Benign breast papilloma: Is surgical excision necessary?

In many centers internationally, current standard of care is to excise all papillomas of the breast, despite recently reported low rates of upgrade to malignancy on final excision. The objective of this study was to determine the upgrade rate to malignancy in patients with papilloma without atypia. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all cases of benign intraductal papilloma in a tertiary referral symptomatic breast unit between July 2008 and July 2018 was performed. Patients with evidence of malignancy or atypia on core biopsy and those with a history of breast cancer or genetic mutations predisposing to breast cancer were excluded. One hundred and seventy-three cases of benign papilloma diagnosed on core biopsy were identified. Following exclusions, the final cohort comprised of 138 patients. Mean age at presentation was 51. Mean follow-up time was 9.6 months. The most common symptom was a lump (40%). Of the 124 patients who underwent excision, three had ductal carcinoma in situ and there were no cases of invasive disease, giving an upgrade rate to malignancy of 2.4%. Upgrade to other high-risk lesions (atypical lobular and ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ) was demonstrated in 15 cases (12.1%). Benign papilloma was confirmed in 100 cases (81.5%), and 6 (4.8%) had no residual papilloma found on final excision. Twelve patients (8.7%) were managed conservatively. Of those, one later went on to develop malignancy. Patients with a diagnosis of benign papilloma without atypia on core biopsy have a low risk of upgrade to malignancy on final pathology, suggesting that observation may be a safe alternative to surgical excision. Further research is warranted to determine which patients can be safely managed conservatively.

Lobular intraepithelial neoplasia: Outcomes and optimal management.

INTRODUCTION: Lobular neoplasia is a term encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ. These pathological findings are of uncertain malignant potential and predispose to a higher lifetime risk of breast cancer. Debate surrounds the management of such lesions, with the rationale for diagnostic excision based on the possibility of upgrading to malignancy. In this study, we report the upgrade rate of these lesions and risk of subsequent development of breast cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained data base of all biopsies of breast screening-detected abnormalities in a single Irish breast-screening unit. We included all patients with lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy who underwent diagnostic excision from 2005 to 2012. We excluded those who had concurrent high-risk lesions on biopsy. End points included upgrade rate and subsequent diagnosis of malignancy on follow-up. RESULTS: During the study period, 66 patients met criteria for inclusion, with a mean age of 53.74 years. Upgrade rate following excision was 13.64% (n = 9/66). Of those not upgraded, 7.02% (n = 4/57) were subsequently diagnosed with malignancy. Median time to diagnosis was 59.61 months (range = 10.5-124.4). CONCLUSION: There is a significant rate of upgrade following diagnostic excision of lobular neoplasia, supporting the practice of diagnostic excision. There is an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer for women with a diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, with many of these cancers occurring outside the standard five-year monitoring period, suggesting a potential benefit in extending surveillance.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been gathering increased recognition as an alternative to more traditional mastectomy approaches. Initially, questions concerning its oncologic safety limited the use of NSM. Nevertheless, mounting evidence supporting the practice of NSM for both prophylactic and oncologic purposes is leading to its more widespread use and broadened indications. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed our experience of 353 NSM procedures performed in 200 patients over the past 10 years. RESULTS: The indications for surgery were: 196 prophylactic risk-reduction (55.5%), 74 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (20.8%), 82 invasive cancer (23.2%), and 1 phyllodes tumor (0.5%). The nipple areolar complex (NAC) was entirely preserved in 341 mastectomies (96.7%). There were 11 patients (3.1%) who were found to have cancer at the nipple margin, warranting further excision. A total of 69 breasts (19.5%) had some degree of skin desquamation or necrosis, but only 12 (3.3%) required operative debridement, of which 3 breasts (1%) necessitated removal of a breast implant. Also, 6 patients (2%) were treated for infection. Of the 196 prophylactic NSMs, 11 specimens (5.6%) were found to harbor occult cancer (8 DCIS and 3 invasive cancers). One patient who underwent NSM for invasive ductal carcinoma in 2006 developed metastatic disease to her brain. No other recurrences are attributable to the 353 NSMs. CONCLUSIONS: The trends demonstrate the increasing acceptance of NSM as a prophylactic procedure as well as for therapeutic purposes. Although NSM is not standard, our experience supports the selective use of NSM in both prophylactic and malignant settings.