the unvaccinated (n = 36, 26.9%) than in the 2-dose (n = 13, 14.6%, p = 0.03) or 3-dose (n = 5, 4.8%, p < 0.001) vaccinated patients. Severe/critical COVID-19 cases requiring oxygen supplementation were the least among 3-dose vaccinated (n = 4, 3.8%) compared to both 2-dose vaccinated (n = 12, 13.5%, p = 0.018) and unvaccinated (n = 25, 18.7%, p < 0.001) patients. ICU admission and death rates were similar among unvaccinated (n = 5, 3.7% and n = 3, 2.2%, respectively) and 2-dose vaccinated patients (n = 4, 4.5%; and n = 2, 2.2%, respectively), while no 3-dose vaccinated patients died or required ICU admission. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant inverse association between 3-dose vaccination and severe/critical COVID-19 (OR = 0.078, 95% CI: 0.022-0.273, p < 0.001). In conclusion, these findings argue in favor of booster vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with SAARD.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Toll-like Receptor 4 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Single-Center Study.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor leading to significant morbidity and mortality; its exact genetic background is largely unrecognized. Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) reacts with lipopolysaccharides, molecules found in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. In damaged liver, TLR4 expression is upregulated, leading to hepatic inflammation and injury. We tried to investigate the role of the two most common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TLR4 in HCC-genesis. Aged > 18 years old, cirrhotic patients were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were non-HCC tumors and HIV co-infection. TLR4 SNPs association with HCC occurrence was the primary endpoint, and associations with all-cause and liver-related mortality, as well as time durations between diagnosis of cirrhosis and HCC development or death and diagnosis of HCC and death were secondary endpoints. A total of 52 out of 260 included patients had or developed HCC. TLR4 SNPs showed no correlation with primary or secondary endpoints, except for the shorter duration between HCC development and death in patients with TLR4 mutations. Overall, TLR4 SNPs showed no correlation with carcinogenesis or deaths in patients with liver cirrhosis; patients with TLR4 SNPs that developed HCC had lower survival rates, a finding that should be further evaluated.

SGLT-2 Inhibitors in NAFLD: Expanding Their Role beyond Diabetes and Cardioprotection.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an 'umbrella' term, comprising a spectrum ranging from benign, liver steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis and eventually cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD has evolved as a major health problem in recent years. Discovering ways to prevent or delay the progression of NAFLD has become a global focus. Lifestyle modifications remain the cornerstone of NAFLD treatment, even though various pharmaceutical interventions are currently under clinical trial. Among them, sodium-glucose co-transporter type-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are emerging as promising agents. Processes regulated by SGLT-2i, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation, autophagy and apoptosis are all implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the NAFLD pathophysiology, and specifically focus on the potential impact of SGLT-2i in NAFLD development and progression, providing current evidence from in vitro, animal and human studies. Given this evidence, further mechanistic studies would advance our understanding of the exact mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the potential beneficial actions of SGLT-2i in the context of NAFLD treatment.

COVID-19 infection among autoimmune rheumatic disease patients: Data from an observational study and literature review.

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with autoimmune/auto-inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AARD) under immunomodulatory treatment has been a focus of interest during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this observational study, demographic data, disease related features and comorbidities, COVID-19 manifestations and outcome as well as antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 were recorded among 77 consecutive patients with underlying AARD infected by SARS-CoV-2. Analysis of data was performed using univariate and multivariate models. Most patients (68.8%) had a mild COVID-19 course. The predominant clinical manifestations were fatigue (58.4%), low grade fever (45.4%) and upper respiratory tract symptoms (68.8%). About a quarter of patients required hospitalization (23.3%) and the mortality rate was 1.3%. Regarding COVID-19 severity, prior treatment with corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab was more common in patients who developed a more serious disease course (60.0 vs 29.9%, p = 0.003, 40.0 vs 7.5%, p = 0.003, 10.0 vs 0.0%, p = 0.009, respectively). When disease related features and comorbidities were considered in multivariate models, older age and lung disease in the context of the AARD were found to be independent predictive factors for hospitalization (OR [95%]: 1.09 [1.03-1.15] and 6.43 [1.11-37.19]). Among COVID-19 related features, patients with shortness of breath and high-grade fever were more likely to get hospitalized (OR [95%]: 7.06 [1.36-36.57], 12.04 [2.96-48.86]), while anosmia was independently associated with lower hospitalization risk (OR [95%]: 0.09 [0.01-0.99]). Though the majority of AARD patients displayed a mild COVID-19 course, certain underlying disease features and COVID-19 related manifestations should prompt alertness for the physician to identify patients with AARD at high risk for severe COVID-19 and need for hospitalization.

A prospective multicenter study assessing humoral immunogenicity and safety of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Greek patients with systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate humoral responses and safety of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic disease (SAARD) patients subjected or not to treatment modifications during vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide, multicenter study, including 605 SAARD patients and 116 controls, prospectively evaluated serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody titers, side-effects, and disease activity, one month after complete vaccination, in terms of distinct treatment modification strategies (none, partial and extended modifications). Independent risk factors associated with hampered humoral responses were identified by data-driven multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with extended treatment modifications responded to vaccines similarly to controls as well as SAARD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (97.56% vs 100%, p = 0.2468 and 97.56% vs 97.46%, p > 0.9999, respectively). In contrast, patients with partial or without therapeutic modifications responded in 87.50% and 84.50%, respectively. Furthermore, SAARD patients with extended treatment modifications developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels compared to those without or with partial modifications (median:7.90 vs 7.06 vs 7.1, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0195, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX) and methotrexate (MTX) negatively affected anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses. In 10.5% of vaccinated patients, mild clinical deterioration was noted; however, no differences in the incidence of deterioration were observed among the distinct treatment modification SAARD subgroups. Side-effects were generally comparable between SAARD patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In SAARD patients, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective and safe, both in terms of side-effects and disease flares. Treatment with MMF, RTX and/or MTX compromises anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, which are restored upon extended treatment modifications without affecting disease activity.

Oral Antiviral Treatment for COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe data on the safety and efficacy of molnupiravir (MP) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NM/R) in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: Among patients with SARD being followed in 2 tertiary outpatient rheumatology clinics, we retrospectively identified those infected with SARS-CoV-2 between February and August 2022 who received MP or NM/R. Patients' medical files were reviewed for demographics and disease-related characteristics, as well as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) characteristics, including vaccination status, antiviral treatment, side effects, and COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with SARD (52 females) were identified who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and received MP (n = 26, 35.1%) or NM/R (n = 48, 64.9%). Most patients were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (n = 62, 83.8%). Among frequently used regimens were glucocorticoids (n = 43, 58.1%), mycophenolate mofetil (n = 26, 35.1%), tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (n = 14, 18.9%), methotrexate (n = 13, 17.6%), and rituximab (n = 12, 16.2%). Common adverse events were reported only by 4 patients receiving NM/R (metallic taste, gastrointestinal upset, hypertension), not leading to drug discontinuation. During follow-up, all but 2 patients (n = 72, 97.3%) recovered at home without COVID-19-related complications. Nonetheless, we describe 2 presumptive cases of COVID-19 rebound who progressed to severe COVID-19. CONCLUSION: These data show a favorable outcome and acceptable safety profile of the 2 oral antiviral therapies MP and NM/R among a high-risk SARD population. However, cases of COVID-19 rebound are being increasingly identified. These findings call for continuous surveillance to capture the real-world efficacy and safety profiles in our subpopulations of interest.

Scleroderma specific autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome patients with interstitial lung disease: Prevalence and associations.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been classically linked to interstitial lung disease (ILD) development, often in association with specific SSc autoantibodies. In the present report, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of SSc autoantibodies in 60 seropositive RA and 41 primary SS patients complicated or not by ILD. SSc autoantibodies were determined in patients' sera by a commercial immunoblot assay. RA ILD patients displayed higher frequency of SSc-specific antibodies at strong titers compared to RA-with no lung involvement (25% vs 3.1%, p = 0.01)[OR 95% CI:10.9 (1.2-94.5)], with no differences detected between primary SS groups. These data indicate that many seropositive RA ILD patients probably represent an overlap RA/SSc entity, requiring tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Biomarkers of lymphoma in Sjögren's syndrome: what's the latest?

INTRODUCTION: Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a chronic autoimmune disease standing in the crossroads of autoimmunity and lymphomagenesis, characterized by chronic B-cell hyperactivity and ectopic lymphoid tissue neoformation, potentially driving lymphoid malignant transformation. Lymphoma development is considered the most serious complication of pSS. AREAS COVERED: 'Old-classical' biomarkers (clinical, serological, hematological, and histological) validated in the past are analyzed under the perspective of recently published research. Biomarkers that have emerged during the last decade are subdivided to 'old-new' and 'newly proposed-novel' ones, including biomarkers pathophysiologically related to B-cell differentiation, lymphoid organization, and immune responses, identified in serum and tissue, both at genetic and protein level. Upcoming new imaging biomarkers, promising for further patient stratification, are also analyzed. EXPERT OPINION: Salivary gland enlargement and cryoglobulinemia still remain the best validated 'classical-old' biomarkers for lymphoma development. Though new biomarkers still need to be validated, some can be used for the identification of high-risk patients long before lymphoma diagnosis, and some might be more relevant in distinct age subgroups, while others have an added value in the assessment of lymphoma remission or relapse. Future development of composite indices, integrating old and recently proposed biomarkers, could contribute to a more precise lymphoma prediction model.

Antibody Responses after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Liver Diseases.

The novel mRNA-based vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 display encouraging safety and efficacy profiles. However, there is a paucity of data regarding their immunogenicity and safety in patients with liver diseases (PWLD), especially in those with cirrhosis. We prospectively assessed anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-spike IgG antibodies and neutralizing activity in fully vaccinated PWLD (n = 87) and controls (n = 40). Seroconversion rates were 97.4% (37/38) in cirrhotic PWLD, 87.8% (43/49) in non-cirrhotic PWLD and 100% (40/40) in controls. Adequate neutralizing activity was detected in 92.1% (35/38), 87.8% (43/49) and 100% (40/40) of cirrhotics, non-cirrhotics and controls, respectively. On multivariable analysis, immunosuppressive treatment was negatively correlated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers (coefficient (SE): -2.716 (0.634), p < 0.001) and neutralizing activity (coefficient (SE): -24.379 (4.582), p < 0.001), while age was negatively correlated only with neutralizing activity (coefficient (SE): -0.31(0.14), p = 0.028). A total of 52 responder PWLD were reassessed approximately 3 months post-vaccination and no differences were detected in humoral responses between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic PWLD. No significant side effects were noted post vaccination, while no symptomatic breakthrough infections were reported during a 6-month follow up. Overall, our study shows that m-RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe and efficacious in PWLD. However, PWLD under immunosuppressive treatment and those of advanced age should probably be more closely monitored after vaccination.

Liver Fibrosis in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.

Background: Primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune epithelitis, potentially affecting salivary epithelium, biliary epithelium, and hepatocytes. Common immunological mechanisms might cause clinically silent liver inflammation, and combined with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), liver fibrosis (LF) may occur. No studies have explored the occurrence of LF in the context of NAFLD among pSS patients. Methods: Consecutive pSS patients from the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the Department of Pathophysiology and individuals evaluated in the hepatology outpatient clinic for possible NAFLD serving as comparators underwent transient elastography (TE) to assess LF and liver steatosis (LS). All participants had no overt chronic liver disease. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory data were collected from all participants at the time of TE. Results: Fifty-two pSS patients and 198 comparators were included in the study. The median age (range) of pSS and comparators was 62.5 (30-81) and 55 (19-86) years, respectively. Both groups had similar prevalence regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and similar body mass index (BMI). Patients with pSS had less frequently high LS (S2, S3) (27% vs. 62%, p < 0.001) and significant LF (F2-4) [2 (3.8%) vs. 34 (17.2%), p = 0.014] than comparators. Univariable analysis showed that advanced LF was significantly associated with older age, higher LS, greater BMI, and disease status (comparators than pSS); of these, only age was identified as an independent LF risk factor in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: Liver fibrosis among pSS patients is most likely not attributed to the disease per se.

Liver Fibrosis during Antiretroviral Treatment in HIV-Infected Individuals. Truth or Tale?

After the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART) back in 1996, the lifespan of people living with HIV (PLWH) has been substantially increased, while the major causes of morbidity and mortality have switched from opportunistic infections and AIDS-related neoplasms to cardiovascular and liver diseases. HIV itself may lead to liver damage and subsequent liver fibrosis (LF) through multiple pathways. Apart from HIV, viral hepatitis, alcoholic and especially non-alcoholic liver diseases have been implicated in liver involvement among PLWH. Another well known cause of hepatotoxicity is ART, raising clinically significant concerns about LF in long-term treatment. In this review we present the existing data and analyze the association of LF with all ART drug classes. Published data derived from many studies are to some extent controversial and therefore remain inconclusive. Among all the antiretroviral drugs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, especially didanosine and zidovudine, seem to carry the greatest risk for LF, with integrase strand transfer inhibitors and entry inhibitors having minimal risk. Surprisingly, even though protease inhibitors often lead to insulin resistance, they do not seem to be associated with a significant risk of LF. In conclusion, most ART drugs are safe in long-term treatment and seldom lead to severe LF when no liver-related co-morbidities exist.

A rare case of duodenal-type follicular lymphoma in rectum appearing as hyperplastic polyp with metachronous appearance in duodenum and stomach.

Hyperplastic polyps consist a very frequent finding in colonoscopy having a very low potential to malignancy. According to the international guidelines, it is recommended that all polyps should be resected except for diminutive (≤ 5 mm) rectal and rectosigmoid polyps which are predicted with confidence to be hyperplastic. Therefore, in departments where optical diagnosis can be ensured, a "resect and discard" strategy may be implemented for diminutive polyps. In our case, a duodenal-type follicular lymphoma was detected in a 5 mm rectum polyp with hyperplastic appearance. After 4 months, the lymphoma was detected also in stomach and duodenum. Under therapy with Rituximab, she is in remission. To our knowledge, there has never been reported such a case in the literature. Furthermore, it alerts us that we should be very cautious with the optical diagnosis and the "resect and discard strategy".