RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have become a standard part of treating oncological patients. Based on the available data, they have lead to significantly higher survival rates in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Reported negatives include potentially longer times between diagnoses and the start of appropriate treatment, and the lack of quality controls over the MTDs actions. This report aims to assess the benefits of MDTs using our own data set for 2017. METHODS: Year 2010 saw the institution of an MDT at the Central Military University Hospital in Prague, with the obligation to refer CRC patients to the MDT before the start of treatment. Having standardized the registration, we have implemented a simple procedure to track the quality of our MDTs involvement and its patient benefits: number of patients, number of referrals with proposed diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, frequency and reason of changes to original strategies, and the frequency of variations from the MDTs conclusions. RESULTS: 405 CRC patients were referred to the MDT in 2017; we have found 499 referrals in this group. The data set was formed predominantly by men (61%), with the mean age of 63 (21-91), and the median age of 64.5 years. Surgical treatment was the most commonly proposed procedure (59%), followed by systemic treatment or, as the case may be, radiotherapy. In 24% of the cases, the conclusion did not match the originally proposed procedure. The decision not to go through with the proposed surgical treatment was the most common change (66 %). We have found a difference in the quality of referral in patients examined specifically by the referring doctor, as opposed to patients whose medical records have just been sent in. We have found therapeutic variation in the MTDs conclusions in less than 5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Having analyzed our data for CRC patients referred to the MDT in 2017, we have found out that in 24% of the patients, the MDT referral leads to a change in the originally proposed diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Consensus among the MDTs members on the CRC patients treatment guarantees an optimum procedure. What is fundamental is that the referring doctor knows the patient. Constant tracking of the MDTs outputs forms a condition for sustaining the quality of its work and a base for assessing its benefits to the patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Liver metastases are diagnosed in 60% of patients with colorectal cancer, both at the time of diagnosis or later in the course of their management. Surgical treatment is the sole potentially curable method with 5-year overall survival of approximately 50%. However, only less than 20% of patients underwent liver resection. A joint effort of medical oncologists and surgeons is to increase the numbers of resected patients. The "liver first approach" (LFA) is one of approaches aimed at increasing resecability. The authors present their preliminary results using this method. METHODS: 102 patients were included in the multicentre study supported by the grant IGA NT 13660 Evaluation of quality of multimodal treatment for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases - conducted at the Central Military Hospital between September 2012 and January 2015. We used LFA in 12 patients (12%). Patients were indicated for liver resection based on good response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Multiple bilobar liver involvement (>4 metastases) was present in 11 cases and one large solitary metastasis in the right liver lobe in one case. The primary tumor was located in the rectum in 9 patients, in the rectosigmoid in 3 patients; 3 patients had a colostomy. Others showed no signs of bowel obstruction. RESULTS: We have performed R0 resections in 11 cases, and two-stage hepatectomy with portal vein embolisation was indicated 3 times (in one case we did not finish the second stage due to quick progression after PVE). We performed major resections 7 times, along with sever extraanatomic resections, incl. 11 RFA (6 times in combination with major resections). Perioperative mortality was 0%, morbidity 33% (Dindo-Clavien >2). Ten patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, in 7 cases including radiotherapy of the small pelvis due to a local advanced primary tumor. Resection of the primary tumor was done in 7 patients (58%). Two patients died recently because of disease progression (17%); progression was observed in 6 patients (50%). CONCLUSION: We deem the LFA suitable especially for patients with metastatic rectal tumors where adjuvant systemic therapy can be combined with radiotherapy. The timing of the resection of the primary tumor still remains a question: it is necessary to rule out potential recurrence of liver metastases, which affected more than 50% of the patients. The benefit of LFA must be confimed by randomised studies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Metastasectomía/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: The Yondelis (trabectedin) project was initiated in January 2011 with the aim to obtain basic epidemiological information on patients with soft tissue sarcomas, standard treatment procedures, and results of trabectedin therapy in routine clinical practice. Expert patronage is provided by the Czech Society for Oncology, CzMA JEP. The project covers a representative sample of Comprehensive Cancer Care centres established to provide systematic treatment to patients with soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma were retrospectively included in the database. Median age at the initiation of trabectedin therapy was 51 years (23-72 years). Leiomyosarcoma was the most frequent tumour (35.6%), synovial sarcoma occurred in 13.3% of patients; liposarcoma, peripheral nerve sheath tumours and unspecified sarcomas contributed 6.7% each. 62.2% of sarcomas were larger than 5 cm. Trabectedin was administered in a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 once in 3 weeks. 40% of patients received trabectedin as the 2nd line treatment, 35.6% as the 3rd line, and 34.4% as the 4th line. RESULTS: Median number of administered cycles was 4 (1-10 cycles). Neutropenia (28.9% of patients) and elevated liver enzymes (26.7% of patients) were the most frequent adverse affects. 73.8% of patients terminated the therapy due to disease progression. Treatment response was recorded in 6.6% of patients (complete and partial remission), stable disease in 26.7%, and progression in 53.3%. Median overall survival (95% CI) was 11.7 months (9.6; 13.8), median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 3 months (2.4; 3.6). CONCLUSION: Expert cancer societies have recently recommended trabectedin as the 2nd line palliative treatment for soft tissue sarcomas with documented effectiveness, particularly in liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas, and good safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Dioxoles/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , República Checa , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Trabectedina , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
An Ashkenazi Jewish Israeli family with two children affected with severe xeroderma pigmentosum was investigated. A son, XP12TA, developed skin cancer at 2 y and died at 10 y. A daughter, XP25TA, now 24 y old, was sun protected and began developing skin cancers at 10 y. Their cultured skin fibroblasts showed reductions in post-ultraviolet survival (11% of normal), unscheduled DNA synthesis (10% of normal), global genome DNA repair (15% of normal), and plasmid host cell reactivation (5% of normal). Transcription-coupled DNA repair was normal, however. Northern blot analysis revealed greatly reduced xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C mRNA. A plasmid host cell reactivation assay assigned the cells to xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C. Cells from both parents and an unaffected child exhibited normal post-ultraviolet-C survival and normal DNA repair. Sequencing the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C cDNA of XP12TA and XP25TA revealed a homozygous deletion of two bases (del AT 669-670) in exon 5 with a new termination site 10 codons downstream that is expected to encode a truncated xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C protein. Sequence analysis of the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C cDNA in cells from the parents found identical heterozygous mutations: one allele carries both the exon 5 frameshift and an exon 15 polymorphism and the other allele carries neither alteration. Cells from the unaffected brother had two normal xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C alleles. This frameshift mutation in the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C gene led to reduced DNA repair with multiple skin cancers and early death. Sun protection delayed the onset of skin cancer and prolonged life in a sibling with the same mutation.