Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 36(6): 685-91; discussion 691-2, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21176275

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Define a group of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, whose risk of bone metastasis is low enough to omit a bone scan staging study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, the medical records of patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included: age, digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, clinical T stage, and bone isotope scan. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of bone isotope scan; positive group and negative group. A univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Of the 106 patients, 98 had a complete data collection and were entered into the study. The median age of the patients was 70.5 years and patients with a positive bone scan was 74 years, significantly higher than for patients with negative scans (69 years) (p=0.02). Bone metastasis was detected in 39 cases (39.7%). In all patients with clinical T1-2 stage, a Gleason score of <8 and PSA≤20 ng/mL, the bone isotope scans were negative. In univariate analysis, PSA (>20 ng/mL) and Gleason score (>7) were independently predictive of positive bone scan, while clinical stage was not. CONCLUSION: Staging bone scans can be omitted in patients with a PSA level of ≤20 ng/mL, and Gleason score<8. Our results suggest that by considering the Gleason score and PSA, a larger proportion of patients with prostate cancer could avoid a staging bone scan.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Cintigrafía , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 11(2): 60.e1-4, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25294281

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Secondary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) is a common problem associated with non-compliant bladders. Management of this disorder is debatable in literature. Many authors reported high resolution rate of VUR with augmentation cystoplasty (ACP) alone. Others showed significant residual VUR after ACP and recommend ureteric re-implantation (UR) at time of augmentation. OBJECTIVE: Studying efficacy of endoscopic correction of persistent high-grade VUR (ECVUR) post successful ACP. DESIGN: Patients with non-compliant bladders and high-grade VUR are enrolled in the program of our institute, where they are initially managed conservatively. Those not responding are managed endoscopically using intravesical botulinum toxin A and ECVUR. Patients who are not candidates or failed this approach undergo ACP without UR. A total of 82 patients with non-compliant bladder underwent ACP between 2001 and 2011. Of those, 24 patients had high-grade VUR with 44 refluxing units (RU), 20 bilateral and 4 unilateral. The mean age at intervention was 7.62 years with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. Patients with persistent high-grade VUR and recurrent breakthrough febrile UTI despite antibiotic prophylaxis following ACP were identified and enrolled in our prospective trial of interval ECVUR. Statistical analyses was performed to identify predictors of high-grade VUR resolution after ACP and ECVUR. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant (Table 1). RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 17 underwent ileocystoplasty and 7 underwent ureterocystoplasty. One of the patients that underwent ileocystoplasty found to have a blind ending RU that was excised. Of the 36 remaining RU, 21/36 (58.3%) showed complete resolution in the first follow-up cystogram, and 1 showed complete resolution after 1 year. Two patients, each with single RU, received repeat ACP because of poor compliance and/or inadequate bladder capacity post ureterocystoplasty and showed complete resolution of reflux post-operatively, which increased the resolution rate post ACP to 66.6% (24/36) (Table 2). Of the remaining 12 RU in 7 patients, 10 underwent trial of ECVUR. VUR resolved in 8 RU after the first trial and in another 2 after the second trial (Table 3). Parents of 1 patient with the remaining 2 RU preferred to continue with conservative management (Table 2). DISCUSSION: VUR in patients with non-compliant bladder is usually secondary to high detrusor pressure, low compliance and small capacity. Whereas some investigators showed high resolution rate of VUR post augmentation without UR, claiming that by successfully augmenting the bladder, compliance will increase, detrusor pressure will decrease, and as a result, VUR will spontaneously resolve. Others showed high incidence of persistent VUR (47-57%) and recommend UR at time of ACP. In our study, the incidence of spontaneous resolution was 66.6% (24/36). In cases where VUR persists, ECVUR was performed. With this approach, VUR resolution increased to 94% (34/36). This study is limited by the small number of patients, lack of randomization and lack of comparison group in which patients undergo ACP with UR. CONCLUSION: ACP without UR with interval endoscopic management seems to be an effective and adequate treatment for high pressure, non-compliant bladder as well as high-grade VUR when conservative management fails.


Asunto(s)
Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/cirugía , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/cirugía , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Cistoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Recuperación de la Función , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/anomalías , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/complicaciones , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/diagnóstico , Urodinámica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/etiología
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 36(6): 685-692, Dec. 2010. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-572424

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Define a group of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, whose risk of bone metastasis is low enough to omit a bone scan staging study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, the medical records of patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included: age, digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, clinical T stage, and bone isotope scan. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of bone isotope scan; positive group and negative group. A univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Of the 106 patients, 98 had a complete data collection and were entered into the study. The median age of the patients was 70.5 years and patients with a positive bone scan was 74 years, significantly higher than for patients with negative scans (69 years) (p = 0.02). Bone metastasis was detected in 39 cases (39.7 percent). In all patients with clinical T1-2 stage, a Gleason score of < 8 and PSA = 20 ng/mL, the bone isotope scans were negative. In univariate analysis, PSA (> 20 ng/mL) and Gleason score (> 7) were independently predictive of positive bone scan, while clinical stage was not. CONCLUSION: Staging bone scans can be omitted in patients with a PSA level of = 20 ng/mL, and Gleason score < 8. Our results suggest that by considering the Gleason score and PSA, a larger proportion of patients with prostate cancer could avoid a staging bone scan.


Asunto(s)
Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Óseas , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Huesos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de Edad , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA