RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for various types of cancer; however, they cause a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The association between the development of irAEs and the clinical benefit remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association of irAEs and the treatment efficacy in real-world practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or gastric cancer who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) at the Keio University Hospital between September 2014 and January 2019. We recorded treatment-related AEs from medical records and graded them using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. We performed an overall survival (OS) analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model and the shared frailty model. RESULTS: Of 212 patients eligible for this study, 108 experienced irAEs and 42 developed multiple irAEs. The median OS was significantly longer in the irAEs than in the no-irAE group (28.1 months vs 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.73; P = 0.0004). Moreover, the OS of patients with multiple irAEs was significantly longer than that of patients with a single irAE (42.3 months vs 18.8 months; HR, 0.473; 95% CI, 0.346-0.647; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our single-center retrospective study revealed a significant tendency associating the development of multiple irAEs with favorable prognoses.
RESUMEN
High-dose melphalan has been gaining recognition as a highly emetogenic agent used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this retrospective study was to elucidate the efficacy of aprepitant in preventing high-dose melphalan-induced emesis. Sixty patients who received melphalan (70 mg/m(2)/day, 2 days) and fludarabine (125 mg/m(2)/day, 5 days) as conditioning for allogeneic HSCT for hematological malignancies, and who received ondansetron and methylprednisolone as an antiemetic prophylaxis, were eligible. Twenty of these 60 patients also received aprepitant for 5 days (aprepitant group); the remaining 40 patients served as a control. The rates of complete response (CR), defined as no emesis without rescue medications, and complete protection (CP), defined as no emesis with or without rescue medications, were assessed between the two groups. The observation period was 12 days from the first day of melphalan administration. The CR and CP rates were significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the control group during the observation period (35 % versus 10 %, P < 0.05; 85 % versus 33 %, P < 0.001; respectively). These results suggest that aprepitant in combination with ondansetron and steroid effectively ameliorates nausea and vomiting caused by the high-dose melphalan-based conditioning for allogeneic HSCT.