Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 334
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 44(1): 5-8, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38100775

RESUMEN

PURPOSES/BACKGROUND: The goals of this preliminary study were to survey psychiatrists and to examine the impact of advertisements on their prescription of psychotropic medications. The study specifically looked at psychiatrists in Massachusetts and Michigan, as the authors were able to readily contact the members of their respective state psychiatric societies. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We used the survey software, Quatrics, to create an online survey that was sent via email link to the members of the Massachusetts Psychiatric Society (1400 estimated members), and the Michigan Psychiatric Society (700 estimated members). Details were obtained about how challenging it was for the psychiatrist to convince the patient that a medication was not indicated. Information regarding how the psychiatrist first heard about new medications and where they go to learn more about these medications was included in the survey. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We received 162 partial or full responses to our survey, representing a response rate of 8%. Those who were less than 10 years out of training were less likely to find it "easy" to change the minds of these patients, when compared with those more than 10 years out of training (Fisher exact test, P = 0.0396). The most frequent medication named as a response to "which medications do patients request" was Rexulti (brexpiprazole), followed by Vraylar (cariprazine), Caplyta (lumateperone), and aripiprazole. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: This survey points to the prevalence of psychiatrists getting requests for these advertised medications and illustrates that those with fewer years out of training may have a more difficult time redirecting patients from medications that are not indicated for their illness.


Asunto(s)
Publicidad Directa al Consumidor , Humanos , Michigan , Publicidad , Massachusetts
2.
Psychother Psychosom ; 93(2): 94-99, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382481

RESUMEN

Clinical interviewing is the basic method to understand how a person feels and what are the presenting complaints, obtain medical history, evaluate personal attitudes and behavior related to health and disease, give the patient information about diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, and establish a bond between patient and physician that is crucial for shared decision making and self-management. However, the value of this basic skill is threatened by time pressures and emphasis on technology. Current health care trends privilege expensive tests and procedures and tag the time devoted to interaction with the patient as lacking cost-effectiveness. Instead, the time spent to inquire about problems and life setting may actually help to avoid further testing, procedures, and referrals. Moreover, the dialogue between patient and physician is an essential instrument to increase patient's motivation to engage in healthy behavior. The aim of this paper was to provide an overview of clinical interviewing and its optimal use in relation to style, flow and hypothesis testing, clinical domains, modifications according to settings and goals, and teaching. This review points to the primacy of interviewing in the clinical process. The quality of interviewing determines the quality of data that are collected and, eventually, of assessment and treatment. Thus, interviewing deserves more attention in educational training and more space in clinical encounters than it is currently receiving.


Asunto(s)
Motivación , Entrevista Motivacional , Humanos
3.
Acad Psychiatry ; 48(2): 153-157, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493959

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Relative to the Black American population size, there is an underrepresentation of Black psychiatrists in the USA. In order to address this issue, it is important to explore factors that contribute to Black medical students' decision to pursue a career in psychiatry. METHODS: First-year psychiatry residents who identify as Black (N = 7) were interviewed. Career Construction Theory provided a structured framework for the interview process. For qualitative analysis of data, codes were assigned to reflect concepts and develop themes. RESULTS: All participants mentioned the impact of being a Black psychiatrist in the Black community, the influence of strong female role models on their life, and the importance of the fit between their personality and the work done within psychiatry. The majority of interviewees identified macro-level and cultural events that had influenced them and discussed a desire for advocacy and the influence of Black role models, perseverance, and the importance of work-life balance. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study identified many influential factors that were deemed important to Black interns in their decision to pursue a residency in psychiatry. With the information learned from these interviews, educators within psychiatry can bolster their support of Black medical students, encourage pursuit of a career in psychiatry, and ultimately, work toward reducing disparities in psychiatric care. Future research should examine additional collective notions of career decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Femenino , Selección de Profesión , Psiquiatría/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Personalidad , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Br J Psychiatry ; 218(3): 125-127, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040746

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: We propose that discussions of benzodiazepines in the current psychiatric literature have become negatively biased and have strayed from the scientific evidence base. We advocate returning to the evidence in discussing benzodiazepines and adhering to clear definitions and conceptual rigour in commentary about them.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 33(2): 101-107, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely impact the mental health of health care workers (HCWs). To address this issue, it is essential to determine levels of anxiety, depression, and traumatic stress, and sources of stress, and to identify subgroups of HCWs at a higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of symptoms of mental illness in HCWs in the area surrounding Detroit, Michigan. The online survey included questions about demographics, health and clinical factors, and sources of stress. Several tools were used to assess psychiatric symptoms among HCWs, including the Perceived Stress Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item assessment, and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5. The adequacy of personal protective equipment, patient resources, and training for highly contagious diseases were rated. RESULTS: The sample (N = 129) was predominantly female (51.2%) and White (65.9%), with 30.2% screening positive for clinical follow-up to assess anxiety, 20.9% for moderate to severe depression, and 16.3% for elevated traumatic stress. Differences were found by self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and chronic conditions, and role on treatment teams. CONCLUSIONS: Frontline HCWs demonstrate high levels of stress and trauma symptoms. Timely screening and accommodations may be needed during health care crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Estrés Laboral , Estrés Psicológico , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Michigan/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Laboral/diagnóstico , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/etiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/etiología , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
6.
Psychiatr Q ; 92(3): 1011-1020, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411127

RESUMEN

Both healthcare workers (HCWs) and psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic appear to have elevated prevalence of psychiatric symptoms, but little is known about HCWs with psychiatric diagnoses. To examine their response to the pandemic, we analyzed their perspective, and association with psychiatric symptoms and stress among HCW with psychiatric diagnosis. Using an online survey of HCW, we analyzed demographics, work information, health factors, open-ended question, sources of stress and standardized mental health scales (Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL)). Sixteen out of 129 HCWs reported a pre-existing psychiatric diagnosis (median age 32 years, 8 were females, 8 work in the emergency department). Their perception of the impact severity on symptoms was significantly correlated with all the mental health scales and with stress from avoiding physical contact. In multivariate analysis, PSS score and PCL score were associated with self-rated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on symptoms (standardized beta = .51 for PCL and standardized beta = .55 for PSS). GAD-7 score was significantly related to both impact (standardized beta = .44) and stress from avoiding physical contact (standardized beta = .53). HCWs with psychiatric diagnoses reported a range of perception of the impact of the pandemic on their symptoms with increased severity associated with worse psychiatric outcomes and more stress from avoiding physical contact with others. There is a growing importance to protect HCWs mental health, including those with pre-existing psychiatric diagnosis, and proactively counter psychosocial consequences of healthcare crises.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud/psicología , Pandemias , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1191: 367-388, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32002938

RESUMEN

This chapter reviews the role of benzodiazepines (BZs) in the treatment of anxiety disorders, specifically panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder (social phobia). BZs pharmacology, classification, efficacy, adverse effects, withdrawal symptoms, possible dependence, and abuse; their positioning among pharmacological treatment; and guidance on how to use them are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Agorafobia/complicaciones , Agorafobia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , Humanos , Trastorno de Pánico/complicaciones , Trastorno de Pánico/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
Acad Psychiatry ; 44(6): 727-733, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32661946

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is a national shortage of psychiatrists. To grow the workforce, educators must understand the factors that influence the choice of psychiatry as a specialty for medical students in the Generation Y cohort. METHODS: Psychiatry residents born between 1981 and 2000 were recruited from six psychiatry training programs across the USA and were interviewed in the fall of their first year. The interviews were coded and analyzed qualitatively for themes. Career Construction Theory (CCT) was applied to relate the themes within the four domains of Career Adaptability (a focus of CCT): concern, control, curiosity, and confidence. RESULTS: The majority of themes mapped onto the four domains. A fifth domain, "contribution," was created to capture additional themes. Themes associated with choosing psychiatry as a career included Practice Concerns and Economic/Lifestyle Concerns (concern), Changes in Stigma and Changes in Legitimacy (control), Exploring Humanity and Exposures to Psychiatry (curiosity), Abilities Called Upon by the Field, Recognized Qualities in the Participant, and Recognized Qualities in the Faculty/Residents (confidence), and Hoping to Make a Difference and Engaging in Research/Technology (contribution). CONCLUSIONS: With the knowledge generated from this study, educators now have a guide for the kinds of learning experiences that may attract Generation Y students to the field, and can identify those with the background, values, or personality traits most likely to find a career in psychiatry to be attractive.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Psiquiatría , Estudiantes de Medicina , Selección de Profesión , Humanos , Psiquiatría/educación , Recursos Humanos
9.
Acad Psychiatry ; 44(6): 751-755, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000447

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A survey among medical students of all medical schools in the Czech Republic was conducted to investigate attitudes and views of psychiatry and career choice of psychiatry. METHODS: A Czech version of the Attitudes to Psychiatry Scale (APS) and a questionnaire surveying demographic characteristics and choices of future specialty were distributed to all medical students of eight medical schools in the Czech Republic via the schools' internal communication systems in the form of an anonymous online questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of a total of 10,147 medical students in the Czech Republic (academic year 2019/2020), 2418 students participated in the survey (response rate 23.8%). Psychiatry as a non-exclusive career choice was considered by 31.3% respondents; child and adolescent psychiatry was considered by 15.4% respondents. Psychiatry as the only choice was considered by 1.6%, and child and adolescent psychiatry was not considered at all. The interest in both specialties was declining since the first year of study. The status of psychiatry among other medical specialties was perceived as low; students were rather discouraged from entering psychiatry by their families. They did not feel encouraged by their teachers to pursue career in psychiatry despite the fact that they were interested in psychiatry. They also felt uncomfortable with patients with mental illness. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high enthusiasm for psychiatry in the first year of medical school, only a small proportion of medical students consider to choose psychiatry, and especially child and adolescent psychiatry, as a career at the end of medical school.


Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría , Estudiantes de Medicina , Adolescente , Actitud , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Selección de Profesión , Niño , República Checa , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Psychother Psychosom ; 93(3): 151-154, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663360
12.
Acad Psychiatry ; 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662133
13.
Acad Psychiatry ; 48(1): 89-92, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148449

Asunto(s)
Pesar , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA