Sex Differences in Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sex on the presentation, etiology, and outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) has not been adequately studied. The aim of the present research was to analyze the impact of sex on the presentation, etiology, and outcomes of IE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 214 adult patients (131 male and 83 female) with IE. All cases of IE were reviewed by two investigators- both senior physicians in internal medicine. Two groups of patients were compared: male and female patients with IE. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We found significant differences in etiologic factors of IE in male and female patients. Microbiologic etiology differences between male and female groups of patients were in coagulase negative staphylococcus (15.0% in male vs 3.8% in female groups, P = 0.011), and culture negative endocarditis (8.7% in male vs 23.8% in female groups, P = 0.004). We did not find a difference in the primary outcome between the two groups; however, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the female group as compared to the male group (26 [31.3] vs 22 [16.8], P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: We found that sex may have important role in both the microbial profile and the patient's outcome with IE.

Early Point-of-Care Ultrasound Assessment for Medical Patients Reduces Time to Appropriate Treatment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Numerous studies emphasize the diagnostic importance of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), but the level of evidence remains low as most data are gathered from observational studies. We conducted a pilot, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of POCUS exam on medical patient's management and clinical outcomes. Patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea were enrolled and randomly allocated to an early POCUS scan group and a control group. POCUS assessment, within 24 h of internal ward admission, was conducted only for the intervention group. The primary outcome was time to correct diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included time to appropriate treatment, POCUS-related rate of primary diagnosis alteration and new clinically relevant findings and time to hospital discharge. Sixty patients were enrolled. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to each study arm. The POCUS exam revealed clinically relevant findings among 79% of patients and led to alteration of the primary diagnosis among 28% of patients. Time to appropriate treatment was significantly shorter among patients in the POCUS group compared with the control group (median time of 5 h [95% confidence interval: 0.5-9] vs. 24 h [95% CI: 19-29] p = 0.014). The time needed to achieve correct diagnosis by the primary team was shorter in the POCUS group compared with the control group, yet it did not reach statistical significance (median time of 24 h [95% CI: 18-30] vs. 48 h [95% CI: 20-76], p = 0.12). These results indicate that POCUS assessment conducted early among patients with dyspnea or chest pain improves diagnostic accuracy and shortens significantly the time to appropriate treatment.