Radiological follow-up of endovascularly treated intracranial aneurysms: a survey of current practice in the UK and Ireland.

PURPOSE: Due to the risk of intracranial aneurysm (IA) recurrence and the potential requirement for re-treatment following endovascular treatment (EVT), radiological follow-up of these aneurysms is necessary. There is little evidence to guide the duration and frequency of this follow-up. The aim of this study was to establish the current practice in neurosurgical units in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: A survey was designed with input from interventional neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons. Neurovascular consultants in each of the 30 neurosurgical units providing a neurovascular service in the UK and Ireland were contacted and asked to respond to questions regarding the follow-up practice for IA treated with EVT in their department. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 28/30 (94%) of departments. There was evidence of wide variations in the duration and frequency of follow-up, with a minimum follow-up duration for ruptured IA that varied from 18 months in 5/28 (18%) units to 5 years in 11/28 (39%) of units. Young patient age, previous subarachnoid haemorrhage and incomplete IA occlusion were cited as factors that would prompt more intensive surveillance, although larger and broad-necked IA were not followed-up more closely in the majority of departments. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the radiological follow-up of IA treated with EVT in the UK and Ireland. Further standardisation of this aspect of patient care is likely to be beneficial, but further evidence on the behaviour of IA following EVT is required in order to inform this process.

Management of non-vestibular schwannomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section Part III: Lower cranial nerve schwannomas, jugular foramen (CN IX, X, XI) and hypoglossal schwannoma (XII).

BACKGROUND: Non-vestibular schwannomas are relatively rare, with trigeminal and jugular foramen schwannomas being the most common. This is a heterogenous group which requires detailed investigation and careful consideration to management strategy. The optimal management for these tumours remains unclear, and there are several controversies. The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the main principles defining management and surgical strategy, in order to formulate a series of recommendations. METHODS: A task force was created by the EANS skull base section committee along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the surgical management of these tumours on a European perspective. To achieve this, the task force performed an extensive systematic review in this field and had discussions within the group. This article is the third of a three-part series describing non-vestibular schwannomas (IX, X, XI, XII). RESULTS: A summary of literature evidence was proposed after discussion within the EANS skull base section. The constituted task force dealt with the practice patterns that exist with respect to preoperative radiological investigations, ophthalmological assessments, optimal surgical and radiotherapy strategies and follow-up management. CONCLUSION: This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the treatment of non-vestibular schwannomas. For each of these tumours, the management paradigm is shifting towards the compromise between function preservation and progression free survival.

Management of non-vestibular schwannomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Part I: oculomotor and other rare non-vestibular schwannomas (I, II, III, IV, VI).

BACKGROUND: Non-vestibular schwannomas are relatively rare, with trigeminal and jugular foramen schwannomas being the most common. This is a heterogeneous group which requires detailed investigation and careful consideration to management strategy. The optimal management for these tumours remains unclear, and there are several controversies. The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the main principles defining management and surgical strategy, in order to formulate a series of recommendations. METHODS: A task force was created by the EANS skull base section along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the surgical management of these tumours on a European perspective. To achieve this, the task force performed an extensive systematic review in this field and had discussions within the group. This article is the first of a three-part series describing non-vestibular schwannomas (I, II, III, IV, VI). RESULTS: A summary of literature evidence was proposed after discussion within the EANS skull base section. The constituted task force dealt with the practice patterns that exist with respect to pre-operative radiological investigations, ophthalmological assessments, optimal surgical and radiotherapy strategies and follow-up management. CONCLUSION: This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the treatment of non-vestibular schwannomas. For each of these tumours, the management of these patients is complex, and for those which are symptomatic tumours, the paradigm is shifting towards the compromise between function preservation and progression-free survival.

Management of non-vestibular schwannomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section Part II: Trigeminal and facial nerve schwannomas (CN V, VII).

BACKGROUND: Non-vestibular schwannomas are relatively rare, with trigeminal and jugular foramen schwannomas being the most common. This is a heterogenous group which requires detailed investigation and careful consideration to management strategy. The optimal management for these tumours remains unclear and there are several controversies. The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the main principles defining management and surgical strategy, in order to formulate a series of recommendations. METHODS: A task force was created by the EANS skull base section committee along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the surgical management of these tumours on a European perspective. To achieve this, the task force performed an extensive systematic review in this field and had discussions within the group. This article is the second of a three-part series describing non-vestibular schwannomas (V, VII). RESULTS: A summary of literature evidence was proposed after discussion within the EANS skull base section. The constituted task force dealt with the practice patterns that exist with respect to pre-operative radiological investigations, ophthalmological assessments, optimal surgical and radiotherapy strategies, and follow-up management. CONCLUSION: This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the treatment of trigeminal and facial schwannoma. The aim of treatment is maximal safe resection with preservation of function. Careful thought is required to select the appropriate surgical approach. Most middle fossa trigeminal schwannoma tumours can be safely accessed by a subtemporal extradural middle fossa approach. The treatment of facial nerve schwannoma remains controversial.

Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Transsphenoidal surgery is the gold standard for pituitary adenoma resection. Although rare, a serious complication of surgery is worsened vision post-operatively. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a safe, reproducible, and effective technological adjunct in predicting postoperative visual function. METHODS: The PubMed and OVID platforms were searched between January 1993 and December 2020 to identify publications that (1) featured patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma, (2) used intraoperative optic nerve monitoring with VEP and (3) reported on safety or effectiveness. Reference lists were cross-checked and expert opinion sought to identify further publications. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included comprising ten case series and one prospective cohort study. All employed techniques to improve reliability. No safety issues were reported. The only comparative study included described a statistically significant improvement in post-operative visual field testing when VEP monitoring was used. The remaining case-series varied in conclusion. In nine studies, surgical manipulation was halted in the event of a VEP amplitude decrease suggesting a widespread consensus that this is a warning sign of injury to the anterior optic apparatus. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited and low-quality published evidence regarding intra-operative VEP monitoring, our review suggests that it is a safe, reproducible, and increasingly effective technique of predicting postoperative visual deficits. Further studies specific to transsphenoidal surgery are required to determine its utility in protecting visual function in the resection of complex pituitary tumours.

Management of haemorrhagic stroke secondary to arteriovenous malformations in childhood.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to describe the outcome and management of all children who have presented with haemorrhagic stroke (HS) secondary to an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) at a single UK centre over a 13-year period. METHODS: All children with HS managed at our institution (2005-2018) were identified and those with underlying AVMs were studied. Clinical and imaging data were obtained from medical records. Outcome was scored using the Recovery and Recurrence Questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety-three children (median age 8.8 years; 56 males; 8 neonates) presented with both global and focal features (28 had Glasgow Coma Score < 8). Haemorrhage was intraparenchymal in 72; prior risk factors present in 14. An underlying vascular lesion was identified in 68/93, most commonly AVM (n = 48). A systemic cause was found in 10, cerebral venous thrombosis in three, and 9 remain unidentified despite neuroradiological investigation. Median follow-up was 2.4 years, six died, and one was lost to follow-up. Outcome was rated as good in 60/86. Of the 48 AVMs, 3 were Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade 1, 21 SM 2, 21 SM3 and 3 SM4. One patient was treated conservatively as the AVM was too high risk to treat. At follow-up, 19 with AVM were angiographically cured, all with low SM grade and with the use of a single modality in 9 cases (all low SM grade). CONCLUSION: Although children with acute HS are extremely unwell at presentation, supportive care results in a good outcome in the majority. Complete obliteration for childhood AVMs is challenging even with low-grade lesions with multimodal treatment.

The use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery.

BACKGROUND: As an intraoperative imaging modality, ultrasound is a user-friendly and cost-effective real-time imaging technique. Despite this, it is still not routinely employed for brain tumor surgery. This may be due to the poor image quality in inexperienced hands, and the well-documented learning curve. However, with regular use, the operator issues are addressed, and intraoperative ultrasound can provide valuable real-time information. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding for neurosurgeons of the development and use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery, and possible future advances. METHODS: A systematic search of the electronic databases Embase, Medline OvidSP, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar regarding the use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery was undertaken. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Intraoperative ultrasound has been shown to be able to accurately account for brain shift and has potential for regular use in brain tumor surgery. Further developments in probe size, resolution, and image reconstruction techniques will ensure that intraoperative ultrasound is more accessible and attractive to the neuro-oncological surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: This review has summarized the development of ultrasound and its uses with particular reference to brain tumor surgery, detailing the ongoing challenges in this area.

The Use of the Suboccipital Transtentorial Approach to the Posterior Inferior Incisural Space.

Objective To describe our experience with the microsurgical technique of the suboccipital transtentorial (SOTT) approach in the removal of posterior fossa lesions located in the posterior incisural space. Method Between 2002 and 2020 we reviewed all patients who underwent microsurgical resection of lesions of the posterior incisural space at the Department of Neurosurgery, Essex Neuroscience Centre, London, England (eight patients, male to female 3:5, mean age: 51, range 35-69). We describe the preoperative symptoms, radiological findings, surgical techniques, histology and postoperative outcomes in this cohort of patients. Results Eight patients with tumours located in the posterior incisural space underwent surgery during the study period including four meningiomas (50%), two haemangioblastomas (25%), one metastasis (13%) and one giant prolactinoma (13%). Gross or near total resection was achieved in six patients (75%): the giant prolactinoma could not be radically removed and one of the meningiomas required a small fragment to be left in place to protect the Vein of Galen. No patient developed a visual field deficit due to occipital lobe retraction. One patient developed a temporary trochlear nerve palsy (13%). Five patients had mild disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) = 5), and four had moderate disability (GOS = 4). Conclusion In our series, the SOTT approach provided excellent access for all cases of tumours in the posterior incisural space. The tumour's size and relationship to the deep venous system contributed to the choice of approach and in one patient who had previously undergone surgery via the supracerebellar route, the SOTT approach enabled the avoidance of gliotic scar tissue. Success is dependent on careful case selection, though from our series of 8 patients, we conclude that this approach allows safe access to the posterior incisural space, with acceptable outcomes with regard to postoperative disability and cranial nerve palsy. As such, the approach should be in the armamentarium of any neurosurgeon who regularly deals with posterior fossa pathology.

The management of symptomatic hyperostotic bilateral spheno-orbital meningiomas: patient series.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of hyperostotic bilateral spheno-orbital meningiomas (BSOMs) is very rare. Patients present with bilateral symptoms and require bilateral treatment. This series describes 6 patients presenting to 2 UK neurosurgical units and includes a literature review. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series documented. OBSERVATIONS: This is a retrospective review of patients with BSOMs presenting between 2006 and 2023. Six females, whose mean age was 43 (range: 36-64) years, presented with features of visual disturbance. Bilateral sphen-oorbital meningiomas were identified. All patients underwent bilateral staged resections. The patients had an initial improvement in their symptoms. Extensive genetic testing was performed in 4 patients, with no variants in the NF2, LZTR1, SMARCB1, SMARCE1, and SMARCA4 genes or other variants detected. The mean follow-up was 100.3 (range: 64-186) months. Sixty-seven percent of patients had good long-term visual acuity. The progression rate was 75% and was particularly aggressive in 1 patient. Four patients required radiation therapy, and 2 needed further surgery. LESSONS: Hyperostotic BSOMs are extensive, challenging tumors causing significant disability. They can recur, with significant patient impact. Multidisciplinary management and indefinite long-term follow-up are essential. The biology of these tumors remains unclear. As molecular testing expands, the understanding of BSOM oncogenesis and potential therapeutic targets is likely to improve.

Results of Surgical Treatment of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Single Institution Over 12 Years.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in whom endovascular treatment is not the optimal treatment strategy, microsurgical clipping remains a viable option. We examined changes in morbidity and outcome over time in patients treated surgically and in relation to surgeon volume and experience. METHODS: All patients who underwent microsurgery for aSAH from 2007 to 2019 at our institution were included. We compared technical complication rates and surgical outcomes between experienced (≥50 independent cases) and inexperienced (<50 independent cases) surgeons and between high-volume (≥20 cases/year) and low-volume (<20 cases/year) surgeons. RESULTS: Most of the 1,003 aneurysms (970 patients, median age 56 years) were in the middle cerebral (41.4%), anterior communicating (27.6%), and posterior communicating (17.5%) arteries; 46.5% were <7 mm. The technical complication rate was 7%, resulting in postoperative infarct in 4.9% of patients. Nineteen patients (2%) died within 30 days of admission. There were no significant changes in rates of technical complication, postoperative infarct, or mortality over the study period. There were no differences in postoperative infarction and technical complication rates between experienced and inexperienced surgeons (P = 0.28 and P = 0.05, respectively), but there were differences when comparing high-volume and low-volume surgeons (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively). The independent predictors of postoperative infarctions were aneurysm size (P = 0.001), intraoperative large-vessel injury (P < 0.001), and low surgeon volume (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We present real-world data on surgical morbidity and outcomes after aSAH. We demonstrated a relationship between surgeon volume and outcome for surgical treatment of aSAH, which supports the benefit of subspecialization in cerebrovascular surgery.

Endoscope Holders in Cranial Neurosurgery: Part 2-An International Survey.

BACKGROUND: Following a previous systematic review of currently available endoscope holders (EHs), we aspired to detect trends, task-specific preferences, and pitfalls of EH in various cranial neuroendoscopic procedures. METHODS: A questionnaire was disseminated to members of the International Federation of Neuroendoscopy. The questionnaire evaluated indications and pitfalls of EH in different applications, in particular, differentiating between intraventricular and skull base endoscopy, as well as subcategories of these 2 main fields. Furthermore, interest or involvement in research projects on EH was investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-two surgeons responded, with a broad geographic distribution represented. Most (54%) do not routinely use EH. Others use holders mainly for intraventricular rather than skull base procedures. Most surgeons (96%) regularly work with a co-surgeon. Reported weaknesses of EH included crude movements, downward drift, loss of depth perception, lack of flexibility, iatrogenic injury, cost, and bulky construct. There is still a lack of consensus on surgical indications. Tumor resections in intraventricular and skull base regions (not small sellar tumors) seem to stand out as good, widely accepted indications. CONCLUSIONS: Although EH have a role in cranial neuroendoscopy, their use seems limited and their technical features are regarded as suboptimal by most neuroendoscopists. Weaknesses and implications were detected in all application categories (skull base and intraventricular) but may vary slightly. Potentially, separate systems with distinct features may be required for skull base versus intraventricular surgery. There is a need for further evolution of EH, which could lead to a future paradigm shift in their use.

Current Surgical Options for Patients with Epilepsy.

Surgery for epilepsy dates back to 1886 and has undergone significant developments. Today it is considered a key treatment modality in patients who are resistant to pharmacological intervention. It improves seizure control, cognition and quality of life. New technologies, advances in surgical technique and progress in scientific research underlie the expansion of surgery in epilepsy treatment. Effectiveness of surgical treatment depends on several factors including the type of epilepsy, the underlying pathology and the localisation of the epileptogenic zone. Timely referral to an experienced epilepsy surgery centre is important to allow the greatest chance of seizure control and to minimise associated morbidity and mortality. Following referral, patients undergo thorough presurgical investigation to evaluate their suitability for surgery. The commonest form of epilepsy treated by surgery is mesial temporal lobe sclerosis and there is Class I evidence for the medium-term efficacy of temporal lobe resection from two randomised control trials. Various other forms of epilepsy are now considered for resective and neuromodulatory surgical intervention due to favourable results. In this article, the authors review the current status of surgical treatment for epilepsy including the presurgical evaluation of patients, surgical techniques and the future directions in epilepsy surgery.

C1-C2 posterior fixation: are 4 screws better than 2?

BACKGROUND: Several types of C1-C2 fixation techniques have been described over the years in order to treat atlantoaxial instability. OBJECTIVE: To compare the pros and cons of the most popular C1-C2 posterior fixation used today: C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw and rods (Harms) and transarticular screw (Magerl) fixations. METHODS: Retrospective review of 122 patients who underwent Harms or Magerl fixation for atlantoaxial instability. Surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: 123 operations were performed, of which 47 were by the Harms technique (group H) and 76 by the Magerl technique (group M). No significant differences were found in duration of surgery, blood loss, postoperative pain, and length of hospitalization. Postoperatively, neck pain, C2-radiculopathy, and hand function improved in both groups, with better, but not statistically significant, results for group H. The intraoperative complication rate was 2.1% in group H and 21% in group M (P < .05); postoperative complication rate was 10.6% in group H and 21% in group M (P > .05). The major complications were vertebral artery injury (2.1% in group H, 13.1% in group M, P = .05) and screw fracture (2.1% in group H, 9.2% in group M, P > .05). Fusion rate at the end of follow-up was not significantly higher in group H. C1-C2 range of movements in flexion/extension at the end of follow-up was lower in group H (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Magerl with posterior wiring and Harms techniques are both effective options for stabilizing the atlantoaxial complex. However, the Harms technique appears to be safer, to have fewer complications, and to demonstrate a more robust long-term fixation.