RESUMEN
Unconditional (upfront) incentives are proposed to improve acceptance of cancer research among underrepresented, racial/ethnic minority populations, but few studies have tested incentive strategies among rural cancer survivors. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic characteristics of survey respondents, and response rates by arm were compared using Chi-square tests. We compared upfront ($2) and response-based ($10 conditional) incentives in a mailed survey of adult post-treatment rural survivors. Individuals meeting eligibility criteria from the electronic medical record (n = 2,830) were randomized into two incentive arms (n = 1,414 for the upfront arm and n = 1,416 for the contingent arm). Of the total delivered, presumed eligible participants (n = 1,304 upfront arm; n = 1,317 contingent arm), 67.8% were aged 65y+, 49.8% were female, and 95.1% were non-Hispanic white. The response rate for all participants was 18.5%. We received eligible surveys from 281 rural survivors in the first arm (response rate: 21.5%); and 205 surveys in the second arm (response rate: 15.6%). Participants who received the upfront incentive had a higher response rate than those receiving a response-based incentive, X2 (1, 2,621) = 15.53, p < 0.0001. Incentivizing survey completion with an upfront $2 bill encouraged a higher survey response rate; other supplemental strategies are needed to achieve a higher response rate for this population.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Adulto , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Minoritarios , Motivación , Neoplasias/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer screening rates in the U.S. still fall short of national goals, while screening rates for other cancer sites, such as breast, remain high. Understanding characteristics associated with colorectal cancer screening among different groups of women adherent to breast cancer screening guidelines can shed light on the facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among those already engaged in cancer prevention behaviors. The purpose of this study was to explore which demographic characteristics, healthcare access factors, and cancer-related beliefs were associated with colorectal cancer screening completion among U.S. and foreign-born women adherent to mammography screening recommendations. METHODS: Analyses of the 2015 National Health Interview Survey were conducted in 2019. A sample of 1206 women aged 50-74 who had a mammogram in the past 2 years and were of average risk for colorectal cancer was examined. Logistic regression was used to determine demographic, health service, and health belief characteristics associated with colorectal cancer screening completion. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the sample were adherent to colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Women over the age of 65 (AOR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.06-2.91), with any type of health insurance, and who were bilingual (AOR = 3.84, 95% CI 1.83-8.09) were more likely to complete screening, while foreign-born women (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.83) were less likely. Cancer-related beliefs did not influence adherence. Stratified analyses by nativity revealed additional associations. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic and health service factors interact to influence colorectal cancer screening among women completing breast cancer screening. Colorectal cancer screening interventions targeting specific underserved groups and financing reforms may enhance women's colorectal cancer screening rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mamografía , Tamizaje MasivoRESUMEN
Low health literacy (HL) is associated with poorer health outcomes. We examined HL among adults with multiple chronic conditions (CCs), using 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Health literacy was measured by 3 subjective questions about difficulty with the following tasks: (1) obtaining health information or advice; (2) understanding spoken health information; and (3) understanding written health information. We estimated the prevalence of low HL (difficulty with ≥1 HL tasks) and used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine associations between HL and number of CCs. The prevalence of low HL was 13.8% overall and increased with the number of CCs from 10.6% among those with no CC to 24.7% among those with 3 or more CCs, with the latter having more than twice the adjusted odds of low HL compared with the former (adjusted odds ratio = 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-2.97). Efforts to improve HL in this population are needed.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples , Adulto , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to report recent trends in self-reported diabetes self-management education (DSME) participation rates among adults in North Carolina and to compare these rates between rural and urban residents. METHODS: Data for this analysis were obtained from the NC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for the years 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2017, when the survey included the diabetes module. Respondents were classified as having participated in DSME if they answered "Yes" to the question, "Have you ever taken a course or class in how to manage your diabetes yourself?" We used the Rural Urban Continuum Code to classify urban and rural residence. The study sample included 4368 adults 18 years or older with self-reported diabetes. We assessed the changes in DSME participation from 2012 to 2017. We used multiple logistic regression modeling to assess the association between rural residence and DSME participation. All analyses were conducted in Stata 14 and accounted for the survey design of the BRFSS. Statistical significance was set at P < .01. RESULTS: Overall, the DSME participation rates decreased slightly in the study period, from 55.8% in 2012 to 55.6% in 2013 to 56.5% in 2015 to 52.1% in 2017. By rural-urban residence, the rates were 52.3% versus 57.8% in 2012, 54.0% versus 56.5% in 2013, 48.8% versus 62.0% in 2015, and 46.7% versus 56.1% in 2017. The multiple logistic regression model results showed that rural residents were less likely to have participated in DSME (adjusted odds ratio = 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.94) than urban residents. Adults with higher income and education levels were also more likely to have participated in DSME (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The recent BRFSS data showed that the DSME participation rate declined slightly in North Carolina. There were persistent rural-urban disparities in DSME participation, with rural residents showing lower rates, and the gaps seemed to be widening. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY OR PRACTICE: Continuous efforts are needed to bring more American Diabetes Association/American Association of Diabetes Educators programs to rural communities and assist persons with diabetes to participate in DSME training to reduce the burden of diabetes. Furthermore, those in rural areas may need additional support.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Automanejo , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiología , Población RuralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The North Carolina (NC) Healthy Food Small Retailer Program (HFSRP) was passed into law with a $250,000 appropriation (2016-2018) providing up to $25,000 in funding to small food stores for equipment to stock healthier foods and beverages. This paper describes an observational natural experiment documenting the impact of the HFSRP on store food environments, customers' purchases and diets. METHODS: Using store observations and intercept surveys from cross-sectional, convenience customer samples (1261 customers in 22 stores, 2017-2020; 499 customers in 7 HFSRP stores, and 762 customers in 15 Comparison stores), we examined differences between HFSRP and comparison stores regarding: (1) change in store-level availability, quality, and price of healthy foods/beverages; (2) change in healthfulness of observed food and beverage purchases ("bag checks"); and, (3) change in self-reported and objectively-measured (Veggie Meter®-assessed skin carotenoids) customer dietary behaviors. Differences (HFSRP vs. comparison stores) in store-level Healthy Food Supply (HFS) and Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores were assessed using repeated measure ANOVA. Intervention effects on diet were assessed using difference-in-difference models including propensity scores. RESULTS: There were improvements in store-level supply of healthier foods/beverages within 1 year of program implementation (0 vs. 1-12 month HFS scores; p = 0.055) among HFSRP stores only. Comparing 2019 to 2017 (baseline), HFSRP stores' HFS increased, but decreased in comparison stores (p = 0.031). Findings indicated a borderline significant effect of the intervention on self-reported fruit and vegetable intake (servings/day), though in the opposite direction expected, such that fruit and vegetable intake increased more among comparison store than HFSRP store customers (p = 0.05). There was no significant change in Veggie Meter®-assessed fruit and vegetable intake by customers shopping at the intervention versus comparison stores. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvement in healthy food availability, there was a lack of apparent impact on dietary behaviors related to the HFSRP, which could be due to intervention dose or inadequate statistical power due to the serial cross-sectional study design. It may also be that individuals buy most of their food at larger stores; thus, small store interventions may have limited impact on overall eating patterns. Future healthy retail policies should consider how to increase intervention dose to include more product marketing, consumer messaging, and technical assistance for store owners.
Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable/estadística & datos numéricos , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Alimentos/economía , Pequeña Empresa/estadística & datos numéricos , Supermercados , Adulto , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Calidad de los Alimentos , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Frutas , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , VerdurasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of chronic exposures to particulate and traffic-related air pollution on allostatic load (AL) score, a marker of cumulative biological risk, among youth with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were drawn from five clinical sites of the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study (n = 2338). Baseline questionnaires, anthropometric measures, and a fasting blood test were taken at a clinic visit between 2001 and 2005. AL was operationalized using 10 biomarkers reflecting cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory risk. Annual residential exposures to PM2.5 and proximity to heavily-trafficked major roadways were estimated for each participant. Poisson regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were conducted for each exposure. RESULTS: No significant associations were observed between exposures to PM2.5 or proximity to traffic and AL score, however analyses were suggestive of effect modification by race for residential distance to heavily-trafficked major roadways (p = 0.02). In stratified analyses, residing <100, 100-<200 and 200-<400 m compared to 400 m or more from heavily-trafficked major roadways was associated with 11%, 26% and 14% increases in AL score, respectively (95% CIs: -4, 29; 9, 45; -1, 30) for non-white participants compared to 6%, -2%, and -2% changes (95% CIs: -2, 15; -10, 7; -8, 6) for white participants. CONCLUSIONS: Among this population of youth with type 1 diabetes, we did not observe consistent relationships between chronic exposures to particulate and traffic-related air pollution and changes in AL score, however associations for traffic-related pollution exposures may differ by race/ethnicity and warrant further examination.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Alostasis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Contaminación por Tráfico Vehicular , Adolescente , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Humanos , Material Particulado/análisis , Material Particulado/toxicidad , Emisiones de Vehículos/análisis , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The North Carolina Legislature appropriated funds in 2016-2019 for the Healthy Food Small Retailer Program (HFSRP), providing small retailers located in food deserts with equipment to stock nutrient-dense foods and beverages. The study aimed to: (1) examine factors facilitating and constraining implementation of, and participation in, the HFSRP from the perspective of storeowners and (2) measure and evaluate the impact and effectiveness of investment in the HFSRP. DESIGN: The current analysis uses both qualitative and quantitative assessments of storeowner perceptions and store outcomes, as well as two innovative measures of policy investment effectiveness. Qualitative semi-structured interviews and descriptive quantitative approaches, including monthly financial reports and activity forms, and end-of-programme evaluations were collected from participating HFSRP storeowners. SETTING: Eight corner stores in North Carolina that participated in the two cohorts (2016-2018; 2017-2019) of the HFSRP. PARTICIPANTS: Owners of corner stores participating in the HFSRP. RESULTS: All storeowners reported that the HFSRP benefitted their stores. In addition, the HFSRP had a positive impact on sales across each category of healthy food products. Storeowners reported that benefits would be enhanced with adjustments to programme administration and support. Specific suggestions included additional information regarding which healthy foods and beverages to stock; inventory management; handling of perishable produce; product display; modified reporting requirements and a more efficient process of delivering and maintaining equipment. CONCLUSIONS: All storeowners reported several benefits of the HFSRP and would recommend that other storeowners participate. The barriers and challenges they reported inform potential approaches to ensuring success and sustainability of the HFSRP and similar initiatives underway in other jurisdictions.
Asunto(s)
Asistencia Alimentaria , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Comercio , Alimentos , Humanos , North CarolinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The North Carolina Healthy Food Small Retailer Program (NC HFSRP) was established through a policy passed by the state legislature to provide funding for small food retailers located in food deserts with the goal of increasing access to and sales of healthy foods and beverages among local residents. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively examine perceptions of the NC HFSRP among store customers. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 29 customers from five NC HFSRP stores in food deserts across eastern NC. Interview questions were related to shoppers' food and beverage purchases at NC HFSRP stores, whether they had noticed any in-store efforts to promote healthier foods and beverages, their suggestions for promoting healthier foods and beverages, their familiarity with and support of the NC HFSRP, and how their shopping and consumption habits had changed since implementation of the NC HFSRP. A codebook was developed based on deductive (from the interview guide questions) and inductive (emerged from the data) codes and operational definitions. Verbatim transcripts were double-coded and a thematic analysis was conducted based on code frequency, and depth of participant responses for each code. RESULTS: Although very few participants were aware of the NC HFSRP legislation, they recognized changes within the store. Customers noted that the provision of healthier foods and beverages in the store had encouraged them to make healthier purchase and consumption choices. When a description of the NC HFSRP was provided to them, all participants were supportive of the state-funded program. Participants discussed program benefits including improving food access in low-income and/or rural areas and making healthy choices easier for youth and for those most at risk of diet-related chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Findings can inform future healthy corner store initiatives in terms of framing a rationale for funding or policies by focusing on increased food access among vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
Desiertos Alimentarios , Verduras , Adolescente , Comercio , Alimentos , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Frutas , Humanos , North CarolinaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our study aimed to examine the prevalence of chronic pain, its severity, its causes, and coping mechanisms that are used by North Carolina adults in rural, suburban, and urban areas. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System's first chronic pain module in 2018, representing 3,598 respondents. Self-reported chronic pain was defined as the affirmative response to the question, "Do you suffer from any type of chronic pain, that is, pain that occurs constantly or flares up often?" We computed prevalence of chronic pain and use of coping mechanisms by rural, suburban, or urban residential status. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between chronic pain and residential location, adjusting for demographic characteristics, employment, and health insurance. RESULTS: In 2018, an estimated 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.6%-29.3%) of North Carolina adults experienced chronic pain. Prevalence of chronic pain in rural areas (30.9%) and suburban areas (30.8%) was significantly higher, compared with urban areas (19.6%). Compared with urban residents with chronic pain, those with chronic pain in suburban areas (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.76) and in rural areas (AOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) were less likely to use nonmedication therapies (eg, acupuncture, physical therapy, yoga) and were less likely to use 3 or more types of chronic pain treatment (suburban AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.88; rural AOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.95). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that persons living in rural and suburban areas may be more likely to have chronic pain and less likely to use nonmedication treatments than those in urban areas.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiología , Población Rural , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To determine if racial disparities exist between African Americans (AA) and Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) for patients undergoing repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) at a rural tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: There were 215 consecutive AA and NHW patients who underwent ATAAD repair at our institution from 1999 to 2019 included in a retrospective analysis of our Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Statistical analysis was performed with a p value of less than .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients undergoing ATAAD repair were 47% AA despite comprising only 27% of the total population in our region. AAs were significantly younger (54.0 vs. 61.2 years), were more likely to be hypertensive (94.1% vs. 79.7%), had higher creatinine levels (1.7 vs. 1.1 mg/dL), and higher body mass index (30.8 vs. 28.1 kg/m2 ) (all p values < .006). There were no significant differences in type of repair or intraoperative variables. A logistic regression analysis showed AAs had an increased rate of postoperative acute renal failure not requiring hemodialysis when compared to NHWs (20.8% vs. 10.6%, p value = .042). Thirty-day mortality was not significantly different (15.7% vs. 13.4%) nor was 1-year survival (78% vs. 79%) in AAs and NHWs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite AAs having more medical comorbidities at presentation, there were no differences in short- and intermediate-term survival. In our catchment of 1.8 million people, AAs appear to undergo ATAAD repair at a disproportionate rate versus NHWs. These findings may alter strategies for surveillance and prevention of aortic disease in this high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Low health literacy has been associated with unfavorable health outcomes. We examined diabetes self- and clinical care measures among adults with diabetes by 3 dimensions of health literacy. DESIGN/SETTING: Questions about health literacy were available for optional use in the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We analyzed 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 4 states and the District of Columbia that had included both the Health Literacy and Diabetes optional modules. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents who participated in the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Virginia, and Washington, District of Columbia, and completed both modules (n = 4397). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health literacy was measured by level of difficulty (easy, difficult) with 3 health literacy tasks: getting health advice or information, understanding health information delivered orally by health professionals, and understanding written health information. Diabetes care measures included physical activity, self-monitoring blood glucose, self-checking feet, hemoglobin A1c testing, professional foot examination, flu vaccination, professional eye examination, dental visits, and diabetes self-management education. RESULTS: Among those with self-reported diabetes, 5.9% found it difficult to get health advice or information, 10.7% found it difficult to understand information health professionals told them, and 12.0% found it difficult to understand written health information. Those who found it difficult to get health advice or information had 44% to 56% lower adjusted odds of A1c testing, professional foot examinations, and dental visits; those who found it difficult to understand written health information had lower odds of self-monitoring glucose and self-checking feet. Difficulty understanding both oral and written health information was associated with never having taken a diabetes self-management class. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that problems with health literacy may be a barrier to good disease management among adults with diabetes and that health care providers should be attentive to the needs of patients with low health literacy, especially for diabetes-specific specialty care.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Alfabetización en Salud , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , AutocuidadoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between geographic information systems (GIS)-assessed accessibility to small food stores, shopping patterns and dietary behaviours among small food store customers. DESIGN: Residential addresses and customer shopping patterns (frequency of shopping, and previous purchase of fruits and vegetables) were gathered through customer intercept surveys. Addresses were geocoded, and GIS-assessed distance and driving time from the participants' residence to the store were calculated. Dietary status and behaviours were assessed using an objective non-invasive measure of skin carotenoids, the National Cancer Institute Fruit and Vegetable Screener, and items to assess sugary beverage intake. Associations between distance and driving time, demographics, shopping frequency, prior reported purchase of fruits and vegetables at the store and dietary behaviours were examined. SETTING: Small food stores (n 22) across North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional convenience samples of English-speaking customers aged 18 years or older (n 692). RESULTS: Participants living closer to the small store had lower income and formal education, were more likely to be Black, more likely to have previously bought fruits and vegetables at the store and more frequently shopped at the store. In adjusted models, skin carotenoids (n 644) were positively associated with distance to the store from home in miles (P = 0·01). CONCLUSIONS: Customers who lived closer to the stores were more frequent shoppers and more likely to have previously purchased fruits and vegetables at the store yet had lower skin carotenoids. These results support continued efforts to examine how to increase the availability and promotion of healthful foods at small food retail stores.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study evaluated a novel composite measure of health literacy and numeracy by assessing its predictive validity for diabetes self-care activities and glycemic control. METHODS: Patients (N = 102) with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a family medicine clinic at an academic medical center. Combined health literacy was assessed by combining the results of the Health Literacy Scale and the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Self-management activities were assessed by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities scale. Hemoglobin A1c (A1c) values were extracted from patients' medical records to assess glycemic control. Path models were used to test the predicted pathways linking health literacy and numeracy, independently and together, to self-management activities and glycemic control. RESULTS: The mean combined literacy score was 72.0 (range, 33-104); the mean health literacy score alone was 43.9 (range, 14-56); and the mean numeracy score alone was 28.1 (range, 8-48). The direct effects results showed that the combined health literacy score (B = 0.107, P < .05) and the health literacy score alone (B = 0.234, P < .05) were significantly associated with self-care activities. The health literacy score alone also had a significant direct effect on A1c (B = -0.081, P < .05). The indirect effects of the combined health literacy on glycemic control through self-care activities were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that the combined health literacy has predictive validity for self-care activities whereas the health literacy alone has predictive validity for glycemic control. More research is needed to validate these findings. Higher patient health literacy skills were not consistently associated with higher perceived numeracy skills. Additional attention and efforts should be made to make sure patients understand medical instructions involving numerical calculations.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Control Glucémico/normas , Alfabetización en Salud/normas , Automanejo/psicología , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Femenino , Control Glucémico/clasificación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Alfabetización en Salud/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sudeste de Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Diabetes is a significant public health problem in eastern North Carolina, and completion of formal diabetes self-management education (DSME) is low. To seek methods to increase DSME completion, patients with diabetes in an eastern North Carolina regional health care system who had not completed DSME (n = 58) were surveyed during wellness visits to examine attitudes toward the use of vouchers (eg, coupons that purchase healthy food, exercise classes, gym memberships). There was an extremely low awareness (19%) of and referral (5%) to DSME. Most respondents (77%) said they would or might be more likely to complete DSME if they received a voucher at the end. Vouchers for healthy food venues such as farmers' markets were most preferred, and 6 months or less was found to be an acceptable time frame to use the voucher. This study offers some evidence for DSME providers to explore vouchers as one approach to increase program completion.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Automanejo/educación , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Escolaridad , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Automanejo/métodos , Automanejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Low health literacy is a recognized contributor to health disparities. Significant proportions of the adult population, especially the underserved, have low health literacy. The purpose of this study was to examine health literacy and its associations with health status and chronic health conditions among North Carolina adults.METHODS The 2016 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System included health literacy questions that focused on accessing and understanding health information. Using these self-reported data, we estimated the prevalence of low health literacy and assessed its associations with general health status and chronic health conditions after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and health care access.RESULTS Overall, 4.8% of adults reported having difficulty getting health information or advice, 7.5% understanding oral information from health professionals, and 8.3% understanding written health information; 14.8% reported having difficulty with at least one of these tasks. The adjusted odds of low health literacy were moderately higher for those who had been diagnosed with the following conditions compared to those not diagnosed: heart attack, coronary heart disease, or stroke (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI=1.33, 2.47); COPD (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.19, 2.34); arthritis (AOR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.32, 2.15); depression (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI=1.52, 2.50); and kidney disease (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.02, 2.60).LIMITATIONS All data were self-reported.CONCLUSIONS A notable segment of the North Carolina adult population has low health literacy, and those who do are particularly vulnerable to adverse health status. Targeted efforts are needed to identify strategies to improve health literacy and decrease health disparities.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , North Carolina , AutoinformeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Given diabetes is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), we examined temporal trends in CVD risk factors by comparing youth recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) from 2002 through 2012. METHODS: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study identified youth with diagnosed T1D (n = 3954) and T2D (n = 706) from 2002 to 2012. CVD risk factors were defined using the modified Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for metabolic syndrome: (a) hypertension; (b) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≤40 mg/dL; (c) triglycerides ≥110 mg/dL; and (d) waist circumference (WC) >90th percentile. Prevalence of CVD risk factors, stratified by diagnosis year and diabetes type, was reported. Univariate and multivariate logistic models and Poisson regression were fit to estimate the prevalence trends for CVD risk factors individually and in clusters (≥2 risk factors). RESULTS: The prevalence of ≥2 CVD risk factors was higher in youth with T2D than with T1D at each incident year, but the prevalence of ≥2 risk factors did not change across diagnosis years among T1D or T2D participants. The number of CVD risk factors did not change significantly in T1D participants, but increased at an annual rate of 1.38% in T2D participants. The prevalence of hypertension decreased in T1D participants, and high WC increased in T2D participants. CONCLUSION: The increase in number of CVD risk factors including large WC among youth with T2D suggests a need for early intervention to address these CVD risk factors. Further study is needed to examine longitudinal associations between diabetes and CVD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/etiología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Edad de Inicio , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Angiopatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The geographic position and high level of poverty in the southeastern United States are significant risk factors that contribute to the region's high vulnerability to climate change. The goal of this study was to evaluate beliefs and perceptions of global warming among those living in poverty in the poorest counties in the southeastern United States. Results from this project may be used to support public health efforts to increase climate-related messaging to vulnerable and underserved communities. This was an ecological study that analyzed public opinion poll estimates from previously gathered national level survey data (2016). Responses to 5 questions related to beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions of global warming were evaluated. Counties below the national average poverty level (13.5%) were identified among 11 southeastern US states (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia). Student t tests were used to compare public perceptions of global warming among the poorest urban and rural counties with national-level public opinion estimates. Overall, counties below the national poverty level in the southeastern US were significantly less likely to believe that global warming was happening compared with national-level estimates. The poorest rural counties were less likely to believe that global warming was happening than the poorest urban counties. Health care providers and public health leaders at regional and local levels are in ideal positions to raise awareness and advocate the health implications of climate change to decision makers for the benefit of helping underserved communities mitigate and adequately adapt to climate-related threats.
Asunto(s)
Calentamiento Global , Percepción , Áreas de Pobreza , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología , Mapeo Geográfico , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Sudeste de Estados Unidos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether the recent Medicaid expansion, as a natural experiment, was associated with better access to care and, as a consequence, better receipt of clinical diabetes care services. METHODS: Data were from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The analytical sample included 20 708 working-age adults with diabetes aged 18 to 64 years from 22 states. The outcome variables included 4 measures of access to care and 4 measures of receipt of clinical diabetes care services. A difference-in-difference logistic regression model was used to compare changes in outcomes between respondents in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states. Data from the 2013 survey provided pre-Medicaid expansion information, and data from the 2015 survey provided postexpansion information. Analyses were conducted using Stata 13 using survey commands to account for the complex survey design of BRFSS. RESULTS: A significant increase was observed in health insurance coverage for people with diabetes from 2013 to 2015 (P < .05) in both Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states, with a larger increase in the Medicaid expansion states. The Time by Medicaid expansion interaction term was significant for 2 measures of access to care: health insurance coverage (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.96) and having an annual checkup (AOR = 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.71). Respondents in expansion states were more likely to have a personal doctor and more likely to be able to afford a physician visit than those in nonexpansion states. The Time by Medicaid expansion was close to significance for one of the measures of clinical diabetes care: getting flu shots (AOR = 1.20, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion did improve health care access but no significant improvement was found for receipt of clinical diabetes care for people with diabetes. Resources provided through Medicaid are vital for diabetes control and management.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Medicaid/clasificación , Medicina Preventiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/normas , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND There is limited information available in North Carolina on the current burden of, and racial disparities in, diabetic retinopathy (DR), a major complication associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aims to describe the overall trend of, and racial/ethnic disparities in, DR among adults with DM in North Carolina.METHODS Data were from 13 waves (2000, 2002-2010, 2012, 2013, and 2015) of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The study sample included 16,976 adults aged ≥ 40 years with DM in North Carolina. DR was identified by self-report by the question, "Has a doctor ever told you that diabetes has affected your eyes or that you had retinopathy?" The overall prevalence of DR was assessed during the time period, and was compared between whites and blacks. All analyses were conducted using Stata 13.0.RESULTS The prevalence of self-reported DR in North Carolina decreased from 27.2% in 2000 to 18.3% in 2015, a reduction of 33% (Trend P = .003). The age-adjusted DR prevalence in whites decreased from 21.7% to 17.6% (Trend P = .04), and in blacks from 39.4% to 20.2% (Trend P = .002). The declining rates in DR were not statistically different between whites and blacks (P = .06). Blacks were more likely to report DR (adjusted odds ratio = 1.20, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.40) during 2000-2015.CONCLUSION The prevalence of self-reported DR in adults with DM declined significantly in North Carolina in the past 15 years. While racial differences in some years appeared to be decreasing, the black-white disparity in DR prevalence during the entire period persisted. Focused efforts on reducing the gap are needed.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Retinopatía Diabética/etnología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiología , Prevalencia , AutoinformeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in adolescents and young adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes enrolled in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. METHODS: The study included 1646 subjects with type 1 diabetes (age 18 ± 4 years, diabetes duration 8 ± 2 years, HbA1c 9.1 ± 1.9%, 76% non-Hispanic Whites) and 252 with type 2 diabetes (age 22 ± 4 years, diabetes duration 8 ± 2 years, HbA1c 9.2 ± 3.0%, 45% non-Hispanic Blacks). Cross-sectional and longitudinal risk factors were assessed at baseline and follow-up visits. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the longitudinal glycemic exposure and cardiovascular risk factors. CAN was assessed by time and frequency domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV). CAN was defined as the presence of ≥3 of 5 abnormal HRV indices. RESULTS: The prevalence of CAN was 12% in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and 17% in those with type 2 diabetes. Poor long-term glycemic control (AUC HbA1c), high blood pressure, and elevated triglyceride levels were correlates of CAN in subjects with type 1 diabetes. In those with type 2 diabetes, CAN was associated with elevated triglycerides and increased urinary albumin excretion. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CAN in this multiethnic cohort of adolescents and young adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are comparable to those reported in adults with diabetes. Suboptimal glycemic control and elevated triglycerides were the modifiable risk factors associated with CAN.