Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment of chronic myocardial infarction.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration on cardiac function of rats with chronic myocardial infarction through two different protocols: high dose short term and low dose long term protocols. METHODS: Wistar rats were submitted to MI surgery and after 4 weeks they received recombinant human G-CSF (Filgrastim) or vehicle subcutaneously. We tested the classical protocol (50 microg/kg/day during 7 days) and the long term low dose treatment (four cycles of 5 days of 10 microg/kg/day). Cardiac performance was evaluated before, 4 and 6 weeks after G-CSF injections by electro- and echocardiography, hemodynamic and treadmill exercise test. RESULTS: All infarcted groups exhibited impaired function compared to sham operated animals. Moreover, all cardiac functional parameter were not different between G-CSF and Vehicle group at resting conditions as well as after treadmill exercise stress test, despite intense white blood cell mobilization in both protocols at all time points. Hypertrophy was not different and infarct size was similar in histological analysis CONCLUSIONS: These data clearly show that G-CSF treatment was unable to restore cardiac function impaired by myocardial infarction either with classical approach or long term low dose administration.

Bone marrow mesenchymal cells improve muscle function in a skeletal muscle re-injury model.

Skeletal muscle injury is the most common problem in orthopedic and sports medicine, and severe injury leads to fibrosis and muscle dysfunction. Conventional treatment for successive muscle injury is currently controversial, although new therapies, like cell therapy, seem to be promise. We developed a model of successive injuries in rat to evaluate the therapeutic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal cells (BMMC) injected directly into the injured muscle. Functional and histological assays were performed 14 and 28 days after the injury protocol by isometric tension recording and picrosirius/Hematoxilin & Eosin staining, respectively. We also evaluated the presence and the fate of BMMC on treated muscles; and muscle fiber regeneration. BMMC treatment increased maximal skeletal muscle contraction 14 and 28 days after muscle injury compared to non-treated group (4.5 ± 1.7 vs 2.5 ± 0.98 N/cm2, p<0.05 and 8.4 ± 2.3 vs. 5.7 ± 1.3 N/cm2, p<0.05 respectively). Furthermore, BMMC treatment increased muscle fiber cross-sectional area and the presence of mature muscle fiber 28 days after muscle injury. However, there was no difference in collagen deposition between groups. Immunoassays for cytoskeleton markers of skeletal and smooth muscle cells revealed an apparent integration of the BMMC within the muscle. These data suggest that BMMC transplantation accelerates and improves muscle function recovery in our extensive muscle re-injury model.