Application of isoxanthopterin as a new pterin marker in the differential diagnosis of hyperphenylalaninemia.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the value of applying a new pterin marker (isoxanthopterin) to the traditional urine pterin analysis to reduce the rate of mis-diagnosis of 6-pyruvoyltetrahydropterin synthase deficiency (PTPSD) and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. METHODS: We compared the urine neopterin (N), biopterin (B), isoxanthopterin (Iso), B% and Iso% levels between patients with phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency and those with PTPSD, and found the most specific pterin biomarkers by ROC analysis. A positive cut-off value of urine pterins was determined. The effect of combined Iso% + B + B% in reducing PTPSD mis-diagnosis was evaluated, and the different urine pterin levels in PTPSD and false PTPSD (FPTPSD) were compared. The concordance of PTPSD diagnosis by the new pterin scheme and gene mutation analysis was determined. RESULTS: (1) Urinary B, B%, Iso and Iso% were significantly lower in PTPSD than those in phenylalanine hydroxylase-deficiency group (P < 0.01); (2) Iso%, B%, and B were the most specific markers; (3) The positive cut-off values of B, B%, Iso% for PTPSD were < 0.17 mmoL/moLCr, < 5.0%, and < 9.5%, respectively; (4) urinary B + B% + Iso% scheme significantly reduced the false-positive rate of PTPSD compared to traditional ones. The Iso% levels in FPTPSD group were higher than the ones in PTPSD group; (5) an accuracy of diagnosis for PTPSD was increased by 9-19% when Iso% was introduced to urinary pterin scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Iso% is helpful to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis of PTPSD in the diagnosis by urinary pterin analysis for hyperphenylalaninemias and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. This approach is worthy of further development and increased utilization.

QDPR gene mutation and clinical follow-up in Chinese patients with dihydropteridine reductase deficiency.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the mutation spectrum of the QDPR gene, to determine the effect of mutations on dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR) structure/function, to discuss the potential genotypephenotype correlation, and to evaluate the clinical outcome of Chinese patients after treatment. METHODS: Nine DHPR-deficient patients were enrolled in this study and seven of them underwent neonatal screening. QDPR gene mutations were analyzed and confirmed by routine methods. The potential pathogenicity of missense variants was analyzed using Clustal X, PolyPhen program and Swiss-PDB Viewer 4.04_OSX software, respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated after long-term treatment. RESULTS: In 10 mutations of the 9 patients, 4 were novel mutations (G20V, V86D, G130S and A175R), 4 were reported by us previously, and 2 known mutations were identified. R221X was a hotspot mutation (27.7%) in our patients. Eight missense mutations probably had damage to protein. Six patients in this series were treated with a good control of phenylalanine level. The height and weight of the patients were normal at the age of 4 months to 7.5 years. Four patients, who underwent a neonatal screening and were treated early, showed a normal mental development. In 2 patients diagnosed late, neurological symptoms were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: The mutation spectrum of the QDPR gene is different in the Chinese population. Most mutations are related to severe phenotype. The determination of DHPR activity should be performed in patients with hyperphenylalaninemia. DHPR-deficient patients who were treated below the age of 2 months may have a near normal mental development.