RESUMEN
Refractory celiac disease type 2 (RCDII) is a rare condition with high mortality because of a lack of effective treatment strategies. RCDII is caused by clonal expansion of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). Gain-of-function JAK1 mutations are frequently found in these cells.1,2 In a previous in vitro study,3 we demonstrated the potential of tofacitinib, a small-molecule JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor, to control activity of the aberrant IEL population. Here, we report on an open-label prospective pilot study with tofacitinib in patients with therapy-refractory RCDII (EudraCT 2018-001678-10; Dutch Trial Registry [LTR] NL7313). Between November 2019 and February 2022, 4 patients with an established diagnosis of RCDII4 who had failed previous therapies were treated in the Netherlands with tofacitinib 10 mg twice-daily for 12 weeks (Methods; Supporting Documents). Two patients in Germany who fulfilled the inclusion criteria received similar treatment outside this protocol.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (CE) is a first line procedure for exploring the SB. Endoscopic GastroIntestinal PlacemenT (EGIPT) of SB CE is sometimes necessary. While the experience of EGIPT is large in pediatric populations, we aimed to describe the safety, efficacy and outcomes of EGIPT of SB CE in adult patients. METHODS: The international CApsule endoscopy REsearch (iCARE) group set up a retrospective multicenter study. Patients over 18 year-old who underwent EGIPT of SB CE before May 2022 were included. Data were collected from medical records and capsule recordings. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of the EGIPT procedures. RESULTS: 630 patients were included (mean age 62.5 years old, 55.9% female) from 39,565 patients (1.6%) issued from 29 centers. EGIPT technical success was achieved in 610 procedures (96.8%). Anesthesia (moderate/deep sedation or general anesthesia) and centers with intermediate or high procedure loads were independent factors of technical success. Severe adverse events occurred in three (0.5%) patients. When technically successful, EGIPT was associated with a high SB CE completion rate (84.4%) and with a substantial diagnostic yield (61.1%). Completion rate was significantly higher when the capsule was delivered in the SB compared to when delivered in the stomach. CONCLUSION: EGIPT of SB CE is highly feasible, safe and comes with high completion rate and diagnostic yield. When indicated, it should rather be performed under anesthesia and the capsule should be delivered in the duodenum rather than in the stomach, for better SB examination outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accurate polyp size measurement is important for polyp risk stratification and decision-making regarding polypectomy and surveillance. Recently, a virtual scale (VS) function has been developed that allows polyp size measurement through projection of an adaptive VS onto colorectal polyps during real-time endoscopy. We aimed to evaluate the VS in terms of variability and systematic differences. METHODS: We conducted a video-based study with 120 colorectal polyps, measured by eight dedicated colorectal gastroenterologists (experts) and nine gastroenterology residents following endoscopy training (trainees). Three endoscopic measurement methods were compared: (1) visual, (2) snare and (3) VS measurement. We evaluated the method-specific variance (as measure of variability) in polyp size measurements and systematic differences between these methods. RESULTS: Variance in polyp size measurements was significantly lower for VS measurements compared to visual and snare measurements for both experts (0.52 vs. 1.59 and 1.96, p<0.001) and trainees (0.59 vs. 2.21 and 2.53, p<0.001). VS measurement resulted in a higher percentage of polyps assigned to the same size category by all endoscopists compared to visual and snare measurements (experts: 69% vs. 55% and 59%; trainees: 67% vs. 51% and 47%) and reduced the maximum difference between individual endoscopists regarding the percentage of polyps assigned to the >10 mm size category (experts: 1.7% vs. 10.0% and 5.0%; trainees: 2.5% vs. 6.7% and 11.7%). Systematic differences between methods were <0.5 mm. Conclusions Use of the VS leads to lower polyp size measurement variability and more uniform polyp sizing by individual endoscopists compared to visual and snare measurements.