Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity-score matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity-score matched population of ICM or NICM patients. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3-3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank p=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank p=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32-4.14], p=0.004), NYHA class III/IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11-4.04], p=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25-3.96], p=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence. CONCLUSION: Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients were at increased risk of VT recurrence after ablation, although long-term mortality did not differ.

Long-term prognosis of patients with Brugada syndrome and an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification of Brugada syndrome (BrS) remains controversial and recommendations for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are not well established. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term prognosis of BrS patients with an ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 55 consecutive patients with BrS assessed between April 2002 and October 2012, 36 (mean age 41.7 ± 13.8 years; 81.8% male) underwent ICD implantation. Nineteen (52.8%) were asymptomatic, 11 (30.6%) had previous history of syncope (arrhythmic cause suspected in eight) and six (16.7%) had aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD). Spontaneous type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern was present in 25 (69.4%) patients and electrophysiological study (EPS), performed in 26 (72.2%), was positive in 22 (84.6%). During a mean follow-up of 74 ± 40 months (>5 years in 72% of cases), seven (19.4%) patients had appropriate shocks (annual event rate 2.8%). These patients most frequently had aborted SCD (54.1% vs. 6.9%; p=0.008) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (57.1% vs. 10.3%; p=0.016) during follow-up. Spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern, syncope and positive EPS were not significantly associated with appropriate shocks. Multivariate analysis revealed that aborted SCD was an independent predictor of appropriate shocks (HR 8.07, 95% CI 1.58-41.2; p=0.012). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that aborted SCD had moderate discriminatory power to predict appropriate shocks (AUC 0.751), with sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 93%. In terms of ICD-related complications, eight (22.2%) patients had inappropriate shocks during the follow-up period, mainly due to sinus tachycardia (five patients); one patient had lead infection and another had a lead fracture. CONCLUSION: In this population of BrS patients with ICD, the long-term rate of appropriate shocks was 2.8%/year. Aborted SCD was associated with a higher risk of appropriate shocks, whereas syncope and spontaneous type I ECG pattern did not predict this event.