RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The impact of gender on outcome in critically ill patients is unclear. We investigated the influence of gender on the epidemiology of severe sepsis and associated morbidity and mortality in a large cohort of ICU patients in the region of Piedmont in Italy. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter, observational study in which all patients admitted to one of 24 participating medical and/or surgical ICUs between 3 April 2006 and 29 September 2006 were included. RESULTS: Of the 3,902 patients included in the study, 63.5% were male. Female patients were significantly older than male patients (66±16 years vs. 63±16 years, P<0.001). Female patients were less likely to have severe sepsis and septic shock on admission to the ICU and to develop these syndromes during the ICU stay. ICU mortality was similar in men and women in the whole cohort (20.1% vs. 19.8%, P=0.834), but in patients with severe sepsis was significantly greater in women than in men (63.5% vs. 46.4%, P=0.007). In multivariate logistic regression analysis with ICU outcome as the dependent variable, female gender was independently associated with a higher risk of ICU death in patients with severe sepsis (odds ratio=2.33, 95% confidence interval=1.23 to 4.39, P=0.009) but not in the whole cohort (odds ratio=1.07, 95% confidence interval=0.87 to 1.34). CONCLUSION: In this large regional Italian cohort of ICU patients, there were more male than female admissions. The prevalence of severe sepsis was lower in women than in men, but female gender was independently associated with a higher risk of death in the ICU for patients with severe sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/epidemiología , Caracteres Sexuales , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe and analyse interventions performed in the emergency department (ED) of an Italian hospital with the aim of humanising the patient care pathway. The actions taken are described and the changes analysed to determine whether they resulted in an increased level of patient satisfaction. METHODS: An observational study was conducted between October 2010 and March 2011. The data were collected via a telephone questionnaire administered to patients who were admitted to the ED before and after humanisation interventions. The respondents were questioned about their general condition and their level of satisfaction. RESULTS: The study population included 297 patients (158 before and 139 after the interventions). The highest overall patient satisfaction after the interventions was highly correlated with the humanisation interventions and not with other factors such as gender, age, educational level or the severity code triage. Specifically, in patients who went to the ED after the changes had been made, there was a greater level of satisfaction regarding comfort in the waiting room, waiting time for the first visit and the privacy experienced during the triage. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the interventions implemented in this study, designed to humanise the ED, improved overall patient satisfaction. Interventions may be taken to reduce the depersonalisation of patients in the emergency room.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Triaje/clasificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This study reports the results of a one-day point prevalence study of infections performed in 2001 (SPIR01) and 2002 (SPIR02) in a Regional network of ICUs in Piedmont, Italy. The study aims were to illustrate the overall proportion of infected patients and the rate of ICU-acquired infections. Mortality rate was evaluated three weeks after the study days. Resistance pattern of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative Staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were recorded. The primary end-point of the study was to document the prevalence and associated risk factors of the ICU-acquired infections, and the impact of infections on mortality. The prevalence of ICU-acquired infection was 30% in SPIR01, and 38.3% in SPIR02. The rate of methicillin-resistance was high among isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci. The prevalence of ICU-acquired infections was lower than that reported in the EPIC study. In our experience, this Regional survey stimulated further research and collaboration to improve the prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of ICU-acquired infections.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Cocos Grampositivos/efectos de los fármacos , Cocos Grampositivos/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of obesity in a large cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and study its impact on outcomes. METHODS: All 3902 patients admitted to one of 24 ICUs in the Piedmont region of Italy from April 3 to September 29, 2006, were included in this retrospective analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter study. RESULTS: Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.0 ± 5.4 kg/m(2): 32.8% of patients had a normal BMI, 2.6% were underweight, 45.1% overweight, 16.5% obese, and 2.9% morbidly obese. ICU mortality was significantly (P < .05) lower in overweight (18.8%) and obese (17.5%) patients than in those of normal BMI (22%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, being overweight (OR = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.58-0.91, P = .007) or obese (OR = 0.62; 95%CI: 50.45-0.85, P = .003) was associated with a reduced risk of ICU death. Being morbidly obese was independently associated with an increased risk of death in elective surgery patients whereas being underweight was independently associated with an increased risk of death in patients admitted for short-term monitoring and after elective surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, overweight and obese patients had a reduced risk of ICU death. Being underweight or morbidly obese was associated with an increased risk of death in some subgroups of patients.