Nature and Clonality of the Fluoresceinated Secondary Antibody in Luminex Multiplex Bead Assays Are Critical Factors for Reliable Monitoring of Serum HLA Antibody Levels in Patients for Donor Organ Selection, Desensitization Therapy, and Assessment of the Risk for Graft Loss.

Luminex multiplex immunoassays enable simultaneous monitoring of Abs against multiple Ags in autoimmune, inflammatory, and infectious diseases. The assays are used extensively to monitor anti-HLA Abs in transplant patients for donor organ selection, desensitization, and assessing the risk for graft rejection. To monitor IgG Abs, fluoresceinated IgG constant H chain-binding polyclonal F(ab')2 (IgHPolyFab) is used as the fluoresceinated secondary Ab (2nd-Ab), whereas IgG subclasses are monitored with Fc-specific monoclonal whole IgG (FcMonoIgG). The fluorescent signal from the 2nd-Ab is measured as mean florescence intensity (MFI). When IgHPolyFab is used, the signal is amplified as a result of the binding of multiple polyclonal Fabs to the C region of primary IgH. The reliability of such amplification for Ab measurements was not validated, nor were MFIs compared with 1:1 binding of FcMonoIgG to primary Abs. Comparing the MFIs of anti-HLA Abs obtained with IgHPolyFab and FcMonoIgG against normal human sera, IVIg, and allograft recipients' sera, it was observed that the number of HLA-Abs was notably higher with IgHPolyFab than with FcMonoIgG The MFIs of anti-HLA Abs also remained higher with IgHPolyFab in the normal sera and in IVIg, but the reverse was true when the autologous and allogeneic IgG concentrations were augmented in allograft recipients. Indeed, MFIs of the de novo allo-HLA Abs were markedly higher with FcMonoIgG than with IgHPolyFab. Serum titration established the superiority of FcMonoIgG for monitoring MFIs of de novo allo-HLA Abs in allograft recipients. Avoiding false amplifications of the number and MFIs of anti-HLA IgG with FcMonoIgG may minimize immunosuppressive therapies, maximize the number of donors for patients waiting for allografts, and enable better prediction of graft rejection.

Preformed class II donor-specific antibodies are associated with an increased risk of early rejection after liver transplantation.

Preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) are considered a contraindication to the transplantation of most solid organs other than the liver. Conflicting data currently exist on the importance of preformed DSAs in rejection and patient survival after liver transplantation (LT). To evaluate preformed DSAs in LT, we retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected samples from all adult recipients of primary LT without another organ from January 1, 2000 to May 31, 2009 with a pre-LT sample available (95.8% of the patients). Fourteen percent of the patients had preformed class I and/or II DSAs with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥ 5000. Preformed class I DSAs with an MFI ≥ 5000 remained persistent in only 5% of patients and were not associated with rejection. Preformed class II DSAs with an MFI of 5000 to 10,000 remained persistent in 23% of patients, and this rate increased to 33% for patients whose MFI was ≥10,000 (P < 0.001). Preformed class II DSAs in multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were associated with an increased risk of early rejection [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58; p = 0.004]. In addition, multivariate modeling showed that in comparison with no DSAs (MFI < 1000), preformed class I and/or II DSAs with an MFI ≥ 5000 were independently correlated with the risk of death (HR = 1.51; p = 0.02).

Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Donor-Specific Alloantibody Among Intestinal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Rejection remains the leading cause of allograft loss, and a major barrier to improving long-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation. Our aim is to define the prevalence and investigate the role of donor-specific antibody (DSA) on intestinal graft outcomes. METHODS: The study includes 109 transplants performed in 95 recipients at a single center. Patients were screened for DSA pretransplant, monitored regularly posttransplant and when clinically indicated using the single-antigen bead Luminex assay. Standard induction immunosuppression was with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, and antithymocyte globulin in high-risk recipients. Maintenance regimens were tacrolimus-based. RESULTS: Pretransplant DSA was detected in 12 (11%) recipients with 50% continuing to have circulating antibodies posttransplant. An additional 24 (25%) patients developed de novo DSA, and of these, 71% had persistent antibodies. Recipients with preformed DSA demonstrated elevated risks of early graft failure, whereas those with de novo DSA experienced accelerated graft loss once DSA was detected, reaching a 28% failure rate within 2 years. HLA-DQ mismatch is a significant risk factor for de novo DSA emergence, whereas the persistence of antibodies is predicted by DSA strength and specificity. Although inclusion of the liver in the intestinal allograft imparts an immunological advantage against rejection-related graft loss, this protective effect was lost among recipients with persistent DSA. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of DSA is associated with inferior graft outcomes among intestinal transplant recipients. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms by which DSA causes allograft injury, and effective strategies targeting humoral immune reactivity are needed to improve long-term intestinal graft outcomes.

Risk Stratification of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II Donor Specific Antibody Positive Patients by Immunoglobulin G Subclasses.

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are a major cause of graft loss in mismatched transplant recipients. However, the time to graft loss resulting from antibody induced injury is unpredictable. The unpredictable nature of antibodies may be related to the subclass of antibodies. In this study, HLA immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses were investigated to determine whether a unique IgG subclass composition could better identify those patients at eminent risk for graft loss. METHODS: The serial serum samples from the 57 patients with post-transplant HLA class II donor specific antibodies (DSA) were tested for the three IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4). RESULTS: IgG3 and IgG4 were highly prevalent in failed patients compared to functioning patients (82 % vs. 34%, 45% vs. 20%, respectively). IgG3 development showed a distinct subclass trend between failed and functioning patients with poor graft survival (log rank p=0.0006). IgG1 was almost equally abundant in both groups (100% and 97%, respectively). Of the 5 patterns of IgG subclass combinations observed, IgG1+3+ showed the strongest association with graft failure (hazard ratio 3.14, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients with IgG3 subclass HLA DSA showed lower graft survival. Post-transplant monitoring for IgG subclasses rather than total IgG monitoring may identify patients at risk for graft failure.